Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The period of the cold war
The period of the cold war
Cold war impact on american politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the story, Democrats and Communists Senator Joseph McCarthy discusses how the communists are ruining the nation. The majority of the state department at this time was filled with communists which McCarthy did not think was right. He considered the state department to be an extremely important department and thought that the communists were infesting it and making our nation have tratorous like actions. The reason America was losing the cold war was due to the Truman administration being swarmed with communists. McCarthy claimed to know 205 of the communists and the ones who questioned his methods were the ones whom were the subject of attacks as well as smear campaigns. Then, in 1950 Millard Tydings dismissed McCarthy’s charges and considered …show more content…
them to be “fraud and a hoax”. Then, in the story, I Cannot and Will Not Cut My Conscience to Fit This Year’s Fashions was based on a letter written by Lillian Hellman.
It was a letter to The House Committee on Un-American Activities also known as HUAC because of their hearings they were holding on communist activity in Hollywood and in 1951 Lillian was summoned to testify. In Lillian’s letter to the HUAC she discussed that she was more than willing to answer all of the questions about herself, “I have nothing to hide from your committee and there is nothing in my life of which I am ashamed”. It was said that under the Fifth Amendment she was able to decline to answer any questions regarding her political opinions. However; she did not want that privilege. She wanted to testify regardless of the risks and consequences she said knowing that previously ten movie writers and directors were sent to prison because they refused to answer the questions. The downfall to her answering the questions about herself was that that meant she would be forced to answer any questions that could potentially be asked about others as well. This is where Lillian drew the line. In the letter she wrote, “...I am not willing, now or in the future, to bring bad trouble to people who, in my past association with them, were completely innocent of any talk or any action that was disloyal or subversive”. She did not want to answer questions about others and bring trouble upon them she considered that to be
indecent. The two stories are similar because the reason for trouble in both stories is due to the communists. In the story, Democrats and Communists the trouble is brought by the communists supposedly being the reason that the Americans were losing the Cold War. While in I Cannot and Will Not Cut My Conscience to Fit This Year’s Fashions it was due to communist activity and peoples views on communists. In both of the stories people were punished. In Democrats and Communists they were punished by getting attacked and smear campaigns. Then, in I Cannot and Will Not Cut My Conscience to Fit This Year’s Fashions people were punished by being sent to prison for either not answering the questions about their political views. They both related the communists to being bad. The difference between the two stories is that Democrats and Communists was McCarthy talking about the communists and the ways they are negatively affecting America. While I Cannot and Will Not Cut My Conscience to Fit This Year’s Fashions was the latter that was written by one of the people who were summoned to testify. So, one was someone who was a Senator against communists and the other was a playwright and screenwriter who got chosen from a committee.
Killing Lincoln Book Review The mystery of how John Wilkes Booth pulled off the most influential and notorious assassination in history is revealed in Killing Lincoln. The author of this book, Bill O’Reilly, built up the plot of the story through vivid historical details and pieced them together like a thriller. He tries to explain all of what happened on one of the most interesting and sad days in American history. Many conspiracies and Civil War ideals are on full display in the book. I agree with most of O’Reilly’s ideas, but there are some that I am not really sure about because of his point of view, like many of the conspiracy theories.
To get a clear view and understanding of the book, first must review the time period in history. The book was written in the mid 1950's during the cold war. Former General McCarthy, then U.S. Senator started a fire ball of suspicion, suppression, and incarceration. This had a very huge impact on the entrainment industry, which included everyone from playwrights to filmmakers, as well as writers and actors. If anyone in that time period was suspected of being a communist, the government could come and pull them out of their home. At the least a suspected communist would be banned, or put on a black ball list. Printed in the Times, McCarthy's First Slander, "Overnight, his speech sparked a media firestorm that played to the basest fears of Americans swept up in a frightening cold war and triggered loyalty oaths, blacklists and personal betrayals that cost an estimated 10,000 Americans their jobs and some shattered innocents their lives." (Johanna McGeary 28) This happened to a number of actors and film makers during that time period. The black ball list was a list of names of people who were believed to be communist. The people on this list came from the movie industry as well as writers. These people would no longer be able to get work ...
“excuse me but lady liberty needs glasses / and so does mrs justice by her side” (Lines 1-2). “Liberty Needs Glasses” written by Tupac Shakur is a poem he wrote criticizing the way the justice system and the liberty this country has presented over the years. Both Lady Liberty and Mrs. Justice always seem to look right over injustices and infringements on liberty in America. Rather than giving justice to everyone Lady Liberty and Mrs. Justice pick and choose who gets justice. Shakur stresses the imperfections of justice and liberty as well as the flaws with both. As well as for a country that values liberty and justice, America should open its eyes and see what is truly going on. Nevertheless, needing glasses to be able to function the way they are supposed to. Furthermore, the structure Shakur uses are the free verse style. A free verse being a literary device that does not have any rules. However, it can be defined as poetry that is free from limitations of regular meter or rhythm and does not rhyme with fixed forms. He uses this style to create metaphors and similes to connect to the prejudice in
Prior to Senator Smith’s speech, Senator Joe McCarthy had forced himself into the public eye after accusing multiple people in the State Department as communists in a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia . Even though she had concerns about communists, Smith became weary of McCarthy’s accusations after he ignored her requests for evidence that proved these people were communists. Initially, Smith hesitated to speak, as she was just a freshman Senator at the time. Senator Smith explained the tradition of the Senate, as “freshman Senators were to be seen and not heard.” However, she became increasingly frustrated with the Wisconsin Senator, a...
If a person of authority ordered you inflict a 15 to 400 volt electrical shock on another innocent human being, would you follow your direct orders? That is the question that Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University tested in the 1960’s. Most people would answer “no,” to imposing pain on innocent human beings but Milgram wanted to go further with his study. Writing and Reading across the Curriculum holds a shortened edition of Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” where he displays an eye-opening experiment that tests the true obedience of people under authority figures. He observes that most people go against their natural instinct to never harm innocent humans and obey the extreme and dangerous instructions of authority figures. Milgram is well aware of his audience and organization throughout his article, uses quotes directly from his experiment and connects his research with a real world example to make his article as effective as possible.
Thirteen days is a historical account of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It is told from the perspective of Robert F. Kennedy, senator and brother to President John F. Kennedy. It is an account of the thirteen days in October of 1962. It lasted from the 16th to the 28th. During this time many crucial events in United States.
In the book Night by Elie Wiesel, humanity is a theme seen throughout. Humanity can be defined in many ways. It can be the disposition to do good, or it can be the human race. In the Night, the theme of humanity is the disposition to do good. In the book, Elie loses and finds his humanity. At the end, he holds on to his humanity, but loses some of it after events like his father’s death. Elie succeeds in retaining his humanity because he holds on to his father, he feels sympathy for people at the camps, and he keeps faith. Elie retains his humanity in the end even though he loses it in the middle of the book.
Within this controversial topic, two authors provide their sides of the story to whom is to blame and/or responsible for the “Cold War.” Authors Arnold A. Offner and John Lewis Gaddis duck it out in this controversial situation as each individual lead the readers to believe a certain aspect by divulging certain persuading information. However, although both sides have given historical data as substance for their claim, it is nothing more than a single sided personal perception of that particular piece of information; thus, leaving much room for interpretations by the reader/s. Finding the ...
task of speaking to secure her own freedom when she was placed on trial for obstructing the draft in 1917. The country was awash in patriotism, and she was prosecuted as an enemy of the state. When preparing her speech, she realized that a seated jury would be a microcosm of the country's national spirit. Jurors may have had children or loved ones committed or lost to the Great War. Her position, though heartfelt and eloquently expressed, with an attempt to express her own patriotism, was subversive and threatening to the population.
Without Conscience: Book Report Psychopaths all have something in common, and that's luring unexpected people in their traps. Its part of human nature to wonder and question the unknown. Psychopaths are a clear example of the unknown with their personalities and behaviors that are far from the norm on a continuum. We wonder what makes them do some of the unimaginable and horrific things to people and/or animals.
McCarthy was elected senate after becoming a lawyer in his sate of Wisconsin. During the first few years of his term nothing major really happened until 1950. In a speech to the Women’s club of wheeling in West Virginia he stated that he had a list in his hand of about 205 known members of the communist party working for the United States department. President Harry Truman had signed an executive order that said that all communists or fascists could not obtain a United States government job. The FBI played a big role in the investigation of this list McCarthy contained. McCarthy’s friend j. Edgar Hoover, which was a violent ant-communist in the federal government, could not wait to expose the people McCarthy accused of being communists. McCarthy’s list created a nationwide scar among the people of the United States. Everything McCarthy said was a lie and he had no evidence to show that the people he accused were really communist but, because of the start of the Korean War and the arrest of two American soldiers accused of spying on the Soviet Union American citizen...
Since the 1950s, most Americans have condemned the McCarthyite witch-hunts and show trials. By large majorities, Americans oppose firing communists from their jobs or banning communist speakers or books.[2] But over the past several years, increasing numbers of historians, writers and intellectuals have sought to minimize, explain away and justify McCarthyism. A spate of books and articles touting new historical evidence has tried to demonstrate that communism posed a real danger to American society in the 1940s and 1950s. They argue that even if some innocent people suffered and McCarthy was reckless, he was responding to a real threat.[3] As a result, Joe McCarthy doesn't look so irresponsible in hindsight.
being a Communist, with the only source being a report on how his father reads a Serbian newspaper. (Clooney) Without genuine evidence from a credible source, an argument is as good as a blatant claim. McCarthy’s “evidence” is in fact unsubstantiated in itself. Therefore, his accusations contain no basis, and lack the foundation needed to provide solid and subs...
For the duration of the 1950's America was absorbed with the fear of the Communists taking control of the country. Joseph McCarthy, a Republican Senator from Wisconsin, heightened the fears many Americans already possessed. McCarthy had a deep hatred for communists, so he devised a plan to make American’s hate communists as much as him, and also had hopes that it would get himself re-elected. McCarthy gave a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia where he held up a piece of paper announcing, "I have here a list of 57 known Communists who are currently employed by the U.S. State Department." Shortly after his speech, McCarthy changed the number of communists in the U.S. State Department from 57 to 205. America had felt safe and at peace from the communists. Now; however, they felt uneasy and panicked at the thought of communists working in their own government. Americans started to demand the names of these people listed on McCarthy's "Blacklist." Congress then started attempting to seek out the people on McCarthy’s list. A particular group that was closely examined was the actors and actresses in Hollywood that McCarthy declared to be communists. Joseph McCarthy used and abused his power of being a senator. In doing so, he created chaos and destruction in the lives of many people, and in most of America.
Night is a memoir written by Elie Wiesel, a young Jewish boy, who tells of his experiences during the Holocaust. Elie is a deeply religious boy whose favorite activities are studying the Talmud and spending time at the Temple with his spiritual mentor, Moshe the Beadle. At an early age, Elie has a naive, yet strong faith in God. But this faith is tested when the Nazi's moves him from his small town.