Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Female gender roles in literature
The role of gender in fiction
Female gender roles in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Set in Boston in the late 1930’s Mrs. Marroner, a woman of high class, is lying on her bed crying. She has just found out that her husband has cheated on her with the maid they took in. Both Mr and Mrs Marroner had loved the young servant from Sweden so it was a great betrayal when Mrs Maaroner found out what her husband had done. Though at first she blamed Gerta, the young maid, she soon ‘turned’ her perspective and saw Gerta as the victim. Her husband, arrived home from an overseas trip finds the house that they had lived together in empty. Wanting to know what happened to his wife he hired private investigators to search for her. When he finds her she has gone back to her job at the university and is taking care of Gerta and the baby she …show more content…
carried. The story ends with Mrs. Marroner asking her former husband, ‘What do you have to say to us?’ I was pleased with the way the woman stood up for themselves and how they treated the concept of infidelity in this text.
When Mrs. Marroner first finds out that she has been cheated on she blames the women, Gerta, for this fact. This is a common thing in our society as you see in movies and books, the women who have been cheated on often blame the ‘other women’ because they can’t possibly believe that their husband or boyfriend that they love could betray them in that way. This concept of women blaming women in our society is quite harmful as it gives the men who cheat all the power in the situation and gives them a ‘free pass’ to do it again as they didn’t get called out on their mistakes. But this situation changes quite rapidly in the short story. Instead of blaming Gerta, Mrs Marroner quickly changes her mindset and realises that Gerta is the victim in her situation. Because Greta is from Sweden and doesn’t understand the consequences of Mr Marroner actions but, “He knew. He understood. He could fully foresee and measure the consequences of this act.” I think that this is one of the strongest ideas in the text as Mrs. Marroner changes her mindset and realised that the man who did this is to blame. We can all …show more content…
learn from this change as i think it would help us as a society to become more equal if we raise our voices and act, like Mrs Marroner did, by moving out and cutting all ties to her husband. If we do not we are just telling the cheaters that it is okay to betray someone's trust in you and not punishing them for their actions.
Both Gerta and Mrs Marroner change their mindset and realise that what Mr Marroner did to them was unforgivable. They realise that they are stronger when they help to lift each other up and teach each other. They become a team and raise the baby together. When Mr Marroner tries to reach out to them at the end of the story Mrs Marroner says, “What do you have to say to us?” The author of the text uses a plural at the end of the story to say that they have banded together and nothing he can say or do anymore will harm them. The plural can also mean all women. What can the man who have lied and cheated on us possibly say to reconcile the fact? We are seeing more and more in Tv shows and movies that women are changing their mindsets and standing up for each other. In the 19th century men in society had all the power and the women were forced to turn on each other in order to survive. The lower class were forced to do everything the upper class wanted and, much like Gerta, were either pressured or forced to have sexual relations with men. Some men gave promises of moving up the social ladder or making a better life for the
woman and the child she would eventually bear. Nowadays women are taking back the power and demanding respect. Women in the 19th century did not have the power to divorce their husbands and could not stand up for themselves. Mrs Marroner was ahead of her time and because of her job in the university and that meant that she could leave her husband as she had another income that she could fall back on. Today to be able to survive in this economy middle class spouse have to have two jobs. This makes it easier for women to leave a toxic relationship like the Marroner’s and forge a path on their own. Mr Marroner, though a product of his time, still made bad decisions and decided to betray the trust both Gerta and Mrs Marroner had put in him and for this reason, Mrs Marroner standing up for herself and leaving her husband, was a strong and smart idea. As a female I was sympathetic to the plight of Mrs Marroner and how the men took advantage of her. Growing up in the middle class I strive to become more successful in everything I do and to see a strong, well educated women in the 19th century choosing her career and other women over her cheating husband is a much needed break from the countless books we have with women who lose all their character traits after they find a man. Mrs Marroner is a good influence for young women everywhere as she shows women that even in a bad situation you can still strive to overcome and progress in your life and society. Though I was concerned about Mrs and Mr Marroner’s treatment of Gerta. Throughout the entire short story Gerta has three lines. These are all answering a direct question or pleading such as when she says, “No ma’am no, please don’t make me.” Gerta is from the lower class and comes from a country where the primary language isn’t english. Their customs and social ideas are different and yet Mr and Mrs Marroner both take advantage of her. Admittedly Mrs Marroner tries to do the right thing for Gerta by taking her away and not throwing her out of her household, but she still doesn’t give Gerta a choice in the matter. At the end of the story she doesn’t have a final scathing word to say to the man who would have ruined her life. Instead Mrs Marroner says the collective us. She is still assuming what Gerta would say and taking advantage of her “quiet nature.” Mr Marroner on the other hand blatantly takes advantage of her by sleeping with her and then only giving her $50 American dollars to help towards the child. He even says in his letter, “if you have to go make sure that you leave an address” which makes it sound like he wants her to leave so he doesn’t have to deal the repercussions of her actions. At the end of the story he even mentions that he had forgotten all about Gerta. This mindset has remnants in our society today as we see men assaulting women and never having to face consequences, in fact in some circles we almost seem to reward it such as Donald Trump, who hasn’t denied the nineteen ongoing sexual harassment claims against him and the video evidence that he can’t dispute. Yet this man who has violated laws and disrespected women is still the president of the United States. What has changed though is the women speaking out about their experiences and helping to change our world for the better with things such as the METOO and TimesUp protests. I think social media is helping this as the middle and lower classes have platforms to speak up on such as Twitter where they can show others that the men and women in power have done things wrong and what we can do about it. Like Mrs Marroner, women in society often try to help others but sometimes to not take into account their cultures or thoughts and they efforts often end up being just as harmful as the men’s actions against them are.
Janie's outlook on life stems from the system of beliefs that her grandmother, Nanny instills in her during life. These beliefs include how women should act in a society and in a marriage. Nanny and her daughter, Janie's mother, were both raped and left with bastard children, this experience is the catalyst for Nanny’s desire to see Janie be married of to a well-to-do gentleman. She desires to see Janie married off to a well to do gentleman because she wants to see that Janie is well cared for throughout her life.
Mr. Pontellier was a very demanding, know it all, kind of man. He expected his wife Edna to come to him at every beck and call. He never let Edna make any decisions of her own. For example, Edna couldn’t sleep one night, so she grabbed a shawl and sat at on her porch for a few early morning hours while her husband slept. He awoke, without her beside him, and demanded that she come in and go to bed. Why couldn’t she stay out on that porch and dream of good thoughts? She was a very unhappy woman, and many nights, she would cry for hours about her unhappiness.
In conclusion, this story ends very tragically, but it is important to keep in mind that Manley wrote this story so vividly for a purpose. That purpose being, to let women know to be responsive to damages caused to them no matter how and in what way they did it. What mattered to Manley and what she wanted to get across was for women to be heard and to prevent this from happening to innocent young ladies. Also to make the reader aware of sexual and class exploitations that took place during the 18th centuries.
Glaspell does not believe that the male gender could understand Minnie’s actions. She is wrong in this conclusion. Plenty of men would understand why Minnie was forced to kill her husband. While Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale are right in covering up for Minnie, Glaspell is wrong in portraying all men as jerks. Now as we approach the turn of another century, we see that there are plenty of men at this day in age that would understand Minnie’s actions and cover for her, just like Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale.
Louise, the unfortunate spouse of Brently Mallard dies of a supposed “heart disease.” Upon the doctor’s diagnosis, it is the death of a “joy that kills.” This is a paradox of happiness resulting into a dreadful ending. Nevertheless, in reality it is actually the other way around. Of which, is the irony of Louise dying due to her suffering from a massive amount of depression knowing her husband is not dead, but alive. This is the prime example to show how women are unfairly treated. If it is logical enough for a wife to be this jovial about her husband’s mournful state of life then she must be in a marriage of never-ending nightmares. This shows how terribly the wife is being exploited due her gender in the relationship. As a result of a female being treated or perceived in such a manner, she will often times lose herself like the “girl
The heroine, Mrs. P, has some carries some characteristics parallel to Louise Mallard in “Hour.” The women of her time are limited by cultural convention. Yet, Mrs. P, (like Louise) begins to experience a new freedom of imagination, a zest for life , in the immediate absence of her husband. She realizes, through interior monologues, that she has been held back, that her station in life cannot and will not afford her the kind of freedom to explore freely and openly the emotions that are as much a part of her as they are not a part of Leonce. Here is a primary irony.
Both the narrator and Mrs. Marroner are searching for peace in her male conquered world. The narrator of the story, “The Yellow Wallpaper”, is symbolic for all women in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, a prisoner of a confining society. Just like society, her husband, John, controls and determines much of what his wife should or should not do, leaving her incapable of making her own decisions. Because he is a man and a physician of high standing, she accepts his orders. When reflecting on men’s behavior, Hausman said, “Gilman tried to prove that what the men think is a biologically ordained pattern of behavior was, in fact, a convention specifically related to their society and the biohistorical organization of human culture” (Hausman). Men treated their wives poorly because that is what they experienced in previous generations. Repression of women’s rights in society stereotype that women are fragile. Men believed they should not work and be discouraged from intell...
Mrs. Mallard’s repressed married life is a secret that she keeps to herself. She is not open and honest with her sister Josephine who has shown nothing but concern. This is clearly evident in the great care that her sister and husband’s friend Richard show to break the news of her husband’s tragic death as gently as they can. They think that she is so much in love with him that hearing the news of his death would aggravate her poor heart condition and lead to death. Little do they know that she did not love him dearly at all and in fact took the news in a very positive way, opening her arms to welcome a new life without her husband. This can be seen in the fact that when she storms into her room and her focus shifts drastically from that of her husband’s death to nature that is symbolic of new life and possibilities awaiting her. Her senses came to life; they come alive to the beauty in the nature. Her eyes could reach the vastness of the sky; she could smell the delicious breath of rain in the air; and ears became attentive to a song f...
But in reality, a male narrator gives a certain sense of understanding to the male audience and society’s understand of the male and females roles and responsibilities in a marriage. Just as men were expected to cut the grass, take out the trash, pay the bills and maintain the household as a whole, women were expected to cook, clean, nurture the children, and be a loving and submissive wife to their husband. The only stipulation required for this exchange of power was to establish a mutual love. In the Victorian age love was all it took for a man to take or alter a woman’s livelihood and
Since Ma’s kidnapping, seven years prior, she has survived in the shed of her capturer’s backyard. This novel contains literary elements that are not only crucial to the story, but give significance as well. The point-of-view brings a powerful perspective for the audience, while the setting and atmosphere not only affect the characters but evokes emotion and gives the reader a mental picture of their lives, and the impacting theme along-side conflict, both internal and external, are shown throughout the novel. The author chooses to write the novel through the eyes of the main character and narrator, Jack. Jack’s perception of the world is confined to an eleven foot square room.
“Men weren't really the enemy - they were fellow victims suffering from an outmoded masculine mystique that made them feel unnecessarily inadequate when there were no bears to kill.” (quotegarden) As changes in industry and lifestyle swept the nation in the mid-nineteenth century, questions regarding women’s place in society started to arise. This prompted many women to reevaluate their positions in their own lives. At the time, women were dominantly domestic figures, residing in the house to matronly care for children and tend to household duties not to be bothered with by the husband. It is important to note that men in this century were raised and cultivated to have a certain view of women, so they are not actually malicious as some might view them, they are simply products of their environment. It just so happened that women drew the metaphorical “short stick”. Socially and politically, women were not independent. The only voice they had was through their husbands, and relationships and ideas shared with other women at this time were thought to be nothing more than domestic chatter, not to be taken seriously. The only exception to this widely accepted rule was, of course, a widow. She was not tied to a husband or father, or any male for that matter, so she had more freedom over not only her estate but her personal life as well. This is the situation Louise Mallard finds herself in in Kate Chopin’s short story, The Story of an Hour. Chopin illustrates the woman’s newfound feelings of pure freedom that come with the death of her husband and helps readers to understand the oppression felt by women during this time period using Mrs. Mallard’s view on her marriage and her intense emotions, along with the inner conflict she feels. ...
The story is very short, but every word has import in the story and each line has great depth of meaning. It is possible to infer a great deal about the woman's life, even though we are given very little on the surface. A telegraph and a railroad are mentioned in the first paragraph, so there is some idea of the time the story takes place. We are also given her married name and the full name of her husband. The fact that she is referred to only as "Mrs. Mallard", while her husband's full name is given, coupled with what we learn on the second page, gives some indication of the repression she's had to suffer through and the indignity society placed on woman in those times. We also learn in the first paragraph that she lives in a man's world, for, though it is her sister that tells her the news, it is her husband's friend who rushes over with the story. Even after his death, she is confined to the structures she adopted with married life, including the close friend's of her husband.
Marie, who is a product of an abusive family, is influenced by her past, as she perceives the relationship between Callie and her son, Bo. Saunders writes, describing Marie’s childhood experiences, “At least she’d [Marie] never locked on of them [her children] in a closet while entertaining a literal gravedigger in the parlor” (174). Marie’s mother did not embody the traditional traits of a maternal fig...
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...
The story begins with Sarah coming to live with her sister, Mary, and her sister’s husband, John Browner. She fell in love with the husband, and upon rejection, she seeked revenge. She did so by convincing her sister, over time, that he was cheating on her. His job as a ship steward made it easy for suspicions to sneak in, and the fighting caused him to break his sobriety, making things worse. Not only this, but a gentleman friend of Sarah’s, named Alec Fairbairn, became the subject of Mary’s affections, no doubt encouraged by her sister.