Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Educational implications of moral development
Educational implications of moral development
Educational implications on moral development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Educational implications of moral development
Generally, people hold one of two views about morality; they either believe in the Postmodern view or the Christian view. The Postmodern view of morality states that morals come from a person’s external environment. This view is incorrect. As C. S. Lewis explains in his book Mere Christianity, every individual is born with an innate sense of right and wrong. Some, however, argue that morality is taught at a young age or that it is just instinct. The universal sense of moral law proves that morality is not these things. Morality is not something that is taught. Each person is born with a sense of right and wrong. From a young age, people use the concept of “fairness” to judge someone’s actions. To a certain extent, children do not need to be taught what is fair because they possess an unlearned sense of morality. Additionally, people feel guilty when they do wrong because they broke the universal standard of right and wrong that applies to all people. When people make remarks such as, “You promised” or …show more content…
The first reason morality is not purely instinct is that instincts are not always moral. Multiple, conflicting instincts may occur at once. In this case, a person must decide which instinct to follow. Lewis gives the example of a man in danger. If a person hears a cry for help, they will feel three emotions. Originally, they will feel a desire to help the person in need, but they will quickly want to save themselves from danger. These two are instincts. The final emotion is that the first feeling, to help others, is correct and the second, no matter how strong, is incorrect. The third emotion is outside of the instincts; the two are separate. Lewis explains it like this: “The Moral Law is not any one instinct or set of instincts: it is something which makes a kind of tune (the tune we call goodness or right conduct) by directing the instincts” (p. 11). This example shows that moral behavior is more than just
The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis is a book of thirty –one letters in which a retired, senior demon named Screwtape coaches his newly educated nephew, Wormwood. Wormwood is quite troubled when it comes to tempting his “patient.” Nevertheless, he need not fear because faithful uncle Screwtape has offered his services. A unique character featured in the letters is, “The Enemy.” This character refers to God, the natural enemy of Satan. Of course Satan is referred to as “Our Lord.” In the letters, and Wormwood and Screwtape try their very best to please Satan and bring him glory. Although the book is written from the demons’ perspective, Lewis naturally uses it to highlight important truths of the Christian faith.
C.S Lewis was like a rebellious teenager of the modern time period. He lived only during the modern era and very beginning of the postmodern era, but in his later years Lewis liked to describe himself as "old-fashioned", writing using ideas contrary to the time periods in which he lived. The modern and postmodern time periods began to view religion as a myth, and used reason to perceive the world instead. During his younger years Lewis embraced the ideas of the modern era, but his world-view changed upon his conversion to Christianity. Since he had dabbled in aspects of both modern and pre-modern eras, his later works intertwined the ideas of both literary periods.
C.S. Lewis begins his book, “Mere Christianity”, by introducing the Law of Right and Wrong or the Laws of Nature. This, however, arises a question. What is the Law of Nature? The Law of Nature is the known difference between right and wrong. That is, mans distinction between what is right and what is wrong. “This law was called the Law of Nature because people thought that everyone knew it and did not need to be taught it”(18). Lewis relates the law to how we treat others. We treat others the way we want to be treated and if they treat us poorly in return we become agitated and annoyed with them. He states that we become a society of excuses when something goes wrong. He goes on to say that we want to behave in a certain way when in reality we do the opposite of what is right or what is wrong. We are humans and humans have primal instincts. We are all capable of using our instincts to do right or wrong. Lewis uses an example of a drowning man to prove this point. When one sees a man in trouble two desires or instincts kick into play, to save the man or ignore him because the situation at hand could endanger you. However, there in another impulse that says help the man. With this comes a conflict of instincts. Do you run and forget about it or do you jump in and help. Most people will help even if the situation is going to endanger their life. This is just one way of seeing moral law. The right in a situation will mostly always prevail over the wrong. “Men ought to be unselfish, ought to be fair. Not that men are selfish, nor that they like being unselfish, but they ought to be”(30). We are creatures of habit and logic. Lewis believes that the moral law is not taught to us rather known by us instinctively. He also believes that the law is real. The law is our behaviors in life via good or bad. Lewis states, “there is something above and beyond the ordinary facts of men’s behavior”(30). This opens Lewis to believe that the natural law is both alive and active in mans life today. Lewis goes on to say that the law must be something above mans behavior. He begins to relate this to the creation of the world.
While maintaining a open look of this moral law, Lewis presents two objections one would present to the moral law: “The moral law is just herd instinct” and “Morality is just social convention. The moral law is not a herd instinct due to man’s choice to suppress stronger instincts in fa...
Graham, Jesse and Johnathan Haidt. 2011. The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of
Most can agree that in, most circumstances, these actions are evil, so it can be concluded that there are certain things that a person simply ought not to do. This is the foundation of C.S. Lewis’ Moral Law argument for the existence of God. Lewis argues that every person has a sense of right and wrong moral behavior, and this sense presses upon us. This is what he calls the Law of Human nature, or Moral Law. However, unlike other laws like gravity, this law can be disobeyed. In fact, despite the fact that all people are aware of this law, they constantly disobey
Is morality an ideology that develops over time as people mature or an influential set of beliefs? “Just Lather, That’s All” written by Hernando Téllez demonstrates how making a decision, whether it be ethical or not, is influenced by the different morals that the person believes in.
He established a code of behavior despite the lack of cultivation and learning in the morals and ethics of Christianity. Thus, morality derives not from the knowledge of a creator or a God, but from an instinctual place within oneself. .”Many things I read surpassed my understanding and experience.
Moral development is not completely accredited to one’s genetic makeup, though, theorists such as Lawrence Kohlberg believe that moral development is underlined by the cognitive development of an individual. He believed that moral thinking changes in predictable ways as cognitive abilities develop, regardless of culture (Arnett, 2012). As listed earlier, morality can be affected by many factors including the environment and the parenting of a child. Parenting has a larger effect on the morals of a child than many scholars have described, but this is because the parents of a child in the early times of life are the only exposure to culture and the teaching of norms and how to obey them. Parenting has no real right or wrong way of being done but for over 5 decades, research has been done attempting to find out how parents parent.
Taking this to be true, Kaufman argues that there is every reason to believe that on the whole our moral judgments will tend to be true. Furthermore, when we take the moral realist’s argument that morality has a deep connection with human flourishing, there are evolutionary reasons, Kaufman believes, for believing that there is a connection between moral judgments and actions that for the most part promote our well being.
Pride. Something that all of humanity struggles with and those who think they do not struggle with it, struggle the most. Both, C.S. Lewis and Flannery O’Connor describe their views of pride through their writings, Mere Christianity and Everything That Rises Must Converge. Both authors view pride as a negative quality, but they reveal this in different ways. I agree with both authors in their explanations and views of pride. Pride is a great sin, but I also believe that our acknowledgement of pride can produce the great virtue of humility.
To blow up, lose it, boil over. Anger is a sin that so affects our lives that often we can’t bear to name it. In his chapter on anger, Guinness points out both the areas it may be lurking in our lives and what our response to this vice should be. Guinness does this by showing us how the little things reveal our true character and our need to follow the second greatest commandment wholeheartedly. When we are not what the world considers an “angry person” we often fall prey to the notion that our struggle with this vice is either non-existent or minuscule.
In the attempt to explain morality, two prominent theories exist- moral relativism and moral objectivism. Morality in a sense is difficult to explain, both theories attempt to shed a bit of light in way to break down its complexity. Moral Relativism argues in the view that morality exists only due to the fact that it is relative, or in respect to, cultural or individual beliefs. In a sense, it is up to the people to determine what is right and wrong. On the other hand, moral objectivism views that morality is not parallel, or relative, to one 's beliefs. That it is independent and not subjective to one 's interpretations, thus it is objective and universal moral facts exist. Louis. P. Pojman, an American philosopher and professor,
In the article “What makes us moral” by Jeffrey Kluger, he describes how morality is defined and how the people follow rules. Kluger discusses about scientific research that has been done to point out the important reasons of morality. Kluger explains that a person’s decision to do something good or bad is based on empathy, that humans tend not to do bad to those they sympathize with. Kluger also compares humans with animals and thinks that morality is the only thing that separates us from animals. I do agree with Kluger that people are born with a sense of right and wrong, but we should be taught how to use it. We learned to be nicer to those around us because we already know the type of person they are, and the morality we learned as children
Every individual is taught what is right and what is wrong from a young age. It becomes innate of people to know how to react in situations of killings, injuries, sicknesses, and more. Humans have naturally developed a sense of morality, the “beliefs about right and wrong actions and good and bad persons or character,” (Vaughn 123). There are general issues such as genocide, which is deemed immoral by all; however, there are other issues as simple as etiquette, which are seen as right by one culture, but wrong and offense by another. Thus, morals and ethics can vary among regions and cultures known as cultural relativism.