Narration Style in As I Lay Dying

1296 Words3 Pages

With most literature preceding the modernist movement, narration of stories was pretty straightforward; they were usually told by a main character or by the author as a third person- and that was that. However, as writing styles began to change, so did the style of narration. One of the most prominent examples of different narration is William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying. In his novel, Faulkner reinvents the traditional expectation of having a single narrator by instead having multiple. Through this tactic of employing multiple narrators, Faulkner is able to change up traditional narration style, allowing readers to receive a wider breadth, rather than depth, of his novel so that independent conclusions can be drawn for each reader, instead of a concrete, universal meaning- all through the use of emotion and event reliability, different perceptions of time through the altering of verb tenses, and the method of switching between stream of consciousness and colloquial prose.
All throughout his novel, Faulkner presents multiple narrators who all give somewhat differing versions of emotions and events that cause the reader to question their reliability. Because he strays from the traditional practice of having a single narrator, every account is completely subjective to whoever is telling it, and therefore a wide range of events are subsequently left up to the reader to decide who and what is most truthful. Readers must sort through the various interpretations of events and each character’s emotions, as they can no longer accept the story that is usually being told by one reliable narrator. Because of this narration style, there is no final truth or final universal meaning in the novel, as everything that happens is open to an individ...

... middle of paper ...

...onally narrated novels. With all of these different internal thoughts and external conversations of each narrator, readers are left with even more to decipher for themselves individually, instead of being able to follow along with collective ideals laid out by having a single, traditional narrator.
All in all, Faulkner’s choice to digress from following the traditional formula of having a single, reliable narrator permitted him to widen the scope of his novel by allowing for multiple perspectives of emotions and events, the distortion of time, and the ability to see two sides to every character rather than just a few. Because of this wide range of various people, events, and thoughts, there is no actual universal meaning to his novel as he simply just touches on all of these things, leaving the reader to interpret what he presents for his or herself individually.

Open Document