My Three Philosophies Of Life

865 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why is it important to have integrity

I have no single philosophy for life, but rather three philosophies. Each of which has different meaning. My three philosophies include the following: work hard, take pride in myself and the accomplishments that I make, and everyone is on this planet for a reason. In the following paragraphs I will explain each of my three philosophies. From this, I hope that others will understand why I look at life the way that I do.
The first of my three philosophies, to work hard, can be easily explained. I feel that if money or a gift given to me by another person because I earned the reward is much more valued. In other words, knowing that I worked hard, did a good job, and deserve a reward makes me feel good inside. I also feel that all persons should have to work and support themselves. If a person does not wish to put forth any effort and work hard to support themselves, …show more content…

I hope that people will look at life the same way I do. I also want readers to understand my interpretation of life. If everyone would look at each other and realize the importance of our lives there would most likely be fewer wars and less hate in the world.
To Henry David Thoreau, the society’s preoccupation with money and wealth seems to be foolish in that they are transient and they costs humanity. Hence, he recommends a life excluding all superfluities. Owning more than the indispensable only distracts a person from seeing the very truth of life. He asks people to establish a goal of life rather than just chasing money. He urges people to “discover that they did not live.”
Thoreau clearly states what he desires in life: “Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth.” Many hesitate to try new things because those are not commonly known. However, Thoreau asks to try those one has imagined. Though it is said by others that it is impossible, Thoreau asserts that what one thinks of himself as is what he actually can

Show More
Related

  • Morality In Thoreau's Walden

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the modern world, people posses more than what they can actually keep tract of physically and mentally. Everyone wants to live the “good life” where they can have no limits to the things they want. Whether it is clothes, cars, jewelry, or houses, the need to buy things that are affordable and are in style preoccupies the minds of many people. The argument for necessity goes against this way of modern living, but agrees with Thoreau's view on it. The argument is that people should have enough of each just ...

    Read More

  • Henry Thoreau vs. Chris McCandless

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both Thoreau and McCandless were against materialism. Thoreau feels that “Most of the luxuries and many of the so-called comforts of life are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind” (Thoreau, Walden 28). He thinks that dependance of worldly possessions hidera ones chance of finding their true self. McCandless had a similar mentality, and acted upon that belief. An example of this is when “…he saw the flash flood as an opportunity to shed unnecessary baggage. He concealed the car as best he could beneath a brown tarp, stripped it of its Virginia plates, and hid them” (Krakauer 29). McCandless was not tied to his own possessions, he was happy to leave them in the middle of no where. Through reduction of worldly possessions and materials, the message that both McCandless and Thoreau throw at the readers is to have a simplistic life without the concerns coming from worldly possessions. These possessions deter one from the true meaning of life.

    Read More

  • Truth in Into The Wild by John Krakauer and The allegory of the Cave by Plato

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    To Thoreau, life’s progress has halted. It seems people have confused progression with captivity driven by materialism. To Krakaeur, people are indifferent to pursing the sublime in nature. To Christopher McCandles the world around him is forgetting the purpose of life. People are blind to nature. In the eyes of these men the world is victim to commercial imprisonment. People live to achieve statuses that only exist because man made them. Fame, money, and monotonous relationships do not exist in nature; they are the pursuits of soulless fundamentalism. The truth is that people pursue meaningless goals, and people don’t want to hear or know how they are foolish. When exposed, reality is so unsettling that it seems wrong. Yet, to be free of the falseness in life is in essence the point of singularity that people realize if there is no truth in love then it is false, if there is no truth in money then it is worthless, if there is no truth in fame then it is undeserving. Without truth everything is a worthless pursuit of a meaningless glass ceiling.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Chris Mccandless

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thoreau conveys many points in his writing and a large recurring one is the state of society. As stated before, he believed that people are too focused on physical gain and modernization which leads them into desperation. He adds on to this belief later in the book asking that above all else whether it be money or fame he be given honesty (Thoreau 246). To Thoreau, the truth is more important than anything measurable in status. Thoreau believes that a minimalist lifestyle is a good lifestyle, similar to Mccandless. He speaks of how it is good that he can put all of his belonging in one pile in his yard because it removes the clutter from his life (Thoreau 85). He also says that his best quality in life is to want very little, because it keeps himself true to himself and keeps him from distraction. Thoreau also believes that every man should be one in himself not oppressed by the government. He says that everyone should be able to be themselves whether is is in accord with the government or not (Thoreau 240). He is essentially saying that the government should not be a part of people's life decisions only to maintain the

    Read More

  • Cyranos De Bergerac Wealth

    1127 Words  | 3 Pages

    A well-known expression is that money can’t buy happiness, yet people fantasize of winning the lottery, living in their dream house, and possessing enough tangible objects to feel satisfied with their lives. Most are under the preconceived notion that the absence of wealth and power translates to hardship and despair. This, however, is not the case, because a self-effacing lifestyle is not an indication of a lower quality of life, and often is better than one of great fortune. People yearn to have the financial independence and capabilities of those in higher ranking positions, and are willing to abandon their morals and own personal well-being if it means being successful. It seems that by reaching a level of wealth in which money is no longer

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and Walden

    1527 Words  | 4 Pages

    To conclude, Thoreau believed that people should be ruled by conscience and that people should fight against injustice through non-violence according to “Civil Disobedience.” Besides, he believed that we should simplify our lives and take some time to learn our essence in the nature. Moreover, he deemed that tradition and money were unimportant as he demonstrated in his book, Walden. I suggested that people should learn from Thoreau to live deliberately and spend more time to go to the nature instead of watching television, playing computer games, and among other things, such that we could discover who we were and be endeavored to build foundations on our dreams.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience In Thoreau's Occupy Wall Street Movement

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    He didn 't believe that the world should stop work and live off the land, on the contrary, he believed, “The human dignity, wild life force and freedom were preserved within such a working process. Thoreau believed that labor was not only the activity that could bring material profits, but also a play which make man complete and developed simultaneously” (Ma 384). Thoreau 's work was experiencing nature and living transcendentally in order to share the quality of life that nature provides. We see Thoreau in many aspects of today 's society whether it 's Lisa from The Simpsons, a means of transportation, or political protests, they all follow a Thoreauvian idea of looking at the bigger picture and seeing what really matters. This way of thinking was created because one man decided that society was too mainstream and he moved off to the edge of town and reflected; people these days that do that are referred to as “hipsters” but the influence had to come from somewhere, and that was Henry David Thoreau. A closer reading of Thoreau 's works can put a new perspective on a common thing and provide a new outlook on life. Thoreau was not one to preach rather do something about it, not for the money or the fame but because of his “love of life— reverence for all the life in the

    Read More

  • Thoreau Tells Us To Cultivate Poverty Analysis

    639 Words  | 2 Pages

    When Thoreau tells us to "cultivate poverty" (25), he is telling us to enjoy what we have, even if it may not be much. When you are unconcerned with material things like clothes, you open yourself to new ways of experiencing life, past the physical elements. When he talks about new friends, I think he is expressing how as humans we have the tendency to act differently to impress new people. This concern for the opinion of others needs to be shed to get to the most important parts of life. Henry David Thoreau stressed the importance of living simply and using your human abilities to get the sustenance, whether spiritual or physical, that you need to survive.

    Read More

  • Liberation, Reductionism, and Preferential Option

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, humankind is blessed with life as God created it. One must reflect on their actions throughout life because one will be judged by God in the next life, one must see the importance of gasping liberation, and one must have a loving and open heart when helping the poor. Life should be lived to its fullest because once time is lost, it cannot be regained; life needs to be appreciated.

    Read More

  • Exploring Frontiers of Thought in Walden

    1144 Words  | 3 Pages

    One way that Thoreau urges his readers to find their true selves is making one's self the most important aspect of one's life.  He does this by disregarding public opinion in favor of private opinion.  He says, "Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion.  What a man thinks of himself that it is which determines, or rather indicates his fate (110)."  In other words, soci...

    Read More

  • It Is The Preoccupation With Abust, By Karl Hobbes

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    From his insights, private property is a result of alienation of labor. Furthermore, the property they produced becomes the origin of future alienation. With alienation, the brain, capability, and even characters of a person become commodities that can be sold in the market. Marx claimed that capitalist hence deprived the personality of labors, though they seem to be well off. (Kolakowski, pp. 138-140) Numerous of pilgrims believe the nature, where there is no need for possessions or avarices, offers a free space for human. They escaped the capitalist society alone where alienation would no longer take place since property rights and division of labor disappear. Thoreau is probably the most famous pilgrim who built a cabin near the Walden Pond. He once stated that “Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. Money is not required to buy one necessity of the soul.” Commodities that can be possessed by paying money are inferior to the commodities for soul. Inspired by Thoreau, Chris is also sees money and possessions as superfluous. He castigated the corruption of politicians, burnt money to ashes after donating most of them to charity, and admired the nature in a post card saying that “The freedom and simple beauty of it is just too good to pass up.”(Krakauer, p29, p34, p123) Chris described civilization as poisonous, therefore he needed to flee from it. “No phone, no pool, no pets, no

    Read More

  • Simplicity and Freedom in Walden by Henry David Thoreau

    962 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thoreau craves the unsophisticated way of life. He agrees that too much stuff does not make life simpler, but more congested.

    Read More

  • Shaping Nursing Practice: A Personal Philosophy

    1971 Words  | 4 Pages

    In its simplest form, my philosophy is this: Each of our experiences shape the way that we perceive the world around

    Read More

  • Analysis Of 'Why I Went To The Woods' By Henry David Thoreau

    1404 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main element of “Why I Went to the Woods” is nature and to live without distractions. In order for Thoreau to be able to do this, he went into the woods to be one with nature to make sure he was not missing what was really important. Thoreau presents his point by stating, “I wanted to live deep and suck out the marrow of life, to live so sturdily” (Thoreau 579). Thoreau wanted to live deep within nature, to take in all nature has to offer, and to get a deeper understanding of his own life. We all have an opportunity to have the same tranquility as Thoreau. Nature is one of the greatest gifts that is given to us freely. We could all have a deeper fulfillment by consuming the same peacefulness in our own mind and souls that Thoreau had. The society we live in today is complex and very dependent, opposite of the life that Thoreau had wanted to live. You do not need to have material items to have a fulfilled life, but a fulfilled spirit. We as a society have become greedy and selfish

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Transcendentalism: Impact Beyond Literature

    1456 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau was a renowned American essayist, poet, and philosopher. He was a simple man who built his life around basic truths (Manzari 1). Ralph Waldo Emerson deeply impacted Thoreau’s viewpoints and philosophies, specifically by introducing him to the Transcendentalists movement. There seems to be no single ideology or set of ideas that entirely characterized Thoreau’s thoughts, but principles encompassing Transcendentalism come closest (Harding and Meyer 122). Spending time in nature and in solitude gave Thoreau an entirely new perspective on life. In fact, his doctrines regarding nature and the impact of the individual on society have transformed realms of political, social and literary history. Politically and socially, Thoreau’s

    Read More

More about My Three Philosophies Of Life

Open Document