Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The psychology behind serial killers pdf
The psychology behind serial killers pdf
Core concepts of rational choice theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The psychology behind serial killers pdf
The index crime I have chosen for this paper is murder. The theory I believe that best defines why people commit murder is the rational choice theory. The rational choice theory implies that people who commit this offense know that killing is wrong and that a punishment may follow if they are caught. They are fully aware of what they are doing and they deliberately plan and successfully murders someone. A perfect example of this theory is a serial killer, especially those that kill for the excitement of it.
In regards to most murder cases, a person usually kills while in a state of anger or to get revenge on another. Examples include an angry spouse who has just caught their partner cheating, a teenager acting out because they feel they
have been labeled as an outcast amongst their peers, or a person who was recently fired from a job. On the other hand, some people commit murder because of gang violence, and others do it for the thrill. Regardless of why they kill, they are aware all aware that what they did was wrong. The Death Penalty Information center (DPIC) provides statistics of murder from all of the states. The center reports that in 2014, the murder rates in North Carolina were 5.1 per 100,000. Nationwide North Carolina ranks number sixteen out of all of the states in reference to murder. South Carolina’s ranks higher in murder rates than North Carolina. According to the DPIC, South Carolina’s murder rate is 6.4 per 100,000 citizens. In reference to murder rates Nationwide, South Carolina is number 4. Although murder is a serious and heinous crime, it is important to remember that there are some cases in which people have to kill another person in order to save the life of either themselves or their loved ones. None the less, it is still considered to be murder. The textbooks definition of murder is the willful and non-negligent killing of one human being by another (Vito, 2007). A perfectly, fitting description that encompasses all that kill. The personality theory is one that is poorly written in reference to helping understanding murder. The personality theory is a division of psychology which seeks to develop a scientifically defensible view of human nature (Free Dictionary, 2003). Basically, the theory implies that crime can be prophesied by detecting the characteristics of the way people behave. If this theory was actually implemented by the justice system there would be a lot of people who would be accused or incarcerated for a crime based off of their behavior.
Murder at the Margin is a murder mystery involving various economic concepts. The story takes place in Cinnamon Bay Plantation on the Virgin Island of St. John. It is about Professor Henry Spearman, an economist from Harvard. Spearman organizes an investigation of his own using economic laws to solve the case.
Imagine yourself going out to a neighborhood party trying to relax after a stressful week. You might want to socialize, drink, or watch television. Now try to think about the penalties that can occur when the party gets out of control such as loud outbursts, fighting, and physical behavior. Depending on the setting of the party, there could be a possible chance of violence happening. In this case, the violent actions can result to homicides, shootings, and suicides. Homicides can vary based on age, gender, race, and methods of killing the victim. Shootings are quick reactions to dealing with victim. Suicides result to choosing to kill one’s life. Overall, there are different reasons to why individuals feel the need to kill someone else. It
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
There is a common knowledge that capital punishment would prevent people from committing crime. But until now, there has not been any actual statistics or scientific researches that prove the relationship between the capital punishment and the rate of crimes. According to Jack Weil, “criminals, who believe that their chances of going to jail are slight, will in all probability also assume that their chances of being executed are equally slight. Their attitude that crime pays will in no way be altered” (3). Most people commit a crime when they are affected by the influence of drugs, alcohol or even overwhelmed emotions, so they cannot think logically about they would pay back by their lives. Also, when criminal plan to do their crime, they prepare and expect to escape instead of being caught. Some people believe that the threat of severe punishment could bring the crime rates down and that capital punishment is the ultimate crime deterrent. However, in fact, the rate of ...
Crime causation is looking at why people commit crimes. There are many theories that have been developed to explain this. The theories can be grouped into eight general categories of which one is the Classical theory (Schmallegar, 2011, p. 79). A subset of this theory, rational choice theory, will be specifically looked at to explain the crime of burglary. Just as no one causation theory explains all crimes committed, the rational choice theory itself does not completely explain why all burglars commit their crimes. Therefore, the pros and cons of the rational choice theory will be discussed in relation to the crime topic of burglary.
The rational choice theory comes from the classical theory which is based off of personal choice towards criminal behavior. Criminal behavior under the rational choice theory has been due to the free thinking of society and has always been because of a specific thought process of personal vendettas. For example, a jealous person may feel the need to do something physically illegal like punching another person in the face because the benefit of gratitude is worth the risk of consequence. The example above is part of the rational choice theory and the reason is because that particular person weighed the costs and benefits of their illegal action. Rational choice theory is a vision where crime is a functionality of the decision-making process of the criminal in which they weigh the costs and benefits of an illegal act in society (Siegel, 2011).
People are uniquely different and because of this reason, they do have different behaviors. Crime is one kind of behavior that an individual can engage in. They are punishable by the law and may be prosecuted by the state (Helfgott, 2008). There are different theories existing that try to explain the actions of criminals. They deeply explain what causes an individual to commit a criminal activity. This paper discusses some examples of the biological theories, social theories and psychological theories of crime.
What drives an individual to kill another human being? This complex question has no single answer. One might say out of greed, anger, revenge, a domestic dispute taken too far, or even through self-defense. Generally, these reasons can represent the underlying motive behind most killings; however, what about the motives of serial killers? Scholars have often debated what truly makes a serial killer. Several theories have been proposed by criminologists to explain the origin of a serial killer. These include popular theories such as the labeling theory, social structure theory, strain theory, differential association theory, or learning theory. This paper will analyze the violent phenomena of serial killing through the social control theory.
Crime exists everywhere. It is exists in our country, in the big cities, the small towns, schools, and even in homes. Crime is defined as “any action that is a violation of law”. These violations may be pending, but in order to at least lower the crime rate, an understanding of why the crimes are committed must first be sought. There are many theories that are able to explain crimes, but three very important ones are rational choice theory, social disorganization theory and strain theory.
In this case, an interest in the broad deterrent effectiveness of these measures is an interest in their crime preventive effectiveness by whatever means prevention is achieved. Accordingly, a person contemplating the commission of a crime would undertake a cost-benefit analysis and would execute the criminal plan only if potential benefits sufficiently outweighed expected costs. In addition to theorists, courts have adopted the rational actor model as a justification for the imposition of certain penalties, specifically the death penalty for the crime of murder.
Murder - it’s violent, malicious, and it’s perpetrated by individuals with a large bone structure, large muscles and a naturally athletic physique. Can this be an accurate statement? Murder is the act of unlawfully and deliberately killing someone. It is considered a serious offence in Canada. One biological criminological theory could explain this heinous crime. It may be possible to draw a connection between the aggressive personality of some men and the crime of murder. The theory of somatotyping suggests large aggressive men may be more apt to commit murder.
A good law should be clear so both the judge and jury can apply it in
I have spent the last four and one half years working in the criminal justice system as a county jailer, jail deputy and currently a police officer. Throughout my short career in law enforcement I had had a front row seat to what many industry insiders call, “The greatest show on earth.” In this class and during my undergraduate years I have studied many theories on why people commit crimes, and all theories have valid points on why people commit crime.
I have chosen the case study number 3. Through this case study, I have chosen the “Psychological Theory” as a theory that can explain the criminal case through articles that I have been chosen.
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.