Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence in the Media
How does media influence violence
Violence in the Media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Violence in the Media
Individuals become desensitized to certain things such as violence and bullying when they are overexposed to these things in their environment. Maggie Nelson in her essay “Great to Watch” explores the violence prevalent present culture. She claims that repeated exposure to violence make individuals desensitized. Desensitization to violence not only reduces responsiveness towards violence, but can also increase support for violence such as the event of Bernie Goetz, where Goetz shot four African American in the New York City subway. Malcolm Gladwell, in his essay “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime” discusses the event of the Bernie Goetz incident to demonstrate the history of violence in New York …show more content…
City and the effect it had on the people of New York City. He references the “Broken Windows Theory” of James Q. Wilson and George Kelling, which explains how little unnoticed and overlooked things in society can eventually create a big issue in the society. Furthermore, Loffreda explores the unnoticed and overlooked things such as intolerance and bullying, which led to a brutal anti-gay murder. Beth Loffreda, in her essay selection from “Losing Matt Shepard: Life and Politics in the Aftermath of Anti-Gay Murder” discusses the murder of Matt Shepard and the repercussions it had on the town of Laramie. She investigates the social issues of intolerance and cultural norms presents within the town of Laramie, which eventually led to the horrifying murder of Matt Shepard. Repeated exposure to violence or sadism from sources such as the media or one's surroundings reduces an individual's fear or anxiety towards violent acts in general. Eventually this desensitization culminates to what Gladwell describes as the "tipping point," meaning that the desensitization become the moment of critical mass, where the idea of violence or violent behavior spread really fast. Desensitization creates emotional distance in human interaction through reducing an individual's ability to empathize with one another.Violence decreases the perception of injury severity as well as decreasing attention to violent events. Individuals are being exposed to violence in their everyday life through media, such as games and TV shows. Overexposure to violence makes individuals less sensitive to violent events. Nelson writes that “Paranoia as intolerance. ‘Paranoia places its faith in exposure,’ ...-which is to say that the exposure of a disturbing fact or situation does not necessarily alter it, but, in fact, may further the circular conviction that one can never be paranoid enough” (Nelson 300). As individuals get exposed to violence again and again, it becomes a general event that is part of their regular life. Furthermore, desensitization can also be applied to intolerance and cultural norms. Deriving from Nelson’s theory, the majority of people in Laramie are desensitized by the cultural norms of intolerance. As Loffreda writes that “Those realities may be too complicated to sum up through the convenient shorthand of railroad tracks and trailer parks, but they still flow, hushed yet turbulent, beneath daily life in this town”(Loffreda 255). People of Laramie became desensitized to the intolerance. Individuals in Laramie were so “hushed” towards the violence and intolerance that media had to twist the “turbulent” part of the story of Matt Shepard's murder in order to get the attention of public. This method of media shows that people are so desensitized that it requires twisted and manipulated story in order to get their attention. The media knows that people just wouldn’t react or pay too much attention to a murder because they became desensitized to violence. Furthermore, desensitization toward violence decreases the reaction to the violent act as well as reduces the hatred for violence. Desensitization toward violent acts shift public consciousness in such a manner where individuals perceived violence as normalcy.Violence increases the belief among individual that violence is normative.
Since violence had become part of every individual's life, they see it as a regular event, which reduces the hatred for violence. Nelson implies that when an individual get exposed to controversial violent acts such executions, those individuals are less likely to react and take action against this violent topic. Nelson argues that “Model of shaming-us into-action-by-unmasking-the-truth-of-our actions cannot hold a candle to our capacity to assimilate horrific images and to justify or shrug off horrific behavior” (Nelson 300). Desensitization to violence takes away the individual's senses of supporting “right” and “wrong” cause of violent acts. As a results, individuals either try to justify the violent acts or just ignore or deny. Likewise, instead of getting horrified by the news of the murder of Matt Shepard, some residents of Laramie became defensive, by attempting to deny the existence of intolerance in their town. Loffreda writes that‘“Hate is not a Wyoming value,’ residents kept telling each other, telling the visitor, telling the press. ‘We really take care of each other here,’ a woman told me one day in a coffee shop, echoing a dearly held ethos I’ve heard from many in Laramie ”(Loffreda 254). Media, through their twisting and manipulation of the murder was …show more content…
still able to bring out the existence of intolerance and cultural norm of Laramie town. However, through the media exposure, they became defensive instead of accepting the truth. Furthermore, this behaviour lead individuals to forget about right and wrong cause, also instead of being horrified, they become intrigued by violence and they use it as entertainment. Desensitization creates spectatorship where individuals enjoy the violent act as well as feel powerful by watching other people getting victimized of violence which lead to more violence. Spectatorship is created by dehumanizing the victim of violent act, which increases the aggression among spectator as well as decrease helping the victim of violence or intervening in violent act to help individuals. Gladwell describe the reaction of the media to the event, where Bernie Goetz shot four young African American boys who tried to mug him on a subway train. The Media supported Goetz’s actions and spoke of him as a hero. Gladwell writes that a few days later “ the New York Post ran two pictures on its front page: one of Goetz,handcuffed...and one of the boys Goetz shot-black...being released from the hospital. The headline read, ‘led Away in Cuffs while Wounded Mugger Walks to Freedom”( Gladwell 150). Through this headline, the newspaper made Goetz the hero and dehumanized the young boys in order to create sympathy for Goetz. Through using the phrase “wounded mugger” to describe the young boy, the media dehumanized the young boy in the mind of people in New York City.Through dehumanization, media supported and justifies Goetz’s violent actions. Dehumanization is the antecedent and descendant of violence. Violence, intolerance, and prejudice toward an individual makes them dehumanize meaning they are not worthy of human treatment. Nelson describes the Blue Servo uses project, where publics through the use of surveillance cameras can watch the US-Mexican border to find any illegal or violent activities such as looking for “illegal immigrant”. As a result, it creates spectatorship among individuals, where the public participating feel like a hunter, which filled them up with a rush of exhilaration . “The condition of Spectatorship” is serve as a “form of empowerment” where individuals feel good and powerful watching the border for violence action or watching out for the illegal immigrant (Nelson 303). The word such as “illegal immigrant” establishes a sense of dehumanization, leading to to spectatorship. People feel happy to spend hours of their time just to watch violent activities. As a result, people become immune to violence against “dehumanized” individuals. Furthermore, individuals themselves get involved in violence against dehumanizing individuals. Individuals using their consciousness can reduce desensitization toward violence that will increase positive human interaction.
Gladwell discusses how by changing or fixing little issues existing in society, the authorities of New York City fixed bigger problems. First the authority realizes the problems, as Gladwell writes that “Like graffiti, fare-beating could be a signal, a small expression of disorder that invited much more serious crimes” (Gladwell 152). Gladwell presents a solution to regain insight as a community through being aware of the small issues in the community. When community became over involved with violence, they ignored the little issues such as graffiti andfare beating. Likewise, Nelson claims that when individuals pay too much attention and become too involved in violence they become unaffected by the violence. Nelson writes that “In light of the heightened state of perception conjured by Cage’s piece-its profound capacity to “return us to our sense” via an emptying out of input rather than an overload” (Nelson 306). To realize the problems in the New York Subway system, authorities needed to “empty out” their over-attentiveness towards the violence and “return” to their sense, which enables them to see the issues that are actually causing the
problems. Desensitization takes away individual's sense of fear and anxiety toward the certain thing that they are being overexposed. Desensitization also reduces the emotional connection between humans, by reducing human attention and empathy towards violence events. It also makes violence part of their regular life, which not only decreases the hatred for violence, also increase the severe level of aggression. As suggested by Nelson, individuals need to free themselves from such effect of violence and use their consciousness and awareness to support the right or wrong cause. Individuals need to use their consciousness to understand what they are watching and how it is affecting their perspective.
These two men, both coming from different backgrounds, joined together and carried out a terrible choice that rendered consequences far worse than they imagined. Living under abuse, Perry Smith never obtained the necessary integrity to be able to pause and consider how his actions might affect other people. He matured into a man who acts before he thinks, all due to the suffering he endured as a child. Exposed to a violent father who did not instill basic teachings of life, Smith knew nothing but anger and misconduct as a means of responding to the world. He knew no other life. Without exposure to proper behavior or responsible conduct, he turned into a monster capable of killing an entire family without a blink of remorse. In the heat of the moment, Perry Smith slaughtered the Clutter family and barely stopped to take a breath. What could drive a man to do this in such cold blood? The answer lies within his upbringing, and how his childhood experiences shaped him to become the murderer of a small family in Holcomb, Kansas. ¨The hypothesis of unconscious motivation explains why the murderers perceived innocuous and relatively unknown victims as provocative and thereby suitable targets for aggression.¨ (Capote 191). ¨But it is Dr. Statten´s contention that only the first murder matters psychologically, and that when
Throughout the article “The Code of the Streets,” Elijah Anderson explains the differences between “decent” and “street” people that can be applied to the approaches of social control, labeling, and social conflict theories when talking about the violence among inner cities due to cultural adaptations.
A society that presumes a norm of violence and celebrates aggression, whether in the subway, on the football field, or in the conduct of its business, cannot help making celebrities of the people who would destroy it. Unfortunately, such acts of rampage have become a prevalent factor in the Canadian culture. As a result of endless media coverage, Canadians now are constantly bombarded with numerous images of violence. Many of which often portray a victim avenging their opponent by means of force. Thus, indoctrinating a nation of individuals to believe that it is only through aggression that problems can be resolved. Rather than being punished for acts of violence, those who commit such offenses are often praised for their “heroism”. In addition, the success of films like The Godfather, Gladiator, and Troy further aid in reinstating the fact that we live in a society that praises violence. Furthermore, this ideology allows for individuals to partake in violent acts with little or no backlash from ones community. However, when an individual strays away from the “norm”, they are likely to then be viewed as a deviant. Such cases of rejection within a society, are often seen in the portrayal of serial killers. Although our society tends to condone violence when it is directed towards a specific individual(s), it does not allow the killing of innocent bystanders. Instead, crimes that are targeted against a number of people over a long period of time, entail the harshest forms punishments under the law. Sadly, in executing the law for said crimes, those in charge often face much public scrutiny. Such occurrences were apparent in the faulty murder investigations of Canada's most notorious serial killer Robert Pickton. This is due to the ...
The basic rights of citizens in cities are challenged in order for officials to protect and maintain safety of the city. Law enforcement reform is an ongoing, popular, controversial topic in modern day politics and communities. Societal changes result from outcomes of solving and preventing crimes. Malcolm Gladwell introduces us to the Broken Windows Theory in the story “The Power of Context” as a resolution to prevent major crimes from being committed in urban cities. The Broken Windows Theory can be corroborated to different situations and scenarios. In the Myth of the Ant Queen, Beth Loffreda highlights how the epidemic of Matt Shepard’s murder began with the details of the crime, rather than the murder itself. This caused the details to
Recently, the effect that violent media has on society has been the focus of many psychological studies. According to an article published in the New York Times, research has found that: “Exposure to violent imagery does not preordain violence, but it is a risk factor” (Pozios, Kambam, Bender, 2013). There has yet to be a direct link between violence actually causing people to go on these massive shooting sprees that have been so common lately. It is natural and understandable for the
To begin, Austin Turk’s conflict theory of crime divides society into two groups: those with power "the authorities" and those without power "the subjects". In Pynchon’s novel The Crying Of Lot 49, this is realized by contrasting Pierce Inverarity, a California real estate mogul to those of low social economic class...
In “the power of content” chapter, Malcolm Gladwell explains how the conditions and circumstances of the times and places influence to the tipping point. He says that we are sensitive to change of our surrounds. He mentions an example about New York City issue in the 1990s when the area was unsafe. It was a story that after George Kelling, who was a consultant of the New York Transit Authority, promoted “Broken Windows” theory, the crime rate went into decline. This theory was that minor offenses such as graffiti or fare-beating were signals that invited much more serious crime. The NY police maintained strict control over these minor offenses. Policemen arrested fare-beaters one by one, and cleaned the graffiti of the trains. As
Kevin Powers and Geoffrey Canada both describe violence and its effects on people in their novels. They assert that violence profoundly changes a person; however, they differ on the merits of these changes. Canada concludes that violence teaches people and helps them grow, while Powers concludes that it dehumanizes and scars them. The two authors also disagree on the necessity of violence. Specifically, Canada argues that violence is necessary and is used to gain distinction and status, while Powers argues that violence is unnecessary and causes people to lose their singularity and identity. Even further, Canada believes violence protects the boys and their lives, while Powers believes violence kills the young soldiers. From their personal experiences, Canada claims boys in the South Bronx need to be violent to gain respect and to survive, while Powers claims the violence of war is a waste of young men’s lives as they lose respect and even their lives.
Anne P. Beatty writes about her inner city teaching job, where gang violence continues to be a way of life. The article includes phrases that make it sound like a newspaper, and not an editorial piece. In her lengthy article she has vivid description, several anecdotes, and some statistics, but her choppy and fragmented thoughts fail to make a point. Beatty avidly applies many literary devices to create mood and engage the reader, however, her essay as a whole lacks direction and leaves one questioning the purpose.
This insulated environment of race-based protection helps to build white expectations for some sort of racial comfort, leading to what the author calls White Fragility. The concept of White Fragility refers to a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, inducing defensive moves, that might include violence as happened in the context of Marlow’s photograph (DiAngelo 56). The protester in the photo was manifesting his desire for an equal society, where blacks and white could have equal treatment and opportunities, but he was oppressed with violence. By using DiAngelo’s lens, it is possible to affirm that the white cops felt threatened by the possibility of having to face a society where their race was no longer the dominant, and therefore they reacted with violence. The “racial stress” in which the white people are usually protected by the environment of the American society came up and the consequence was the intolerance with which the cops reacted. Besides violence, the reactions might include the display of emotions like fear, guilt, and anger, and behaviors such as silence, argumentation and leaving the situation that induces stress (DiAngelo58). This explains the lack of action of the cops that surrounded the police officer that assaulted the black man, since they acted with silence, another consequence of the racial stress. Therefore, it is now clear that the photograph, which was taken in London and at first glance seems to address a British issue, expands its representation to an American problem, and perfectly reflects the racism that is still present in American popular culture. Clearly, this racism is a consequence of the threat which racial equality would bring for white
But incidents like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting are predictable; they are not a random act of brutality because such violence is a learned behavior. Americans glorify violence and this attitude is illustrated through the tolerance of violence portrayed through the media. And although distinguishing between violence as pure entertainment and violence as social criticism is important, good intentions can still lead to terrible outcomes. The effect of viewing violent films has been insufficiently considered, yet plays a significant role in encouraging aggressive behavior.
...ens should have more faith in the established institution’s ability to deliver justice over that of a vigilante serial killer, but for many, that is not the case. Second, Darkly Dreaming Dexter demonstrates that there is not as clear of a barrier between what is morally right and wrong as North American society sometimes believes, seeing as murder, which is usually regarded as undeniably wrong, can sometimes be justified and placed in the spectrum of acceptable behaviour. Blindly dividing actions up into right and wrong, then, is not only irresponsible, but also dangerous, as it can lead individuals to inappropriately oversimplify complex situations. Ultimately, then, a society that unwaveringly opposes all forms violence can be just as problematic as one that condones them.
He creates this tone to convey his purpose to the reader which is that prejudice is still an ongoing problem in American society, and that it will never be a thing of the past. Staples gives many personal anecdotes that are very somber; the readers are affected by this because they can emphasize and feel the prejudice that the victim, Brent Staples, faces. Although Staples is never delighted with the positions he is in, he never shows his resentment. In one part of the article, Staples said, “It is not altogether clear to me how I reached the ripe old age of twenty-two without being conscious of the lethality nighttime pedestrians attributed to me.” (Staples, 2). Staples attributes that he knows many people in American society automatically assume that he is a threat to “their” society because of
Prior to reading Zimring’s, The City that Became Safe, I had a general understanding of the national crime decline, beginning in the last decade of the 20th century, continuing into the early 21st century. In addition, there were concepts that were brought up consistently throughout my previous JLC classes – Nixon and Regan’s War on Drugs, the Crack-Cocaine Epidemic, Super Predators – that began to appear, at least to me, as simple terms, to explain a complex issue. Individuals would use these concepts as keywords, coupled with the increase in incarceration (i.e., mass incarceration) that served as a deterrent to rising recidivism rates, to explain the crime drop across the nation, without a deeper appreciation and understanding as to the deeper significance of each ‘key term.’ As I will later discuss, these individuals are known as naïve consumers of information. Nonetheless, as I began to delve into the novel, Zimring brought up a topic known as the “New York Difference,” which refers to an unsolved element or technique implemented within New York City that served as a catalyst for the boosted decline in their crime rates, years after the national trend began stabilizing. Nonetheless, I would soon come to realize how – as Zimring mentioned – “little all of us know about criminology,” to the extent of understanding why these index crimes (e.g., homicide, robbery, rape) occurred in great numbers prior to the 1990’s and the techniques that
A person experiences violence regardless of his or her geographical location. Violence is catastrophic, toxic and dramatically impactful on a community. Violence is a product of misbehavior and lack of emotional outlets. People bring violence to the streets of Chicago because they believe that actions speak louder than words. People solve confrontation on the streets with the pull of a trigger rather than taking a minute to talk it out. Many Chicagoans have become numb to the headlines that read- “40 shot and 4 killed this weekend” or “She didn’t have a chance.” Chicagoans shake their heads and scoff, while saying “There goes another one.” How could traumatic events become ordinary? Community members continuously march for justice and peace in their neighborhoods while city officials create new programs and jobs to keep young