Flatland Nature Vs Nurture

825 Words2 Pages

Gissel Perez
Mary Adelyn Kauffman
IDH1001
15 October 2015
How does the Flatland view of irregularities in configuration relate to the question of whether nature or nurture has a greater influence on character development? How are irregulars treated in Flatland society?
Nature versus nurture has been an ongoing argument about whether nature (a persons’ genes), or nurture (environmental factors) has a greater influence on human development. However, many people would agree “It no longer makes any sense to talk of "nature versus nurture" or "genes versus the environment". When it comes to human development, the two are inextricably intertwined…” (Ridley 38). Consequently, I believe that in the novel Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions by Edwin A. Abbott, both nature and nurture have …show more content…

This indicates that nature and nurture are not completely independent of each other. The genetic makeup that constructs the irregulars to be unequal is what triggers society to treat them differently. Furthermore, the environment in which they live has set up laws (“Law of Nature”), that ultimately, make it more difficult for irregulars to develop simply because their genes are different. One of the ways an irregular may be able to develop is if they receive surgery. This surgery is to “cure” irregularity. However, in some states they are not as lucky, and the irregular infant is abolished at birth. Sometimes when an irregular infant is born, instead of performing surgery, or killing it, they allow it to grow to see if their base grows with them. In the novel, Pantocyclus was the one that “…first convinced mankind that Configuration makes the man..” (Abbott 37). In other words, he is saying that the way you are born (genetics) greatly influences your future. If you are an Isosceles, “…you will assuredly go wrong unless you have them made even..” (Abbott 37). If you are a square or any other shape, but were

Open Document