Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Constructivism in todays schools
Constructivism in the classroom
Constructivism in todays schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Constructivism in todays schools
Chapter 2: Literature review
2.1 Introduction
Van de Walle et al. (2013 p.375) suggested that measurement is not an easy topic for students to understand. They further stated that measurement is one of the useful mathematics content strands, as it is an important component in everything from occupational tasks to life skills for the mathematically literate citizen.
2.1.1 Introduction to the concept of measurement
Numerous factors contribute to learners understanding of the topic of measurement. A National Statement on Mathematics for Australian Schools (1991), states that measurement requires students to develop dexterity in the use of range of measuring instruments. Making sense of measurement also requires learners to develop personal referents
…show more content…
The researcher concluded that there was a reluctance to teach measurement concepts by primary teachers and that this may stem from contextual constraints including teacher knowledge.
2.2 Theoretical framework
The theory supporting the study is constructivism, Janet G. (2004) defined constructivism as a philosophy of education that says people construct knowledge through their experiences, reflecting on those experiences and interacting with the world. He further suggested that constructivism help learners pursue personal interests and purposes, use and develop his or her abilities, build on his or her prior knowledge and experiences and develop life-long learning.
Brookes (1999) as cited by Janet (2004) suggested that constructivism is a process that helps learners to develop their own goals and assessments, create understandings via coaching and control learning
…show more content…
In a constructivism classroom, teachers and learners share responsibilities and decision making. Teachers pose problems of emerging relevance to learners, emphasise hands-on, real-world experiences, seek and value learners’ point of view and social context of content. Christie (2005) suggested that constructivism is applied in a classroom whereby teachers structure around, essential concepts, be aware that learners’ point of view are windows into their reasoning, access learners learning in context of teaching.
A constructivism classroom is a learner-centred classroom. Christie (2005) emphasised that constructivism encourages teachers to provide for each learners preferred learning style, provide rate of learning and personal interactions with other learners, use authentic tasks, experiences, settings, assessments and context presented holistically-not in separate parts.
In connection to this study, constructivism plays a crucial role when it comes to learners understanding and manipulating of mathematical problems and develop a sense in
Teaching theories are as much part of the classroom as the student and the teacher. The effect individual theories have on an environment depends how they are incorporated within the classroom in addition to the influence they have had on the curriculum construction. This essay will briefly look at how motivation theory, cognitive and social cognitive theory along with constructivism have impacted on education and the classroom.
All children learn differently and teachers, especially those who teach mathematics, have to accommodate for all children’s different capacities for learning information. When teaching mathematics, a teacher has to be able to use various methods of presenting the information in order to help the students understand the concepts they are being taught.
To investigate the notion of numeracy, I approach seven people to give their view of numeracy and how it relates to mathematics. The following is a discussion of two responses I receive from this short survey. I shall briefly discuss their views of numeracy and how it relates to mathematics in the light of the Australian Curriculum as well as the 21st Century Numeracy Model (Goos 2007). Note: see appendix 1 for their responses.
Constructivism represents a paradigm shift form education based on cognitive theories. This concept assumes that learners construct their own knowledge on the basis of interaction with their environment. (Gagnon & Collay, 200?) The role of the teacher as a constructor of the learning experience to ensure authentic curriculum and assessment which is responsive to the skills, needs and experiences of the learner, within established curriculum framework and with the reference to the achievement of literacy, numeracy, retention and attainment of outcomes. Krause, Bochner and Duchesne (p.157) comment that “as learners interact with their environment, they link information learned through experience to previous knowledge, and so construct new understandings and knowledge.” Constructivism then inturn encourages Teachers and Learning Managers to recognise the value of prior knowledge and experiences that each child brings with them into the classroom, and help them (the students) build on their understandings of the world by providing appropriate learning experience plans.
Brooks, J. G., Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case of Constructivist Classrooms, with a new introduction by the authors. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ashford/Doc?id=10078162&ppg=28
Constructivism theorists believe that learning is an ongoing collective application of knowledge where past knowledge and hands on experience meet. This theory also believes that students are naturally curious. If students are naturally curious, their curio...
Concerning the prior measurement learning of the children, they were able to make indirect and direct comparisons to determine which object is longer or shorter and use some mathematical language relating to measurement attributes such as taller or smaller but were unable to use units of measurements (ACARA 2011b, para 4). Statistics and Probability Activity It is
A. Behaviorism, constructivism and cognitivism are relatively common theories used in the classroom as ways to approach student learning. Behaviorism focuses on observable behavior, such as students answering questions correctly, or being able to follow directions to complete a task as instructed. Characteristics of a classroom that uses behaviorism might be memorization of facts, writing vocabulary words, or a token reward system to inspire the desired behavior and decrease undesired behaviors. Constructivism, as indicated by the root word “construct,” focuses on the construction of new ideas, or expanding on what is already known. Students in a classroom using constructivism as a means for learning might seem more actively engaged in the learning process; they often learn something new through applying what they already know about the content area, and exploring new matter to further their understanding. This type of classroom often uses hands on manipulatives to allow students to actually build, create, or experiment with what they are learning. A cognitivism approach to learning might be explained by the minds capacity to process information – such as how a learner might remember something, retrieve information, or store new concepts. Learning through this method often depends on how the student processes what the teacher is presenting. Classrooms using this approach might incorporate learning strategies that help students categorize and sequence information to assist with processing. Like constructivism, it can be an active style of learning.
Con: Constructivism classrooms do not have much room for structure (Rhinehart Neas). For new teachers, structure is important to maintain to have control of the classroom. Constructivism is meant for classrooms that can be more student centered than teacher controlled. For new teachers this method could not work very well. Another problem with constructivism is that students may not have the prior knowledge to begin a new lesson (Rhinehart Neas). The student that does not understand is also going to be the student who does not ask for help. Therefore, the teacher sometimes does need to teach and not just be a guide.
Among many teaching styles and learning theories, there is one that is becoming more popular, the constructivist theory. The constructivist theory focuses on the way a person learns, a constructivist believes that the person will learn better when he/she is actively engaged. The person acts or views objects and events in their environment, in the process, this person then understands and learns from the object or events(P. Johnson, 2004). When we encounter a certain experience in our life, we think back to other things that have occurred in our life and use that to tackle this experience. In a lot of cases, we are creators of our own knowledge. In a classroom, the constructivist theory encourages more hands-on assignments or real-world situations, such as, experiments in science and math real-world problem solving. A constructivist teacher constantly checks up on the student, asking them to reflect what they are learning from this activity. The teacher should be keeping track on how they approached similar situations and help them build on that. The students can actually learning how to learn in a well-planned classroom. Many people look at this learning style as a spiral, the student is constantly learning from each new experience and their ideas become more complex and develop stronger abilities to integrate this information(P. Johnson, 2004). An example of a constructivist classroom would be, the student is in science class and everyone is asking questions, although the teacher knows the answer, instead of just giving it to them, she attempts to get the students to think through their knowledge and try to come up with a logical answer. A problem with this method of learning is that people believe that it is excusing the role of...
We must first look at the need for a constructivist approach in a classroom, to do this we think back to our days in primary school and indeed secondary school where textbooks we like bibles. We were told to take out our books, look at the board, and now complete the exercise on page z. This approach in a class is repetitive, the teacher holds authoritarian power and learning is by no means interactive. “In a traditional classroom, an invisible and imposing, at times, impenetrable, barrier between student and teacher exists through power and practice. In a constructivist classroom, by contrast, the teacher and the student share responsibility and decision making and demonstrate mutual respect.” (Wineburg, 2001) This approach focuses on basic skills and strict adherence to the curriculum. Children are being forced to learn through repetit...
As a secondary subject, society often views mathematics a critical subject for students to learn in order to be successful. Often times, mathematics serves as a gatekeeper for higher learning and certain specific careers. Since the times of Plato, “mathematics was virtually the first thing everyone has to learn…common to all arts, science, and forms of thought” (Stinson, 2004). Plato argued that all students should learn arithmetic; the advanced mathematics was reserved for those that would serve as the “philosopher guardians” of the city (Stinson, 2004). By the 1900s in the United States, mathematics found itself as a cornerstone of curriculum for students. National reports throughout the 20th Century solidified the importance of mathematics in the success of our nation and its students (Stinson, 2004). As a mathematics teacher, my role to educate all students in mathematics is an important one. My personal philosophy of mathematics education – including the optimal learning environment and best practices teaching strategies – motivates my teaching strategies in my personal classroom.
As part of the secondary education degree at ACU, I was asked as part of second year practicum to partake in five observation days at an allocated school for insight to the teaching profession, as well as searching for components of behaviourism and constructivism from the teachers in each class. Being a part of the school for these days was an enlightening experience in which I witnessed both learning theories in action, the different approaches teachers took when incorporating them into the classroom, and the different methods of teaching used by the same teacher just with different classes, subjects they teach, and year levels.
120). Similarly, the constructivist theory of learning closely correlates with the above educational philosophy. As noted by Cannon and Boswell (2016) the main goal of education and educators is to actively involve students to understand the material and provide the freedom for trial and error with eventual comprehension of the material (p. 65).
There are methods that are considered very different than constructivism that are used in the classroom. One of the approaches is the traditional approach where the teacher teaches the information to the student, and the student does not contribute as much or convey the prior knowledge of the material during instruction (Airasian & Walsh, 1997). It has been said that traditional teaching can segregate students, especially ones with special needs, in the classroom (Bloom; Perlmutter& Burrell, 1999). In other words, traditional instruction is a more teacher-centered approach that uses rote, fact based learning. The teachers create the values, behaviors, and beliefs for the students. The teacher is in charge of the classroom, where they have rewards and consequences, and the students work mostly by themselves (this is very different that the constructivist classroom, which will be explained) (Windschitl, 1999).