Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rousseau's democracy
Civil unrest and failing economics present a perfect political opportunity for tyrannical mindsets to manipulate themselves into power. The prestigious, and well revered Napoleon Bonaparte was the embodiment of Rousseau's worst nightmare. While his Coup d’Etat in Brumaire liberated France from the conforming rule of the Directory, Napoleon’s desire for hegemony clouded his vision and caused him to destroy the democratic empire he originally created. Consequently, through Bonaparte’s numerous enactments and actions during his reign, it is clear as to how forcibly created, and spurred nationalistic feelings in France and surrounding countries. Napoleon exemplifies this proposition through not only his various policies but numerous military conquests. …show more content…
In doing so, he prevented people from having judgment passed upon them based on a single person’s selfish whim, a common occurrence during King Louis XII reign. In addition, the Napoleonic Code appeased the religious freedoms of the people, specifically Catholic practitioners, through the Concordat of 1801. While all people were allowed to practice freely, those of whom were Catholic found themselves without a seminary or clergy in which they could preach to. Napoleon’s negotiation with the Pope, the Concordat was created, which permitted the reopening of seminaries and reinstatement of clergies, and thus true religious freedom. Through his utter allowance of religious freedom, Napoleon united his country even more, and gave them a reason to love and protect it, and subsequently lead the citizens of France to increase their nationalistic sentiment for their country. Above all, with the exemptions of all peoples taken into account, his law simultaneously allowed a crumbling France to unify together while catalyzing the nationalistic feelings buried within the hearts of France’s citizens through the implementation of civil freedom the people …show more content…
Napoleon’s various military encounters acted as the spark for the nationalistic emotions within the citizens of France, and were kindled into an untamable blaze as he continually emerged victorious in his multitude of campaigns. Through his rebellious Coup d’Etat of Brumaire, he lit a flame powered by nationalistic intent within the French people by appeasing their hunger for democracy while also simultaneously taking command and restoring their faith in figures of power. Following his fiery acquisition of government control, he proceeded to engage in the Battle of Austerlitz in 1805, where the rulers of Austria, Russia, and France clashed. Blazing as he was, however, Napoleon efficiently burned his opponent into ash as his “...assault crushed the defenders and forced them to retreat[,]... [causing] their lines..to collapse all along the front, [and for enemy] troops...to flee the field.” Through this victory, Napoleon effectively “...made peace [with Austria] through the Treaty of Pressburg[, and received] a war indemnity of 40 million francs.” Napoleon, through his victory, restored the lost honour in France’s military, as well as the people’s faith in their military while heightening their nationalistic emotions. Moreover, the win allowed “Napoleon [to] abolish the Holy Roman Empire and establish...the Confederation of the Rhine as a buffer state between France and Prussia.” As a
Napoleon Bonaparte’s attitude towards the French Revolution is one that has often raised questions. That the revolution had an influence on Bonaparte’s regime cannot be denied – but to what extent? When one looks at France after Napoleon’s reign it is clear that he had brought much longed for order and stability. He had also established institutions that embodied the main principles of the revolution. However, it is also evident that many of his policies directly contradict those same principles. Was Napoleon betraying the same revolution that gave him power, or was he merely a pragmatist, who recognised that to consolidate the achievements of the revolution he needed to sacrifice some of those principles?
One of Napoleon’s first areas of concern was in the strengthening of the French government. He created a strong centralized government and pretty much got rid of the hundreds of localized law codes that had existed during under the control of the monarchy. He also created an army of government officials. He had the entire country linked under a rational administration. He also was able to get an easy supply of taxes and soldiers under his new and improved French government. Before he could get very far, however, he had to gain public favor and shape the public opinion. To do this he used reforms of propaganda and thus caused people to think that they were getting the better end of the deal, but were actually, subconsciously giving Napoleon their approval for his actions. Among some of the methods he used for propaganda included getting all of the printers and book sellers to swear an oath to Napoleon and all newspapers fell under state control, so Napoleon gained access to almost everything that the citizens of France were able to read. Many of the gains from the French Revolution were kept, such as equality before the law, and careers open to talent. Some anti-revolution actions that Napoleon took included repressing liberty, restoring absolutism, and ending political liberty. He believed that allowing political freedom would end with a state of anarchy. He believed that he could solve these problems by acting in favor of the people’s interests as an enlightened desp...
During Napoleon’s reign there were numerous events that changed the world however for this essay I will only address three significant events. The first event I will discuss is the Code of Napoleon followed by the Haitian Revolution and finally the sale of Louisiana.
As a military genius, Napoleon won many battles to expand France and was always welcomed back to France as a hero. His use of strategic warfare throughout many battles allowed him to be seen as a hero not only in France but all of Europe. Although his army was outnumbered by the Russians and Austrians in December 2, 1805, Napoleon' brilliant strategies resulted in a defeat of the opposing armies in the Battle of Austerlitz.
Napoleon’s “coup d’etat of 18 brumaire was an insurance against both the Jacobin revolution and the Royalist restoration.” The French people expected Napoleon to bring back peace, order and to consolidate the political and social conquests of the Revolution. Napoleon considered these conquests to be “the sacred rights of property, equality and liberty.” If Napoleon gained power with the promise of upholding the principles of the French Revolution, how did he betray the revolution? Many historians argue that Napoleon was an effective but ambitious leader.
“Europe cannot conceive of life without Kings and nobles; and we cannot conceive of it with them. Europe is lavishing her blood to preserve her chains, whereas we are lavishing ours to destroy them”(Maximilien Robespierre). For centuries upon centuries, the monarchal system had dominated European life. The very nature of this method of rule incited rebellious feelings, as a definite imbalance of power was present. Understandably, people under this system had risen against authority. The glorious nation of France was no exception. The eighteenth century brought about a great deal of economic and social turmoil. By the end of this one hundred year period, rebellion had been talked about by many citizens for quite some time. However, no definitive action was taken until one man stepped to the forefront; Maximilien Robespierre. Born in Arras, France about thirty years prior to the French Revolution, Robespierre was an immensely intelligent man as is seen from his ability to read and write fluently from the age of eight (the Force of 10). Robespierre rose from fairly humble origins to become a provincial lawyer, advancing further to become a representative in the Estates General, and eventually ascending to the leader of the French Revolution itself. For its sake he sent thousands to the guillotine, overthrew a monarchy, declared a new national religion, and invigorated the will of a nation. “No individual of the French Revolutionary era, with the exception of Napolean Bonaparte, has excited more passion in his time than the…dedicated provincial lawyer, Maximilien Robespierre”(Maximilien 1). During this era, Robespierre led France’s world inspiring cry for the liberation of mankind and petrified the world with its relentle...
Kirchberger, Joe H. The French Revolution and Napoleon. New York: Facts on File inc, 1989.
To regain peace among the people of France, Napoleon sought to end the factionalism that had been so rampant during the Revolution. He started by bring all the different factions into his fold and offering their leaders positions in his government. For their inclusion into his government, Napoleon required the factions to be loyal not only to France, but also to him. Undoubtedly, there were factions that refused to submit to Napoleon’s terms; however, they were all brutally massacred by his secret police.
Napoleon was a excellent military and governmental leader in France during the 1790s. He tried to create an excellent country and even more excellent government system that would make the country better. He was one of the greatest leaders in human history. One of his greatest achievements was the creation of the code of Napoleon. The code of Napoleon was the first time that France had tried to put together a reasonable government system that was fair to everyone. He also changed the tax system in France. He made it where everyone in France was required to pay taxes, and no one was exempt from the taxes. He promoted agriculture in France as well. He went of the building ideas of the Roman Empire and the designs of all his buildings that he build
Taking the throne of France, Napoleon Bonaparte started to change himself into greedy and get more ambition. In October 1799, Napoleon returned to France. At that time, France was in danger because most of countries in Europe, such as England, Russia, Austria, Naples, Portugal and Turkey, formed a military alliance to protect themselves from France. “France was also writhing internally,” claims that politics of France had some problems such as the attack from other countries and the French revolution, which ended in 1799. Even though his country, France, was in awful situation, Napoleon was staying in Egypt fo...
In my opinion, Napoleon’s mistake on the Invasion of Russia was his significant reason for his downfall. He starts to become paranoid about things. Napoleon lost many soldiers when he went against his ally, Alexander l. Therefore on June 1812 he invades Russia but some of his troops were not loyal so most of the soldiers end up going back home. The effect this has on the empire is that he loses more soldiers than he started with. His strategy was proven wrong and it was his ego that got in the way. This defeat made his enemies take advantage of
With all the glory and the splendour that some countries may have experienced, never has history seen how only only one man, Napoleon, brought up his country, France, from its most tormented status, to the very pinnacle of its height in just a few years time. He was a military hero who won splendid land-based battles, which allowed him to dominate most of the European continent. He was a man with ambition, great self-control and calculation, a great strategist, a genius; whatever it was, he was simply the best. But, even though how great this person was, something about how he governed France still floats among people's minds. Did he abuse his power? Did Napoleon defeat the purpose of the ideals of the French Revolution? After all of his success in his military campaigns, did he gratify the people's needs regarding their ideals on the French Revolution? This is one of the many controversies that we have to deal with when studying Napoleon and the French Revolution. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion on whether or not was he a destroyer of the ideals of the French Revolution.
Napoleon Bonaparte is often seen as a tyrant, however; through Napoleon’s strong tactics and military leadership he led France through a time of great turmoil and provided the stability and guidance France so desperately needed. During his reign, Napoleon was able to bring an end to the French Revolution, a series of wars that had fractured the French at their core. After the resolution of the revolution, Napoleon developed the Civil Code or Napoleonic code to unite all of France under one governing law. The Civil Code blended the governing laws of the Roman law practiced in the South with the customary law practiced in the North. Through the Code, Napoleon brought unity to France, improved the rights and lives of citizens, and allowed for France’s own growth and development. The Civil Code is considered one of Napoleon’s
The Napoleonic Wars made a tremendous impact on Europe and the most important impacts resulted from victories by Napoleon. As a result of Napoleon’s victories, European countries were able to form alliances. The Battle of Marengo ended the Second Coalition and enforced Napoleon’s position as First Consul. The Treaty of Pressburg, as well as the Confederation of Rhine were subsequent results of The Battle of Austerlitz. The Battle of Wagram lead to the Treaty of Vienna and territory gains for Napoleon. The battles that were lost by the French made compensated for all the chaos that was caused. With his victories, Napoleon was capable of bringing much of Europe together in alliance.
Napoleon Bonaparte was one of history’s most influential military leaders. Between 1795-1799, he proved his military genius and rose the ranks to become the ruler of France. This was no easy task, as France had been harmed by the preceding, corrupt Directory (previous government of France), and was still recovering from the French Revolution with King Louis XVI and the Reign of Terror. Not only was he able to quickly rise to power, but he advanced France, all the while maintaining the overall satisfaction of the citizens. He had incorporated multiple economic organizations to uplift his country’s past repercussions. Additionally, he incorporated several sociopolitical systems that would benefit the government and meet the needs of the people.