More handpicked essays just for you.
Fast and furious franchise film analysis
Fast and furious franchise film analysis
Analysis of fast and furious movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fast and furious franchise film analysis
The Fast and Furious franchise has been going on since 2001. Since then there have been seven movies to come out. Fast and Furious 7 may be the last movie in this series. With the actor Paul Walker, Bryan in the movie dead, there may not be any other way to produce another film. With that said, I thought the movie was very good and well thought of when coming to filming the rest of movie without Paul Walker and digitally having his face put in. In some scenes near the end of the movie you can tell that something is off and seems a little weird when looking at Paul’s character but aside from that it was a brilliant job done by the
producers.
Beginning the mid 1920s, Hollywood’s ostensibly all-powerful film studios controlled the American film industry, creating a period of film history now recognized as “Classical Hollywood”. Distinguished by a practical, workmanlike, “invisible” method of filmmaking- whose purpose was to demand as little attention to the camera as possible, Classical Hollywood cinema supported undeviating storylines (with the occasional flashback being an exception), an observance of a the three act structure, frontality, and visibly identified goals for the “hero” to work toward and well-defined conflict/story resolution, most commonly illustrated with the employment of the “happy ending”. Studios understood precisely what an audience desired, and accommodated their wants and needs, resulting in films that were generally all the same, starring similar (sometimes the same) actors, crafted in a similar manner. It became the principal style throughout the western world against which all other styles were judged. While there have been some deviations and experiments with the format in the past 50 plus ye...
Everyone can look back on memories at school and remember the “problem kid”. This student may have been the one who got bad grades, was disrespectful to the teacher or the one who just never came to class. We see these students and automatically judge them not knowing the circumstances that surround their decision making. When we judge those students we don’t understand the backgrounds and the home life that some of these students have. Problems at home can drastically affect a student’s academic life and one option they are left with is an at-risk school such as Black Rock. In “Summer’s Choice” we are able to see one of these students who was written off even though she is tremendously talented in the art field. In “Summer’s Choice” we see
Sex, love, depression, guilt, trust, all are topics presented in this remarkably well written and performed drama. The Flick, a 2014 Pulitzer Prize winning drama by Annie Baker, serves to provide a social commentary which will leave the audience deep in thought well after the curtain closes. Emporia State Universities Production of this masterpiece was a masterpiece in itself, from the stunningly genuine portrayal of the characters of Avery and Rose, to the realism found within the set, every aspect of the production was superb.
America has always been depicted as an amiable place to live in. More than often, foreigners would visualize America as the place where neighbors would greet each other in the morning and have their children play in the back yard with the family dog. However, as with most foreigners, this image was shattered by the adverse environment that surrounded them. One of the biggest mistakes that they failed to recognize was the murder of innocent civilians. These murders were almost always published on the front-page of every major newspaper. As such, Americans have always been interested in the death of others. This is true in the ninetieth and, more predominately, twentieth century. As tales of murders got colder and bloodier, Americans had an instinctive
Quentin Tarantino has proven time and time again to be one of the most confusing directors to understand when attempting to unravel the personal ideologies in his films. Each of his films deals with race, sexuality, and gender to some extent, and it is often difficult to know whether or not Tarantino is making a commentary on these things or if he truly believes much of the problematic discourse found in his films. Kill Bill Vol. 1 and 2 are a testament to this understanding of Tarantino’s films, as they appear to be extremely feminist films at surface level yet, upon deeper inspection, have some very problematic qualities. Looking at Kill Bill Vol.’s 1 and 2 through both a feminist and anti feminist lens can allow the audience to better
A League of Their Own (Marshall, 1992) explicitly characterizes an American era when a woman’s place was in the home. Even our modern perspective implicitly follows suit. Although women have gained rights and freedoms since the 1930’s, sexism remains prevalent in America. This film offers an illustration when men went to war and big business men utilized women as temporary replacements in factories, sports, and so on. Here, course concepts, such as gender socialization, gender expressions, role stereotypes, emotion expressions, and language, correspond to the film’s characters and themes.
In the framework of film and media aesthetics, a montage is the thematic placement and arrangement of event images that once arranged, create a greater event or portrays a deeper meaning. A montage is a technique that allows producers to swiftly reveal certain event details in a quicker, more condensed manner. Montages can sometimes build a narrative by use of images, scenes or sequences. An analytical montage is one that analyzes and event for its thematic and structural elements, selects the vital elements, and then synthesizes them into an intensified screen event. Sequential analytical montages are when the event is shown as the original cause/effect relationship within the same continuous time it would normally happen. Sectional analytical montages illustrate showing the depth of the event from several viewpoints rather than from a time aspect.
The story of the movie revolves around two brother wrestler’s lives Dave Schultz (Mark Ruffalo) and Mark Schultz (Channing Tatum) and how a multimillionaire sponsor John E. du Pont (Steve Carell) changed their lives. These actors have done amazing comedies like Get Smart, 22 Jump Street, despicable me and many more that’s why looking at the cast of the movie one would think of it as a comedy, but after watching the movie they would say otherwise. The amount of emotion that is developed throughout the movie is just too overwhelming, even though the story is public knowledge the director (Bennett Miller) has succeeded in keeping the viewers at the edge of their seats. The intensity with which Steve Carell has played the role of John E. du Pont
Cool running’s is a 1993 American sports filmed based on the true story of the Jamaica national bobsled teams and their debut in the bobsled competing that took place at the 1988 winter Olympics in Calgary, Alberta Canada. This movie puts quite a few sport psychology qualities such as motivation, determination, leadership, imagery and goal setting. The movie showcases how an underdog Jamaican team who lives In a constant summer can compete in a winter sport due to the fact that they never gave up and used every resource they had available to them including sport physiology. Throughout this summery I will talk about the certain aspects of sport psychology and how the movie shed light on them.
Even with the major flaws in the operations execution the idea of the operation was a good idea. Operation Fast and Furious was an operation with a good thought process behind it but with poor execution. The goal of the operation originally was to place trackers in guns and then to supply these guns to mexican cartels and work side by side with the mexican government to bring down the cartels. Operation Fast and Furious was never going to work it was a flawed operation and a way for the U.S. to give weapons to the mexican cartels. Operation fast and furious was not a flawed operation, but rather it was an operation in which the execution was everything but flawless.
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.
When American Sniper opened in theaters January 2015, the world was shocked and excited that a film about a war has finally shown the emotional and psychological pain a soldier goes through. To many this was a new concept but, what the public did not realize, was in 2014, a World War II film, Fury was released. Fury is an insightful film about a tank crew surviving through World War II through the emotional and psychological hardships. The film takes place in April 1945, five months before WWII ends (Fury, IMDb). There are many key points to which makes Fury a modern war film from the extent of backstory each character has, to the prescreening prep and training, to the research of the props. Though American Sniper and Fury differ in wars and
It had been over thirty years since the world had seen any great action films form movie producer George Miller. One of the best action trilogies of all time, Mad Max, appeared on screens between 1979 and 1985. Since then, Miller strayed from fast paced movies and produced documentaries and family-friendly movies like Happy Feet all until recently. With the announcement of another Mad Max movie scheduled to start production, Mad Max Fury Road, many questioned if the newest addition could hold up to the already praised franchise. The filmmaking realm has become consumed with redundant and unnecessary sequels but Mad Max Fury Road breaks away from that cycle. It is one of the rare older series that actually merits further evaluation and growth.
The movie Juice has influenced me not just because of the hairstyle but because it teaches me about life. It teaches me responsibility, respect, integrity, compassion, and grit. I've learned a lot from my mistakes in the past that not doing or showing these thing will make you not a good person.
There was a moment in life that I can remember that was consequential in my view of the world. I moved from just accepting the world as I was told it was to truly questioning things and arriving at my own conclusions. Before the film Zeitgeist I generally accepted what authority figures in my life had said and the way they described the world to work. But after the film I began to question what I had been told and the assumptions I had made. The film helped to make me a more critical minded person.