Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between law and morality
The relationship between law and morality
The relationship between morality and law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between law and morality
Morality should be mandated by law for the purpose of upholding justice in Malaysia. I think in order to uphold the justice of Malaysia, a part of the morality should be mandated by law, but another part of morality cannot be mandated to the law. This is because as mentioned above, moral's right or wrong cannot be clearly measured, it is based on personal conscience. However, the law can be clearly measured whether a person makes mistakes and will be punished according to law. However, we cannot include all moral principles in the law. This is because if we include all moral in the law, it may become illogical and unnecessary. For instance, Immanuel Kant is a philosopher and he says law adjusts people's external relations, while morality …show more content…
Morality is based on one's religion, background and social culture. Morality also involves motivation, bad behaviour can lead to guilt and reprehension and good behaviour can lead to benign feelings and praise. The law is the idea of control by human and the idea of human conduct being regulated by a superior authority or power. Law are made by the members of Parliament and by judges in courts and legally enforceable. Morality do not have standard of right and wrong, it is based on personal conscience. The law can clearly specify whether a person is wrong and punished. The law must be based on morality and only the moral law will make it acceptable to the people. Law can also be used to maintain order and peace in the country. Some ethically unmanageable behaviours must be controlled by law. For example, there are frequent cases of abandon baby in Malaysia. Abandoning a baby is a very unethical and irresponsible act, so it must be included in the law. Besides, rape is also very disrespectful to women. The occurrence of rape comes from a person's impulse and irrationality, if not legal control, then the boys can easily rape any girl even though he knows it is immoral. I think in order to uphold the justice of Malaysia, a part of the morality should be mandated by law, but another part of morality cannot be mandated to the law. Law can uphold justice, but we cannot make all morality into law. Some morality needs to be maintained by law, while others can be upheld and resolved through our own religion, background and social culture. If all morality is included in the law, it will become illogical and unreasonable, which will make the people doubt the law. I think maintenance of parents act must be implemented. In order for children to fulfil their responsibility to take care their parents and parents should be protected by law so that child will not abandon them. With the changing times, everyone has
laws is to keep the bad things out from the old society out such as
In the late eighteenth century, the moral treatment was first adopted by Dr. Willis and then popularized by French physician Philippe Pinel and British philanthropist William Tuke. Discouraged by the inefficiency of traditional treatments and inspired by the Enlightenment principle, these innovators tried to find a new approach to help psychotics back to sanity. Because the principle and practices of moral treatment place a high value on respecting the liberty, humanity, and individuality of patients, the moral treatment achieved the success in curing patients and remained popular in the next century.
In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
When one thinks about morals, he or she often find himself in difficulty. It is a fact that morals are mostly passed from one generation to another. However, we all face challenges when trying to understand whether they are all accurate or not. To start with, Morals are those values that normally protect life and always respectful of the dual life value of individual and others. Therefore, Morals are those rules that normally govern actions that re wrong or right. We know that morals may be for all people in the society or individual beliefs in the society. Some of the great morals include freedom, charity, truth, honesty and patience and all of them have a common goal. It is a fact that when they function well in the society, they end up protecting and enhancing life. These morals need to be examined always to make sure that they are performing their mission of protecting life. As a matter of fact, morals are derived from the government and society, self and religion. When morals are derived from the government and society, they tend to change as the morals and laws of the society changes. An example of the changes is seen in the cases of marriage versus individuals living together. It is true that in the past generation, it was quite rare to see any couple living together without having any legal matrimonial ceremony. However, this
In “The Essential Agrarian Reader,” Norman Wirzba claims that “it is only as we are faithful to the particularities and demands of place and accept responsibility for our actions in those places, that we can claim to be moral beings at all” ( Wirzba 95). Without recognizing the effects of our actions on a certain place we cannot consider ourselves moral individuals. In this paper, I will argue that this claim is correct because without a sense of accountability, a connection to morality cannot be made.
Question of morality is a controversial one and usually occurs when things take a turn for the worse. What do people considered being morally right and what is morally wrong? Does law dictate it or do we follow ethics? Where people believe that there is not other solution but to commit a deed that can ultimately lead to destruction, question of faith and sometimes death. Each person has his or her very own opinion of what is deemed moral and what is not.
Mustapha Mond is the most powerful character in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Mond keeps scientific and historic documents from reaching the people. Mond believes that science, religion, and art threaten Brave New World if let out, but religion would be bane of Brave New World.
James Rachels' article, "Morality is Not Relative," is incorrect, he provides arguments that cannot logically be applied or have no bearing on the statement of contention. His argument, seems to favor some of the ideas set forth in cultural relativism, but he has issues with other parts that make cultural relativism what it is.
To be sure, modern laws are made to express the general will, a will that aims at the common good. This means that laws in most cases intend to protect every social member’s rights under the principle of justice and fairness. For telling examples one need to look no further than American judicial system. The access to the two courts systems, one federal court and one state court, provides citizens with the greatest potential to have their legal problems resolved quickly and justly. Besides, the entire U.S. legal system depends upon the involvement and integrity of citizens in the roles of parties, witnesses, jurors, legal counsel and judges, making the legislation, judgment and enforcement respecting more citizens' will, which is probably based on various interests, so that laws can be as just as possible. Therefore, modern laws are in nature pursuing to treat and protect every individual in the society.
Even though Malaysia’s law system is similar to English Common law system, things like family conflicts and small conflicts at work are so...
Morality is about rules, rules that everybody agrees to abide by because it is in their interest. I have presented here some reasons why one isn't necessarily morally compelled to obey the law. I have explained why politics and morals, and politics and charity cannot mix. Unfortunately, these are merely a few reasons why a real moral society has not been realized. Morality is very complex, subject to many differing points of view. While understanding the issues presented here hopefully contributes to better moral practices, there are still many issues facing proper morality.
Many people have different views of what ethical behavior is. Ethical behavior is defined as “Acting in ways consistent with what society and individuals typically think are good values. Ethical behavior tends to be good for business and involves demonstrating respect for key moral principles that include honesty, fairness, equality, dignity, diversity and individual rights (Ethical behavior, 2016).” In this paper, I explored ethical decision making with examples. In addition, I discuss how ethical decision making benefits from a Christian worldview.
The laws of Malaysia are classified into two types which are written law and unwritten law. Written laws are laws which have been executed in the constitution or in legislation. Unwritten laws are laws which are not contained in any statutes and can be found in case decisions.
Ethics is a system of moral principles and a branch of philosophy which defines what is acceptable for both individuals and society. It is a philosophy that covers a whole range of things that have an importance in everyday situations. Ethics are vital in everyones lives, it includes human values, and how to have a good life, our rights and responsibilities, moral decisions what is right and wrong, good and bad. Moral principles affect how people make decisions and lead their lives (BBC, 2013). There are many different beliefs about were ethics come from. These consist of; God and Religion, human conscience, the example of good human beings and a huge desire for the best for people in each unique situation, and political power (BBC, 2013).
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.