NFL Protests

850 Words2 Pages

When it comes to protesting in the uniforms of their team, players who kneel during the national anthem are unintendedly protesting against the flag’s etiquette and the deeper meanings of it. As stated previously, this can upset many, even if the protest was intended for another cause, like Black Lives Matter. This raises the question of whether or not the turf where these players kneel on is the right place to establish a protest, that is, if these players should protest for the national anthem, to gain the most ground while upsetting the least amount of people. To consider this, lets look at the impacts of what is known as the “Kaepernick Effect”. Ever since the protests began, there has been an increase in media attention of the NFL especially. …show more content…

hundreds of schools, from college sports to youth leagues, has demonstrated ways to protest the national anthem. Their protests have flourished conversation around the country from all backgrounds. But with this, kids “as young as 11 (years old) have received death threats” and even a youth football team “cut their season short because of backlash” (Gibbs 2016). These effects have very tragic countereffects that affect even the youth of America. If the NFL were to encourage youth football players to work harder and go out and play better football, these countereffects of these national anthem protests should be terminated and no longer endured. Therefore, if an NFL player were to protest for a wrongdoing of the country (i.e. Black Lives Matter, protesting Trump), they completely have the right to do so, but it should be done in a different setting. The setting of stating an argument is key to both getting an idea out and establishing peaceful protest. For example, all NFL players have access to be interviewed for the media, have access to write their own opinion on social media, and have access to write their own articles, books, etc. on their opinions, as protected by the First …show more content…

The First Amendment states that any form of protest that does not show a present violent action against the government is completely legal by any means, which includes the freedom of expression and freedom of religion shown by Kaepernick and other national anthem protesters. In more specific terms, law professor Howard Wasserman from Florida International University conducted a 2003 legal study concluding that “professional athlete silent protesting against anthems is one of several forms of “symbolic counter-speech” (Bomboy 2017). However, there are questionable actions that Kaepernick used that could or could not be “silent, peaceful protest”. For example, Kaepernick’s reason for kneeling during the national anthem was due to the fact that he was heavily involved with the Black Lives Matter movement. Other than kneeling, he was later seen wearing socks depicting pigs in police uniforms, which is clearly not peaceful to say the least. When it comes to kneeling during the national anthem, is it really peaceful for kneeling for a flag that not only disrespects those who fought for it but causes hateful outrage by the opponents of such protesters? It is due to such situations that western nations including Canada have imposed limits on “hate speech”, in other words, “speech that others find hateful” (Scaliger 2017). It should be a gradual process, but

Open Document