In a sinister convergence of desperation and deceit, C. Montgomery Burns, Homer Whipershoneshire, Peter Mansbridge, and Martin Wallage orchestrated the murder of Sherlock Holmes, each contributing unique skills and motives to the crime. In a perplexing whodunit, the murders of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. John Watson appear to be linked to four prominent individuals - C. Montgomery Burns, Homer Whipershoneshire, Peter Mansbridge, and Martin Wallage. Each suspect harbours their motives and plays a critical part in executing the crime, driven by a potent cocktail of ambition, desperation, and revenge. As the investigation unfolds, it becomes evident that each man utilized their unique skillset to further their nefarious agendas, leaving behind deception …show more content…
The fact that Homer had already committed murder once suggested that he possessed the necessary ruthlessness to complete this task. Unknowing himself though, Homer utilized a knife with his initials on it, H.W. In the frenzied world of journalism, Peter Mansbridge and Martin Wallage are hungry for the next big story. When they stumbled upon the aftermath of the gruesome murders, they saw an opportunity to catapult their careers to new heights. Peter, consumed by ambition, seized control of the narrative, directing Martin to capture every gory detail in the picture. Their rush to document the scene led to a crucial oversight: Peter's distinctive peacock feather fell from his hat, leaving a literal mark of his presence at the crime scene. This lapse in judgment highlights the human frailty of even the most seasoned professionals, showing how our desire for success can cloud our judgment and lead us astray. In the tumultuous aftermath of the murders, each conspirator scrambled to conceal their involvement, fearful of the consequences of being caught
When Mr. Martin feels that his job, an important part of his life, is threatened he, decides to take action. Mr. Martin even fictionalizes a trial in his head. Through this trial Mr. Martin rationalizes Mrs. Barrows’ death as a justified homicide he states, “Gentlemen of the jury, I demand the death penalty for this horrible person”(2). The contemplation and planning that Mr. Martin put into getting rid of Mrs. Barrows reflects his systematic, wise and weak character, yet the intent of the crime does not. Mr. Martin is an introverted and submissive person therefore, he simply searched for an easier and keener way to correct Mr. Fitweiler’s error. Thus, it is confirmed that Mr. Martin did not intend to kill Mrs. Barrows, but rather wanted to prevent the destruction of the routine he lived by.
Although the true identity of Jack the Ripper has never been identified, experts have investigated Prince Albert Victor, Thomas Neill Cream, and Montague John Druitt as prime suspects. Based on facts and information given, the researcher found evidence that Jack the Ripper was Montague John Druitt. Druitt’s family, appearance, and suicide support the researcher’s claim. Ultimately, the obsession with the Jack the Ripper case will never perish.
This paper will explore the relationship between Sherlock Holmes and his companion and friend Dr. John Watson. What is the relationship between Holmes and Watson? Are they compatible or are their differences to great for them to overcome. Looking at how they work together will also be a key factor in how well the relationship works between the two of them. Do their own interests and abilities get in the way? Does the time period in which they live factor into the environment of their communication styles?
For Sherlock Holmes, his partner in crime is Dr. John H. Watson. Not only is he a trusted friend, but also he is Holmes’ associate and the first person narrator of the Sherlock tales. The stories of Sherlock Holmes are a collection of short stories and fictional novels created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. These stories are based on a famous and most notorious detective all throughout London, Sherlock Holmes. Along his side, Dr. Watson narrates his and Holmes’ detective cases and reveals Sherlock’s abilities and knowledge of solving cases and fighting deadly crimes. For the duration of the stories, Watson and Holmes share a particular relationship where Holmes verbally dominates Watson, “You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is very clear” (Doyle 241). When he isn’t insulting Dr. Watson he talks about how much he relies on his partner, “I am lost without my Boswell” (Doyle 243).
Critics pose interesting views concerning the identity and significance of the mysterious third murderer. Henry Irving provides an adamant argument as to how the Attendant could be the third murderer. Irving uses multiple cases in the story where, when interpreted a certain way, one can see how the Attendant is a prime suspect. This man's knowledge of and comfort with the structure and surroundings of the castle shows that he would be a valuable asset to the murderers.
In the novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick, Dr. Watson, is confronted with an eerie mystery situated around the fabled Hound of the Baskervilles. They are challenged with many risks and in the end must unearth the mystery before it is too late. Throughout the enigma, Sir Arthur explores the theme of what can happen when one does or does not let themselves be ruled and dominated by fear.
The book, "The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher' by Kate Summerscale published in April of 2008, is a mysterious murder case based on true events that occurred in England. On the 29th of June in 1860 a young boy, only the age of three, was gruesomly murdered in his own house, Road Hill He was found in a n outside privy with his throat slit and covered in blood with a blanket over his body to try and hide the evidence. With very little things known about detectives in that time, there were only eight detectives in all of England. The main detective in this book is a Mr. Whicher, who was the best detective known for his work. Mr. Whicher was not on the case for very long when he had to come to a shocking truth that the young boy must have been murdered by a member living in the house.
In Hound of the Baskervilles written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes and Watson have a special type of relationship.In the beginning the reader is shown that Dr.Watson is a foil to Sherlock Holmes.The meaning of “Foil”s a character who contrasts with another character (usually the protagonist) in order to highlight particular qualities of the other character.In the book the reader see’s 3 thing that are always memorable.Watson is seen as smart but Holmes will always be seen as a genius,Watson is very open while Holmes is very secretive,and both of them trust each other but as seen that Watson is the one that trust more.Over time the reader can tell that Watson and Holmes are alike but very different which makes them great partners.
Sherlock Holmes, one of the most famous fictional characters in literary history is a detective capable of solving the most complex mysteries. The author behind the character, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a very successful British writer. The majority of his literary success is due to his crime-fiction tales such as the Sherlock Holmes series. However, Mr. Doyle and Mr. Holmes himself must not take all the credit because there is another character that plays a major role in the stories success. He goes by the name of Dr. Watson, Holmes’ sidekick. The importance of Dr. Watson is evident in many of Doyle’s stories such as A Scandal in Bohemia and A Study in Scarlett.
The Murder Of Roger Ackroyd Fictional Titles 2. Write a short sequel to the book you have read to a prospective publisher. That evening during dinner, Caroline noticed that Dr. Sheppard was unusually quiet. She asked Dr. Sheppard who was the killer. But Dr. Sheppard merely said, "I really have no idea, Poirot did not tell me anything."
The presence of brotherhood in the Sherlock Holmes stories is notable because it occurs primarily between two starkly different men, though Doyle’s assertion through Holmes and Watson that brotherhood is vital does not diminish. Holmes, an intelligent man whose “observations have fairly astounded” (Scarlet 24) Watson serves as a foil to Watson himself, who finds contemporary knowledge of vast importance. This contrasts Holmes’ opinion that “useless facts” (Scarlet 25), like those pertaining to the solar system, serve him no purpose. However, as Watson is a “Doctor of Medicine” (Scarlet 17), their mutual interest in observation and science ultimately strengthens the depth of their relationship, allowing Holmes and Watson to be included a sort of “brotherhood” of science. In fact, in A Study in Scarlet, it is under the umbrella of science, at the “chemical laboratory” (Scarlet 18), that Watson and Holmes first meet. Further, this inclusion ...
...Henry, though he describes himself as an “amateur sleuth” (p.125). But it is Miss Marple who solves the case, although most investigations are done by the police. She is the one who finds the murderer, putting the right theory, after young Peter Carmody, Adelaide Jefferson’s son, serves an important piece of evidence.
Watson takes it to the extreme in what he does with Holmes. In the story before the investigation, Holmes and Watson are confronted and threatened with their lives if they continue and investigate (Doyle 100). Now Holmes, being the sarcastic man he is, challenges him and Watson is left with a decision, he could either risk his life and become a better partner with Holmes, or stay at home and be sensible. However instead of doing the rational thing and keeping his life secure he decides to go risk his life just for a better relationship with Holmes. Watson is so involved with this pursuit of a partner that he basically will do anything for Holmes, even if it means putting his life in
Although these theories where mostly based around Russian folk tales “Propp’s broad theory, around much earlier narratives, can still be applied” (MSG) in this episode of ‘Sherlock’ there are not all characters fit into these roles for example there is no princess, as a reward for the hero or her father who rewards him. Yet there is in fact a villain in the form of Moriarty, a hero in the shape of Sherlock and a helper in the appearance of John Watson. Sherlock Holmes is a well known, complex and unique fictional hero whose “greatness as characterized by Dr. John Watson speaks to Victorian notions of leadership embodied in the Carlylian hero”(pg. 65) Although the character of Sherlock is known to be heartless and self righteous, the BBC’s adaption and Benedict Cumberbatch’s portrayal of the character is sharp, intelligent and sensitive. As discussed in Lynnette Porter’s essay “The BBC portrayal of a 21st century Holmes in the television series Sherlock introduces a younger, edgier character than the Canonical Holmes, but this contemporary character is also information literate, although he has some very interesting
In the rest of the essay I will analyse the structure of the stories, the social aspects of the stories and the character of Holmes himself. I will use examples and quotes from the stories "The Man With The Twisted Lip," "The Speckled Band," "The Boscombe Valley Mystery," "The Red-Headed League" and "The Noble Bachelor. " In the 19th Century the Victorians views on many things were different. This includes the police force.