Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The story of an hour thematic construction
Themes in the story of an hour
Themes in the story of an hour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The story of an hour thematic construction
Free at Last!
In the Story of an Hour, the main character faces the troubles of feeling free after the death of her husband. However, after the news broke about the alleged death of her husband, Mrs. Mallard strangely finds herself feeling liberated. Mrs. Mallard’s newfound independence is justifiable in every way.
Mrs. Mallard was justified by feeling liberated with her husband’s death in the sense that it changed her, for example, in this quote “She was young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression and even a certain strength. But now there was a dull stare in her eyes, whose gaze was fixed away off yonder on one of those patches of blue sky”(Chopin 476). Mrs. Mallard was not the same person she was prior to her marriage to Mr. Mallard. In fact, she was once her own strong-willed individual. All of Mrs. Mallard’s identity had
…show more content…
vanished after marriage to Mr. Mallard. In the line “whose lines bespoke repression” gives off the impression that Mrs. Mallard is not actually expressing things or feelings obtained in the marriage. Which brings into question what sort of things are occurring behind closed doors? Despite how the characters in the story explain her, which is described as delicate, the author says Mrs. Mallard has a “certain strength." Chopin describes Mrs.
Mallards "monstrous joy” in the following quote: “There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature"(Chopin 477). Mr. Mallard’s influence on Mrs. Mallard was described a “powerful will." Blind persistence can be referred to as Mr. Mallard not looking forward to seeking Mrs. Mallard’s needs, but his own. Mrs. Mallard was being, in a way manipulated and controlled. Once married to Mr. Mallard, there is no way that she could continue to be unequivocally herself.
Mrs. Mallard’sMrs. Mallard’s feeling of Mrs. Mallard’s feeling of being free can certainly be justified. Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to sudden “death” of her husband is not what you would consider a cliché Reaction. Instead of mourning her husband’s death, Mrs. Mallard was overcome with a freedom that was not only unavoidable but pleasurable. Although some may consider it morally wrong to find happiness in the death of their husband, one's feelings cannot be controlled. Mrs. Mallard is absolutely entitled to feel a sense of
freedom.
Mallard had a love/hate relationship with her husband. She loved him dearly, but it was very apparent that in some ways she did not always like him very much and that showed in her actions after she found out he died. “She knew she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked save with love upon her; fixed and gray and dead. But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome.” (Chopin in Gardner, Lawn, Ridl & Schakel, 2013, p. 60-61). That clip leads you to believe that the husband sometimes looked at her as if he did not love her also. Mrs. Mallard makes it very clear that is sad that he has died, but is not sad that she is “free” from him. “And yet she had loved him – sometimes. Often she had not. What did it matter! What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being! “Free! Body and soul free!” she kept whispering.” (Chopin in Gardner, Lawn, Ridl & Schakel, 2013, p. 61). From the story you cannot tell why Mrs. Mallard feels the way that she feels about her husband, but whatever the reason is, she was very happy to get away from it and start her new life, husband
Mrs. Mallard?s freedom did not last but a few moments. Her reaction to the news of the death of her husband was not the way most people would have reacted. We do not know much about Mr. And Mrs. Mallards relationship. We gather from the text that her freedom must have been limited in some way for her to be feeling this way. Years ago women were expected to act a certain way and not to deviate from that. Mrs. Mallard could have been very young when she and Brently were married. She may not have had the opportunity to see the world through a liberated woman?s eyes and she thought now was her chance.
Mrs. Mallard is the example of a typical housewife of the mid 1800’s. At the time, most women were not allowed to go to school and were usually anticipated to marry and do housework. During that time, the only way women could get out of a marriage was if they were to die or their husbands was to die. In that time period, the husband had control of all of the money, so it would not be wise if the wife were to leave the financial freedom that was provided by the husband. This is most likely why Mrs. Mallard never leaves her husband’s death, she is sad at first but then experiences an overwhelming sense of joy. This shows that she is not in a fulfilling marriage as his death means she will finally have own individual freedom, as well as financial freedom being the grieving widow who will inherit her husband’s wealth. In the words of Lawrence I. Berkove he states, “On the other hand, Chopin did not regard marriage as a state of pure and unbroken bliss, but on the other, she could not intelligently believe that it was desirable, healthy, or even possible for anyone to live as Louise, in the grip of her feverish delusion, wishes: to be absolutely free and to live totally and solely for oneself.” (3) Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to her husband’s death is Chopin’s way of expressin...
Chopin depicts marriage as a prison institution that confines women to life. In the story, there is no possibility of divorce and death seems to be the only way out. Evidently, since marriage is dictated by society, women do not seem bothered by their lack of freedom since they feel it is their obligation to run their homes without complaining. From the story, Mrs. Mallard does not seem perturbed by her present situation until she gets a taste of freedom after receiving the news about her husband's death. Precisely, we are told that she was beginning to recognize this thing that was approaching her, and she was striving to beat it back with her will--as powerless as her two white slender hands would have been.
Chopin reflects her rejection of the “postures of femininity” through her character’s descriptions. She describes her as “young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression.” Describing her as young and calm are what men looked for in a wife in the 19th century. They wanted a submissive woman to tend to their needs as Chopin’s description suggests. Furthermore, Chopin says of her character Mrs. Mallard, “she would live for herself.” Her character believes she will now be free of her marriage, and won’t be “repressed” as aforementioned any longer by her husband. Wives had a natural servitude towards their husbands as husbands worked and went about their lives. All in all, Chopin displays her character as having a joyous moment after the death of her husband because she is let go of being forced into her “femininity.”
Key Elements:The story of an hour · Plot: Standard plot. A woman who receive the notice of her husband's death, and when she begins to felt freedom her husband appear again and she can't accept it and fall died. · Characterization: Few characters a. Mrs. Mallard or Louise: Mallard's wife. Was afflicted with hearth trouble.
... This woman suffers a tremendous amount from the commitment of her marriage, and the death of her husband does not affect her for long. A marriage such as this seems so unbelievable, yet a reader can see the realistic elements incorporated into the story. This begs the question of how undesirable marriage was during Chopin’s life. The unhappiness felt by Mrs. Mallard seems to be very extreme, but Chopin creates a beautiful story that reflects upon the idea of marriage as an undesired relationship and bond to some women in the nineteenth century.
Mallard at the end of the story stands for the suffrage of women during this time to be free. She would rather die than lose her newfound freedom. Chopin’s biography before the story states “[t]he loss of her husband, however, led to her assuming responsibilities…Eventually devoting herself entirely to writing” (30). Her success was found only after she was free from her marriage; Chopin herself could have been hinting to the fact the she would have rather died than lose her own freedom. Chopin also uses the heart condition to kill Mrs. Mallard. She writes “the doctors…said she had died of a heart disease—of the joy that kills” (32). The metaphor of the heart condition standing for the weakness put on women returns with her husband. She is no longer strong and free; she is weak and trapped by her marriage. Chopin uses this purposely to show that women are weak in marriage and need to be set
Mallard struggle between her personal values and the demands of a male-controlled society. After learning of her husband’s accidental death, Mallard has “a dull stare in her eyes, gaze was away off yonder...suspended of intelligent thought” (426). Even though, yes Mrs. Mallard did mourn in the solitude of her own room, her emotions change as she considers what this truly means for her. In this society wives are bound to serve and worship their husbands, now with Richard gone Mrs. Mallard realizes how ‘“free, free, free!”’she truly is (426). Mrs. Mallard had come to the realization that she was no longer bound to be her husband’s slave and suddenly she had her life returned to her; “The vacant stare and the look of terror...They stayed keen and bright” (426). Romance was highly absent in this era most married for money, for stability, or because it was what the parents wanted, Mallard confesses “she had loved him – sometimes” (426). For too long Mrs. Mallard had suffered to please someone else other than herself, now with her husband gone, she could focus on what truly mattered herself. Once this is realized of her independence, she stops her tears, and “she breathes a quick prayer…with a shudder that life might be long” (426). Unfortunately, Mrs. Mallard’s independence is ripped from her grasp when her husband, unharmed, walks through the door. The utter realization of her freedom being taken from her once again kills Mrs. Mallard instantly. The
“The Story of an Hour” was a story set in a time dominated by men. During this time women were dependent on men, but they always dreamed of freedom. Most people still think that men should be dominant and in control. They think that without men, women can’t do anything and that they can’t be happy. Well this story has a twist.
Mallard. Her self-assertion surpassed the years they were married and the love she had for him. She is beginning to realize she can now live for and focus on herself. The text insists “There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature.” (Chopin 477.) Finally she can live freely and no longer worry about being confined in her marriage and inside her own home. She has come to realization that she is now independent and can think freely and achieves happiness and freedom. She is no longer held down or back by her marriage. She will no longer be someone’s possession she will be free and respected. Her husband Brently returns and he is alive the happiness and freedom she once possessed briefly with the mere image of her deceased husband were quickly torn away. “When the doctors came they said she died of heart disease of joy that kills” (Chopin 477). She was free but still confined without the knowledge of her husband who wasn’t dead. Chopin illustrates at the end that she was free because joy killed her. She was joyous because she was finally set free but she is now once again confined by the grief knowing her husband was not killed
Countless varieties of internal conflict substantiate Mrs. Mallard to fight back the joy of freedom following her husband’s death. “She was striving to beat it back with her will” (Chopin 762) reflects how Mrs. Mallard would sense any indication between empathetic views of herself towards restraining freedom taking over her. Although struggles with desire connecting authority over her relief, she realizes she should not sense relief over her husband’s death and attempts to transition from that experience. By the same token, she appears vulnerable abandoning freedom because this influences social expectations. Even if Mrs. Mallard’s freedom did not portray a part of society, she would reject preparation to emulate through offering it. As
Not attempting to hide, Mrs. Mallard knows that she will weep at her husbands funeral, however she can’t help this sudden feeling of seeing, “beyond [the] bitter moment [of] procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely” (Chopin, 16). In an unloving marriage of this time, women were trapped in their roles until they were freed by the death of their husbands. Although Mrs. Mallard claims that her husband was kind and loving, she can’t help the sudden spark of joy of her new freedom. This is her view on the release of her oppression from her roles of being a dutiful wife to her husband. Altogether, Mrs. Mallard claims that, “there would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature” (Chopin, 16). This is the most important of Mrs. Mallard’s thoughts, as she never officially states a specific way when her husband oppressed her. However, the audience can clearly suggest that this is a hint towards marriage in general that it suffocates both men and women. Marriage is an equal partnership in which compromise and communication become the dominant ideals to make the marriage better. It is suggested that Mrs. Mallard also oppressed her husband just as much as he did to her when she sinks into the armchair and is, “pressed down by a physical exhaustion
Not only are Mrs. Mallard’s heart problems a physical hinder on her health, but the heart troubles expand to the emotional level. For the most part, she loved her husband. However, their marriage has taken a toll on her. After the news of her husband’s death, Mrs. Mallard’s heart is torn. She is devastated about the death of her husband but enlightened by the idea of being independent and free. As the idea of being free entered her mind the heart once again becomes the focal point of the story. After Louise continually repeats the word “free” to herself, “Her pulses beat fast, and the coursing blood warmed and relaxed every inch of her body”, expressing her desire to be independent (Chopin, 477). When someone experiences great joy it is said that they experience the warming of the heart. As soon as Mrs. Mallard thought about her newfound independence she was overcome by this warm sensation. Her heart was pumping wildly and any pain she was suffering from the loss of her husband, dissipated. Her problematic heart was now at full strength and she was relieved of any worry she once had. While her physical heart still posed a threat, she was free from her emotional
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.