NAFTA

987 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nafta and international trade essay uni

N.A.F.T.A. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) took effect January 1, 1994. It is a trade agreement between all three of countries of North America, which are The United States, Canada, and Mexico. The Canadian Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney, the Mexican President, Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and former U.S. President George H. Bush spearheaded the agreement. Relationships between the countries were already on good terms, especially between The United States and Canada. Five years before NAFTA went into effect they signed the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement that eliminated all tariffs. It was only time before a more integrated agreement was put into effect for all of North America. The geographic location and the already established trade of goods and services made NAFTA a logical decision. Most trade agreements are created for the elimination of tariffs between the specified countries, but NAFTA is an exception. It covers market access, such as phasing out tariffs over a 15-year period and the rules of origin. The rule of origin states that goods and services must originate in one of the North American countries to receive access to the lower tariffs. NAFTA also covers trade rules, services, the removal of investment restrictions, and the protection of intellectual property like patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Lastly, a dispute settlement process was established, which is critical in solving problems between the countries before they cause serious problems. NAFTA also had special provisions embedded into the agreement to please the strongly opinionated labor unions and environmentalists. Former President Bill Clinton implemented two side-treaties, The North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperati... ... middle of paper ... ...o's trade with the European Union has dropped 3% over the course of seven years. The thought of losing national sovereignty is a major problem between the three countries, especially for Canada. Canada is already stuck exporting an abundance of energy to America when they could use it and now their clean water supply is on the trading block. At this pace NAFTA will create one super-country, rather than three separate entities. Future Since before NAFTA was even created, discussions about trade agreements among North, Central, and South America were on the table. The United States would like to pull them together to form a super trading enterprise call the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA). It would fall somewhere between a regular free trade agreement and the European Union. Negotiations are slow, but many remain hopeful that it can be accomplished.

Show More
Related

  • Canada Is Becoming Too Americanized

    933 Words  | 2 Pages

    It should be a great thing for the economies of both countries, but since the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed, American businesses almost took over the Canadian economy. When the American companies started to make more business in Canada, it brought more jobs and money to the country in the short-term. But as a long-term effect Canadians became even more depended on the U.S. as the American companies started dominating Canadian companies in Canada. Also, today Canadian manufacturers have little protection from the government when ch... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Wawa's Expansion into Canada

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ts and a very open relationship with one another. Having such a close relationship with Canada minimizes the risk of downfall Wawa could face in a different country.

    Read More

  • Understanding International Trade: Costs, Benefits, and Agreements

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    The article goes over the affects this deal has on some local Canadian industries. For example, the author explained that this deal will possibly increase the amount of imported foreign car parts and maybe even dairy products, which could mean a better selection as well as lower prices for consumers but also hurt some workers who operate locally in these businesses. Currently the absence of foreign products in the Canadian dairy market means that there is less selection for a higher price, but this also means that local farming communities can have stable incomes and can be

    Read More

  • Maquiladoras & NAFTA

    2053 Words  | 5 Pages

    In addition, Mexicans as well as US citizens will start to demand more accountability from the Mexican government and the Maquiladora industry. They need to be more responsible for their actions. What will the U.S. corporations do when human rights activists and environmentalists start lobbying and protesting on their US sites? Do they want to risk losing their shareholders to this type of negative attention?

    Read More

  • The Canada-U.S. Trade and Economic Relationship

    1583 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Canada-U.S. trade relationship is not static. Political and business strategies and practices change on both sides of the border, and events occur – such as "mad cow disease" – that are beyond almost everyone's control.

    Read More

  • Zapatista Movement in Mexcio

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    The goal of North American Free Trade agreement was to eliminate barriers of trade and investment between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The implementation of the agreement brought the immediate removal of tariffs on more than one-half of U.S. imports from Mexico and more than one-third of U.S. exports to Mexico. Within ten years of the implementation of the NAFTA agreement, all United States and Mexico tariffs would be gone. The only tariffs that would remain would be those that deal with U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico. However, these were to be slowly phased out within fifteen years of the initial implementation of the program. NAFTA also seeks to eliminate all non-tariff trade barriers.

    Read More

  • U.S-Mexico Borderlands

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    After three years of debate NAFTA was established in 1994. Fears concerning NAFTA included job creation, loss and transfer, wages and infrastructure. (Ganster/Lorey 188-189) However, with the implementation of NAFTA the economy grew. Ganster and Lorey reveal that bilateral trade increased by $211.4 per year from 1989 to 2004. Commerce grew by 20 percent in the first six months of 1994. There were advantages and disadvantages of NAFTA, nevertheless, NAFTA “intensified the integration of the two economies rather than distancing them.” (Ganster/Lorey 190)

    Read More

  • NAFTA: The North American Free Trade Agreement

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    Prior to NAFTA (Inc. April 2006), “… tariffs of thirty percent or higher on export goods to Mexico were common, as were long delays caused by paperwork…. NAFTA addressed this imbalance by phasing out tariffs over 15 years. Approximately 50 percent of the tariffs were abolished immediately when the agreement took effect, and the remaining tariffs were targeted for gradual elimination.” According to Kimberly Amadeo (2015), article 102 of the NAFTA agreement outlines its purposes which is to “Grant the signatories Most Favored Nation status, eliminate barriers to trade and facilitate the cross-border movement of goods and services, promote conditions of fair competition, increase investment opportunities, provide protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, create procedures for the resolution of trade disputes, and establish a framework for further, trilateral, regional, and multilateral cooperation to expand the trade agreement’s benefits.”. This quotation, condenses the agreement by stating that the intentions of NAFTA which was an agreement created to ease trade on imports and exports, by eliminating tariff barriers, in order to encourage competition and venture opportunities. Although, free trade is supposed to bring wealth, strength, and prosperity it should also

    Read More

  • The Failure of the North American Free Trade Agreement

    1348 Words  | 3 Pages

    In December of 1992, Presidents Salinas (Mexico), Bush (U.S.) and Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The Mexican legislature ratified NAFTA in 1993 and the treaty went into effect on January 1, 1994, creating the largest free-trade zone in the world.

    Read More

  • The Progressive Era

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Progressive Movement, government regulation of big business was a prominent theme. This theme was primarily shown in President Roosevelt’s idea of the ‘Square Deal.’ In 1904 he advocated this domestic reform program which called for government control of corporate abuses. The ‘Square Deal’ was his campaign slogan in the election of 1904. It basically meant that when big business abuses its power, the government will step in to make business equal on all sides, like a square. This ensured that business was fair for all. In 1902, Roosevelt put his idea into use during the United Mine Workers Strike when the workers wanted a raise, shorter hours and recognition of their union but their employers refused to give them what they wanted. Roosevelt called both sides to the White House and forced a compromise. The workers were given shorter hours and a raise but not recognition of their unions. In another instance, Roosevelt applied his plan when he passed the Elkins and Hepburn Acts in 1903 to give the Interstate Commerce Commission power to regulate railroads, prohibit better rates to ‘favorite’ customers, and allow the ICC to set ma...

    Read More

  • Negative Effects Of NAFTA

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first source is demonstrating the effect of the NAFTA which stands for North American Free Trade Agreement. The NAFTA is a political agreement between Canada, USA and Mexico, and the purpose of this agreement is to improve trading relations by decreasing trade barriers, by removing tariffs. The first source shows an image of a political cartoon. In this image there is a man with a sad expression on his face in front of a US factory, with a sign on the building saying “Labor Day: This year’s picnic will be held in Mexico, where your job went”. What the source is demonstrating is one of the negative effects of the NAFTA, which is job loss for Americans. The source shows this through symbolism and labelling: The sad man represents American

    Read More

  • NAFTA

    801 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1994, the most controversial alliance between nations took its affect. NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was the agreement to have free trade between Canada, United States and Mexico. According to the Institute for International Economics one million workers in 1995 would owe their jobs to U.S. exports to Mexico. Some 175,000 of those would be new jobs in higher paying sectors (Mohn 2007). Although it was suppose to drastically increase trade and create jobs, in many ways had the reverse affect. The environment took a backseat to the corporate greed. With the increase of trade, the pollution increased and the quality of goods decreased significantly. Our country lost more jobs than it gained. We have become increasingly dependent on other countries. The United States has sat by silently as the pollution from unregulated foreign low-wage manufacturing plants infiltrates our earth's rivers, air, and ground water. Our government has turned their heads on workers in other countries as well as our own, being exploited and forced to work in conditions not fit for and animal. NAFTA may have increased trade but at what cost? It looks like even the United States can be bought. The U. S. Government no longer controls our country, big business does.

    Read More

  • Canadian International Trade

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...be tempered by their desire to be a wealthy nation as well. Becoming a wealthy nation means becoming economically dependant on the US. Foreign ownership is on the rise in Canada, our vast natural resources up for grabs by the energy hungry US and there are less and less restrictions every day for trade within North America. NAFTA has created a good environment for Canada thrive, exports are increasing and we are exporting a safe amount, as not to deplete or decimate any one of our natural resources. Canada is in a good position. We have a small population, great resources and neighbours who have an insatiable need for our goods. Unfortunately this may mean giving up some of our Canadian identity, as if that hasn’t already happened. Yes, our import and exports are mainly to one country, the US, but why not be dependant on the most powerful nation on the planet, ever.

    Read More

  • Essay On NAFTA

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    The goal of NAFTA was to systematically eliminate most tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and investment between the countries. NAFTA has allowed U.S., Mexico, and Canada to import and export to other at a lower cost, which has increased the profit of goods and services annually. Because the increase in the trade marketplace, NAFTA reduces inflation, creates agreements on intern...

    Read More

  • Globalization: The European Union, the ASEAN Group, and NAFTA

    3413 Words  | 7 Pages

    Globalization has become one of the most influential forces in the twentieth century. International integration of world views, products, trade and ideas has caused a variety of states to blur the lines of their borders and be open to an international perspective. The merger of the Europeans Union, the ASEAN group in the Pacific and NAFTA in North America is reflective of the notion of globalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement was the largest free trade zone in the world at its conception and set an example for the future of liberalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement is coming into it's twentieth anniversary on January 1st, 2014. 1 NAFTA not only sought to enhance the trade of goods and services across the borders of Canada, US and Mexico but it fostered shared interest in investment, transportation, communication, border relations, as well as environmental and labour issues. The North American Free Trade Agreement was groundbreaking because it included Mexico in the arrangement.2 Mexico was a much poorer, culturally different and protective country in comparison to the likes of Canada and the United States. Many members of the U.S Congress were against the agreement because they did not want to enter into an agreement with a country that had an authoritarian regime, human rights violations and a flawed electoral system.3 Both Canadians and Americans alike, feared that Mexico's lower wages and lax human rights laws would generate massive job losses in their respected economies. Issues of sovereignty came into play throughout discussions of the North American Free Trade Agreement in Canada. Many found issue with the fact that bureaucrats and politicians from alien countries would be making deci...

    Read More

More about NAFTA

Open Document