Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methods of lie detection
What is society's view about lying
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Methods of lie detection
Lying has been a problem since societies were first formed. Some people are great liars, others are not. But, whether someone is a good liar or not, one-tenth of a second is all it takes for subtle changes known as micro expressions to appear and disappear from a person’s face. These micro expressions are a sign of emotion. The people who read these micro expressions are human lie detectors. Although. police have machines such as the polygraph test, which measures body temperature and voice tone to help them detect when people are lying, micro expressions are far more reliable. Micro expressions are more useful to police than polygraph tests because, polygraph tests only detect spikes in emotion, there is little scientific evidence about accuracy, and micro expressions are proven to help people further scientific research.
In the first place, the polygraph test can only detect spikes in emotion unlike micro expressions. Micro expressions are more useful to police because polygraph tests are unreliable; polygraph tests cannot tell which emotion is being felt by the person, they cannot tell why an emotion is being felt, and micro expressions cannot be controlled by people like polygraph tests can. To begin, polygraph tests cannot tell which emotion a person is feeling. Paul Ekman is one of the few scientists who researches micro expressions. He wrote a book called The Polygraph as a Lie Catcher, in this book he addresses the worldwide debate of whether the polygraph is an accurate lie detector. Ekman says, “Remember that the polygraph test is not a lie detector. It only detects emotional arousal” (251). The polygraph test cannot accurately detect the specific emotion a person is feeling; someone may be feeling nervous and the po...
... middle of paper ...
...ons. Guliford,
2010. 211. books.google.com. Web. 30 jan. 2014.
“Microexpressions: More Than Meets the Eye.” Talk of the Nation/Science Friday (NRP) (2013):
Newspaper source. Web. 14 Jan. 2014.
“Micromovements Hold Hidden Information About Severity of Autism, Researches Report.”
newsmedicine.iu.edu. Indiana University, ISUM Newsroom, 2 December 2013. Web. 30
Jan. 2014.
“Polygraph Validity Research.” polygraph.org. American Polygraph Association, 2010. Web. 30
Jan. 2014.
Porter, Stephen, and Leanne Ten Brinkle. “Reading Between the Lies.” People.ok.ubca.ca. N.P. 31
Oct. 2007. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. PDF.
Leach, Amy-May, et al. “The Reliability of Lie Detection Performance.” Law and Human Behavior
33.1 (Feb. 2009): JSTOR. Web. 19 Jan. 2014.
Lock, Carrie. “Deception Detection.” Science News 66.5 (Jul. 31, 2004) : JSTOR. Web. 19 Jan.
2014.
“A good liar uses the truth.” This is a technique used by notorious imposters Frederic Bourdin, and Frank Abagnale. Although Bourdin posed as a child for a second chance at adolescence, Abagnale posed as an adult to gain financial means and respect. Bourdin and Abagnale’s success in deception can be primarily attributed to their careful observation of their surroundings, as well as their ability to detect the emotions of those around them.
“Accuracy-confidence correlation: an eye witnesses’ stated confidence is not a good predictor of identification accuracy; Stress effects: highly stressful situations may make an experience seem especially vivid, but such stressors can reduce the ability to recall details about a person’s face…Cross-race bias: eye witnesses are more accurate at identifying members of their own race than members of other races.”
One of the last types of ways investigators are coached to detect deception is in the behavioral attitudes of a person being interviewed such as being unconcerned or over anxious (Kassin, 2005). The success rate of looking for these cues are very successful in telling if an individual is being deceitful and has surpassed any laboratory tests conducted on the subject. The laboratory test however did reveal some interesting facts. The research showed that people who had training and experience did not score better than the control group who received no training. In fact all individuals scored at the chance level with the people who had training scored just above chance or at the chance level. To check if special training in the detection of deception was more accurate a study ...
While communicating with another human being, one only has to examine the other’s face in order to comprehend what is being said on a much deeper level. It is said that up to 55 percent of a message’s meaning can be derived from facial expression (Subramani, 2010). These facial manipulations allow thoughts to be expressed in ways that are often difficult to articulate verbally, with the face demonstrating “the thoughts of the mind, and the feelings of the heart” (Singla). Many expressions are said to universal, particularly those showing happiness, sadness, fear, anger, disgust, and...
Lying is simply an act of not telling the truth, and this definition of lying will be used in future sections of this paper. There are three groups of lies t...
Author Allison Kornet in her article (1997) “The Truth about Lying: Has Lying Gotten a Bad Rap” states that deception or lying has become a part of everyone’s life. A person lies or deceives as often as he brushes his teeth or combs his hair. Many psychologists have neglected or ignored the concept of deception or lying and its effects on everyone’s life. Kornet explains that in the previous two to three decades, the psychologists started noticing or analyzing the effects of a person’s deception on others or why a person lies so many times in his day-to-day life. The person might learn lying from childhood
That, like unreliable narrators, individuals often ‘lie’ to themselves in order to cover up the actual
A person once said “the truth does not cost a person anything, but a lie costs a person everything”. The aim of the study is to take an in depth look at how the kinds of lies and sex differences in lying demonstrated in the scientific article are related with Pamela Meyer's tedtalk.
Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitness distorts their reports of the eyewitness experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360-376.
The polygraph is a very controversial topic when comes to the introduction of the techniques into court. The polygraph technique has not changed since first developed in 1895. What the polygraph does is measures the blood pressure fluctuation, pulse rate and respiratory rate changes. The rate of the blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate not only changes due to the body being stressed because the person is lying, but it also changes due to anxiety, anger and medical conditions. This will affect the accuracy on the technique and give inconsistent readings within the results (Gailus, C., 2008, November
Deceit is the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misleading the truth. Deception has always been a part of psychology and researchers have always determined that in the majority of cases the deceptions are harmless or minimal, yet they still exist. As a result of Mailgram’s experiment, deceptive research operations are now under harsh examination all across the discipline. It is obvious that Milgram’s intent was not to revol...
Houston, K. A., Clifford, B. R., Phillips, L. H., & Memon, A. (2013). The emotional eyewitness: The effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance. Emotion, 13(1), 118-128.
Although alterations have been made to protect the validity an minimize the error of the polygraph, the results are still dependant of the subjects physiological response. Although research has shown that these alterations do in fact minimize the inaccuracy of the results, no matter what changes are made, there is still a minimal possibility that one can wittingly breach the barriers.
A lie detector is a machine that tries to detect if a person is lying (“Lie detector.”31 of 2). Over the centuries different people and cultures have tried to find a way to see if someone is lying. The Chinese would make a person who was a suspect of a crime chew and spit out some rice powder after being questioned. If the powder was dry the person was guilty because they thought someone whose mouth is dry is guilty and if it was moist they were innocent (Lie detector1 1 of 2). Also the english would give a suspect a slice of bread and cheese if they could swollow it they were innocent, but if they could not they were guilty this is saying that people would have trouble swolling if they were guilty (Lie detector1 1 of 2). “The first scientific instrument designed to measure physiological respones to questioning was used in 1895 by an italian criminologist, Cesare Lombroso, he took an existing device called a hydrosphygmegraph – a small, water-filled tank in which a subjects hand was submerged. The tank was then sealed by a thin sheet of rubber. Any changes in the subject’s pulse or blood pressure would be transferred through the hand to the water and would change the water level. When the water level changed, a difference in air pressure resulted. The air pressure was monitored by an air-filled tube connected to a revolving drum. Lombroso’s device coud detect any physical changes in pulse and blood pressure. Some...
One of the components of Reid approach is training the interrogators to establish whether a suspect is lying or telling the truth by evaluating the nonverbal and verbal behavior during the interview. Many people question the effectiveness of interrogation training in assisting to discern truth from suspects. According Professor Richard Leo, people are poor in drawing accurate judgments of deception and truth (Leo, 2013). The behavior prompts used police are not diagnostic of deception, the investigators cannot differentiate false from truth denials of guilt, and yet they maintain they draw accurate