Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Papers about history of sexuality
Perspective of human sexual history
Sexuality and repression in the Victorian Age
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Papers about history of sexuality
Michael Foucault’s History of Sexuality explains how today’s norm follow the idea of the Victorian Regime and why sexuality is repressed due to the norm. Before the Victorian Regime, people were open to sex and had less secrecy. During the 17th century, people enjoyed having sex for the fun. Eventually, people decided that sex should be sacred and it became something that people enjoyed but should not be talked upon in public. Sex was becoming more serious and sexuality was becoming more private into the homes. Couples were having sex with the goals of reproduction. The couple’s secrecy changed the norm of society. Adults were not allowed to talk about sex especially in front of children because children should not know about sex. The society was censoring and repressing sexuality and thus became the …show more content…
Sex was something that people could talk about and openly have fun doing it. I think it’s crazy how norms can be changed due to leading actions such as repression. Like Foucault stated, repression help with the growth of capitalism and in a sense, it was a power that caused secrecy in a society. I don’t know how a society without repression might look like. The idea of a society or norm without repression is strange because we were born into a society that repression already exists. The media, our parents, and all adults prevented children from learning anything about sex due to censorship and/or repression. Movies with nudity or anything vulgar are forced to put a tag that states “Rated R” to let people know that it’s not suitable for children. I think repression is just a way to keep people intact because it is an unspoken rule that created our society. People follow this rule of secrecy of sexuality, even though it is not stated that we couldn’t talk about it in public. In a sense, these rules are a way to confining people from becoming unnormal and make them more
Foucault capitalizes that power and knowledge contribute to the discourse of sex; he discusses how people in power controlled this discourse to repress sex entirely. Foucault talks about the repressive hypothesis in his book. The repressive hypothesis states that whoever holds the power, also controls the discourse on sexuality. Specifically, those in power, according to the repressive hypothesis, exercise to repress the discussion of sex. In addition, Foucault comments that knowledge represents power. Whoever has the power can dictate the language of the population, thus this causes powerful people to also regulate the knowledge of the population. Although Foucault does not agree with every aspect that the repressive hypothesis exclaims, he agrees about the timing of when people started to repress sex. With rise of the bourgeoisie in the 17th century, a rise in tighter control about sex also took place. Foucault stated that the discourse of sex remained
Then came the sixties and the sexual revolution. The restraints against sexual intercourse for unmarried women gave way as the Pill [oral contraceptive] finally freed them from the fear of unwanted pregnancy. Seduction became abbreviated and compressed, oftentimes bypassed altogether, as women, reveling in their newfound liberation, sought the sexual freedom that had for so long been ‘for men only.’ The assumption of the era was that she wanted sex as much as he did, the only question being whether or not they wanted to do it with each other. Young people lived together openly, parading their sexuality before their parents’ outraged and bewildered gaze (13).
Unlike sex, the history of sexuality is dependant upon society and limited by its language in order to be defined and understood.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage, 1978. Print.
Most forms of entertainment in Brave New World somehow relate to sex. For example the “feelies” are pornographic movies with a more advanced plot line and the tremendous bonus of experiencing the same things as the actors on the screen. The government actually encourages sex and promiscuity among its citizens; if a person is not promiscuous they are seen as outcasts. Sex is not a private matter and is openly practiced. To ensure that sex’s purpose is for entertainment the government makes only thirty percent of the female population fertile. This ensures that the population will not view sex as a form of reproduction because the majority is not capable of sexual reproduction. The more partners a person has the more popular the person is. Due to this a person is discouraged from having a long-term relationship with one person. If they have a long term relationship their loyalty to the government and Ford is in question, as evidenced early in the book when Fanny was scolding Lenine for not being with more men when she had the chance. “And you know how strongly the DHC objects to anything intense or long and drawn out. Four months of Henry Foster without having another man - why, he’d be furious if he knew,” (46). One night-stands are common and expected; the idea of marriage is practically nonexistent. Because it is common for the people of the World State to talk constantly about sex and are encouraged to have sex frequently, it is not seen as dirty, shameful or something to be discussed behind closed doors. From a young age children learn about sex and contraceptives. Children are forced to use contraceptives every time they have sex. They are encouraged to participate in sex play from a young age. Those who do not wish to participate are taken to a psychologist for an evaluation. Unfortunately, these actions are steadily becoming common in our own
In the book History of Sexuality: An introduction, Volume 1 by Michel Foucault, he discusses the “repressive hypothesis” which he had developed. Sexual repression was due to the rise of the bourgeois. He suggests that the repressive hypothesis is important for discourse on the revolution of sexuality. Foucault has recognized the repressive hypothesis as a form of discourse. The repressive hypothesis has power to repress the debate of sexuality. Foucault mentions that society has created control over how people talk about sex over time. In the 17th century with the rise of the bourgeoisie, there had been control on the discourse of sex. In the 18th century, sex was studied for the means of regulating the demographic of the population. Sex lives
In this new world, sex is ingrained into children at a very young age. In fact, in the hatcheries children are encouraged to join in on erotic sexual games with each other. The government leaders do this in order to build a firm ideal that "everyone belongs to everyone else" and to remove attachments from between each individual. Everyone in this society has seemingly slept with everyone else, and when a citizen questions there own promiscuity, their peers will quickly step in to correct them back onto the path of further casual sex. They even go to the point of having simulated sex as one citizen recalls a simulation where "There 's a love scene on a bearskin rug; they say it 's marvellous. Every hair of the bear reproduced. The most amazing tactual effects." The idea of simulated sex is to dehumanize every part of sex to make it almost automated without emotion. They seek only the pleasure and none of the attachments, so in essence a friends with benefits type of scenario. Sex plays the role of distracting and suppressing the population because it allows them to focus more on soma and who they will be having sex with rather than independent thought. This is crucial for the government to keep control because if everyone loves everything and there are no independent thoughts then there will be no
The Repressive hypothesis states how we currently live in a sexual repressed society. The repressive hypothesis also states that sexuality needs to be liberated, or that it does not have to be repressed. Identifying with ones sexuality is the key to unlocking ones identity and one’s happiness. The repressive hypothesis initially implies three edicts; that derive from our repressed society. According to the repressive hypothesis, specifically in the repressive culture we live in, the first edict explains how all sexuality must be silenced in all occasions, for the mention of sexuality is taboo. In modern times, specifically within the 17th century, it was also important to keep sexuality “hush-hush”, only those who belong to the lower class
This essay will analyze and critique Michel Foucault’s (1984) essay The Use of Pleasure in order to reveal certain internal weaknesses it contains and propose modifications that would strengthen his reading of sexuality as a domain of moral self-formation. In order to do so, it will present a threefold critique of his work. Firstly, it will argue that that his focus on solely the metric of pleasure divorced from its political manifestations underemphasizes state power as a structuring principle of sexuality. Secondly, it will posit that his attention to classical morality privileges written works by male elites and fails to account for the subtexts that would demonstrate other forms of morality. Finally, it will argue that the nature of actors’ resistance to moral codes, explicated through Butler’s concept of iterability and signification, is an important factor that should also be considered. As a result of this critique, this essay
... decades ago. This book is one that will allow the reader to view many aspects of sexuality from a social standpoint, and apply it to certain social attitudes in our society today, these attitudes can range from the acceptance of lesbian and gays, and the common sight of sex before marriage and women equality. The new era of sexuality has taken a definite "transformation" as Giddens puts it, and as a society we are living in the world of change in which we must adapt, by accepting our society as a changing society, and not be naive and think all the rules of sexuality from our parents time our still in existence now.
The unfriendly Victorian social environment and moral apparatus, coupled with certain vested interests, are squarely to blame for this sad state of affairs. Prudery, sexual repression, prevalence of Puritanical attitudes that privileged the institution of family and projected marriage as something sacred to be preserved no matter how much the women had to suffer -- all th...
Up from the time they are born, boys and girls have social norms applied to them. Society is more harsh on women than men any day. Women are not even allowed simple human rights that a man doesn’t even have to fight for. It is as if we coexist with each other on the same planet but we are indeed from two separate worlds of experience. Girls are sexualized before they even know what sexuality is, and boys are encouraged to sexualize women as soon as they reach intrest in doing so. But when the roles are reversed, the woman is shamed for embracing her sexuality while the man is instead praised. Why does this happen? How is it that a man can sexualize a woman as much as he wishes, but once a woman sexualizes herself she is slut shamed beyond belief. Women’s rights have came a long way since the days of Wollstonecraft but we still have a big battle ahead of us. Why is it that the government... the government, is still able to control what a woman can and cannot do with her body? For what reason is it any of congressmen’s business what the women of the country that they’ll never personally know choose to do with their bodies? When men lost having complete control over woman forcing them to obedience their egos were bruised harshly for they were created on the power of being dominant over us, but when that power is taken away what is there left of
As a society, I believe we’ve been liberalized but not truly liberated. Compared to a few decades ago, society has come a long way in terms of accepting sexuality as part of our culture. It’s acceptable for people to engage in premarital sex, but society is not as free as it should be. During the sixties and seventies, society started to make a move towards liberation during the sexual revolution and then suddenly made a swing back in the opposite direction. I’m not sure why this occurred, but our society is right back in the mindset that sex and sexuality is okay but it is not acceptable to freely discuss it. Technically, I am free to do as I please, but the intense scrutiny that I would receive limits how think and behave.
Sexuality has always an issue of conflict and debate. Who controls sexuality, and is male and female sexuality really distinguishable. People have always been having sex; for reproduction and for pleasure. Even though it is a women’s and a man’s rightful claim to this intercourse women tend to feel as if sexuality is against them. This would also be contingent on the type on society one lives in. In some societies the mere topic of sex is tabooed and the subject is not confronted with clarity, meanwhile in other societies it is encouraged, praised, and advocated to speak about it openly. Sexuality in The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood was one that was tabooed and against the strict, empowering rules of the Gilead state. Sex was forbidden for men and women; but women were the ones who reproduced the babies. Therefore, they were forced into having sex with no pleasure to conceive children. In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, sex for only sexual pleasure is what society actually strived at. The feeding of the physical as being more essential than anything else that can bring about happiness and repress the truth.