Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corruption in africa
Corruption in the democratic republic of congo
Corruption in soutyh africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corruption in africa
Great Britain consul Roger Casement, who served under Stanley, played perhaps the most important role in the unveiling of the corrupt system in the Congo. In February 1904, he issued the Casement Report, which detailed interviews with many natives explaining the atrocities. His report went beyond his order to investigate the Congo; he studied the hierarchy of chiefs, assistant, local assistants, militia and finally, the laborers. One result of this was Morel’s creation of the Congo Reform Association in 1904, which put into a global perspective the issues of the Congo, and made them easy to understand. One of the horrifying topics that he shed light on was the mutilation of hands in the Congo Free State. Witnesses described in detail what happened.
I ran away...and went with two old people...but we were caught, and the old people were killed, and the soldiers made me carry the baskets with the things these dead people had and the hands they cut off.
…show more content…
Another native gave an account, saying of the black soldiers, “...they killed a lot of people, and they cut off their hands...and took them to the white man. He counted out the hands - 200 in all.” Casement’s investigation made it clear that hand mutilation “was not a native custom prior to the coming of the white man; it was not the outcome of the primitive instincts of savages…; it was the deliberate act of the soldiers of a European Administration.” Although many still did not take his report seriously, it was clear that more information needed to be
The book opens "Nous sommes tours Sauvages," which translates to "We are all Savages." It's a fitting way to begin a book chronicling the story of Major Robert Rogers and his rangers journey, Native American slaughter, and return home. In White Devil: A True Story of War, Savagery, and Vengeance in Colonial America, author Stephen Brumwell depicts a well researched, unbiased image of: war, hardship, courage, savagery, vengeance, and survival. Brumwell wants to show his readers an image of the true nature of war and all the trimmings that goes along with it. There has never been a war where atrocities were not committed. Further more, there has never been a war where the atrocities were not committed by all sides, to one extent or another. This war was no different. This compelling read draws from a broad range of primary sources, including Rogers' Journals, contemporary newspaper accounts, the letters and remembrances of Rogers' surviving Rangers, and several generations of Abenaki oral history.
In A Narrative of a Post-Civil War Visit to Gowrie and East Hermitage Plantations, Louis Manigault shows a totally different point of view from the other documents. In which, he presents that apparently he had a peaceful relationship with his slaves. “They all seemed pleased to see me, calling me "Maussa" the Men still showing respect by taking off their caps” (Manigault). He shows some changes that in his belief the blacks were in a better situation before than after Civil War. “I am of opinion that very many Negroes are most unhappy in their changed condition, but this however they do not care to admit” (Manigault). But in reality, either way there were being abused, or through slavery or through “contracts”.
Growing up Black Elk and his friends were already playing the games of killing the whites and they waited impatiently to kill and scalp the first Wasichu, and bring the scalp to the village showing how strong and brave they were. One could only imagine what were the reasons that Indians were bloody-minded and brutal to the whites. After seeing their own villages, where...
Through The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien moves beyond the horror of fighting in the Vietnam War to examine with sensitivity and insight the nature of courage and fear. Included, is a collection of interrelated stories. A few of the stories are brutal, while others are flawed, blurring the distinction between fact and fiction. All the stories, however, deal with one platoon. Some are about the wartime experiences of soldiers, and others are about a 43-year-old writer reminiscing about his platoon’s experiences. In the beginning chapter, O’Brien rambles about the items the soldiers carry into battle, ranging from can openers, pocketknives, and mosquito repellent o Kool-Aid, sewing kits, and M-16 assault rifles. Yet, the story is truly about the intangible things the soldiers “carry”: “grief, terror, love, longing… shameful memories (and) the common secret of cowardice” (Harris & O’Brien 21).
The Things They Carried is a classic because it approaches the gruesome subject of war in a way that is truly unique and honest. O’Brien’s unique point of view results in a book that is revered by the majority of its readers. “Now and then, when I tell this story, someone will come up to me afterward and say she liked it. It’s always a woman. Usually it’s an older woman of kindly temperament and human politics. She’ll explain that as a rule she hates war stories; she can’t understand why people want to wallow in all the blood and gore. But this one she liked” (pg.65-66). Many soldiers come home from war and try to hide the brutality of war from the rest of the population. Tim O’Brien allows readers in on the horrid truth of war! Throughout the novel, Tim O’Brien depicts how his fellow platoon members are held captive by their subconscious minds. “He shot it in the hindquarters and in the little hump at its back. He shot it twice in the flanks. It wasn’t to kill; it was to hurt. He put the rifle muzzle up against the mouth and then shot the mouth away. Nobody said much. The whole platoon stood there watching, feeling all kinds of things, but there wasn’t a great deal of pity for the baby water buffalo” (pg.75). It would be impossible for someone who has not experienced war to understand how the subconscious mind can imprison a soldier. However, O’Brien’s stories are so vivid that the reader feels that he or
The label of “genocide” can be an indefinite term, much like a binary model of examination, where discrepancies are not simply viewed as right or wrong, but rather with multidirectional perspectives. With respect to the atrocities the Native Americans endured, it is important to determine how to label the events based on the formal definition of Raphael Lemkin’s genocide which, in short, is defined as the intent to kill or destroy a specific group of people based on race, ethnicity or religious affiliations (Convention). I strongly assert that it is essential to define the Native American case study initially as genocide. With such a strong label, most will gravitate towards it and express more interest. However, that attention is more than
It is also made clear that the savage atrocities blamed on the Indians. When looked at historically truly must be blamed on the whites. They paid up to twenty-five dollars as a bounty for Indian scalps, before the Indians ever took a single one for trophies. The whites were also responsible for the first mutilations of corpses, the Indians just folowed suit off the method’s they witnessed for interrogation and trophies.
As previously mentioned, due to racial biases by both the American military and the French, African-Americans were alleged to have raped and sexually assaulted women during the American occupation of French. Both the French and White American soldiers regarded African-American soldiers as savages that had barbarism deep rooted from their African roots (240). What exists in this hate is the contrasting relationship that the White soldiers shared with the French about the African-American soldiers. Whilst, the White soldiers regarded the French as shameful and disgraceful, the French exerting the same exact belief on the African-American soldiers in terms that they were hypersexual and completely uncivilized. Though the White soldiers had viable and proven evidence that the French were committing acts that weren’t socially accepted in American culture; this same evidence did not even exist and was based on mere rumors of African-American soldiers committing these vicious
First, Lemann documents horrible accounts of violence against freed blacks. The casual observer views the underlying reasons for these attacks as simple racial hatred. However, Lemann connects the acts of violence to show an orchestrated movement intended to undermine both keys to the freed blacks’ quality of life, organizing abilities and voting rights. Violence against blacks existed for years, but in the form of a master supposedly disciplining his slave. The acts of violence outlined by Lemann show a shift from fear and ignorance to organized intimidation. After all, whites of the time viewed themselves “as protectors of [the] natural order” meaning racial superiority (65). What first started as a fear of being the minority turned quickly to a fear of losing political power and economic wealth. In the end, the use of violence all...
The conventional image that comes to mind when talking about the native Americans during the period of the building of the new world is brutal. The term “savage” is most closely associated with them and their practices at the time. It is important, as mentioned in P’s class, to remember that all the information we have on native Americans is what had been provided by the settlers. Therefore when studying the autobiography of Mary Rowlandson during her captivity, observing the actions of the native Americans, beyond Rowlandson’s descriptions gave more insight into what the atmosphere at the time was. It is also important to note that the Puritans,
The prevailing opinion is that European explorers came to the America’s to peacefully colonize and gradually begin mutually beneficial relationships with the native people. However, Howard Zinn proves that the majority of explorers could not coexist with the native tribes, as the conquerors slowly stole their land, and did not return the initial hospitality most of the natives had showed to them. Therefore, the European colonizers blatantly ignored the rights of the Native Americans and acted with violence towards them. In order to conquer the natives, the colonizers “set fire to the wigwams of the village” and “ [destroyed] their crops” (Zinn).
Native Americans in particular were abused by white people in the States. From the 16th century and on, European nations rushed into the “New World,” claiming terrain that Native Americans had lived on for hundreds of years. Treaties were repeatedly made with the United States government and Native American ethnic groups. These treaties generally brutally kicked the “Indians” out of their land and pushed them farther and farther west. The Indian Removal act of 1830 encompassed more than five tribes and pressing all of them out of the southern United States. While some Natives fought back, many were forced to comply in order to save themselves from the Americans’ wrath. Eventually the white people themselves went so far west that there was no longer anywhere to put the Native Americans. In order to deal with this conundrum, the American army forced most tribes to abide on reservations in hopes that they would gradually become civilized and assimilate to the American culture. These reservations were often iniquitous and atrocious places. It was almost unfeasible for the Indians to hunt the w...
Over the course of human history, many believe that the “Congo Free State”, which lasted from the 1880s to the early 1900s, was one of the worst colonial states in the age of Imperialism and was one of the worst humanitarian disasters over time. Brutal methods of collecting rubber, which led to the deaths of countless Africans along with Europeans, as well as a lack of concern from the Belgian government aside from the King, combined to create the most potent example of the evils of colonialism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century’s. The Congo colonial experience, first as the Congo Free State then later as Belgian Congo, was harmful to that region of Africa both then and now because of the lack of Belgian and International attention on the colony except for short times, the widespread economic exploitation of the rubber resources of the region, and the brutal mistreatment and near-genocide of the Congolese by those in charge of rubber collecting.
When we got about halfway there we had some food, canned peas and tomato juice. The peas didn’t taste too good but Sargeant Reynolds said “Peas will give are high in vitamin K, vitamin C, and vitamin B1.” So I ate them all but the peas weren’t that filling, I tried to get at least a little fuller by drinking the tomato juice but it didn’t work either. When we got to the camp were we moved out into the war we slept since it was at least 1 in the morning. After we slept we got up at around 4:30 to get ready. After we got up, we went outside, then we grabbed our guns. When we got to the area where the fighting was, the first thing I heard was a soldier screaming in pain. “Help! Help me!” The soldier said still screaming in pain. “Watashi wa korosa nakereba naranai!” A japanese soldier said. Then he shot a american soldier, killing him instantly. “Oh my god!” I yelled “Get down!” A soldier said, then he tackled me and he saved me. But he got shot in the neck. Blood ran down his chest. I started crying, he tried to talk but it was no use. He died minutes later, I got so mad that I got up and aimed at a japanese
As Marlow passes through the waters of the Congo, it is easily visible the trouble of the natives. “Black shapes crouched, lay, sat between the trees, leaning against the trunks, clinging to the earth half coming out, half effaced with the dim light, in all the attitudes of pain, abandonment, and despair.” (20) Show that the holding of these colonies has started. The soldiers have come in and taken the inhabitants and are destroying them and taking from them the one thing they deserve over everything, life. The imperialists seem to not care about the Africans and are just there for their land.