Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The metamorphosis point of view analysis
Metamorphosis essay introduction
Metamorphosis essay introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The metamorphosis point of view analysis
Franz Kafka’s stories and novels contain such disturbing situations that the word Kafkaesque has been created to define the most unpleasant and bizarre aspects of everyday modern life. A master of dark humor and an artist of unique vision, Kafka captures perfectly the anxiety and absurdity of contemporary urban society (Norton Anthology 1866). In 1912, Kafka produced his longest, as well as his most famous novella written, The Metamorphosis. Metamorphosis means change, which is something readers see a lot of in this novella. It is about a young man, Gregor Samsa, who wakes up and sees that is has been transformed into a bug. He, as well as his families, lives are completely turned upside down. They had all depended so heavily on Gregor, and …show more content…
they were all very ungrateful. He had given up his own life to pay off his father’s debt, as well as help with financial costs of living for his entire family. Kafka is showing readers the sacrifices people make in order to help the ones they love, and the thanklessness so many people display in regards to that. One of the saddest aspects in this piece of work is the love Gregor feels for his family, and how little of it is returned. From the beginning of the story, it is clear he will do whatever is necessary to support his loved ones, even if they do very little for themselves. When he becomes an insect, the strength of family devotion and compassion are tested. Gregor is rejected, and it seems as though Kafka believes there is no such thing as unconditional love. Gregor Samsa lived with his mother, father, and sister Greta. He spent his entire life working to pay off his father’s debts, as well as supports all their other financial needs. He was entirely used and taken for granted. When he woke up a bug, his first thought was work. Kafka writes, “What if he called in sick? But that would be mortifying and also suspicious, since Gregor had never once been ill in all his five years of service (Kafka 1881).”It is evident he is a hard worker, doing whatever he needs to do. But even before his transformation, he felt unappreciated and misunderstood. He was the man of the house, while his father sat on the couch all day long. Once he becomes a bug, he loses the power of speech. Although he continues to think, he cannot share his thoughts. Thus when he turns into a reviled insect, the lack of communication Gregor perceived as a man becomes an actuality (Norton Anthology 1879).”An even greater transformation occurs concerning his family. The expected love and support turns into shamefulness and resentment since he has let the family down. The sympathy they feel turns to disgust very quickly. Gregor rapidly becomes an unimportant“it”to them. When the family needed Gregor, he was there.
He had worked a job he did not enjoy, and even wanted to send his sister to music school. Kafka wrote Gregor out as a good son, a kind brother, and a hard worker. He was, by no means, a bad person. This makes readers question exactly why he was turned into a bug, and died a sad, lonely death. After careful examination of this novella, readers can learn why. Kafka was not trying to make a point out of Gregor, but of his family. His family turned their backs on him of a time of need. Kafka writes, “the apple remained lodged there in his flesh, a visible memento, since no one dared to remove it-seemed to have reminded even his father that Gregor, despite his current lamentable, repulsive form, was a member of the family who should not be treated like the enemy, for family duty dictated that the others swallow down the disgust he aroused in them and show him tolerance, only tolerance (Kafka 1902).”Kafka seems to be saying that family duty is what kept the family members from hurting Gregor. But, family duty does not involve love or compassion or gratefulness. They must “deal” with him. Family duty essentially comes down to suffering the company of ones family because they have no other
choice. This novella shows a man who is incapable of breaking out of the ties society has placed on him. He is constantly used and mistreated at work, as well as at home. Gregors transition into an insect has forced him to be helpless to all occurrences that take place in his life. Kafka teaches a very simple lesson, in a very absurd way. Individuals must be grateful for those around them. Life is short, and one could never guess the future. While the chances of someone become a bug are impossibly slim, other things could happen. Love is an unbelievably important aspect of a family structure. It is required for a family to truly be happy. Kafka’s novella displays a wonderful message, in the strangest of ways.
Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis is so strikingly absurd that it has engendered countless essays dissecting every possible rational and irrational aspect of the book. One such essay is entitled "Kafka's Obscurity" by Ralph Freedman in which he delves down into the pages of The Metamorphosis and ferrets out the esoteric aspects of Kafka's writing. Freedman postulates that Gregor Samsa progresses through several transformations: a transformation of spatial relations, a transformation of time, and a transformation of self consciousness, with his conscious mutation having an antithetical effect on the family opposite to that of Gregor. His conjectures are, for the most part, fairly accurate; Gregor devolves in both his spatial awareness and his consciousness. However, Freedman also asserts that after Gregor's father throws the wounding apple, Gregor loses his sense of time. While his hypothesis certainly appears erudite and insightful, there really is no evidence within the book itself to determine whether if Gregor has a deteriorating sense of time. If Freedman had only written about Gregor's spatial and conscious degradation, then his entire thesis would be accurate.
Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis is a masterfully written short story about Gregor Samsa, a man who devotes his life to his family and work, for nothing in return. Only when he is transformed into a helpless beetle does he begin to develop a self-identity and understanding of the relationships around him. The underlying theme of The Metamorphosis is an existential view that says any given choice will govern the later course of a person's life, and that the person has ultimate will over making choices. In this case, Gregor?s lack of identity has caused him to be numb to everything around him.
What is happen if one day you wake up in your bed and recognize that you turn into a giant bug? I think it may be the most terrible and unforgettable day of your life. “He lay on his armour-like back.... His many legs, pitifully thin compared with the size of the rest of him, waved about helplessly as he looked,” “What 's happened to me?"(Kafka) Gregor Samsa thought- he transforms into a “horrible vermin”(Kafka). This is the short paragraph into the book name is “The Metamorphosis” of the author Franz Kafka. So, the book tells the story that Gregor, who is work as a travelling salesman, wakes up one morning in his bed, and he recognizes that he not a human anymore- he is a horrible vermin now. When he tries to adapt to his new body, he finds
In the stories of the Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka and The Elephant Vanishes by Haruki Murakami, there are events of magical realism and marxism that occur. In the Metamorphosis, Gregor had to adapt to his new environment and also deal with the financial crisis from his family. In the Elephant Vanishes, the people in the city, had to deal with the disappearance of the town’s symbol, the elephant.
Many views of existentialism are exposed in Kafka's Metamorphosis. One of these main views is alienation or estrangement which is demonstrated by Gregor's relationship with his family, his social life, and the way he lives his life after the metamorphosis. Namely, it suggests that man is reduced to an insect by the modern world and his family; human nature is completely self absorbed. Kafka reflects a belief that the more generous and selfless one is, the worse one is treated. This view is in direct conflict with the way things should be; man, specifically Gregor should be treated in accordance to his actions. Gregor should be greatly beloved by his family regardless of his state. This idea is displayed in three separate themes. First, Gregor's family is only concerned with the effect Gregor's change will have on them, specifically the effect it will have on their finances and reputation. They are more than willing to take completely gratuitous advantage of Gregor; he works to pay their debt and they are happy to indulge themselves with luxury. Gregor is the soul employed member of his family and this is their primary interest when Gregor is transformed. Secondly, Gregor is penalized for his efforts to be a good son, and a good worker; his toils are completely taken for granted by his family. The Samsa family is not interested in Gregor beyond their own needs, outsiders are reverentially treated. Thirdly, it is displayed by the positive changes that occur in the Samsa family as Gregor descends into tragedy and insignificance. As Gregor's life becomes more painful, isolated, and worthless the Samsa family becomes more functional and self-reliant.
The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka is a classic piece of literature. This masterpiece of stunning psychological, sociological and existential angst has blessed the minds of readers since it was written in 1912. It is the story of Gregor Samsa, a hardworking man trying to pay off the debt of his family, but transforms into a vermin, (bug). There are many parallels of Kafka’s life to Gregor’s in Metamorphosis. Both Kafka and Gregor were in family and social discord, and a bureaucracy of a work world. The way Kafka chose to write his novella, in third person limited omniscient narration, serves his purpose of wanting to understand and reflect on his own experiences along with entertaining. Choosing Gregor to narrate the novella would change the purpose, plot, and understanding of the story.
In his novel The Metamorphosis, Franz Kafka describes his own life through the life of his protagonist Gregor Samsa. Careful study of Franz Kafka's life shows that Kafka's family, workplace, and reaction to the adversity in his family and workplace are just like those of Gregor. So we might ask why Gregor was transformed into a bug since Kafka obviously never turned into a bug. The absurd image illustrates how Gregor lacks self-respect and feels like he's a bug in the eyes of his family and society. Franz Kafka was unhappy and never found his place in life, either. Therefore, he might have felt just like Gregor, like a bug. Furthermore the novel describes Kafka's expectations of his own future and he was partially correct.
In terms biology, a metamorphosis means “the process of transformation from an immature form to an adult form in two or more distinct stages” (Oxford dictionary). For animals, they must undergo this event in order to become physically developed and fully mature. This phenomenon that provides the animals with the ability to survive in the wilderness is also shown in The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka; a salesman named Gregor Samsa wakes up one morning and finds himself transformed into a giant insect. Throughout the book, Gregor’s metamorphosis leads to many different changes of the family as they experience their own metamorphosis and grow stronger. Although Gregor’s metamorphosis may seem as if it has caused a great deal of suffering to his family, it had provided him and his family an opportunity to pursue new lives.
Upon reading Franz Kafka’s story The Metamorphosis Part 1 I found myself reflecting my twenties. Kafka never states Gregor’s age, but his sister, Crete, is seventeen. Gregor’s life as a salesman takes a toll on him and it is only to keep his family afloat, he continues, despite his great dislike towards the office manager. I too worked a very demanding job with an intense travel schedule and a strong dislike for my boss; although, not having any financial obligations, I continued in this manner for many years. At twenty-nine, I woke up and had a metamorphosis of my own.
To be human does not mean to be a physical part of the human race. In The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, the characters showed many examples of human and inhuman characteristics. The Metamorphosis features travelling salesman Gregor Samsa and his family, and explores how they dealt with Gregor’s sudden transformation into a bug. His father seems least affected by the transformation. On the contrary, Gregor’s sister Grete and his mother, Mrs. Samsa, show a lot of compassion with how they deal with this abrupt change in their lives. The character development of each character is shown through their acts of compassion. According to The Metamorphosis, to be human means to care for others, or to have compassion, as seen through Gregor, Grete, and Mrs. Samsa over the course of the novella.
Likewise, the BBC video shown in class reflects views about being an outsider. It goes into detail about how a work like Kafka’s The Metamorphosis shows the fall of the main character out of the social order, making him an outcast to society. It also brings up the story of Jekyll and Hyde, which explores the world of a self inflicted transformation meant to let Dr.Jekyll fulfill his dark desires as Mr. Hyde. He had done so because he wanted to be the good person that fit in well, but he also wanted to act in such a way that wasn’t typically supported in society, (3:07-3:19). This, as well as kafka’s story brings the idea that humans understand change and can like it, but they can also get swept up in it. Due to how individuals can independently
The turn of the twentieth century sparks the change of European culture as people experience the power struggle between nations. As World War I heightens in the early 1900s, devastation is brought to many families as the men are sent to battle in the trenches, while the remaining working class struggles to control their own lives at home. Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis exemplifies the constraints wrapped around the working class as World War I was underway beginning in 1914. Gregor Samsa’s bug transformation depicts his isolation from his world and his family since he is not able to work. While this is apparent, in Mussolini’s The Doctrine of Fascism and Brecht’s Fear and Misery of the Third Reich, the state instills fear into people in order
Franz Kafka’s novella, The Metamorphosis, has been a popular topic amongst the literary world for years. Many articles, papers, and lectures have been inspired by the curious story of a man waking to find himself transformed into a large insect. The topic has been widely debated. Did Kafka simply write an absurd story meant to entertain the audience? Was it meant to be a satirical piece about the different economic classes, as Marxists have theorized? Or is the character of Gregor Samsa the reflection of a real life person, with Kafka using his transformation into a bug as an allegory for something much deeper and more complex?
Even when faced with silence from his family, he thinks about how happy he is that he could give them the luxury of a simple life.“‘What a quiet life my family has been leading,’ Gregor said to himself, and as he gazed fixedly into the darkness before him, he felt great pride at having been able to give his parents and sister a life like this in such a beautiful apartment” (1891). The sympathy felt for Gregor grows even stronger as the story progresses because of the way that his father treats him. In part one, his father hurt him by shoving him through the door. His father was angry, and one wondered exactly why. In the second part, his father hurts him again, by throwing apples at him, and his mother has to beg for his life. “She clasped her hands at the back of his father’s head and pleaded with him to spare Gregor’s life”
Since Benjamin and Brecht in 1934 in Swedish exile Kafka discussed, there is something as an unbridgeable divide between Kafka and Brecht: Here the Marxist that the undogmatic Marxist; here the parable as a Gordian knot that the egg of Columbus; here the solipsistic that the changeable “reality”; here the ontological that the capitalist (self-)alienation; here the autonomous that the engaged art.