Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument for and against ethnic identity
Why ethnic identity is important
Argument for and against ethnic identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument for and against ethnic identity
Midterm: (Q1) Identify your race and ethnicity. Explain the characteristics that distinguish one from the other. Which do you think has the greatest impact on your life? Why?
According to the text, race is defined as “a socially constructed category of people who share biologically transmitted traits that members of society consider important.” (pg 340,para 5) This includes basically any physically biological trait on the body. I identify as a black or African American woman because I believe both can be used to one’s liking in a way. Identifying as black, in my opinion, includes that even as a descendent from Africa, I also acknowledge that I am a descendent from others. The same goes for identifying as an African American, I have roots from Africa but this term kind of contradicts itself because if someone from Africa receives a US citizenship then they would be considered African American. I, myself, have never seen or set foot on African soil so the term is used very loosely in my case but still somewhat identifiable. All of this is understandable due to race being “socially constructed” and continues to lump people into whatever category they see fit. (pg 340,para 8)
Ethnicity is
…show more content…
defined as “shared cultural heritage” among a group of people. (pg 342, para 4) Language, food choices, religion, where a person lives are ways that people identify with a culture. As stated in the text, ethnicity is slightly more complicated than race because many people may identify with numerous cultures. (pg 343, para 3) Again, I will identify with the black culture but I do understand that there are many people who identify with the culture and do not share the same values, religion, and even food choices such a I because they may intertwine something from another ethnicity they identify with. So I now acknowledge the fact that ethnicity is very socially constructed also. (pg 343, para 1) Not everyone of an ethnicity share every aspect of a culture. Between race and ethnicity, ethnicity would be the most important to me because it allows a wide variety of identity. Race just sticks you into a box because of the way I look. I love the thought of ethnicity because to be able to identify and intertwine what you want. For example, I identify black but if I move to Italy and learn their culture then I can also say I have something in common with them. The ability to combine my black culture with another is fascinating to me. In my opinion, I believe that everyone shares a part of another ethnicity and may not even know it. Midterm: (Q2) Summarize the theories of prejudice. With which do you agree with the most and why? There are four categories of prejudice: Scapegoat, Authoritarian Personality, Culture, and Conflict. To understand where prejudice stems from these theories are used to explain by focusing on frustration, personality, culture, and social conflict. (pg 348, para 4) What is a scape goat exactly?
According to the text, it is “a person or category of people who have little power who are often blamed from their own troubles usually minorities.” (pg 348, para 6) The Scapegoat Theory focuses on the frustration of those who basically need someone to place blame on when a situation does not go their way. The ability to make someone feel inferior to them brings solace. For example, there is a huge deal about Mexicans stealing jobs in the US. Many people blame them for not being able to get a job but Mexicans typically take the dirtiest jobs some people will not apply for and then are called lazy or illegal. So how is it their fault? They are used as scapegoats to make it seem like they are taking all the jobs so that’s why people are
unemployed. Secondly, the Authoritarian Theory focuses on authoritarian personalities. This theory developed by Theodor Adorno and some colleagues of his examined that upmost prejudice is a personality trait. (pg 348, para 7) Basically saying that if you dislike one minority there probably is a change you dislike all. He concluded that people who had domineering parents usually develop this type of personality where they are hostile and aggressive due to a cold childhood. They find minorities as inferior to them and easily targeted. Thirdly, the Culture Theory explains that everyone basically has prejudice views besides those that are extremely prejudice. This theory states that we live in a “culture of prejudice.” (pg 348, para 11) We are taught to have these ideas about other categories of people placing them on a scale of superiority and inferiority. Lastly, the Conflict Theory implies that prejudice is used by those with power to subdue other categories of people. This entails that those powerful people will use any type of tactic especially money to discourage the advancement or growth of certain individuals. Another part of the conflict theory proposed by Shelby Steele states that minorities encourage “race consciousness meaning they play on the notion that all that they have suffered special circumstances should be granted. (pg 349, para 2) Steele declared that this type of thinking leads to adverse reactions from other races claiming special treatment. Out of all four theories, I can mostly agree with the Scapegoat and Culture theories. I picked these two because I believe that they both equally explain the context of prejudice. The Scapegoat theory breaks down the specifics of how and why others tend to find a way to blame or target someone to minimize their short comings. The Culture theory explains that even though you have some people who are extremely prejudice, everyone displays prejudice which is so true. We tend to sometimes not even know that we do it which is kind of alarming. Midterm: (Q3) Compare Socialism with Capitalism. What in your opinion could be two positives of both systems and two negatives. Explain. Which would you prefer to live under? Midterm: (Q4) List the types of social movements. What are the features of each one? Pick a social movement in the United States and apply the features you have read about. What is a social movement? According to the text, a social movement is an organized activity in which people set out to encourage or discourage social change. (pg 555, para 5) There are four social movements discussed in the text: alternative, redemptive, reformative, and revolutionary social movements. The alternative social movement helps some certain individuals change something in or about their lives or choices and are less intimidating. This movement attempts to “seek limited change in only part of the population.” (pg 555, para 8) For example, texting and driving. In the last couple of years, there have been many laws and campaigns to prevent texting and riving especially among teenagers. This movement targets teenagers and others to change a behavior that may result in harm or death to themselves and others The redemptive social movement like the alternative social movement helps certain individuals but seeks to total change a person’s life. Not necessarily a social movement but religion especially Christianity, is a great example. There are still many people who try and persuade that becoming a Christian will save your life and make it better. Other religions tend to do the same. Reformative social change affects everyone but only seek a small change. For example, going green for the environment. The movement aims for society to recycle, not pollute, and reduce waste among other issues. It suggests that if society make a few green changes in the world we can save earth and everything that occupies it. Their aim not just save the planet but get everyone to understand and accept their part. Lastly, the revolutionary social movement tries radically to make a whole society change and it’s the most extreme. Take for instance, Black Lives Matter. This group would be an excellent example of having a radical approach for its cause. Black Lives Matters touches bases with the mistreatment of blacks whether from police brutality to racial injustice following numerous incidents throughout the last 3 years. They aim to spread the word and get results by holding protests all around the US and using social media. Looking deeper into their movement, not only are they advocating for the people but also forcing others to pay attention. Law reform and then revamping of the justice system seem to be the majority of why this group exist. As we can see each one of these social movements as an impact on something or someone. They can be very helpful and also very detrimental depending on the circumstances given. In my opinion, if it wasn’t for social movements the world would be at a standstill and freedoms and laws to protect us would probably never exist. I am glad people can be a voice for those who can or will not speak for themselves.
Throughout history in the United States, what it means to be a black person has taken on different meanings. This is a result of forced the segregation that occurred during the post slavery era. Whites wanted to keep the Caucasian race “pure” and in order to do so, anyone that had one drop of black blood in them was considered black. This is very different from the way today’s society identifies black people. Presently, a black person is more likely to be identified by the color of their skin or their phenotype instead of their genotype.
The movie Friday is a comedy drama released in 1995 starring Ice Cube (Craig) and Chris Tucker (Smokey) in the lead roles. (CITE) The film takes place in South Central Los Angeles during a 16 hour time period in the eventful lives of friends Craig and Smokey. After just being fired from his job, Craig decides to hang out with his friend Smokey, smoking marijuana and drinking on the front porch of his parents house. Things get interesting when Smokey brings Craig into a “little”, or rather not so little problem of his. Smokey owes local drug dealer Big Worm $200 on that Friday night by ten o'clock p.m. for smoking, rather than selling the marijuana that Big Worm gave to him, or else they'd both be killed. The movie details all the of the events in the 16 hour time period which led up to them eventually getting the $200 that they owe to Big Worm, and in turn saving their own lives. The film is full laughs brought on by comedic scenes throughout, especially due to the fact that African American characters are portrayed in a very stereotypical manner. It was evident that the common stereotypes of African American people in the early to mid 90's were fully supported by the film.
Scapegoat is defined as one that bears the blame for others or one that is the object of irrational behavior. Even though in retrospect the scapegoat has in some way failed in their own goals, we use scapegoats because it’s easy. When we don’t succeed in a particular goal or feel we are going to embarrass ourselves the person we blame is the person we assume to be the weakest. The weakest person is usually different from the norm and not the most popular they dance to their own beat.
The conflict between race and ethnicity came up throughout the time I administered my questionnaires. In the questionnaires, many people questioned what they should respond to for the question which referenced their “race” or “ethnicity”. Some people saw it as a division and how the terms can be used as a negative term or a positive term to label a group of people.
I wonder why. Maybe because “scapegoating” speaks to the paranoia in all of us: the anti-immigrant or the anti-minority, the bigot or the conformist—the side of us that fear change because we have gotten too comfortable in our own little world. Maybe because it also speaks to our self-denial, to stick to such ideology that somebody else is responsible for our failure and misfortune, instead of facing our own individual responsibility and moral obligation. I truly do not understand such ideology; however, one thing I have fully understood—the society makes it seem as if embracing change can be pretty
An obsession exists in the world today based solely upon the use of scapegoats. According to the dictionary, a scapegoat consists of a person or group made to bear the blame for others or to suffer in their place. Some of the most influential scapegoats consist of Jesus Christ taking suffering for the sins of civilization, the Jewish population being punished for the problems in Germany, and more recently the U.S. citizens who perished in 9/11 being punished for the sins of America. Scapegoats have come in many forms over time and have been very destructive. The usage of scapegoats in our society, such as in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, has proved to be damaging, and an end must be found in order to find peace.
Through our readings of the Mexicans in the U.S. and the African-American experience modules, we begin to understand the formation of identity through the hardships minorities faced from discrimination. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast the ideas of identity shown through the readings. These two modules exemplify the theme of identity. We see how Blacks and Latinos tried to find their identity both personally and as a culture through the forced lifestyles they had to live.
As the narrator points out, this is a extremely short time in regards to evolutionary terms. Today, we classify one another by “race,” when there is actually sub-species or “race” of humans. According to scientist, humans have not been separated long enough to develop any differences other than skin color, meaning there is only one species of human. This belief contradicts anything and everyone today that asks for your race or believes there is any difference between an African American and European American other than skin color.
Since 1619, when the first slaves were brought to North America, race has played an important role in everyone’s life; especially those who are different from what people would consider “American”. According to the textbook, “race is defined as any group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographical distribution” (pg. 59). People are placed into different categories instead of all being considered human beings. Although we do not have slavery, that we know of, in the United States today, this does not mean that race is still not an issue. However, race in this country has taken a turn over time and has now, “taken on a meaning that refers to differences between people based on color” (pg.
That is where we see that the state and government have enormous power when it comes to defining what race actually is. The state can fundamentally shape your social status within their means. They have all access to one’s economic opportunities, including employment, and they also can control your political rights. The government pretty much has control of how you look and define yourself, but more importantly the control how others will define you. The state controls medical and research facilities and can influence all that fall under these categories, creating things such as race based
The topic of race, redistricting, and minority representation in Congress has emerged as one of the most salient issues in contemporary political thought. The creation of so‑called majority minority districts has been attacked as unfair and racially polarizing by some observers and ultimately struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The study of race in relation to American politics and institutions, and, in particular, to the institution of Congress, has produced a wealth of research and literature in recent years. This scope of budding research ranges from legislative activity and Congressional voting to the electoral process and campaigning. This study examines the effects of race in Congressional elections and campaigning, and will be primarily focused on constituent relationships with members of the House of Representatives. Through this research, a better understanding of the differences in constituent relationships and engagement between African American House members and their Caucasian colleagues will be reached. Based on the current literature and prevailing scholarly attitudes, one could likely conclude that African American Congress members, on the whole, develop closer and more personal relationships with their constituents than do white representatives.
Scapegoating is when a person irrationally blames their failures on others, therefore not taking responsibility themselves. The “scapegoating theory says that prejudiced people believe they are society’s victims” (Schaefer 38). It is always someone else’s fault that things do not go their way and the person “… transfers the responsibility for failure to some vulnerable group” (Schaefer 38).
Race and Ethnicity According to Anthropologists Examining the ideas and beliefs within ones own cultural context is central to the study of Anthropology. Issues of Race and Ethnicity dominate the academic discourses of various disciplines including the field of Anthropology. Race and Ethnicity are controversial terms that are defined and used by people in many different ways. This essay shall explore the ways in which Anthropologists make a distinction between race and ethnicity and how these distinctions serve as frames for cross-cultural comparison and analysis. It is important to accurately define these coined terms before one is able to make accurate comparisons and distinctions between them, and their relation to the concept of culture.
The article, “RACE AND ETHNICITY- CHANGING SYMBOL IS OF DOMINANCE AND HIERARCHY IN THE UNITED STATES” by Karen I. Blu is an exceptional work that clearly expounds on the racial and ethnic groups especially in America. Racial and ethnic groupings are gradually becoming popular in the public arena, in which people are shifting their focus on classifying other people on the basis of racial groupings to rather classifying them on the basis of ethnicity. Moreover, race grouping is slowly submerging into ethnic grouping with Black activism being the role player in this (Blu, 1979). The following is a summary of the aforementioned article in how it relates to racial and ethnic groups and response regarding its views.
Race and ethnicity are two terms that are constantly used in today’s society. Understanding these terms can help people to recognize that color of skin or color of hair does not define a person. These terms connect with history, social interaction, and the overall make up of a person. However America is constantly obsessed with labeling people by the way that they look or the way that they act. America seems to encourage the terms race and ethnicity and continue to divide people into categories. It is interesting to comprehend these terms because they are not going to disappear any time soon. Race and ethnicity are apart of America’s history and will be a part of the future.