Michelangelo's Dying Slave Essay

517 Words2 Pages

Michelangelo’s Dying Slave was commissioned along with Rebellious Slave for the tomb of Pope Julius II. Completed between 1513 and 1516, they were not included in Julius’ tomb. Michelangelo’s primary concern in creating Dying Slave is with the figure’s body, a detailed sensual form that forgoes facial details and gives the figure a serene and placid demeanor.
Standing at 2.09 meters, roughly 7’4”, Dying Slave is larger than life. Carved from marble, the surface of the slave is smooth and has a flesh like luster. There are no chisel or hammers mark left on the figure’s body from the hand of Michelangelo. The ground and supporting marble behind the slave’s legs is raw and unhewn. The beginnings of a monkey take shape but is left unfinished. You can see the strikes Michelangelo left with his tools in the raw marble, unlike the figure where the artist’s hand is not visible. Michelangelo had many works that had an unfinished look about them. Non finito was a technique regularly employed by Michelangelo and he uses it in both of the Captive sculptures, Dying Slave and Rebellious Slave. This gives the figure the appearance of just having sprung to life from the …show more content…

The figure’s muscles are well defined and detailed. His body is ever so slightly bending and arching towards the raw marble support behind him. There is motion in his pose, and he looks like at any moment he might shift his weight and adjust himself. He is bound tightly around his chest, right shoulder, and around his left wrist. The restraints around his wrist pull his hand behind his head. Where there is tension in his lifted arm and his latissimus dorsi, there is none in his face or neck. The expression on his face is serene, and he appears to be sleeping, albeit deeply, more than he appears dying. Michelangelo pays more attention to detail in the slave’s body than in his face, which lends to his composed

Open Document