Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marx's theory of class
Marx's theory of class
Karl Marx's theory of social class
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During the 18th Century, anger against the French king, King Louis XVI, turned into a very violent revolution, as the French people attempted to defend their country against anyone who they saw as being for the king and against the revolution. This idea of nationalism would spread across all of Europe, and would eventually lead to the idea that each nationality should have its own nation. The modern idea of a nation-state is based on many arguments. Some examples are that a nation-state should consist of people with a common nationality, and the people should be willing to protect the state. A nation state also needs a strong economy to function properly.
A nation-state should consist of people with a common nationality. In Johann Gottfried
…show more content…
von Herder’s document Materials for the Philosophy of the History of Mankind, he claims that “the most natural state… is… [made] of one people” and that “the wild confusion of races and nations under one scepter… is a monstrosity” (DOC 1). In this passage, he is arguing that Germany is suffering due to its people being split into different states.
Germany, at the time, was only a group of states held together by the incredibly weak Holy Roman Emperor. Because Herder was German, he probably witnessed the consequences of the weak and decentralized Holy Roman Empire which is why he believes that nation-states should consist of one united nationality Herder’s document was most likely influenced by the works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a philosophe from the Enlightenment. Rousseau believed that the state of nature was very peaceful. Men in the state of nature lived very happy lives and treated each other kindly; however, when men invented government and society, they became corrupt and morally poor. In the beginning of Herder’s document, he claims that because “nature brings forth families” which share genetic and cultural similarities, the state should also consist of people who share the same culture and ethnicity (DOC 1). His argument claims that being closer to the state of nature is better, just like Rousseau. The argument that a nation state should contain people with a common nationality can also be seen in Thomas Davis in Ireland. Unlike Herder, who wanted the Germans from many different states to unite, Davis wanted the two states of England and Ireland to be seperated, for they were two different …show more content…
nationalities. This can be seen in his poem Lament for the Death of Eoghan Ruadh O’Neill, where he curses the man who poisoned Eoghan Ruadh O’Neill, asking God to “wither up their hearts.” He then tells the story of how O’Neill “against Cromwell,... marched up to measure swords: But the weapon of the Sassanach met him on his way” (DOC 3). During the seventeenth century after Cromwell overthrew the Stuarts in England, he had to deal with Catholic Irish uprising, for the Irish were extremely unhappy that the English were trying to impose Anglicanism on them. Cromwell invaded Ireland and brutally crushed the uprisings; this angered many Irish people, including O’Neill. O’Neill stood by his fellow Irishmen against the invasion, and he was assassinated because of it. Davis’ account of O’Neill’s death is somewhat credible, though it may be exaggerated to increase the reader’s anger against the British. Davis was also not there to witness O’Neill’s death; in fact, he never met him or anyone who knew him because O’Neill died about 200 years before Davis wrote his poem. Davis and O’Neill, like Herder, argued that each nationality should have its own individual state. The citizens of a nation-state should be willing to defend their nation. According to Herder’s Material for the Philosophy of the History of Mankind, “No greater injury can be inflicted on a nation than to be robbed of her national character, the peculiarity of her spirit and her language,” and many others thought the same (DOC 1). In 1870, the French rebelled against their monarch for the second time. This rebellion was called the July Revolution, and it was depicted in a painting by Euguène Delacroix called Liberty Leading the People. The painting is an extremely nationalistic painting, for the French tricolour is in the center and held above all the people. The painting also shows people from all classes taking arms to defend their country against their king. This revolution was caused by King Charles X, who imposed a set of edicts, called the July Ordinances, which dissolved the legislative assembly while revoking the people’s freedom of speech and the press. The people were angered by this, and replaced Charles X with his cousin, Louis-Philippe. Because the people felt that the king was working for his own personal gain instead of helping the people and the state, they rebelled against him and replaced him. Delacroix’s painting is a very trustworthy source for it was painted in 1830, the same year as the revolution. He was most likely there to witness the revolution take place. Another example of the citizens defending their nation is in mid to late 19th century, when the Prussians fought the Franco-Prussian War in order to become a nation. Bismarck mentions this war in his speech to the Reichstag in 1888 when he claims that “[i]f Germany wish[es] to wage a war” then “[i]t must be a national war, a war carried on with the enthusiasm of 1870” (DOC 11). Bismarck feels that the German people should have so much national pride that the whole country should be willing to go to war to protect Germany with as much enthusiasm as the army in Franco-Prussian War. During this war, France, who was opposed to German unification, declared war on Prussia. Even though the Prussians were outnumbered and the French had better guns, the Prussians managed to destroy the French in battle and captured their Emperor, Emperor Napoleon III. Because their nationality was incredibly important to them, Europeans were willing to do anything to protect their state. A strong economy is necessary to run a nation-state.
George Friedrich List in his National System of Political Economy states that “[t]he civilization, political education and power of the nations, depend chiefly on their economical condition and reciprocally; the more advanced their economy, the more civilized and powerful will be the nation” (DOC 4). List probably witnessed this in his own country Germany. The Prussians had set up a commons union called the Zollverein in 1834, six years before List wrote this passage. The Zollverein brought great prosperity to all of the German states, and would eventually cause them to look up to Prussia to unite Germany into a single country. The importance of a good economy can also be seen in France. In France, workers complained about finding “it impossible to earn a livelihood” because “[f]or fifteen years, ten thousand foreign workers have arrived to bring misery to trade” (DOC 5). Because of the increase in foreigners and other agricultural and industrial problems, the French people were unable to find jobs; they complained to their king, Louis-Philippe, but the king did not help. The people’s discontent with their king would eventually lead to a third French Revolution and the removal of King Louis-Philippe. A stable economy was necessary for a strong
nation. In conclusion, the people in 19th century Europe believed that a nation-state should consist of people with a common nationality. They also believed that the people of a nation-state should be willing to protect the state, and that nation-state also needs a strong economy to function properly.
Prior to the “Era of Good Feelings”, America was characterized as a nation where people did not recognize themselves in union but instead identified themselves according their region. During this period America became more integrated (politically, socially and economically) and a sense of nationalism prevailed. In the years following the War of 1812 America 's status on the world stage strengthened, the economy grew and became more prosperous due to the market revolution, and new forms of transportation and their improvements connected the country in ways that had not been seen before. Despite this rise in nationalism, there were also some elements of sectionalism that had existed since colonization.
Germany. Nationalism is a complex concept that can be viewed as both a unifying and a disunifying force, depending on one's perspective and background knowledge. On one hand, it can bring people together who share a common bond based on a single "nationality" or ancestry. Those who view nationalism as a unifying force often reject loyalty to a monarch, instead choosing to remain loyal to their fellow citizens. On the other hand, some people see nationalism as a disunifying force because it can disrupt efforts to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
Nationalism is a sense of strong pride and loyalty of ones nation over other nations. This is different from past beliefs that pride and loyalty rests in religion. Its biggest strength was to cut across the social classes and motivate large groups of people. Stavrianos, 1999) Nationalism developed in the 1770’s gaining major support throughout Europe. The earliest signs of nationalism were found in England during the puritan revolution. England during the time of the revolution was becoming a leading nation scientifically and economically which they thought would change they viewed freedom. John Milton a major writer at the time defined this change in freedom as “celebrated for endless ages as a soil most genial to the growth of liberty.” (Encyclopædia Britannica Online, 2011) The French revolution had a major influence on the development of nationalism. French enlightenment thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau helped spread nationalism throughout Europe through his works about popular sovereignty where people would give their consent to be governed. (Encyclopædia Britannica Online, 2011) This was the starting point fo...
After the Franco-Prussian War, France was afraid that Germany would attack France for more land. So then France started building up it’s army so that Germany wouldn’t attack. Germany wanted a war. This caused the six stronge countires in Europe to start building up their armies and get ready for the war. The six stronge countries were England, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Turkey. All of these countires were compeating to be the strongest. Russia and Germany did not get along. Russia, too, was afriad Germnay would attack, so Russia started to build up it’s army to make Germany afriad. Russia and Austria-Hungary also didn’t get along. Austria-Hungary was afriad Russia would attack so they started to build up their army to intimidate Russia. Turkey didn’t get along with Austria-Hungary. Turkey saw that Austria-Hungary was building up their army, and that frightened Turkey, so they started building up their armies to scare Austria-Hungary. All of thse countries were compeating to be the best and the strongest. This is an example of militerism and nationalism. Nationalism is a deep feeling of pride for one’s country with a desire to prove that it’s better than all other countires.
Some historians recall the confederation interval of american history, from 1781 to 1789, probably the most valuable generation in the nation's progress. Having rebelled towards royal authority, the collection of yank colonies, now turn out to be a group of yankee states, needed to strengthen a new govt. This executive was the Articles of Confederation, a general structure, which was once ratified through all the states in 1781 before the revolutionary battle ended. However from their conception in 1781 to their abandonment in 1789, the Articles have been wholly inadequate, offering the U.S. With an ineffective govt. Probably the greatest contribution the Articles made was to exhibit the people that a robust primary executive was wanted.
The United States is a strong and powerful nation that is respected by most other countries, but it was not always this way. In the United States’ early history, the Articles of Confederation established the purposes of the national government after it declared independence from Great Britain. The Articles were basically a “league of friendship” between the thirteen states, and it led to an extremely weak government. After Shay’s Rebellion, it opened the eyes of many Americans, and the people realized that changes needed to be made if The United States of America was going to survive as a nation. In May 1787, fifty-five delegates met in Philadelphia and the Constitutional Convention began. Initially, delegates met to amend the Articles of Confederation,
After defeating the Redcoats at the Battle of Yorktown in 1781, the American peoples finally had freedom from the British powers they had been rebelling against for so long. This freedom was met with the immediate need to create a strong nation of unified states to legitimize America as its own country. America at this time consisted of 13 colonies, each with their own sovereignty and power over their individual territories. The American people were naturally so far pleased with this system as they felt most in-touch with their colonial governments. The entire reason Americans broke away from their British forefathers was due to an oppressive central government that left the people virtually powerless. So when time came to draft a document officially declaring the separate powers of the states
In order to have a strong nation, Americans required a capable government. However, the Articles of Confederation failed shortly after its creation and the need for a new system was met with differences of opinion. Although the government clearly needed to be strong enough to enforce its laws, the question of how strong this new system should be created some difficult standards. The Constitution restricted American liberty because it was written by elites, for elites and as such, it could not protect the average American; the dismission of a large population, the limitation of democracy, and the need of the Bill of Rights demonstrated the new strains on the American's freedoms.
There are two countries that flourish due to Nationalism, Germany and Italy. The creation of Germany was possible through nationalism. Nationalism brought German community to unify and create a nation. On the other hand, the rivalry of the great powers to control other territories grew more as countries were wanting to influence past their borders. “The great powers had come into conflict over spheres of influence in China and over territories in Africa, and the Eastern Question, created by the decline of the Ottoman Empire, had produced several disturbing controversies.”(“World War I” 2015) Militarism was another aspect of these ideologies where countries would increase military spending to get new weapons and increase the military size. This gave people the idea that war was the only solution to their problems and also intensified nationalism because it increased their confidence in the military, thinking their country could win any battle against any foe. “Imperialist and nationalist, resulted in a hardening of alliance systems in the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente and in a general armaments race.(“World War I”
The rise of European nationalism in the 19th Century brought with it an overabundance amount of change that would definitively modify the course of history. The rise of nationalism in one country would rouse greater nationalism in another, which would in turn, motivate even greater nationalism in the first, progressively intensifying the cycle that eventually concluded in a World War. Nationalism as an ideology produced international competition which inspired absolute allegiance to an individual’s nation state. The ideology was fueled by industrial commerce and imperialistic developments which led to nation-states pursuits of outcompeting rival nations.
Imperialism in had both negative and positive effects. These effects brought India to what it’s like today. Due to the weakening of the Mughal Empire and the unmodern society, the British decided to step in and basically take control over India. There were many positive effects of Imperialism for the British, and for India. One Positive effects were new transportation methods and communication do to the industrialization of India that was introduced by the British. A negative effect was that Britain controlled the government and didn't allow the native people to have a say or be part of anything related to politics or the government.
Nationalism has a long history although most scholarly research on Nationalism only began in the mid-twentieth century. Some scholars point to the French Revolution of 1789 as the birth of Nationalism. The French Revolution is seen...
Planned Parenthood federation of America (PPFA), is widely known as Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that provides reproductive healthcare and family planning services. Planned Parenthood is the nation 's leading sexual and reproductive health care provider and advocate (Planned). Planned Parenthood receives federal funding from the government to help practice the services they provide, but some groups believe that funding this organization is morally wrong. Specifically, in the recent Republican Presidential debates, defunding Planned Parenthood and Abortion rights have been the central topic. However if the government were to move forward with the defunding
Nationalism is being patriotic towards one’s own country. It took place in the nineteenth century to those people who shared a language, history and culture. Nationalism led to creation of new powers, which are Italy and Germany. As these countries became united and stronger, they created war against other countries.
Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and geographic proximity ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. In the following essay I will describe many of the consequences of nationalism on European identity, as well as some of the conflicts that it created.