Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How did militarism contribute to ww2
Militarism and its effects on ww1 essay
The causes of war and conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How did militarism contribute to ww2
World War One was one of the most traumatic events that has happened in human history. At the end of the war, over six countries were involved in the overall war. There is lots of speculation about why tensions between countries formed and eventually turned into violence, but instead of the alliances or imperialism, it is clear that militarism (the expansion of a country’s military force) is the true underlying cause of World War One. This is due to the fact of germany’s fear of britain, overwhelming increases in military expenses, and the mentality of the triple entente.
Germany was in fear of the British empire. As far as they were concerned the British forces had plans to take over the world. In Germany’s eyes the British would have to spend most of the money they earned through their colonies to launch such an attack. In retaliation, Germany decided to strengthen their military powers. Due to the fact that Germany was doing this, the triple alliance saw this as a direct threat to their impenetrable hold on Europe. These chain of events and striving to balance the power, directly caused militarism, which would eventually lead to WWI.
…show more content…
The growth of armaments that took place between 1890 and 1914 shows the increase of the money spent on army and naval military forces.
In 1890, the countries Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, Great Britain, Russia, and France spent a total of one hundred million dollars. Almost twenty five years later, the same countries spent two hundred and forty million dollars. These numbers, calculated before the war, represent the tensions between the alliances. This increase of money spent going into military forces and the fear of keeping one’s own country alive directly affects the defcon status of European nations, therefore, causing the tragic
WWI. “The Hammer and The Anvil” written by the german chancellor Bernhard von Bulow is a document that carries lots of information about how the Germans felt during the beginning phase of world war one. The document states that German politicians know there is going to be a war and are questioning whether they want to be the offender or defender, hence the hammer and anvil analogy. The letter does in fact state that Germany wants to be the hammer in the situation that they are in. Due to their offensive purposes the German government increased the amount of money that went into their military. Once again money and militarism caused WWI. Militarism can sometimes be a blessing but, when it gets out of control like it did before WWI it will end up poorly for all the nations in the end. Even though there was a tragic amount of losses in WWI, those countries didn’t learn their lesson because nearly 30 years later WWII, was declared.
The first underlying cause of WWI was greed. People always want more than what they have. The countries from the Triple Alliance wanted more land, power, or wealth than what they owned. Germany despised Great Britain at the time, because of the number of colonies they had. In Document --, a German cartoonist drew a propaganda poster, claiming "England is the bloodsucker of the world". This appears that Germany is very fearful of England taking control of the world. It also shows that Germany aspires to be as large of a country of Great Britain. Also, in document 16, in the spring of 1914, before the war started,
The underlying cause of World War 1 were the alliances within Europe. An alliance meant that if one country goes to war than the country associated will also fight. All the countries were picking sides before the war started. Otto von Bismarck, the Chancellor that led the unification of the German states, did not like the fact that Germany was between Russia and France. “Bismarck formed the Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy in the year preceding
Germany continued to push buttons resulting in the world jumping into a World War. Nations desired to grow and gain more influence. Danger increased while others selfish dictators were trying to bloom. In The Treaty of Versailles an article stated that German troops were forbidden from entering
The origins of World War One The Fritz Fisher thesis Fritz Fisher focuses on the Kaiser, Gottlieb von Jagow, Bethmann Hollweg and Helmut von Moltke. These four were the German leading figures at that time; Fischer is convinced that these people were responsible for the outbreak of World War One. Fischer’s three main claims were: 1. Germany was prepared to launch the First World War in order to become a great power. 2. Germany encouraged Austria-Hungary to start a war with Serbia, and continued to do so, even when it seemed clear that such a war could not be localized.
World War One was greatly influenced by many factors, and in many ways. National interest ignited the mistrust and insecurities within nations, which in turn led to the creation of strong alliances and immense military forces. The growing suspicion Britain had of Germany only heightened the wariness and uncertainty of nations. The means, by which individual nations dealt with the issues within themselves, and outside of their boundaries, in the years preceding World War One, were irrational and improperly thought through. Nations fell into a strong ultra nationalistic point of view, and acted in a way which expressed interest in themselves only.
Germany was economically frail subsequent to World War I. The Treaty of Versailles had held them accountable for the cause, and the Great Depression further deteriorated their condition. Germany was ambitious for power and resources. Envisioning world domination, Adolf Hitler, dictator of Nazi Germany, led his Nazi Party to invade Poland in 1939. France and Britain guaranteed to offer military support if Poland were to become attacked; they declared war, initiating World War II.
Balkan nationalism was a major factor in the outbreak of the WWI .It is one of the long-term causes which caused European powers to declare war to each other. Even if the war between Austria and Serbia was expected to be a short one it culminated into a worldwide conflict that lasted four years. The idea of Pan-Slavism was the result of Serbian’s nationalism and Serbia refused to be oppressed by Austria-Hungary. Serbs demanded for rights of self-governance and unified state. However their neighbor Austria-Hungary wanted to become imperial power and she implied territorial expansion. Historians have different opinions about this subject and because of its complexity it is not possible to say that none of them is completely right. Balkan countries were a big threat for her foreign policy and this led to the culmination of their conflict and the outbreak of the war. Although nationalism is important in understanding the outbreak of WWI, there are many underlying causes that together culminated into a worldwide conflict. It is hard to reach the final answer on the question which relates to the extent of the importance of Balkan nationalism in the outbreak of the war because there are many different perspectives in understanding this question. For example Ruth Henig’s opinion is that Balkan nationalism was extremely important for the war and sees the guilt of Austria-Hungary for its outbreak. On the other hand John Leslie says that the responsible is Germany :“Austria-Hungary can be held responsible for planning a local Austro-Serb conflict, which was linked to its fears about Balkan nationalism, but Germany, which was not interested in this quarrel, quite deliberately used it as an opportunity to launch the European war which Austria-...
Alliances between European nations can also be considered an underlying cause of World War I. As a result of the Triple Alliance consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, the Triple Entente (understanding) was formed between France, Britain, and Russia. Although France and Britain were natural enemies, their fear of Germany united them together with Russia. These alliances set the final stage for the beginning of World War I. Each country in each alliance would help each other during warfare. For example, if Germany attacked France, Britain and Russia would help France, and Italy and Austria would help Germany, dragging Europe into a state of chaos and violence.
The power of alliances also played a key role in the creation and devastation of World War I. Dating back to the time of Bismarck, most alliances formed for the sake of reassurance or to postpone the outbreak of a war. But as time passed, alliances greatly increased international tension by dividing Europe into two armed camps. “I felt strongly that England ought to remain neutral, and I collected the signatures of a large number of professors and fellows to a statement.
Germany evidently disregarded attempts to reach diplomatic de-escalation with other European powers, especially Britain. All of the major European powers were faced with suspicion and paranoia of each other and feared the possibility of external invasion. The triple entente was reluctant in allowing Germany to expand and reach its full potential, which may have led to their defensive attitude and offensive policies. Despite this, Germany was hungry for war and international history fails to explain exactly why the war broke
The first global world war that led to the death of millions of people and the use of excessive chemical weapons, tanks, and machine guns that the world has ever witnessed is accused by Germany’s violent actions and their extreme ideologies, but some others argue Germany was not the sole cause of the war. In an attempt to dominate the world, Germany enforced their extreme ideologies to the rest of Europe. Many scholars believe that Germany fueled World War 1 because Germany believed that they should conquer the weak. Some people believe that Germany was the sole cause of World War because their extreme ideologies led them to declare war on other countries. Although Germany deliberately supported Austria to go to war with Serbia, supported the idea of Nationalism, and signed secret treaties, Russia also supported Serbia and signed secret treaties. Thus, Germany wasn’t the sole motive of World War 1.
There were several long-term events that led to the outbreak of World War One. The most prominent factors include: nationalism, militarism, imperialism, the Balkan and Morocco crises, and the alliance system. Ironically, these things were either started in response to, or upheld because of, one of the other factors. The alliance system was one of the last factors to emerge before the war. Consequentially, the contributions of this system to the beginning of the Great War have to be considered. Although the alliance system was a main cause of the First World War, it arose because of several other factors, and did not cause the war single handedly.
In conclusion, the causes of World War One included many factors both long term and short term. Some factors go deeper and contributed to the tension and rivalry developing in the nineteenth century among the Great Powers stage. Such as things involving politics, cultures, economics and what I believe to be the most important, the alliance system; lots of other factors tie in with the complex web of alliances. There are many factors that lead on and link in with one another; this just explains a few of the well known factors. Most involve contributing to tension and rivalry. The Great War is considered to be one of the most significant events of the twentieth century.
Europe has seen many wars over its vast and broad history, some of which being quite immense and destructive. One such war would undoubtedly be World War One. A war powered by the brainwashing ways of militarism and the stubborn pride of nationalism. Once engaged in a war a country’s militarism will produce fine soldier ready to drop like dominos on the battlefield, while the nationalism works as fuel providing the naive determination to fight the war. This naïve determination and soldier production is why World War One, like every other war, continued with such persistency. But what started World War One? Was it militarism that trained young men since they were kids to become soldiers, nationalism propelling a nations pride forward or was it neither? While both of those aspects could be potential reasons their still not the main pillars of cause. The true reason’s that made World War One inevitable were the intimidating alliances, avaricious imperialism, and tedious tensions.
The Countries were building up their armies and navies to prove they were the most powerful. Because the countries thought that their armies were the best, they felt they did not have to be as careful when dealing with other countries, because they had something to back them up. This led to a lot of disputes which contributed towards WWI.