Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of third party presidential candidates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of third party presidential candidates
Two factors, in particular, could potentially hinder Michael Bloomberg’s bid for the presidency. The first is that he plans to run on an independent ticket. Historically, third party Presidential campaigns have been largely unsuccessful. A third party candidate has never won a U.S. presidential election. The reason for this is primarily systemic. The United State’s electoral system functions under a multiseat plurality, meaning, “… a third party would have to win the largest share of votes in several states to have any realistic chance of winning.” However, the likelihood of a third party winning the largest share of votes in any state, let alone several states is slim, partly because voters feel their vote will be “wasted” on a minor party …show more content…
Bloomberg has already missed the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries, which received a considerable amount of media coverage given their early positions on the primary calendar, a key factor in candidates connecting with voters and thereby gaining ideological and monetary support (monetary support is of least concern to Bloomberg). Success in these first two primaries can provide momentum to a candidate’s campaign and propel them into later primaries. Further, primaries have filing deadlines, and Bloomberg has missed the filing deadline for a majority of the state primaries. By missing these filing deadlines Bloomberg cannot achieve ballot access and has forfeited a great number of votes and essentially delegates to the convention. An article by Brookings stated, “… the candidate who has missed filing deadlines through the end of January, has potentially forfeited 2,232 …show more content…
But, in Bloomberg’s opinion, the political atmosphere did not align for a successful run from an Independent candidate. This time around, however, he is willing to run if the Democrats nominate Bernie Sanders and the Republicans nominate Donald Trump or Ted Cruz. Because Sanders, Trump, and Cruz are not the “status quo” per say, Bloomberg and his advisors feel he has the best shot at success as an Independent in the 2016 presidential campaign. If Bloomberg decides to run and is unsuccessful, he can still influence the race by taking away votes from a major party candidate, more than likely a Democratic candidate. This happened in the 2000 election when Independent candidate Ralph Nader took votes away from Al Gore, which ultimately contributed to George W. Bush’s win. In this instance, Bloomberg would be acting as a
...: Wall Street Insider - Financial News, Headlines, Commentary and Analysis - Hedge Funds, Private Equity, Banks. Retrieved January 15, 2012, from http://dealbreaker.com/2010/06/wachovia-vp-had-good-reason-to-steal-money-from-bank-that-youll-probably-never-understand/
My Written Report is a Short Biography of Colin Luther Powell. He was born on May 5, 1937 in Presbyterian Hospital. He was born, and grew up, in the South Bronx, New York. There was a big influence of drugs and gangs where Powell lived but, he seemed to steer away from all of that (source 1, page 23). Powell's parents were immigrants from Jamaica. His mother's name is Muad Ariel McKoy. In Jamaica the McKoy fammily watched over sugar plantations. She came to America with her mother (Colin's grandmother). Powell's father's name is Luther Theophilus Powell. In Jamaica the Powell families were peasant farmers. Muad and Luther while in New York not in Jamaica (source 1, page 20, 21). Colin Powell is a smart man. Surprisingly when he was in fourth grade he was in the slow class. When he attended Junior High School, he went to an all male school. He did well academically but he was over looked by his parents because his sister, Marilyn Powell, always did better. He attended Morris High School in 1950. He was good in high school; he never got into any fights or any sort of trouble. He completed High school in 1954 (source 1, page 29, 30, 32). Powell applied to two colleges City College of New York (CCNY) and New York University (NYU). Both accepted him but he went to CCNY because it only ten dollars a semester as opposed to seven hundred and fifty dollars a semester at NYU.
The reason why 3rd party candidates don’t win in presidential elections is not because they are unqualified; it’s because the electoral system that we have in place creates enormous obstacles for them. One obstacle is that 3rd party candidates get unfair representation in political debates on television and another is that 3rd party candidates have trouble mobilizing their voters to get to the polls.
As a result, more states vie for earlier primaries to claim a greater influence in the
Having only two candidates running for the leader of our country restricts our choices for president. If a third part wins the majority of the popular vote, that doesn't necessarily mean they will be the president because it's all up to the electors. If the candidate doesn't win the electors' votes then they will not h...
In January of 1990, Washington, DC, the seat of the federal government of the United States was turned upside down by scandal. While the headlines were filled with the efforts of the Bush Administration to crack down on drugs, the District's Mayor and symbol of black power against a nearly all white backdrop of authority was caught on videotape buying and than smoking crack cocaine with an exotic dancer two days before he was expected to announce an unprecedented fourth campaign for mayor. The sting was setup and carried out by a Federal Bureau of Investigation unit that had been pursing the frequent rumors of the Mayor's drug dependency.
Both parties will tend to be broad-based and attempt to target as many groups as possible: this is because any smaller parties will not stand a chance in competing in most districts, hence causing parties to consolidate in order to be viable (ACE Project, 2012). This analysis by the ACE Project shows how larger parties may tend to squeeze out smaller ones, and cause smaller parties to be excluded relative to their actual level in government, hindering their ability to act on a national stage, providing a normative basis for their exclusion in Canadian
The Green Party of Canada, also known as the GPC, is a minor Canadian federal political party that is known for preaching ecological wisdom. Founded in November of 1983 in Ottawa, GPC currently holds one seat in the House of Commons. GPC was highly motivated by observing the West German Green Party, which overcome great odds to win 27 parliamentary seats.2 Over the past several years, GPC has made remarkable strides to advance its political platform and gain a voice in the House of Commons. In 2000, GPC received only 0.8% of the votes and received zero seats in the House. However, GPC heavily improved in the 2004 federal election, winning 4.3% of the votes. After this “electoral breakthrough,” GPC earned a great deal of respect and garnered attention in the mass media.2 More importantly, by receiving 4.3% of the votes, GPC qualified for federal funding. By doing so, GPC received much-needed subsidies that would eventually play a huge role in its emergence in Canadian politics. Four years later in the 2008 federal election, GPC received 6.8% of the votes to ensure that green issues would be discussed in policy agendas of Canadian government.
The Electoral College allows a candidate to win the presidency without winning the majority of popular votes. Additionally, the unequal representation created by the number of electors each state has leads to a differential worth depending upon a voter’s state of residency. Moreover, the winner-take-all rule of the results in votes which are essentially rendered worthless if they are contrary the state majority. Finally, the system places much of the focus and power to effect elections in the hands of so called swing states that are not historically aligned with only one party. (Dahl, 80-83) These aspects of the U.S. political system are utterly counterintuitive and stand in stark contrast to many of the cardinal ideals of
The most influential structural element of the new primary system is the newfound practice of the political parties choosing a favored candidate before the primary season. The parties then throw all their support and financial backing behind this candidate and instantly make him/her a front-runner. While this element is standard among the two parties, the remaining structure of the primary system differs between the two main political parties. While both the Democratic and Republican parties hold open and closed primaries, the two parties hold many of their state primaries on separate dates. Additionally, the two parties have different rules that determine how each state’s delegates are allotted. The Democrats practice the proportional representation method of delegate allocation. The Republicans, on the other hand, pract...
The two party system has encouraged the idea that voting for anyone who is not ‘blue’ or ‘red’ is a wasted vote. This can be seen in the lack of votes that 3rd party candidates are getting, for example in 2012 between the three third party candidates there was a total of 1,570,767 votes.(IVN) This could be because only a little more than half of the voting age population actually voted. (GMU) Or it could be to the lack of media coverage that they get. Third party candidates, or any candidate for that matter need to get at least 5% of the vote in a general election to get equal ballot access and federal funding like the two big parties. Another reason this idea of a wasted vote comes through is because no one knows what these other parties stand for they just hear what people on CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News say about them. For instance the libertarian party has been deemed nothing more than a bunch of pot smoking hippies just because they want to legalize marijuana. The big media outlets don’t look at the party as a whole and find one unpopular opinion they have and bash it into the skulls of their viewers as the truth.
In the presidential elections of 1980 and 1992, in both cases, the third party received a good amount of popular vote (Doc B). This should mean that they should receive electoral votes. But that’s not the case. This shows a dominance of our 2-party system. Even bet...
A leader is a person who directs or commands a group,organization or country. Governor Mario Cuomo was our leader and left his mark as one of the most ethical leaders New York State has had.An ethical leader is someone that directs with respect for the beliefs and values of others and can be described as a trustworthy, honest and fair person. In Cuomo’s 3 terms in office he was loved by the American people and many wanted to see him as President. This was because of his ability to put the future of the people above his own personal beliefs, his confidence in his leadership skills and his capability to know his limits as a leader.
Despite being the constant underdog and loser in major elections third parties make some significant contribution to the political spectrum in the United States. Third Party Agendas are taken serious by the Democratic and Republican Parties and specific pieces of the Third Party Agendas are sometimes adopted by the two major parties. Third parties give discontented voters other alternatives. The Republican and Democratic Parties have been known to operate in similar styles and third parties give the voter the opportunity to express their discontent. The third parties in the United States are policy advocates and often are more specific about were they stand ideologically. Often the Republican and Democratic Parties try and take a moderate approach to political issues, and third parties are more conservative or liberal when it comes to political issues. Also, third parties tend to do exactly the opposite when their agenda concerns social issues. Then there is the ?spoiler factor? a Third Party Candidate can collect enough votes to change the outcome of a Presidential Election.
Sege, A. (2011, August 8). Third-Party Challenge in 2012? Not Likely, Experts Say. McClatchy-Tribune News Service. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from SIRS Researcher.