Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The status of women in medieval England
The role of women in Elizabethan England
The role of women in Elizabethan England
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The status of women in medieval England
Misogyny is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as the “hatred or dislike of, or prejudice against women” (2016). Eighteenth-century England was undoubtedly a misogynistic society where women were denied the same privileges and rights as men and often led limited lives. With the emergence of prose narrative and novels in the eighteenth-century as a literary form, a more nuanced portrayal of women also followed. In Daniel Defoe’s The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Famous Moll Flanders, &c. (1722) and John Cleland’s Fanny Hill or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure (1748-9), the texts feature the struggles of an unprotected, lower-class female protagonist against the hostile and misogynistic society of eighteenth-century England. This essay …show more content…
will discuss if the texts continually reinforce misogyny by exploring the depiction of sexuality, marriage and consent. Misogyny is an extreme hatred of women often associated with a fear of female sexuality. Sexuality here is employed to mean ‘sexual activity’, rather than the more specific sense of a person’s sexual orientation. With the rise of feminism, particularly in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, “the personal is political” brought to public attention the acknowledgement that women can enjoy and take control of their sexuality.
Unfortunately, in eighteenth-century England, women were most definitely seen as objects of male desire. Until recently, any textual representation of female sexuality was non-existent and considered a taboo subject to speak of in public, so the acknowledgment of female sexuality by Cleland and Defoe is liberal and progressive in their time. In Moll Flanders, after Moll is tricked by the elder brother, her view of sex changes. Moll understands that “nothing but money now recommends a woman” and learns to transform her only asset, her body, into a commodity for monetary exchange (Defoe, 2011: 18). Mark Schorer (1950) argues that this depiction of sexuality reduces Moll and many of the other female characters to things to be bought and sold. Yet after her marriage to Robin, Moll never allows herself to be controlled. She chooses the men who satisfy her financially and manipulates them into marrying her. Her predatory and ruthless nature - traits typically associated with masculinity - transgresses her gender stereotypes. While the discourse of sexuality in Moll Flanders …show more content…
becomes inextricably linked with the discourse of wealth, this does not reduce Moll to an object.
Moll cannot completely break free of the patriarchy but she cleverly uses her sexuality to benefit her during a time in which women in her position had little else. Similarly in Memoirs, Fanny is a female protagonist who enjoys sex and uses her sexualised female body as the source of her livelihood. In the eighteenth-century, female sexuality was a source of anxiety for men, which perpetuated the myth that female pleasure did not exist. The sex industry and pornography have always been a highly contentious issue in feminist debates. To certain feminists, prostitution is highly misogynistic as it objectifies women and by exchanging sex for money, it reinforces the misogynistic ideology that the male exploitation of the female body for sexual purposes is acceptable. However, this ignores the difference between free and forced prostitution. It also infantilizes sex workers as passive victims to be used by men, as opposed to adults capable of making their own choices. From a pro-sex feminist perspective, Cleland acknowledging that women have sexuality and can enjoy sex is not misogynistic at all. Fanny can be interpreted as a powerful, confident woman
using her sexuality to exploit the weakness of men and secure herself a fortune. However, Cleland’s acknowledgment of female sexuality and depiction of sex from a female perspective is not without problems. Cleland often expresses a clear misogynist and patriarchal attitude towards female sexuality. Any acknowledgement of female sexuality is an artificial construction aimed to produce sexual pleasure in male readers. It is ultimately unproductive for contemporary feminism as it provides neither an authentic representation of female sexuality nor an empowering articulation of a female voice. Furthermore, Memoirs is dominated by Cleland’s strong phallocentrism with regards to sexuality. There are always references to huge erect penises described by Cleland in extensive prose. Fanny and her friends are constantly dominated by their desire for the male genital organ. It "constantly inscribes a range of sexual practices only to thwart them in favor of vaginal intercourse between men and women.” (Weed, 1997, 11) The lesbian sex scenes were for male objectification, and were considered false and “rather the shadow than the substance of any pleasure” (Cleland, 1985: 71). Therefore, its championing of heterosexual sex embodies the ideal of a patriarchal society. If misogyny is an ideology that exists to legitimise male dominance and female subordination, then female sexuality as a tool for women to manipulate men and put themselves in the position of power undermines male dominance. However, while the representation of female sexuality is a step ahead of Cleland’s time, it is dangerous to ignore the other misogynistic elements in Memoirs, which is ultimately an oppressive male fantasy of female sexuality. Both Moll and Fanny are not immoral seducers but victims of circumstances. While Defoe and Cleland clearly celebrate their heroines’ intelligence and sexuality, it is Cleland who continuously undercuts any feminist sentiment with his misogynistic attitudes.
The title character of Catharine Maria Sedgewick’s novel, Hope Leslie, defies the standards to which women of the era were to adhere. Sedgewick’s novel is set in New England during the 17th century after the Puritans had broken away from the Church of England. Hope Leslie lives in a repressive Puritan society in which women behave passively, submit to the males around them, and live by the Bible. They allow the men of their family to make decisions for them and rarely, if ever, convey an opinion that differs from the status quo. However, Hope Leslie does not conform to the expected behavior of women during that time, behavior that only further expressed the supposed superiority of males. Hope portrays behaviors and attitudes common in a woman today. Hope is capable of thinking for herself, is courageous, independent, and aggressive. Sir Philip Gardner describes Hope as having “a generous rashness, a thoughtless impetuosity, a fearlessness of the… dictators that surround her, and a noble contempt of fear” (211). In comparison to Esther Downing, Hope is the antithesis of what a young Puritan woman should be, and in turn, Hope gains a great deal of respect from the readers of the novel through her “unacceptable” behavior.
During the Victorian Era, society had idealized expectations that all members of their culture were supposedly striving to accomplish. These conditions were partially a result of the development of middle class practices during the “industrial revolution… [which moved] men outside the home… [into] the harsh business and industrial world, [while] women were left in the relatively unvarying and sheltered environments of their homes” (Brannon 161). This division of genders created the ‘Doctrine of Two Spheres’ where men were active in the public Sphere of Influence, and women were limited to the domestic private Sphere of Influence. Both genders endured considerable pressure to conform to the idealized status of becoming either a masculine ‘English Gentleman’ or a feminine ‘True Woman’. The characteristics required women to be “passive, dependent, pure, refined, and delicate; [while] men were active, independent, coarse …strong [and intelligent]” (Brannon 162). Many children's novels utilized these gendere...
Traditional female characteristics and female unrest are underscored in literary works of the Middle Ages. Although patriarchal views were firmly established back then, traces of female contempt for such beliefs could be found in several popular literary works. Female characters’ opposition to societal norms serves to create humor and wish- fulfillment for female and male audiences to enjoy. “Lanval” by Marie De France and “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” by Geoffrey Chaucer both show subversion of patriarchal attitudes by displaying the women in the text as superior or equal to the men. However, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” also incorporates conventional societal ideas by including degradation of women and mistreatment of a wife by her husband.
Looking back through many historical time periods, people are able to observe the fact that women were generally discriminated against and oppressed in almost any society. However, these periods also came with women that defied the stereotype of their sex. They spoke out against this discrimination with a great amount of intelligence and strength with almost no fear of the harsh consequences that could be laid out by the men of their time. During the Medieval era, religion played a major role in the shaping of this pessimistic viewpoint about women. The common belief of the patriarchal-based society was that women were direct descendants of Eve from The Bible; therefore, they were responsible for the fall of mankind. All of Eve’s characteristics from the biblical story were believed to be the same traits of medieval women. Of course, this did not come without argument. Two medieval women worked to defy the female stereotype, the first being the fictional character called The Wife of Bath from Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. The second woman, named Margery Kempe, was a real human being with the first English autobiography written about her called The Book of Margery Kempe. In these two texts, The Wife of Bath and Margery Kempe choose to act uniquely compared to other Christians in the medieval time period because of the way religion is interpreted by them. As a result, the women view themselves as having power and qualities that normal women of their society did not.
Misogyny in this text is represented through many factors showing how women can only prove their dominance by removing the men’s sexuality and freedom of independence. It is also represented in the fact that Nurse Ratched is seen as perfect except for her breasts, her outward mark of being a woman. “A mistake was made somehow in manufacturing, putting those big, womanly breasts on what would of otherwise been a perfect work, and you can see how bitter she is about it.” (6) The fear of women is usually stemmed from ...
One of the aspects of the Middle Ages which is explored by numerous scholars today is that of the antifeminist stereotypes which pervaded literature and cultural mores during the period. In an era governed by men, the fact that women were treated as inferior is unsurprising; archetypal visions of femininity fit neatly into medieval history. However, most people would like to believe that such pigeonholing has been left in the past, allowing for more liberated times in which women are portrayed realistically and as the equals of men.
18th and 19th Century Attitudes Towards Women From the author of both sources we can immediately gather that they both relate to middle-class women. Working class women were on the whole illiterate, as they were offered no education, so therefore would not be purchasing, 'The Magazine of Domestic Economy'. For Florence Nightingale to be able to write diaries, this demanded a middle-class upbringing. With the ability of hindsight, we know that Florence Nightingale was a very unusual woman, as the, 'Lady with the Lamp' tendered to many injured soldiers in the Crimean war. Despite experiencing the nurturing into being the 'typical woman', such as attending tea parties and presenting yourself respectably as a lady, she seems bored by this monotonous routine, as suggested when she finishes her entry with the sentence, "And that is all."
Throughout history, women have struggled with, and fought against, oppression. They have been held back and weighed down by the sexist ideas of a male dominated society which has controlled cultural, economic and political ideas and structures. During the mid-1800’s to early 1900’s women became more vocal and rebuked sexism and the role that had been defined for them. Fighting with the powerful written word, women sought a voice, equality amongst men and an identity outside of their family. In many literary writings, especially by women, during the mid-1800’s to early 1900’s, we see symbols of oppression and the search for gender equality in society.
These women authors have served as an eye-opener for the readers, both men and women alike, in the past, and hopefully still in the present. (There are still cultures in the world today, where women are treated as unfairly as women were treated in the prior centuries). These women authors have impacted a male dominated society into reflecting on of the unfairness imposed upon women. Through their writings, each of these women authors who existed during that masochistic Victorian era, risked criticism and retribution. Each author ignored convention a...
In the early twentieth century, the issue of gender inequality and lack of feminism was prevalent throughout society. Susan Gladspell’s play, Trifles, contains various instances of gender discrimination within the characters’ actions in the plot. Females in that society were subjected to great discrimination due to their sexuality and were viewed as insubordinate and only capable of obtaining menial jobs. This resulted in men constantly demeaning women in the form of mental and emotional abuse. Occasionally, this abuse gradually worsened and finally accumulated into some major disaster. In order to better the lives of women, the feminism movement was on the brink of starting a major revolution to restore equality in society. Throughout Susan Gladspell’s play, Trifles, the author incorporated elements of gender inequality and discrimination in hopes of bringing about the feminist movement.
Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre entails a social criticism of the oppressive social ideas and practices of nineteenth-century Victorian society. The presentation of male and female relationships emphases men’s domination and perceived superiority over women. Jane Eyre is a reflection of Brontë’s own observation on gender roles of the Victorian era, from the vantage point of her position as governess much like Jane’s. Margaret Atwood’s novel was written during a period of conservative revival in the West partly fueled by a strong, well-organized movement of religious conservatives who criticized ‘the excesses of the sexual revolution.’ Where Brontë’s Jane Eyre is a clear depiction of the subjugation of women by men in nineteenth-century Western culture, Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale explores the consequences of a reversal of women’s rights by men. This twentieth-century tradition of dystopian novels is a possible influence, with classics like Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984 standing prominence. The pessimism associated with novels of this genre—where society is presented as frightening and restrictive—exposes the gender inequality between men and women to be deleterious.
In the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries, the idea of patriarchy ruled the many societies all over the world. Particularly in Britain, its “overarching patriarchal model” (Marsh) had “reserved power and privilege for men” (Marsh). Also during this time period feminist literature began to arise and was invaded by, “the complex social, ethical, and economic roots of sexual politics… as testimony to gender bias and the double standard” (“Sexual Politics and Feminist Literature”). In Jane Austen’s writing, readers have been aware of her constant themes of female independence and gender equality. However, many have criticized the author for the fact that many of her “individualistic” female characters have ended up
To force me to give my fortune, I was imprisoned-yes: in a private madhouse…” (Maria 131-32). These lines from Mary Wollstonecraft’s (1759-1797) unfinished novella Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman substantiates the private operation of the madhouse where the protagonist Maria is confined. The importance of private ownership is that this places the madhouse outside the discourse of law. It is illegitimate yet it is legitimized as it is a symbol of male-dominated state oppression. Parallel to this Bastille becomes the direct symbol of the same repression which is used by Wollstonecraft to depict the predicament of dissenting revolutionary women in the late Eighteenth- century England. The language which she is using is evidently from the French Revolution as we know the symbolic importance of the dreaded tower of Bastille where political ‘criminals’ were imprisoned. So, Wollstonecraft’s objective is to politicize the genre of novel as the other Jacobin women writers- novel, for them, is a vehicle of political propaganda.
... allows the present day reader to gain insight into commonly held beliefs regarding women during the 14th century. By allowing Alison to have a sense of humor and joke about aspects of her marriage, Chaucer was able to make numerous points regarding women that would not have been acknowledged had a female author created them. By making Alison a laughable character, Chaucer was able to make points about women such as the unfairness of double standards, the acknowledgement of female desire, and the reality of women marrying well to improve their economic situations. Chaucer also provides us with detailed examples of commonly held stereotypes regarding women that are still relevant approximately seven centuries later.
In regards to Flanders having sex with her own brother it would be difficult to argue that this was a predetermined event considering she truly did not know her husband was of her own flesh and blood. If, indeed, she was aware of the relation and then chose to proceed then one could discus it further in the context of freewill. As for being a whore there is no question that Flanders, especially later in her life, involved herself with such happenings, but for me it was the thievery that seemed to capture the essence of Flanders continual undoing and constant need for penitence. There is no better part of Defoe's work to capture the feelings of utter despondency then when Moll is going to steal for the first time from the apothecary's shop. Defoe prefaces the scene with a few paragraphs where Moll explains her absolute "desolate state". The crime is then set in what James Sutherland explains, "...Moll's first theft he sets the scene with such careful attention to detail that he fixes it in our minds, and gives to it that air of authenticity which, for Defoe, is almost justification of fiction". This is where Defoe's journalistic stylings shine. The reader is indeed in the apothecary and sees Moll's gaffe unfolding before him.