The definition of premeditation is “A design or plan to do something; a conscience decision to commit an offense” (Hendrix, Experience Criminal Justice, p. 389). Which means that Meursault had a plan or had thought through killing the Arab man. I think that Meursault shows the reader many obvious thoughts that he wanted to kill this man. All these thoughts show the reader that Meursault had premeditation when he was walking on the beach before killing the Arab man. Meursault shows the reader his premeditation when he says, “Take him on man to man and give me your gun…” (Camus, The Stranger, p. 56). This when Meursault starts to think and starts planning to kill the Arab man. He takes Raymond’s gun and even though he did not kill the Arab man right then and there he eventually uses Raymond’s gun to kill the man. Meursault tells the reader that he thought about leaving the beach when he says “To stay or to go… A minute later I turned back to the beach and started walking” (Camus, The Stranger, p. 57). This shows how Meursault thought through either staying …show more content…
106). The words of the jury tell the reader that the jury felt like Meursault had an intent to shoot and kill the Arab man. In the criminal justice system in order for someone to be convicted of premeditated murder, the jury must come to a unanimous decision. Therefore, everyone on the jury believed that Meursault was guilty of premeditated murder. According to the article “How Many People Are Wrongly Convicted? Researchers Do the Math” by Virginia Hughes, “… [There is an] error rate [of] .027 percent [of wrongly convicted people] – or, to put it another way, a success rate of 99.973 percent [rightly convicted people].” Although there were a couple of things that may have shown that there could have been an unfair trial, statistics show us that the criminal justice system hardly ever gets the ruling
Chapter 6 of part I of The Stranger concluded with Meursault’s conscious decision to shoot an Arab because of the physical discomfort the Arab’s knife caused him. The significance of the ending of part I is that it was the first demonstration of Meursault’s awareness of the possible consequences of the act that he committed. This awareness continues into the second part of the novel as he is arrested and trialed. The reason for Meursault’s trial is the murder of the Arab. His insensitivity towards Maman’s death and lack of a social conscientious are factors that contributed to support further investigations, but are not reasons to trial him because they have not ‘harmed’ society on a way that he could be arrested for. For example, if Meursault
“Next came Raymond, who was the last witness. He waved to me and all of the sudden blurted out that I was innocent” (95). This scene is ironic because prior this trial, Raymond doesn’t express any sense of loyalty. But in this scene, Raymond shows loyalty towards Meursault. He says that the Arabs hated him and Meursault was there by chance. This scene is important because it shows how everything that occurred was indirectly caused by Raymond and Meursault’s friendship under the pretense of “chance.”
Part I of The Stranger begins with Meursault's attendance at his mother's funeral. It ends with Meursault on the beach at Algiers killing a man. Part II is concerned with Meursault's trial for that same murder, his ultimate sentencing to death and the mental anguish that he experiences as a result of this sentence. Several curious parallels emerge here, especially with regard to Meursault's perception of the world.
There was a very notable instance in The Stranger where Meursault chose to stay out and walk back to the spring to cool off, albeit the fight earlier with the “two Arabs in blue dungarees.” (Camus 35) The heat was nearly unbearable for Meursault and had worn him out. When Meursault reached the spring, he encountered the Arab again, particularly the brother of Raymond’s mistress. The Arab approached Meursault and “drew his knife and held it up to [him] in the sun.” (Camus 38) Meursault’s uncomfortableness grew and “[his] whole being tensed and [he] squeezed [...
The main character Meursault is literally a stranger, a stranger to the reader. He is a stranger in many ways. Meursault does not act as we would say a normal person would. Being as he did not shed a tear at his own mothers funeral. Meursault also shot and killed an Arab at the beach and showed no regrets. Throughout the novel Meursault kept himself isolated himself mentally,
All of this imagery works together to create the feeling of intense pressure in the actions being carried out by both Meursault and the Arab on the beach. All of it describes what is happening in the physical world, yet none of it deals with how Meursault feels in that situation (whether apprehensive, frightened, or angry) or what he is thinking. Since the imagery of the passage deals only with action and not the emotion, Camus creates the impression that there is no emotion.
In the novel, we are given a more complete view of Meursault. The story is told from his point-of-view, which allows us to understand the situation as Meursault perceives it. Looking at the situation in this light, we can see Meursault as not evil, but simply indifferent and detached from life. He doesn’t attempt to get wrapped up in emotion or relationships, he just takes things as they come, doing whatever is easiest for him. He becomes friends with Raymond and agrees to marry Marie simply because he doesn’t have a very good reason not to. Seeing the story from Meursault’s viewpoint, we understand that even killing the Arab wasn’t an act of malice or evil intent. As Meursault puts it, “My nature is such that my physical needs often get in the way of my feelings.” With this in context, things begin to make more sense. Meursault’s seemingly cryptic statement that he murdered the Arab “because of the sun” can be taken as truth. Meursault does things that society judges as wrong not because he is evil or wants to appear immoral, but because the sun and heat, symbols for Meursault’s emotional state, cause him to become uncomfortable and act “inappropriately.
In modern society, a person is sentenced to death because they pose a significant risk to society. Do you believe that Meursault is a risk to society? Does he deserve the death penalty? Is he more or less dangerous than a criminal who commits a crime with a clear motive? Meursault is detached from the world he killed somebody just to kill somebody so, he committed premeditated murder which means he has no feeling to what he did.
The journal articles used for research of this paper were extremely helpful in proving Meursault's incorrect conviction . The first article that drew attention to proving his innocence was An Analysis of the Effects of Subjective and Objective Instruction Forms on Mock-Juries' Murder/Manslaughter Distinctions written by Matthew Spackman, Jann Belcher, Justin Calapp, and Aaron Taylor (2002). When first researching
middle of paper ... ... He wanted to file a legal appeal, but he knew they would all get rejected. Meursault was not sentenced to death because he killed the Arab, but because of his absence of emotion to his mother’s death. The people wanted him dead because he posed a threat to the morals of the society.
On the day of the funeral Meursault immediately notices details such as, “the screws on the casket had been tightened and that there were four men wearing black in the room.” Throughout the day he does not display any signs of grief, and hardly seems to pay any attention to the fact that he is at his own mother’s funeral.
The second act of violence takes place at the beach between two Arabs on one side and Raymond and Masson on the other. This leads to Raymond's getting hurt. Before this Camus foreshadows violence when Raymond gives Meursault a gun in case things get worse. After taking care of Raymond, Meursault goes back to the beach. He says to himself, "To go or to stay, amount to the same thing.
The trial portrays the absurdist ideal that absolute truth does not exist. This ideal destroys the very purpose of the trial, which seeks to place a rational explanation on Meursault’s senseless killing of the Arab. However, because there is no rational explanation for Meursault’s murder, the defense and prosecution merely end up constructing their own explanations. They each declare their statements to be the truth, but are all based on false assumptions. The prosecution itself is viewed as absurd. The prosecutor tries to persuade the jury that Meursault has no feelings or morals by asking Perez if “he had at least seen [Meursault] cry” (91). The prosecutor then continues to turn the crowd against Meursault when he asks him about his “liaison” with Marie right after his mother’s death. Though Meursault’s relationship with Marie and his lack of emotions at his mother’s funeral may seem unrelated to his murder, the prosecutor still manages to convince the crowd that they are connected to one another. The jury ends up convicting Meursault not because he killed a man, but because he didn't show the proper emotions after his mother ...
At the beach with Raymond, the sun provokes Meursault to commit a crime. He says, "(the sun) shattered into little pieces on the sand and water." While going to get a drink of water, the foreign Arab uses a knife to shine the sunlight in Meursault's face. Meursault knew that all he had to do was turn around and walk away. His emotions (again not shown externally and reserved) took over. Camus states, "All I could feel were the cymbals of sunlight crashing on my forehead and, instinctively, the dazzling spear flying up from the knife in front of me. The scorching blade slashed at my eyelashes and stabbed at my stinging eyes." This strong imagery forces Meursault to fire and kill the Arab with a revolver. What makes it worse, he fires four more times to make sure the sun is dissipated for good.
Meursault is distant from set plans, ambitions, desires, love, and emotions in general. He has a difficult time with emotions such as regret and compassion. The reader sees the nature of his personality in the first few lines of the novel: "Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don't know." When he hears of the death of his mother through a telegram, he is unattached, and can be considered uncaring.