Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary topic about feminism
Feminism essays examples
Male dominance today is based inpart upon
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the story of “Taming of the Shrew,” Shakespeare does a fantastic job of humorously telling a tale involving a huge theme of misogynistic female subjugation. Misogynistic female subjugation deals with hate against women and the process of bringing women “under control.”
This comedy is about a girl named Katherine who is known as a shrew among all because she will not submit to men easily. No man has tried to win her love because they do not want a woman who will not submit to them. Unfortunate for her sister, Bianca, Kate must get married before any men may ask for Bianca’s hand in marriage. Bianca has many suitors, so the play takes many twists and turns that may be hard to comprehend without a strong understanding. In the end, a man name
…show more content…
Petruchio ends up “taming” Katherine, and Bianca is able to get married to Lucentio (one of her suitors). Shakespeare utilizes irony by changing Katherine’s ideology to the complete opposite, foreshadowing through quotes to convey the main plot, and metaphors comparing females to things instead of humans throughout “Taming of the Shrew” in order to show a comedic take on a serious issues such as misogynistic female subjugation.
Shakespeare’s use of irony involving Katherine’s ideology during this play works to convey the message that people can change their opinions on situations depending on their prior experiences. In the beginning of the play, Katherine, unlike her sister Bianca, would not easily submit to men. This is the main reason no man had tried to ask for her hand in marriage. This play is set in a time period where misogyny was very common, and men felt as if they owned women during marriages. Katherine however, was not originally a big fan of marriages at all. By the end of the story, Katherine submits to a man named Petruchio, which is extremely ironic because the whole story revolves around her not wanting to submit to a man. In the play she says, “Such duty as the subject owes the prince, wven such a woman oweth to her husband; and when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour, and not obedient to his honest will, what is …show more content…
she but a foul contending rebel.” (Act 5. Scene 2. Line 171). In this quote, Katherine is comparing husbands and wives to princes and their subjects. She makes this comparison because she views marriages as an alpha-male commitment. She implies that women are like the subjects of their husband, who they should view as a prince. This quote shows how hierarchical marriages were viewed as at the time, which can later be seen through Kate’s marriage to Petruchio. This quote shows irony because at the time she recites this, she is already married to Petruchio, so in a sense she is describing her relationship. Petruchio, the man who ends up marrying and in a way “taming” Katherine, is very cocky about everything. The way Petruchio acts in the play is a reflection of how him and other men measure their manliness, which is by assessing their relationships with women. A quote that Petruchio reveals in one of the first parts of the play that supports this is, “Why came I hither but to that intent? Think you a little din can daunt mine ears? Have I not in my time heard lions roar? Have I not heard the sea, puffed up with winds, Rage like an angry boar chafed with sweat?” (Act 1. Scene 2. Line 201). While reciting this quote, he was trying to convey how “great” he thought he was, how he thought he could do anything, and how he feels about men and women hierarchical relationships. He believes that men should be in charge of everything that the women of the relationship does. Shakespeare’s use of foreshadowing in “Taming of the Shrew” works to convey a hint to the readers of what is to come later in the story. In the beginning of the story, Katherine, the main character of the story, hates men and would never dream of submitting to one. As time in the play goes on and the plot further develops, the audience can tell that Katherine is starting to think more about her decisions involving men when she says “Of all thy suitors, here I charge thee tell, whom thou lov'st best. See thou dissemble not.” (Act 2. Scene 1. Line 8). This quote is directed towards Bianca and makes the audience question whether she will change her opinion on men in the future of the play. She says this when Bianca will not share details of her suitors with her, so it is apparent that Katherine is interested in the idea of marriage and may want to end up with a husband. Another quote involving Katherine that foreshadows the future of the play is said during a conversation with Petruchio. She says I will be angry: what hast thou to do, father, be quiet. He shall stay my leisure.” (Act 3. Scene 2. Line 221). She says this to Petruchio after he told her to stop being angry at Baptisa, her dad. Kate’s disrespectfulness for her dad foreshadows how she will act when she has a husband, which will be disobedient and disrespectful. These quotes contribute to the overall theme of misogynistic female subjugation because they foreshadow how the women will later be treated in the play. Shakespeare’s use of metaphors of comparing women to property works to convey a message of gender dominance within the plot. The character who talks down to women and treats them like property the most within this play is Petruchio. Petruchio manipulates Kate throughout the story and treats her as if she is truly his property once they are married. Petruchio says, “Thus in plain terms: your father hath consented, That you shall be my wife, your dowry 'greed on, And, will you, nill you, I will marry you.” (Act 2. Scene 1. Line 284). In this quote, he is insisting that Katherine’s only choice is to marry him and that she is powerless. Petruchio and Baptisa have already made an agreement about Katherine’s engagement to Petruchio by this time in the play, so Katherine feels powerless at the least. In this instance, he is decreasing her say in anything and is treating her like a thing rather than a human being. Another quote that Petruchio says to Katherine comparing her to property is “She is my goods, my chattels; she is my house, my household stuff, my field, my barn, my horse, my ox, my ass, my anything. and here she stands, touch her whoever dare.” (Act 3. Scene 2. Line 235). This quote of scene 3 sets the stage for the rest of the play and implies that when Petruchio and Kate get married that she will be treated as his property. This also makes the audience view Petruchio as even more of an overbearing and dominant alpha-male. These quotes reveal the overall theme of misogynistic female subjugation because they show how Petruchio views Katherine in their marriage, and how he treats her. He treats her as if she is his property and not a human being. Shakespeare utilizes literary elements such as irony, foreshadowing, and metaphors throughout his play “Taming of the Shrew” in order to convey an important message through a comedic and interesting take.
Misogynistic female subjugation is a very important concept that needs to be known by everyone because it is not appropriate to treat a woman like they are anything less than a human being with natural rights. In present day, misogynistic female subjugation is less common than at the time in the play. However, there are still people who believe women should be “owned” by men in a marriage. Shakespeare does a wonderful job of telling a story with a serious theme through different uses of literary elements, that make the play more thought-provoking to the
audience.
In Shakespearean time and even up to the turn of the 20th Century men were expected to be the sole provider of the family, entailing them to be either well educated or hard working. They were also expected to be good with the handling of finances and property. It was also acceptable for them to be barbaric, boisterous and socially well connected. This has given the men of this time an overwhelming sense of power, respect and freedom; rights which were not given to women at this time. Far from what was socially acceptable in regards to men, the gender identity of women was of a somewhat weaker nature. Women during Shakespearean time were regarded as docile, quiet and non-opinionated. Their socially acceptable role in many cases was to be domestic, entailing them to spend countless hours in the home, tending to basic familial needs, such as cooking and cleaning. This position prevented many women to receive an education or to socialize outside of the home. As a result of their inferior social status, they were expected to be submissive and to cater to her husband’s needs at all times. Women in Shakespearean time were also treated as property, either by their husbands or fathers, which diminished any sense of self-worth they may have possessed. This gender ideology ultimately paralyzed women, as the majority were helpless to alter their social standing or designated familial role.
The Role of Women in Challenging the Status Quo in Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew
The Elizabethan society in which Shakespeare lived during his life held a misogynistic ideology in high esteem. ‘Much Ado about Nothing’ was written in 1598-9, during a time when women were second class citizens compared to males and were considered to be inferior to males in every way. As soon as she was born, a female was her father's property until she was married off by her family when she then became her husband's property. A woman was expected to be seen and not heard, she was to be chaste and submissive. Women were uneducated and undervalued, they were not their own person.
The way the men acted and treated the women in the play was an over exaggeration of how things actually were back then, and this contributed to the comedic aspect of the play. In a way, Shakespeare seemed like he was trying to get a point across to the audience, to let them know how absurd sexism really is, and how easy things would be if it were to not
“The Taming Of The Shrew” by William Shakespeare is a work of satire created to criticize the misogynistic outlooks of the 16th century. With this play, Shakespeare is trying to say that the idea and role of women in his society is deeply flawed and should be fixed, as well as to make other social commentaries, such as on the treatment of servants. Through exaggeration and parody, Shakespeare makes society look silly.
In the beginning of “The Taming of the Shrew”, some say Shakespeare portrays Katherina as a very shrewish figure. Others may argue that she is not shrewish but just a very strong willed person. At the end of the play some people say she is transformed into a very kind and gentle person, while again others will argue that she is not “tamed” but just putting on an act to “show up” her younger sister Bianca, whom has always been more beautiful and charming. Kate is “like a wasp, like a foal, like foal that kicks from his halter; pert, quick and determined, but full of good heart.” 1. This statement made by one author, shows clearly that he does not see her as shrew-like, even at the beginning of the play. The same author states that at the end of the play she has not really transformed, rather she has just fallen in love with Petruchio, in essence she is free from torment because she is no longer seen as the shrew.
Imagine being a woman in sixteenth century Europe. Females were raised to believe that they were subservient and that men knew better on any subject. Basically, women had no rights. They were considered property, first “owned” by their fathers and then control was “transferred” to the husband chosen for them. Marriage was not about love, but in most cases, it was a business deal that was mutually beneficial to both families – an interesting fact is that like young women, most young men had no choice in the selection of their future betrothed. These traditions and the gender roles assumed by men and women at that time had an impact on Shakespeare’s writing and performances and a great example of this is evident in A Midsummer Night’s Dream.
The first Shakespeare play which Zeffirelli adopted to the cinema, The Taming of the Shrew, deals with the theme of gender roles. In a grander scale the play explores the behavior expectations of males and females both in society at large and within a domestic relationship. For many years, most critics agreed that the heart of the play suggested male domination and female submission, especially to the authority of their husbands, as the accepted male-female dynamic. This view went unchanged for many years and audiences widely accepted Petruchio's “taming” of Katherina as politically correct.
"The Taming of the Shrew" is a great example of Shakespear's use of women. Shakespeare indeed does transcend the stereotypes of his own time.
A Shakespearean scholar expanded on this, “The play enacts the defeat of the threat of a woman’s revolt; it does so in a comic form – thus so offers the audience the chance to revel in and reinforce their misogyny while at the same time feeling good” (Gay). The Taming of the Shrew at many points is just praising the men in the novel despite their behavior and putting down the women for being anything but perfect. The novel makes the actions happening comedic and the reader does not get upset at the things happening, but in reading further into it and comparing in to modern day, it is not hard to see the plain and simple abuse. Although gender roles are still prominent into today’s society they are toned back. In contemporary version of The
The Taming of the Shrew is set in a time period that did not accept women as we do today. In today's society, women who are strong and independent and quick witted are praised. In Elizabethan times women were supposed to know their role in life, being good to their husbands, making children and taking care of them. There were no women in politics, there were no women in business, it was only acceptable for women to participate in domestic areas of life. Women could not live a respectable life in this time period without a male figure to take care of them, rendering them helpless without men. If there was anything that must be done involving economics or education, it was up to the men. Men were the ones who worked and brought home the money to support the family. The roles of men and women were very distinct, and it resulted in giving the men the majority of the power.
The Taming of the Shrew is one of the earliest comedies written by William Shakespeare. The Taming of the Shrew focuses a great deal on courtship and marriage. Especially the life after marriage, which was generally not focused on in other comedies. Notably, the play focuses on the social roles that each character plays, and how each character faces the major struggles of their social roles. Which plays into one of the most prevalent themes of The Taming of the Shrew. The theme of how social roles play into a person’s individual happiness. This is displayed through the characters in the play that desperately try to break out of the social roles that are forced upon them. This exemplified through the character, Katherine, an upper-class young maiden-in-waiting, who wishes to have nothing to do with her role.
Aaron Wein Kristie Dowling Ma. English 9 Spring 2024 Shakespearean Sexism The Taming of the Shrew is a play that was written by Shakespeare in the 1500s, about how to tame a woman. The evidence presented in The Taming of the Shrew shows that Shakespeare is sexist. However, two examples in the play show it particularly well when Kate is distracted by clothes and her speech that ends the play. In contrast, Taming of the Shrew movie is much more feminist than the play.
In Shakespeare’s time, women had very limited rights. They were expected to be submissive to any man no matter the relationship. Women were supposed to do domestic services while the higher-class women were taken to nunneries to like. They were not allowed in any decision-making. If a husband said no, that was the end of the conversation. Women were required to respect their husband’s word and consider it law.