Michelangelo's David Analysis

1074 Words3 Pages

Michelangelo’s David that he sculpted from 1501 – 1504 is a piece of artwork that caught my eye during the study of the High Renaissance period. Michelangelo paid a lot of attention to the careful detail of the human anatomy and it shows in this statue. The statue is seventeen feet tall with small details such as muscle definition, veins in the skin, and curly locks of hair, and the details in the eye to let the viewer know that David is looking off into the distance, assumingly at Goliath. It is amazing that the artist was able to sculpt realistic details from solid marble.
Another detail that is worth noting is how different Michelangelo’s David is from Donatello’s David. Donatello’s work showed the man after his battle, Goliath’s head was …show more content…

Peter’s Pizza and the baldacchino, Bernini’s sculptures were the things he was known for second. Bernini’s David was another work that caught my eye that was based on the hero David. Standing at almost six feet tall, it is another statue made of marble that was sculpted in 1623 during the Baroque period, over a hundred years after Michelangelo’s piece and over two hundred years after Donatello’s piece. Although it is not as detailed as Michelangelo’s, there is still a strong sense of anatomy and details in the statue that are breathtaking. His hair, small bit of clothing, body language and expression are all conveyed successfully to show that the man is in the middle of action. The emotion, action and theatrical appearance were all characteristics of the art period at the time. Bernini, similar to Michelangelo, took a different step towards recreating …show more content…

This painting caught my eye because of the level of detail that Courbet put into the entire composition. The differences in age between the two people shown in the foreground gets Courbet’s intent for the painting across. He believed that if you are born poverty you will remain poor the rest of your life. The rendering of the folds in clothing, the rocks on the ground, and even the background all have the same amount of detail, Courbet did not take any shortcuts when doing this piece. It is interesting to see how the mundane things of life can be captured in a painting and made into something that is considered

Open Document