Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the nature of military strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the nature of military strategy
Essay
National security once meant a strong dollar, a strong border and
the confidence of a people in their government. Now, maintaining our
national security depends upon our ability to communicate effectively in
other languages and across cultures.
A new definition of national security strategy is emerging that
must confront issues across the spectrum from dictators to disease, from
nation-states to stateless movements, from foreign to domestic
battlefields and from outer space to cyberspace. Policymakers must be
correctly informed to protect the homeland and to advance and protect
American interests abroad.
Our national security purview now encompasses environmental security,
military security, political security, and security of energy and natural
resources around the globe. To ensure this security, we must not
only be vigilant about our nation's strengths but we must be informed
about other countries' weaknesses that may threaten our security and the
global economy.
Nowhere is this more evident than in our relationship with the
Middle East.
The Middle East is home to 65 percent of the proven global oil
reserves and 45 percent of its natural gas. The concentration of so much
of the world's hydrocarbons in this geographical location means that the
Middle East will continue to play a key role in global politics and
economy -and in the national security interests of the U.S. as well.
To maintain our national security we must foster security and
stability across regional and religious boundaries in the Middle East. To
do this we must have adequate intelligence that supports both diplomacy
and our military in times of war and peace.
In the wake of the Iranian revolu...
... middle of paper ...
...at the grassroots level.
It would also provide critical language skills, vocabulary and
experience in my development as a naval officer who is capable of
speaking the regional dialects and possessing a deep multi-domain
understanding of the Middle East.
Most importantly, living and breathing in Syria, meeting and
speaking with the Syrian people in their own dialect, engaging in face-to-
face discussions with language partners regarding cultural, political,
religious and ethical issues, and understanding the role of Islam in
their lives would provide me with not only the necessary skills,
training, life experiences and facility with the language but it would
also serve our national security interests through forming bonds,
friendships, cross cultural understandings and communications between
ordinary Americans and ordinary Syrians.
It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.
In this book, Friedman presents a coherent picture of forces in the Middle East that have led to the Israeli- Palestinian confrontation and to bin Laden and his group of terrorists. Friedman’s articles describe meetings, discussions, and arguments he had with people at all levels of society through out the Middle East. From his extensive travels and through dynamic interactions with the people he derived intense insights into how 9/11 came about, why, and what should be done about it.
She strengthens the persuasiveness of these statements with an authoritative and informed tone. She also references a poll about how people feel that the Bush administration should deal with security in the United States. Poll participants were asked if they felt the government under Bush was adequately dealing with the matter of security and it was found that “only 11 percent thought the administration had gone too far” (251). She may rely on such techniques so readers do not react too strongly to her essay and instead focus on the validity of her
Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has been calling every citizens and every nations to support his Middle East policy. Nonetheless, the U.S. has been involved in the middle-east struggle for more than half of the century, wars were waged and citizens were killed. Yet, political struggles and ideological conflicts are now worse than they were under Clinton’s presidency. As “President’s Address to the Nation” is a speech asking everybody to support the troops to keep fighting in Iraq, I, as an audience, am not persuaded at all because of his illogical fallacy in the arguments. In this essay, I will analyze how and what are the illogical fallacies he uses in the speech.
Retrieved from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/268/540 White, J. R. (2014). Terrorism and homeland security (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
America is dependent on other nations for their ability to create energy. The United States is the world’s largest consumer of oil at 18.49 million barrels of oil per day. And it will continue to be that way for the foreseeable future considering the next largest customer of oil only consumes about 60% of what the U.S. does. This makes the U.S. vulnerable to any instability that may arise in the energy industry. In 2011, the world’s top three oil companies were Saudi Aramco (12%), National Iranian Oil Company (5%), and China National Petroleum Corp (4%). The risk associated with these countries being the top oil producers is twofold. One, they are located half way around the world making it an expensive to transport the product logistically to a desired destination. And two, the U.S. has weak, if not contentious,...
Examining the now unoccupied position in the Secretary of State, there has been a debate on who will take over the job. On this topic, this paper will include things about: the important job of being Secretary of State, the firing of the recent Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, and Mike Pompeo, the replacement of the position. Now, there are many responsibilities to being the Secretary of State. One of those responsibilities is ensuring citizen protection in foreign countries (“Duties of the Secretary of State”). This is important for the job for protecting American citizens from the possibly strict laws in another country. Another responsibility for this job is informing citizens about concerns in foreign countries (“Duties of the Secretary of State”). This is important as well is it could affect American citizens being more prepared, the citizens’ safety, and the impact of our economy. An addition to the other responsibilities to Secretary of State is that it negotiates U.S. foreign relations (“Duties of the Secretary of State”). How this is important to the position because it could bring peaceful solutions to potential challenges.
Aside from causing a major shift in geopolitical power, WWII also solidified the integral role oil played politically in national security. However, following the war the United States was no longer the world’s largest oil producer and was unable to maintain self-sufficiency as it had in the past. As a national security imperative oil was more important at this point than ever before. America’s war machine needed to be well oiled in case the new Cold War suddenly turned hot.
After the tragedy and chaos of September 11th, 2001 there was an expectation for the United States to respond with aggression. In his address to the nation, President George W. Bush stated “The search is underway for those who are behind these evil acts…We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.” It became apparent that the perpetrators were affiliates of the radical Muslim group Al-Qaida, and with Al-Qaida as the espoused target the War on Terror in the Middle East began. War was presented as the only course of action. The attacks on the World Trade Center elicited fear in the US public and a post-9/11 state of emergency regarding homeland security made war … It started in Afghanistan and eventually transitioned into Iraq. I will discuss how an Orientalist discourse used by politicians and the media framed and justified the War on Terror . Through this discourse an inferior “other” was created and that alienated dehumanized the East and its people in the US public consciousness, internationally and within the United States.
Homeland security is the way Americans put forth the effort to ensure the homeland is safe, secure, and stands firm against terrorist acts and other hazard that could put the health and welfare of the American people. The mission of the Homeland Security is to prevent terrorism, secure and protect our open borders, uphold all immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace, and be content and resilient when it pertains to disasters.
The strategy of the United States concentrates on the next five to ten years in order to protect the national interests around the global. With the increase in globalization, the ability to have a presence in all regions becomes important to national security and the United States accomplishes this by building and strengthening alliances. This promotes stability and security in the region as well. Defending the home front is the most important objective of the NSS and in order to accomplish that, continued global power projection is necessary. The NDS and NMS both seek to accomplish this through a thorough assessment of the strategic environment and applying either diplomatic or military power as necessary. The military serves as a major deterrent to potential adversaries, because of the United States’ military capability.
Harpreet, Paul. “‘The War You Don’t See’: Iraq, Afghanistan and Israel/Palestine.” Global Policy in Brief. N. p., 24 June 2011. Web. 2 Mar. 2014.
Wright, R. T., & Boorse, D. F. (2011). In addition to the rise in prices, another negative aspect of the U.S. dependency on foreign crude oil is the risk of supply disruptions caused by political instability in the Middle East. According to Rebecca Lefton and Daniel J. Weiss in the article “Oil Dependence Is a Dangerous Habit” in 2010, the U.S. imported 4 million barrels of oil a day, or 1.5 billion barrels per year, from “dangerous or unstable” countries. The prices at which these barrels are being purchased are still very high, and often lead to conflict between the U.S. and Middle Eastern countries. Lefton and Weiss also add that the U.S. reliance on oil from countries that are dangerous or unstable could have serious implications for our national security, economy and environment....
Col. Randy Larson, renown author and Director of the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Center, speaks on an in-depth prospective of the field of homeland security and factors that drive the continued efforts to address future threats to the nation for the 21 century. The area of focus presented in the interview are the various ways an individual may enter the field but are not limited to a particular area of study. For example, health care, agriculture, or political science, there is essential no set track for finding a career in homeland security. Challenges surrounding area of homeland security are the mounting financial burdens and the need for the appointment of leadership at a national executive level to address this realistic future threat. Despite these concerns, evidence suggests quality system practices can assist in guiding theses area and the adoption of tools that support quality improvement when addressing homeland security and future concerns.
Progressive era foreign policy was motivated by a variety of factors including racial and national superiority, business and economic interests, strategic concerns, and idealism. Excerpts from For the Record provide various examples supporting the concerns that led to America’s foreign policy.