Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morals of the crucible
Morals exposed in the crucible
Essay about reverend hale in the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morals of the crucible
Moral development focuses on the change and understanding of morality, which are principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong behaviour. A person with strong moral beliefs has developed overtime what they learn to value. Nevertheless, one who is morally weak does not have the strength to resist morally wrong ethics. As evident in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 affect the moral development of the characters, which ultimately affects their beliefs, relationships, and virtues. Reverend Hale, a committed minister, grows righteously strong in The Crucible by modifying his beliefs about the witch trials to become remorseful, whereas Mary Warren, a servant to the Proctor household, declines in moral stature …show more content…
because she is easily influenced by malicious characters. Reverend Hale questions his faith about the validity of witchcraft as well as his knowledge regarding the trials, which leads him to strengthen his integrity and righteous qualities.
After realizing that judge Danforth is in control of the proceedings, Hale, who was once confident, is convinced that John Proctor is innocent: “I may shut my conscience to it no more -- private vengeance is working through this testimony! From the beginning [Proctor] has struck me true. By my oath to Heaven, I believe him now” (Miller 105). Reverend Hale’s acknowledgement of Abigail Williams, a selfish and vindictive orphan, and the girls’ potential fraud reveals his sense of integrity and pursuit of justice. Hale refuses to be apart of a corrupt system that determines a humans’ individuality, which portrays his firm moral stature. After Hale leaves his position in the court, he returns to Salem “to counsel Christians [as] they should belie themselves. There [was] blood on [Hale’s] head!” (121). As Hale advises the upright community to confess witchcraft in order to save themselves, he reveals his selflessness personality. Hale realizes that his culpability for the deaths of innocent citizens makes him self-aware of his wrongdoings. By disavowing Abigail, Reverend Hale evolves into a morally powerful character by developing a strong sense of integrity and …show more content…
mercy. In contrast to Reverend Hale’s development, Mary Warren is easily influenced by her peers and environment, feeling captive by Abigail due to her violent threats and acting accordingly to Abigail.
When Danforth asks Mary during a trial to faint like she did before, she explains “[i]t [was] only sport in the beginning, but then the whole world cried spirits, spirits, and I promise you, Mr Danforth, I only thought I saw them but I did not” (Miller 100). Describing the state of mass hysteria that Salem is experiencing illustrates how Mary can be caught up in the commotion. Emotionally, the feelings Mary is experiencing are real, however, logically the perception is more than false, which explains how much power the witch trials have. Additionally, Mary Warren is enthralled by Abigail Williams’s chaotic actions during a trial, and Mary declares that Proctor is “the Devil’s man!...Abby, I’ll never hurt you more!” (110). Mary’s opinion on the charges change due to Abigail’s hysterical accusations and peer pressure, now defending Abigail against John Proctor. Mary does this despite knowing that Abigail is a liar, revealing to the reader how gullible Mary is when she is around those who intimidate her. Mary’s incapabilities lead her to be easily influenced by her surroundings, ultimately contributing to her decline in virtuous
status. Due to the untrustworthy community of Salem, Reverend Hale and Mary William evolve into two contradictory characters due to their changed beliefs on the witch trials. The word “crucible” is defined as a container of metal employed for heating substances at high temperatures. In The Crucible, the container is Salem, while the substances are the people, and the temperature are the accusations; the accusations of the Salem Witch Trials refine the characteristics of Hale. Simultaneously, the allegations damage and destroy the ethics of Mary Warren. The Salem witch trials strongly affected the morality of two characters in opposing ways, which generate conflicts in relationships and beliefs.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, is about mass hysteria of witches being in the town of Salem, Massachusetts. An educated man named Revered Hale arrived in the town with his exclusive knowledge of witches to help the town eliminate the presence of the Devil. He became a member of the court and aided in putting innocent people in jail or hung. As Hale started to see the consequences of his actions, he struggled with fixing his mistakes. The change in his perspective of the witch trials caused his overall personality and attitude to change as well. Hale’s dialogue, stage directions, and other people’s perceptions of him reveal a man motivated by good intentions; furthermore, his mission to help Salem destroyed evil in the beginning and his attempts
Corruption has always existed in our society since the beginning to present time due to conspiracies such as the witch trials and the communism era. The Crucible by Arthur Miller was written during the era of communism to mere the hysteria. The Crucible is about the Salem witch trials in Salem Massachusetts in 1692. It’s a corrupt witch trial in Salem that’s due to false accusations of witchcraft for personal gains. John Proctor is the protagonist in the story The Crucible who goes through the ultimate test by choosing his reputation over integrity. He also had an affair with a young girl named Abigail who is the antagonist and is the main reason the bloodshed is occurring in Salem. Initially, Proctor hesitates to deal with his sin, but as the play progresses, he begins to understand its effects; this ultimately leads him to find goodness in himself as he stands for the truth.
Mary realizes that what Abigail is doing is wrong and she’s the only one who can put a stop to it. Abigail’s frustration grew as Mary announced to the court that, “She [Abigail] sees nothin’!” (121) and tried to accuse her of murder. Abigail saw Mary’s confidence building up as Mary kept denying using witchcraft after she repeatedly accused Abby of it. Transition here Abigail screaming at the “bird” on the ceiling because she thought it was Mary, Mary supposedly sent to attack her as Danforth asks Mary, “Have you compacted with the Devil? Have you?”(121) and Mary replies with, “Never, Never” (121). Mary Warren knows that if she does not admit to using witchcraft she could be hung, but she knows she must put an end to Abby’s manipulation. Earlier in the novel, Mary was too intimidated by Abigail and would never have had the courage to accuse Abby of lying about the events in the woods. To successfully accuse Abby, Mary had to admit that, “I never saw no spirits” (112) which put her own life in danger as well. Until accusing Abby of witchcraft and murder in the court with John Proctor, Mary Warren had no confidence in herself and did what everyone else wanted her to do. At the end of the play, Mary made decisions for herself and wasn’t afraid to go against what everyone else was doing.
A basic sense of honesty is another of Mary Warren’s traits. In Act I she goes to Salem to convince Abigail to tell the truth about what really happened in the woods. When the witchcraft scare gets out of hand, Mary joins Abigail and the other girls in falsely accusing women of being witches. These false accusations are motivated by hysteria. There is evidence that Mary really believes that the women in court are bewitching her. She tells the judge that she thought she saw spirits. The other girls were screaming, and before she knew it, Mary was screaming with them. When she realizes that there are no spirits, Mary is willing to be truthful. After Elizabeth Proctor’s name is brought up in court, Mary Warren defends her against the accusation. At the end of Act II, the reader hopes that the basic sense of honesty will remain strong enough to allow Mary to testify on behalf of the accused women in Act III.
The test that Reverend John Hale faces is whether he can change his character early enough to redeem himself for the lives he has caused to be lost. He is the character that shows the most significant transformation overall. When he first comes to Salem, he is eager to find witchcraft and is honored that his scholastic skills are necessary. He feels that as an exorcist, it is his duty to help pe...
Statements from Hale show that he has realized the error of his ways. He decides to “shut [his] conscience no more” (223) and quits the court. Hale can no longer suppress his beliefs about the court and in effect, like Pontius Palter, absolves himself from the court. Next, Hale’s Words are used to show the immense amount of guilt that rests on his shoulder. Hale walks the prisons of Salem and, in knowing that “there is blood on [his] head” (234), “counsels Christians they should belie themselves” (234) even though he is also belying his reputation as reverend by doing this.
Morals are conforming to standards of what is right or just in behavior. In The Crucible most characters believed in morals. Salem is mostly run on what the church's morals are. Each character must abide by these rights and wrongs in order to be accepted into the church and town. During the time that this play has taken place the church and court were inseparable. So if the judges did not think you were right in "God's eyes" then you were proven guilty. And with dynamic characters such as John Proctor who strongly believe in his own morals may find it easy to have his life affected by this rule. Then there are our more characters like Mary Warren, Elizabeth Proctor, Reverend Paris, and Reverend John Hale who base their morals on the church and town they are more accepted or in "their place".
ruinously impact a whole community, is very aptly titled. By definition, a “crucible” is “a severe test,” and the challenges faced by Miller’s characters are many. The historical events dramatized in the play reflect how core human values, including truth, justice and love, are tested under life and death conditions. The trials of the characters and the values they hold dearly come when their simple, ordered world ceases to be black and white and easily deciphered, and is turned upside down in the gray shades of ambiguity.
Context: This part of the text is included at the beginning of the drama, telling the audience about Salem and its people. The author explains how a theocracy would lead to a tragedy like the Salem witch-hunts. This is the initial setting and is based on the principle that some people should be included and some excluded from society, according to their religious beliefs and their actions. This is basically the idea that religious passion, taken to extremes, results in tragedy. Miller is saying that even today extremes end up bad- communism, like strict puritans, was restrictive and extreme. It only made people suffer.
In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, justice and injustice is portrayed through the characters of John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor and Abigail Williams. It is also shown through the minor characters of Mary Warren and Mercy Lewis, followers of Abigail Williams, and through Danforth and various townspeople.
The Crucible – Human Nature Human nature was fully to blame for the disaster which took place in Salem in 1692. Human nature is what your character is made of in trying situations, and in 1692 scientific knowledge was extremely poor by today's standards and so all reoccurring problems were blamed on an evil force, whether it be the devil or witches or anything the imagination could conjure, hence human nature was being tested regularly. The decisions people made were critical to the disaster's progression, in today's scene in would have been dismissed within minutes, but the paranoia floating around in the town kept the ball rolling. People were so terrified of the thought of evil that any suggestion of it would create a preordained judgement in the mind of anyone, especially those who made judgement of the accused. To get to the supposed
The Crucible by Arthur Miller raises many thought provoking issues throughout the play, including the importance of personal integrity, injustice in society and the rights of the community versus the rights of the individual.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
Persecution has been a round for sometime and can be traced historically from the time of Jesus to the present time. Early Christians were persecuted for their faith in the hands of the Jews. Many Christians have been persecuted in history for their allegiance to Christ and forced to denounce Christ and others have been persecuted for failing to follow the laws of the land. The act of persecution is on the basis of religion, gender, race, differing beliefs and sex orientation. Persecution is a cruel and inhumane act that should not be supported since people are tortured to death. In the crucible, people were persecuted because of alleged witchcraft.
In every conflict there always seems to be at least one person to blame. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, many problems arise that deal with live and death. Many innocent people in this play were hanged during the Salem Witch Trials. Of course, there are many people that may be blamed. In The Crucible, one may find Abigail Williams, The Putnams, and Mary Warren to blame. Abigail was manipulative, The Putnams were very jealous, and Mary Warren was weak-willed.