Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methodology of terrorism
Nature of terrorisms
Psychological factors that motivate terrorist organisations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Methodology of terrorism
Not all extremists move from words to deeds. Many people can adhere to extremist ideas. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies need to consider with one person both the intent and the ability to effectively move from parole to action or to mobilize against violence. The signs of mobilization to violence help to distinguish "speaker" from"makers". They took a wide range of activities and behaviors. Essentially, it is a presage of travel arrangements, changes in the training or fitness program, financial readiness, evidence of deception or concealment, and final preparations or movements related to ordering business. The mobilization process consists of concrete and observable measures. These measures include building capacity, overcoming financial barriers, and taking action to …show more content…
other other. It is a noticeable change in the rights of every person who is in the habit of adopting in his or her everyday life.
The two processes : radicalization and mobilization to violence are not linear. In other words, the process of radicalization or mobilization of a person can begin, slow down, accelerate, end depending on a multitude of factors. A person who mobilizes for violence may also want to hide his activities from the authorities or members of his entourage. In this case, hints of concealment and deception can be detected. For example, a person could use software to encrypt his communications, invent a story to justify his departure from a Country X to a country. You create a dual identity on social media. Indicators of mobilization to violence should be used in association with others and depending on the context. They help to clarify the intent and ability of an
What is adoption? “Adoption establishes a legally recognized, lifelong relationship between a parent and child. The adoptive parent becomes legally and morally responsible for the child's safety, education, health care, value development, development of life skills, as well as the day-to-day care of that child.(Society, 2014)” Adoption is not only maintaining a child, but it is maintaining the responsibility to love and take care of a human being.
Adoption is a process where by a person assumes the parenting for another and, in so doing, permanently transfers all rights and responsibilities from the biological parent or parents. Unlike guardianship or other systems designed for the care of the young, adoption is intended to effect a permanent change in status and as such requires societal recognition, either through legal or religious sanction. Adoption has changed considerably over the centuries with its focus shifting from adult adoption and inheritance issues toward children and family creation; its structure moving from recognition of continuity between the adopted and kin toward allowing relationships of lessened intensity. In modern times, adoption is a primary vehicle serving the needs of homeless, neglected, abused and runaway children (Wikipedia, “Adoption”).
Adoption is in place to balance, to nurture and create a structural environment of safety in which the child can thrive and develop into a productive individual contributing to society. Also, it allows older children to abandon old maladaptive behaviors and make their first steps toward the construction of new behaviors influenced by their new environment. In years past, parents who adopted a child as an infant often debated whether to tell him or her about the adoption. Many children grew up not knowing they were adopted, and the birth mother’s identity was kept secret from those who did know (Ashford, LeCroy and Lortie 249). This paper provides facts on widely acceptance option of open adoption rather than the traditional practice of closed adoption. Adoption separates real biological family members, removing the adopter heritage whether the adoption is open or closed. Open adoption can lead to problems, but there are proven facts that open adoption is the best option for all parties working together in the best interest of the children.
Robert Wright considers the element of the biology of violence as a component of poverty and violence. To clarify his views he makes the relationship between gangs and political coalitions. He relates the motives of gangs to those in politics by depicting gangs as a group of people with concurring views who desire to serve each others interests suitably. Although the degree of destruction between gang violence and war or terrorism differs, it is Wright’s belief that the underlying principle that leads to each is the same. To understand this statement’s take the example of a poverty stricken mother or father. If the only way that they would be able to provide food or shelter was through acts of violence, it would be safe to assume that they would take whatever course of action necessary. Acts of terrorism (separate from the events of Sept 11 and onwards) are sometimes the result of a political statement or threat being made in an attempt to have a member of their group released when all else has failed. Environment also plays a role as in a sad but true way that violence is more “accepted”, in run-down, poorer areas.
The topic of child welfare is quite a broad one. There are numerous programs and policies that have been put in place to protect children. One of these policies is that of Adoption. Adoption was put into place to provide alternate care for children who cannot live with their biological families for various reasons. One of the more controversial issues surrounding adoption is that of Transracial adoption. Transracial Adoption is the joining of racially different parents and children (Silverman, 1993).
The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 changed the way we approach foster care and adoption. It was the first law that solely focused on children alone, not the entire family. The main objective of this law was to create timelines. These timelines determined the length of time a child could be in foster care before the parents’ loose custody of the child. After parental rights are terminated, the agency is to start searching for a family to adopt the child. In essence, this act took a process that could go on for years and condensed it. This law gives incentives for parents to clean up their act and prove they are changing for the better, through agencies allocated by the Adoption and Safe Families Act, but did not force a child to wait endlessly for their parents to either...
The workings of a nonviolent struggle are in many ways more complex that those of violent warfare. A nonviolent struggle requires a great deal more planning, commitment, and discipline to be
Despite numerous high-profile terrorist attacks that have been committed by individuals operating independently from terrorist groups, little attention has been given to explaining how these lone actor terrorists can emotionally perform violent acts against others. Recent studies of violence suggest that micro-level situational factors are essential in emotionally enabling violent action. Perhaps the most critical factor is enabling violence is situational emotional dominance. This dominance is most often established through several group dynamics that include an entrainment with the physical and emotional states of confederates, mutual monitoring (a form of peer pressure), as well as the role of emotionally supportive observers. Indeed, Collins highlights the
There are three reasons violence took place in the West: personal, collective, and state-sanctioned warfare. These of course all had many factors to them like economic factors, racial and ethnic factors, American values, and labor unions. Personal violence is the most common type and it includes “assault, murder, suicide, rape, and violent robbery or vandalism” Collective violence also known as group violence in the West was mainly “banditry, lynching and vigilante actions” State sanctioned violence had to do with the Spanish conquest and Indian wars. Some examples of extreme violence were lots of Indian attacks from whites and the U.S. military forcing “marches, dispossession of their homelands, and incarceration in prisons and reservations”
“Adopting one child won 't change the world: but for that child, the world will change.” (Unknown)(Buzzle.com). Adoption can take place in multiple shapes, forms, and fashions. You can adopt from a local adoption agency, or adopt from an orphanage half way around the world. You can adopt a child whose parents are no longer living, or you could adopt from a young mother who is not ready to raise a child. You can adopt one child who has touched your heart from an orphanage in Uganda, or a set of triplets being moved around from house to house in foster care. There are still further motivations and reasons for adopting. What if you and your spouse are unable to become pregnant? The desire to be parents does not diminish with the lack of
Truly understanding the motivation and rationale behind action is often subjective. Biases are evident within society and can skew perceptions of behaviour. However, the foundation for action can be understood by looking at what role societal or cultural pressures have become placed upon individuals. Furthuremore, Militia movements that have evolved into modern socetiy must be understood from a strucutral, soiteal vantage point instaed of an individual pathology ( 223). Traditional theories for studying criminals focus on the brain pathology or childhood trauma which shaped an individual into a degranged killer. However, strucural changes within society have the ability to push anyone over the edge. Economic and deccelopmental changes that
But what specifically leads one to such radical ideas, and eventually radical actions? In Ted Kaczynski's case he was deceived in participating in subjecting himself to a series of purposely brutalizing psychological experiments, that lead him to a hating of technology, so a case can be made that he acted out of brainwashing (Chase). However, Kaczynski openly decided to stop teaching at Berkeley and become a revolutionary. In the case of Alpert, she had been convinced that society was only misogynistic women haters. She was not brainwashed, she came across radicalism on her own, she came to the “realization”. The fact of the matter is that either individual was ultimately willing to commit audacious acts. It does not matter whether or not one of them was brainwashed, but the fact they were willing to do such a
In my opinion, it's a very difficult question and I can see from both sides. On one hand, I think that in a case like Nazis wanting to march the streets of America, that insinuates violence and is threatening Jewish people everywhere. It’s wrong, not just because Nazis are horrible people, but because it can cause fear and panic to Jewish people. 11 million people died in the Holocaust and letting Nazis, who supported this, march is not free speech. Its hateful and causes violence.
The New York City Police Department came to the same conclusion and found that there are four main stages of radicalization. The four stages are the pre-radicalization, the self-identification, indoctrination, and Jihadization (Silber and Bhatt, 2007).
A social movement is a structured group of people or organizations that strive toward a mutual social change or human society goal. There are many forms of social movements such as; religious movements, reform movements, revolutionary movements, and resistance movements. Changes in society comes from the social movements. Social movements influence any society to introduce changes based on the ideology on which that movement is based (Shah, 2014). In this paper I will discuss the four types of social movements that I named above. I will also touch base on what social movement, that is currently taking place, I would be a part of.