Muhammad's First Revelation: Historical Analysis

250 Words1 Page

The information provided in the Evidence of the Past regarding Muhammad's First Revelation is more than likely extremely, unintentionally distorted. This document was composed by someone who compiled four plus generation old verbal accounts from descendants of Muhammad's associates. The document would more likely to be accurate if it were documented and written by Muhammad (primary source) or his associates (secondary source) as it occurred. The main points are likely accurate consisting of who, what, when, and where. However, the finer details were likely embellished, forgotten, or muddled causing the story to change from fact to fiction over the four to five generations of verbal accounts.



Verbal accounts of historical events have been disproven many times through scientific investigation. However, some have been reinforced as well with archaeological findings to back up verbal accounts. Unfortunately the credibleness and plausibility of verbal accounts have suffered leading to conflicts and disagreements over facts, both in the past and present day. …show more content…

The Bible was written by many people, but several being Jesus' disciples. One issue that has taken place is loss in translation. The Bible was not written in English - King James Version! It has been translated from many languages and versions leading to an inherent loss of fact. However, it is more accurate than Muhammad's biography written over a century after his death based on verbal

More about Muhammad's First Revelation: Historical Analysis

Open Document