Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay nature v nurture debate
Essay nature v nurture debate
Essay nature v nurture debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“He roamed the school halls with his head down like a ghost.” Danny Lopez has always felt lost. He is biracial, with a white mother and a Mexican father who left his family years ago. He used to attend a prestigious, mostly white private school. There, he felt as if he did not belong because of the color of his skin. He was an outsider. When his mom moves to San Francisco with her new boyfriend, Randy, Danny decides to go to National City and live with his uncle and cousin, Sofia for the summer. In National City, people do not look down on him because he is Mexican; most of the town’s population falls under the same category. Although Danny appears to fit in because of his Hispanic background, one thing separates him from the rest: his inability …show more content…
to speak Spanish. Throughout the book, a theme of identity and defining what makes a person who they are is present while Danny continues to wonder whether he belongs in a white society, a Mexican society, or if he never truly will belong. As the story begins to unfold, the theme does the same. The theme is first evident when Danny’s ethnicity is revealed to readers. “He feels pale. A full shade lighter. Albino almost. Less than” (de la Peña 2). This is an important part of the book where it is apparent that Danny feels inferior because of his appearance. The theme becomes more obvious during a scene in which Danny sees Sofia’s friends playing baseball and thinks back to his life at his old school. Readers are more aware of how lost Danny feels and how this lead him to completely give up on interacting with others when de la Peña writes, “Back in Leucadia, he made a pact with himself. No more words” (16). The events that take place during the rising action and climax shape and refine the theme. Danny’s insecurities and self-doubts are related to his father’s absence, which after learning, makes the theme easier to grasp. This is shown on page 165 Mexican Whiteboy when Danny asks himself, “How can this older black man from Oxnard, a person he doesn’t even know , his best friend’s dad, how can he be the first person he’s ever met who understands that his heart is broken” (de la Peña 165)? Although Danny feels lost and unwanted, having a close friend helps him get through the tough times. Danny’s progress can be seen on page 175 when de la Peña writes, “Danny’s face lights up as he gives Uno daps”. The recurring theme in the novel, Mexican Whiteboy, is the question of what makes someone who they are.
The conclusion of the book shapes and fully develops this theme. Towards the end of the book, signs point to Danny blaming himself for his father’s absence. This is unmistakable on page 224 when Sofia says, “You didn’t do anything wrong” and Danny replies, “I must have” (de la Peña). Danny had spent so much time thinking and worrying about his father, but when the chance finally arose for Danny to see him again, he was hesitant. “This is everything he’s ever wanted over the past few years. But does he want it anymore? Over the last couple of days, he’s decided that maybe he’s okay without his dad” (de la Peña 246). The conclusion of Mexican Whiteboy very well may be the most significant part. Danny finally realizes that his dad’s actions, personality, and presence in his own life do not define him; it is up to him to decide who he wants to …show more content…
be. The nonfiction text that correlates with Mexican Whiteboy most is The Nature vs.
Nurture Debate. The central idea of this text is that genetics and how a person is raised both contribute towards who they will grow to be. The text supports their claim that nurturing is a contributor by mentioning that native language is determined by environment. This is backed up by the fact that, “Studies show that children can learn any language with equal facility” (CommonLit 3). However, the claim that nature is a contributor is also verified in the text. For example, not all traits are genetically heritable. This is proven in the article in paragraph 6 when the CommonLit Staff writes, “Wealth and social status are two non-genetic factors that are generally passed down from family.” The text, Nature vs. Nurture Debate, and the novel, Mexican Whiteboy go side-by-side when it comes to their common themes. Both revolve around one’s identity and how it comes to be. Among many other great examples, a quote by Doug Cooper portrays the central theme of the novel, Mexican Whiteboy. The central theme of both the novel and the quote is the question of what determines one’s identity. The quote touches base on the fact that there is a specific way that an identity is determined. This is shown when the author writes, “Identity cannot be found or fabricated but emerges from within when one has the courage to let go” (cooper). This is shown to be true when Danny begins to find and believe in himself once
he lets go of all of his emotions caused by his dad’s disappearance. The novel, Mexican Whiteboy, the text, The Nature vs. Nurture Debate and the quote by Doug Cooper all share a common theme: what makes us who we are. The idea that one’s identity is decided by genetics and one’s environment, and that it cannot be found or fabricated are all proven to be true in the novel. Danny didn’t speak Spanish and his dad abandoned him: he had the odds stacked up against him. Despite this, he managed to learn about himself and decided what type of person that he wanted to be.
The Mexican White boy is a good book. It is by the author named Matt de la Pena. Although it wasn’t my type of book I would recommend it to someone. The Mexican White Boy is about a boy who moves with his father side of his family and tries to fit in with the Mexicans although he doesn’t know how to speak Spanish. The story is really relaxing. The plot is great, the theme, the tone, and mood of the story. . The plot of the story is always changing. It changes from enemies to friends. I feel like the author want to change your mind about people. For example, first Danny, the main character, must fit in with everyone. Then he meets a kid named Uno and the first time they meet they get into a fight. But later, in the story Uno and Danny start being friends.
After a whole book of building up, from Danny having to visit the library secretly to him having to hide his college plans, the writer reveals that the person Danny has always tried to keep secrets against knew and acquiesced all of his actions since the very beginning. Unlike how they portrayed him as, Reb Saunders does his best to raise Danny with freedom and spirituality at the same time instead of controlling Danny and trying to limit his freedom. Finally, though unwillingly, he lets Danny go, “Today is the-the Festival of Freedom.” There was a soft hint of bitterness in his voice. “Today my Daniel is free….”(288). At last, Danny is allowed to pursuit his dreams free from the burden of his family heritage. This final event raps up the book in a truly ironic way by alternating the readers’ views on Reb Saunders and his way of raising Danny that seemed cruel and
Jonathan Mendoza “Brown Boy, White Boy”, really did speak me, no I am not biracial but I was able to understand in a nutshell of what they go through. In a world that is divided by blacks and whites where should they fit in? From the outside looking in, I always thought that mixed kids had the best of both worlds, they the nice hair and skins, they could pass for white and have great opportunities and could kick it in the hood. But after listening to Jonathan I’ve learned that it is not all that simple. They go through so much trying to figure out who they are, trying to identify with what history is theirs. Like he said it is a game of tug of war. Which brings me into the Attitudes toward interracial relationships, where they hit on the concept
In the film “Bordertown”, the protagonist, Johnny Ramirez ultimately finds solace, happiness and satisfaction in the aftermath of his own failure. If one were to believe the notion that we are all at a fixed station in both life and society, then the Mexican protagonist’s ambitions and their disastrous outcomes would only serve to bolster this opinion. This is, however, what the film “Bordertown” attempts to convey to its audience. As Johnny Ramirez ambitiously sets out, attempting to acquire material success, in the world outside of his neighborhood, he finds only offers of wickedness and corruption. His final retreat back into his barrio is where he finds goodness and love. This film, then, suggests that not only should Ramirez not have bothered in his undertaking, but that any venture outside of one’s own “station” or “place” would put that person out of his or her natural element. The results of this can be dangerous or disastrous. The film’s message is clear: Stay where you belong.
“We all use stereotypes all the time, without knowing it. We have met the enemy of equality, and the enemy is us,” quoted by Annie Murphy Paul, a journalist. Human beings typically have varied mindsets as they grow up with different cultural values as well as social environment. Author Gary Soto’s “Like Mexican” compares his Mexican life with his wife’s Japanese background, while author Deborah Tannen’s “Gender in the Classroom” contrasts the “gender-related styles” of male and female students. From the two perspectives Soto’s and Tannen’s experiences’ give a universal, stereotypical point how different gender tendencies, conversational styles, and cultural background can result in a miscommunication of one’s behavior.
In "Like Mexicans" by Gary Soto, it begins with the statement, “Again I dream” and then further explains a descriptive detail of a meal that only existed through his mind of imagination because of his economic stance. One of the primary points in the poem is the critique of poverty stricken culture of several Mexican and Mexican-American families. An example of the most compelling lines of the poem is his concluding two lines: “let the day end and us begin, the fork, the knife, the plate, all useless.” The selection of words highlights a compelling portrait of himself fantasizing the world where hunger is not prevalent to him, but shortly understands it was an escape and represents a harsh reality of no purpose to have kitchen utensils because
Danny came from a family where his mom is white and his dad is Mexican. He was made fun of at school for being white by the Mexican kids and made fun of for being Mexican by the white kids. He tried out for the baseball team, and they made fun of him for not making it because he was Mexican. He didn’t fit into any group. So that summer he went to stay with his aunt, uncle, and his cousin Sofia, in National City, California. He was in a place where everyone was Mexican. Even though he was Mexican he still didn’t fit in because he was also half white. He didn’t know any Spanish like the rest of his friends and family did in National City. That made him feel left out when they would speak in Spanish. They still accepted him though.
The argument comes because of an existing psychological argument, nature vs. nurture. This is an argument on whether people are the way they are because of the way they were raised or the way they were born. Many psychologists today believe that people are the way they are because of a combination of nature and nurture. I believe that the argument in this book can be solved with this belief.
Instead of loving and caring for her baby, and forgetting about Danny, she became worse than him. Rodriguez presents many aspects of the minority class that live in the United States, specifically the South Bronx. Even though the cases presented in Rodriguez’s short stories are difficult to mellow with, they are a reality that is constant in many lives. Everyday someone goes through life suffering, due to lack of responsibility, lack of knowledge, submission to another entity or just lack of wanting to have a better life. People that go through these situations are people who have not finished studying, so they have fewer opportunities in life.
In the short reading “Like Mexicans” Gary Soto is undecided about what route he should pursue when moving on into the future. In his early teens his grandmother told him to become a barber and to marry a Mexican girl, Soto’s mother told him this as well. When Soto was in his twenties he ended up falling in love with a Japanese woman named Carolyn. Towards the end of the story Soto realized that the reason his mom wanted him to marry a Mexican girl was because they are in the same social class as him. At the end of the story when Soto is at Carolyn’s house he perceived that her family was different, but they were just like Mexicans because they were poor. Throughout this story Soto crossed three life changes: Culture, food,
In Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, the main character Arnold, also known as Junior, has many health issues, and notably stands out in the crowd. It does not help that he is a poor Indian boy that lives on a reservation, and that he decides to go to an all-white high school. Many of his experiences at school, and on the Reservation, impact his identity. Experience is the most influential factor in shaping a person’s identity because it helps gain confidence, it teaches new things, and it changes one’s outlook on the world.
Nature versus nurture has been an ongoing argument about whether nature (a persons’ genes), or nurture (environmental factors) has a greater influence on human development. However, many people would agree “It no longer makes any sense to talk of "nature versus nurture" or "genes versus the environment". When it comes to human development, the two are inextricably intertwined…” (Ridley 38). Consequently, I believe that in the novel Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions by Edwin A. Abbott, both nature and nurture have
In 1874, Francis Galton said, “Nature is all that a man brings with him into the world; nurture is every influence that affects him after his birth”. The human body contains millions upon millions of cells and each of these cells contains hereditary information and DNA. However, there is no proof that the information carried in these genes predetermines the way in which we behave. I believe it is our life experiences and what we see and are told that shape the way in which we behave. Therefore, it appears to me that nurturing plays a far more governing and dominant role in a human being’s development rather than nature.
Child growth and development is a process that consists of some building blocks, which are components that combine in an infinite number of ways (Cherry, n.d.). As a result of the variations of building blocks in a child’s development, educators, psychologists, and philosophers have been constantly engaged in the debate of nature versus nurture debate. Many researchers agree that child development is a complex interaction between his/her genetic background (nature) and his/her environment (nurture). In essence, some developmental aspects are strongly affected by biology whereas other aspects are influenced by environmental factors. From the onset of an individu...
Heredity Versus Environment - The Nature-nurture Controversy, Exploring Heredity And Environment: Research Methods, Beyond Heritability