Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise and fall of the Ottoman empire
Islamic influence in Turkey
Rise and fall of the Ottoman empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise and fall of the Ottoman empire
Religion in Modern Turkey and Iran I will compare and contrast the role of religion in modern Turkey and Iran, beginning from the First World War to the present. WWI was a turning point for religion in both countries, but in extremely different ways. Anatolia was an area that was home to many civilizations throughout history. Each time a group settled they imposed their own ideals, language and Islam to the area. It also was an area under the powerful, Ottoman Empire that reigned for over 600 years. The First World War (1914-1918) resulted in the extinction of the Ottoman Empire, which was the regime that controlled the territory of modern day Turkey. Many reforms and new ideals began to take shape during the decline of the Ottoman Empire. …show more content…
As Kemal’s rose in power he had a great influence on many non-traditional ideals. Kemalism was composed of six pillars. Revolutionism, populism and statism (estatism), were three pillars inspired by the Russians. Republicanism, nationalism and secularism (laicism) were three pillars of Kemalism that were inspired by the French revolution. This concept of laicism became a core belief in Kemal’s leadership over Turkey. It was a term that described a state in which would not uphold or support any one religious denomination. Those who supported Kemal’s lacist reforms were called Kemalists. They upheld beliefs that kept the role of religion in its rightful place and “generally speaking, the Kemalist position combines a kind of authoritarian democracy with a westernized secular …show more content…
This was an incredible feat in Islamic history, because by attaining secularization, a part of the state that held religious power had to be completely removed. Kemal’s driving force in implementing secularism was his strive to decrease the need and significance of values and to extinguish institutions that were stamped with Islam. He used the concept of a Grand National Assembly to gain political legitimization and because he used Islam in his favor he also gained the sultan-caliph leadership. The concept millet, which was once used to describe religious subdivisions, was reconstructed to give attribute to a ‘nation’. This shows the blurred lines and slowly widening the gap between an Islamic state and a secular nation that was taking place. (mahalle MARDIN pg.
I will be discussing "A Letter on the Cruelty of the Turks". This letter was written in the year of 1438 in Constantinople. Bartholomew de Giano wrote this letter to to Friar Abbot of Sartiano. Bartholomew is letting Friar know the number of people the Turks have made turn away from Christ. He even lowers the number in hopes that he will believe him.
The Ottoman Empire was a large empire that lasted for several hundred years. They were primarily Sunni Muslims and they were led by the Sultan. Over time, they had a long decline, mostly because they hadn’t progressed with the times. France and Britain were getting very involved with their affairs in Egypt. By the late 1800’s most of the Ottoman Empire was gone. During World War One (WWI), in 1916, the Arabs helped Great Britain to defeat the Ottoman Empire. In 1918 the Ottomans surrendered and their empire was dissolved. When mandates were established it caused nationalist ro revolt. General Mustafa
The Young Turks, a group of young military officers who wanted to keep their country’s decline from continuing, wanted to improve general conditions for certain peoples in the Ottoman empire. Not only was anyone who was not Muslim treated as second class citizens, they were also required by law to pay more for their taxes than a muslim civilian. Realizing this, in the 1890s and early 1900s, an organization called The Young Turks arose, pressing for political reform calling for the right to vote, a constitutional government and and an end to discriminatory practices such as the aforementioned raised taxes. Eventually, The Young Turks staged a coup successfully in an attempt to change the rule to a constitutional monarchy . This, however, had some unforeseen consequences.
While taking the class of Early Modern European History there was two states that really stuck out and peaked my interest the most. They were the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe. If you compare and contrast both the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe during the 16th Century through the 18th Century, you will see that there are a number of similarities as well as differences when you look at the expansion of the states. You will also see many of these contrasts as well when you look in terms of each states military and commerce. Although the Ottoman Empire existed before the 16th century and continued to exist past the 18th century and in great decline until the early 20th century, when looking at the state as a whole the time period of 1500’s through the 1700’s is a period of growth and strength. It is perhaps even known as a golden era for the state, when taking in to comparison the Early Modern Europeans where the same time period marks a change in how society thought and how people were treated.
The emergence of the Young Turk movement, the decline of the Ottoman Empire, and its defeat in World War I, saw many changes in Asia Minor. The internal conflict with the Armenians during the war, and the flight of hundreds of thousands of Greeks, led to a dramatic change in the population of the emerging Republic of Turkey. The moving of the Turkish capital to Ankara in 1923 led to a shift from the previous capital, Constantinople.
The formation of states and political legitimacy has most of the time been intertwined with the religious authority that resided in the state. In Christian Europe, the church was the initial source of legitimacy post-Roman Empire. The rise and fall (and rise again) of the Catholic church and the Protestant Reformation help shaped state structures and ultimately, the rise of the secular state. In contrast, in Dar-al-Islam, there was a unique and changing relationship between the state and the ulamas because politics and religion was more or less in the same realm. In some instances, the state and ulamas remained relatively separate but in other cases, the ulamas became the
Hilāl, ʻAlī Al-Dīn. Islamic Resurgence in the Arab World. New York, NY: Praeger, 1982. Print.
The failure of defensive development in Egypt, the Ottoman Empire, and Persia had a large and long-lasting effect on the Muslim world. The original goal of the reforms was to end European intervention, revive the weakening empires, and to be on equal standing with Europe. Yet, all three empires over-utilized the wealth and knowledge of Europe, leading to their ultimate demise. The empires wished to impose reforms in the military, economics, education, and law which the region had not experienced previously. This resulted in backlash, violence, and division within the empires eventually leading to bankruptcy, ironically, to those which they wished to separate themselves.
The Iranian Revolution of 1979 was a religious uprising that involved the collapse of the longstanding Monarchy in Iran. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the background and ideology of the Iranian Revolution with the Russian Revolution of 1917. I will then outline the major differences and similarities between the two.
...vided and chaotic. The Ottoman Turks took advantage of the declining empire during a war often referred to as the Turkish War. During this time, the Ottomans, which were mostly composed of Sunni Muslims, conquered the Byzantine Empire through a series of battles, and expanded the territory into Balkan. The new Ottoman Empire peaked under the leadership of Emperor Süleyman I. While the Ottoman Empire reached its highest point due to it’s military and governmental strengths, the Byzantine Empire fell in 1265.
...olutionist reforms proved permanent, and gave Turkey domestic peace and a measure of prosperity even in his lifetime. But Kemalism has also left Turkey with a divided identity - Europeanised but not quite European, alienated from the Islamic world but still a Muslim country.
Atatürk undertook a series of reforms to "raise Turkey to the level of modern civisilizations" which can be grouped under five titles
... by the method with which the military elite class dealt with factionalism as a result of the slave-state system in which they lived. The Sultan was more of a factional leader defined by how much popular support he carried and was in constant danger of being overthrown. As a result, the economic system that was implemented which intaled a hybridization of the Egyptian bureaucratic system and the Syrian Iqta system was founded on appeasement of the ruling elite class. Tax distribution and land grants were given to amir to both ensure loyalty and codify the legitimacy of the sultanate. While local participation was limited, the Mamluk state was based on a religious Sunni conceptualization of legitimacy and therefore the Ulama offered the local Arab Muslim populations opportunity to carry a measure of power through religious education and spiritual community leadership.
...e pluralistic market needed to establish and maintain a high percentage of religious participation within a population. The Muslim Brotherhood provides many social welfare services and benefits that has permeated throughout the Islamic world. This has led to many embracing the religious extremism and social programs of the Brotherhood, despite increased violence from the state against the Brotherhood’s leadership and organizations. Sufism, also, portrayed a much more diverse interpretation of Sunni Islamic practices and has proven to be an example of conversion that follows closely along the lines of religious familiarity. Even when comparing the Islamic world to the United States, it was clear that diversity in the religious marketplace exists and that social movements and religious schools of thought create a supply and demand environment to win over constituents.
Religious nationalism is defined as a nation that sponsors an official national church. Religious nationalism is different from nationalism in that a person identifies with their nation in nationalism. Nations with religious nationalism have a state religion and individuals identify with both. Oftentimes leaders use religious ideology to create loyalty which results in religious nationalism (Little 1). Turkey, Iran and Pakistan are three examples of countries with religious nationalism. These countries have similar conditions regarding state religion and conditions of society. This paper will discuss the different aspects of religious nationalism, the history, and the causes of religious nationalism. Lastly, the countries of Turkey, Iran and Pakistan will serve as examples of countries with religious nationalism. Religious nationalism is a growing aspect in today’s world and the religion of Islam encompasses a large number of religious nationalist countries.