Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of restorative justice
Advantages and disadvantages of restorative justice
Restorative justice a place in the criminal justice system journals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of restorative justice
Circles are a method of restorative encounter that can be traced back to 1992 when they were first used in the town of Mayo in the Yukon Territory of Canada. The judge that first used this method saw a number of advantages to using the circle. He pointed out that some advantages were that it promoted a shared sense of responsibility, it involved the offender and the victim, it created a constructive environment, and it extended the focus to the underlying cause (Van Ness & Strong, 2010). These are some of the advantages that are focused on today when circles are used in the restorative justice system, but now there is something known as a Modified Circle, which varies some from the traditional Restorative circle. The two types of circles have …show more content…
much in common, but vary in some areas as well. Modified Circles are circles that usually take place inside the prisons and include the inmate whose situation will be covered in the circle, as well as fellow inmates. There are also facilitators involved in this circle to help guide the members of the circle in the right direction. This method, or type of circle, was discovered by chance when Eric, an inmate at Waiawa, was participating in a training program. When Eric got word that he would be moving to Laumaka, a residential work furlough program located in Honolulu, he was asked about his plans by one of the facilitators. The facilitator wanted to know what his plans were after he would leave Laumaka. Eric did not have any plans of where he would live or what he would do once he left, but he mentioned wishing he did have a plan. The facilitator then came up with the idea for Eric, the facilitators, and the other inmates to all work on putting a plan together for him. For the remainder of the meeting, one of the facilitators recorded on a white board everything that the group said. Eric received a printed four-page copy of his plans two days later. It was titled Circle Summary and Transition Plan and it included what he was most proud of accomplishing while in prison, the strengths that the other men saw in him, and his plans for the future. Eric’s situation marked the first Modified Circle ever used (Walker, 2009). Restorative Circles and Modified Circles have the same focus, which is on helping incarcerated individuals change their future behavior and how they can lead happy, healthy, and peaceful lives.
The main difference between the two types of circles is the parties involved in the circle. Restorative Circles tend to involve the offender, victim, friends and family, members of the community, and usually representatives of the justice system (Van Ness & Strong, 2010). Modified Circles typically include the facilitators, the inmate whose situation is being discussed, and other inmates who may benefit from helping their fellow inmate. The Modified Circle does not mean to exclude the other parties normally involved in Restorative Circles, but it can just be difficult to invite the other parties and have them show up. It can be time consuming and almost impossible when inviting loved ones to attend the circle. Many inmates do not have loved ones that are willing or able to attend, which can make it difficult to find individuals to invite. The problem with this being time consuming is that some inmates have limited time, like Eric who only had a week before he …show more content…
left. The same things accomplished in a Restorative Circle may not be able to be accomplished in a Modified Circle because of the parties involved, but there is a benefit to having other inmates participate in the circle. Other inmates involved in the Modified Circle may be able to apply what is being said to their own situations. For example, in Eric’s Modified Circle a fellow inmate recognized that he too had wrongly used women after Eric had spoke on wanting to reconcile this. His acknowledgements of his wrongdoing were a demonstration of how group members can imitate each other’s actions and learn from one another (Walker, 2009). This is something that would not happen in a typical Restorative Circle, as other inmates are not usually one of the parties involved. One party that is not a part of the Modified Circle is the victim, which is a huge focus in the typical Restorative Circle.
There is a question of whether or not the victim still receives the outcome he or she is looking for. In most cases, the victim probably wants to see the offender show empathy, have a desire to turn his or her life around, and know that the offender will not hurt anyone else. Although the victim may not be as aware of this when a Modified Circle is used, it can still be accomplished. When Modified Circles are used, inmates still take responsibility for their actions, work on plan to change their behavior, and strive to create a better version of themselves. If these outcomes are what most victims are looking for, then they can still be accomplished in the absence of the
victim. In Eric’s case, he was working full-time, had been released from the Laumaka work program, and was off parole in only six months (Walker, 2009). The Modified Circle showed successful in Eric’s case, and would probably show successful in other cases as well. While Restorative Circles focus on al parties involved and how they were all affected, Modified Circles put more of the focus on helping the offender have a successful reintegration. Since more focus is put on this in a Modified Circle, the reintegration process may be more successful than when a typical restorative circle is used. This type of circle can also benefit the other inmates involved in the group, which can help their reintegration be more successful as well. When the issue at hand is the reintegration of an inmate, Modified Circles may serve to be more successful as more time can be spent on that specific issue. Restorative Circles are also beneficial, but more so in other areas, such as the restoring of the relationships broken as a result of the crime. Modified Circles benefit other inmates, while still getting the outcomes that most victims want. Modifies circles are a great program to use upon the release of inmates and it could really help them turn their lives around, as it did for Eric.
Circle Justice is a Native American way of justice. It seeks healing in contrast to punishment. Unlike jail Circle Justice helps heal your soul and helps figure yourself out. Also it helps with your inner peace and helps you become respectful to others. Disadvantages of Circle Justice include possible breaches of confidentiality. Some people feel that criminals are not punished equally or fairly under the Circle Justice philosophy. Circle Justice requires the criminal
Roach, K. (2000). Changing punishment at the turn of the century: Restorative justice on the rise. Canadian Journal of Criminology. 42, (2), 249-280.
Circle Justice can be used for both adult and juvenile offenders. One of Circle Justices main goals is to build a sense of community, to solve conflict, and to make sure that everyone’s voice in the community is heard. Conclusion: There is a way to make the healing process more effective with Circle Justice. Circle Justice can actually be used to provide a sense of healing for everyone. It also makes sure that the community has a say.
Restorative justice is defined as “using humanistic, no punitive strategies to right wrongs and restore social harmony” (Siegel, 2008, p. 189). Instead of imposing harsh penalties on offenders like long prison sentences or even the death penalty, restorative justice calls for a more rehabilitative approach, such as reconciliation and offender assistance.
The purpose of this paper is to examine why the justice system fails for First Nations persons and alternative rehabilitation methods used by Aboriginal people, comprised of Aboriginal people, for Aboriginal people, in hopes to rehabilitate offenders and prevent criminal behavior in the Aboriginal community from precontact to today. Through the attempts of Aboriginal people to take control of their own destiny’s in the ever going struggle to attain self-government I will examine the aims and structure of one of these alternative rehabilitation methods, the Sentencing Circle used today to address the need to return to community based “Restorative Justice Programs” in the Aboriginal community
With the authority to discipline, our society has the ability to influence the future. Although, punishment is used to human savagery , it can also be used to exert power. The act of consigning punishment is extensively documented in literature. Such is the topic in Ben Mikaelsen’s novel, Touching Spirit Bear. Cole Matthews proves that the power to punish is often misused, resulting in detrimental side effects for society. Thankfully, Cole’s most recent crime is judged using the Native American tradition known as Circle Justice. Due to the process’ restorative approach, Cole is allocated a punishment, which allows him to peruse a path towards redemption. As demonstrated by Cole’s transformation in Ben Mikaelsen’s Touching Spirit Bear, justice provides redemption as illustrated through setting, symbolism, and characterization, which proves society should refrain from allocating justice solely based on punishment.
A. Community Justice and Restorative Justice –Restorative justice is an alternative to traditional court processing in that it seeks to involve offenders, victims, and ...
There are better ways to punish criminals and protect society than mass incarceration. The state and local governments should be tough on crime, but “in ways that emphasize personal responsibility, promote rehabilitation and treatment, and allow for the provision of victim restitution where applicable” (Alec, 2014). The government also succeeds in overseeing punishment but fails to “…take into account the needs of offenders, victims, and their communities.” (Morris, 2002: Pg. 1 and 2). Alternatives to incarceration, such as sentencing circles, victim offender mediation, and family conferences, can successfully hold criminals responsible while allowing them a chance to get “back on their feet”. Research has proven that rehabilitation has lowered the rate of re-offenders, reducing the crime rate, protecting communities and also saves a lot of
A circle justice is for healing. It can be for community. You can have an individual, a group or also community session. Also it is part of a Native American culture.
The program is modeled after similar programs that begun in the 1970s and 1980s in New Zealand and Australia (Lawson 2004). It is used in schools, juvenile courts, and youth centers. However, for this discussion I will use the facts from Catherine Lawson’s restorative justice study in Missouri. In Lawson’s writings she references Derek R. Brookes, who came up with the conclusion that restorative justice attempts to produce these three outcomes: reconciliation, reparation, and transformation. Reconciliation is stage where all the apologies happen. Reparation is the stage at which the offender takes responsibility for his or actions, by providing fair restitution to the victim and lastly transformation is the stage where the offender is re-guided back into society as a productive member and is out of the cycle of
As the purpose of restorative justice is to mend the very relationship between the victim, offender, and society, communities that embrace restorative justice foster an awareness on how the act has harmed others. Braithwaite (1989) notes that by rejecting only the criminal act and not the offender, restorative justice allows for a closer empathetic relationship between the offender, victims, and community. By acknowledging the intrinsic worth of the offender and their ability to contribute back to the community, restorative justice shows how all individuals are capable of being useful despite criminal acts previous. This encourages offenders to safely reintegrate into society, as they are encouraged to rejoin and find rapport with the community through their emotions and
This approach has introduced a criminal justice policy agenda. In the past, victims to criminal activities have been outsiders to the criminal conflict. In recent times, many efforts have been made to give the victims a more central role in the criminal justice system. Some of these efforts were introduced a few years back, though even at that time, these efforts were seen as long overdue. Some of these efforts include access to state compensation and forms of practical support. For advocates of restorative justice, crime is perceived primarily as a violation of people and relationships, and the aim is to make amends for all the harm suffered by victims, offenders and communities. The most commonly used forms of restorative justice include direct mediation, indirect mediation, restorative cautioning, sentencing panels or circles and conferencing. In recent...
It’s quite evident that one can hardly tell which of these principles of effective intervention are more effective or important than the other when it comes to community corrections. Nonetheless, the best results can only be obtained if these principles are applied together; by reinforcing one principle with the others (Anstiss, 2013; Cullen & Gendreau, 2011).
“Restorative justice is an approach to crime and other wrongdoings that focuses on repairing harm and encouraging responsibility and involvement of the parties impacted by the wrong.” This quote comes from a leading restorative justice scholar named Howard Zehr. The process of restorative justice necessitates a shift in responsibility for addressing crime. In a restorative justice process, the citizens who have been affected by a crime must take an active role in addressing that crime. Although law professionals may have secondary roles in facilitating the restorative justice process, it is the citizens who must take up the majority of the responsibility in healing the pains caused by crime. Restorative justice is a very broad subject and has many other topics inside of it. The main goal of the restorative justice system is to focus on the needs of the victims, the offenders, and the community, and focus
Johnstone, G. and Ness, D. (2007) Handbook of Restorative Justice. USA: Willan Publishing. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/the-big-question-what-are-the-alternatives-to-prison-and-do-they-work-419388.html [Accessed 01 January 2014].