Menachem Begin has been called numerous names over the past few decades, these names range from Israeli’s sixth prime minister to a terrorist; however, behind all of this, one cannot deny that Begin was a firm realist. Before even acquiring an influential political position, Begin experienced a lifetime of political struggle. Beginning his political career under Vladimir Jabotinsky’s ultra revisionist Zionist views (Tress 1984, 304), Begin sought out controversial approaches to reach his goals. Under Jabotinsky, Begin was influenced into siding with non-mainstream secular Jewish movements. These included going against the somewhat Utopian left-wing socialistic views and embracing the idea that at the core, Jews had to survive on their own. …show more content…
With views that disagreed with socialistic ideologies, Begin’s youth under Jabotinsky can be described as the process that greatly shaped Begin. Other than the paramilitary ideas, Jewish self-defense, the fascist concept of a strong leader with direct contact with the masses that Jabotinsky stressed (Tress 1984, 308) directly relates to how Menachem Begin manages his political manifestations. Living as a Jew in Eastern Europe was hard enough for Begin; however, with the start of World War II things went downhill fast. Upon sending his wife to Palestine, Begin attempted to reunite with her, but on the way there he was captured by the Soviets. Even after he was freed by the Soviets in 1941, Begin’s Zionist passion did not fade away. Following his freedom, Begin made it to Palestine and worked his way up to become an Israeli underground Irgun (Teller 1952, 360). During Begin’s time as the head of the Irgun, he was called a terrorist; however, this term has been challenged numerous times. Following the bombing of King David Hotel on July 22, 1946 led to numerous casualties; people tend to forget that the hotel was a military base for the British and the fact that Begin had called the to warn them of the impending bombing (Begin 1977, 224). Two years down, another large incident that happened during Begin’s involvement with the Irgun was the Altalena Affair, where the newly formed Israeli Defense Forces sunk the battleship Altalena (Zamir 2010, 17-58). The ship was financed by the Irgun to bring in people and weaponry to aid the newly found state of Israel; however, during the process of communication between Begin’s Irgun and Ben-Gurion’s IDF, there were complications. These so called complications led to the ultimate decision that resulted with the sinking of the Altalena along with its 1000 immigrant fighters and weaponry (Omer-man 2011). Following the tragedy of Altalena, in August 1948, Begin and high-ranking Irgun officials formed the Herut. The party was ideologically cherry-picked Begin’s mentor Jabotinsky’s revisionist Zionist writings. Furthermore, in addition to the revisionist Zionism, the Herut’s foreign policy was to “bring about the unification of all parts of” (Collin Schindler 2008, 132) historic Israeli territories. Although Begin officially entered the political arena with the Herut party in 1948, he did not gain power until almost three decades later in 1977. Leading up to the elections, the Likud -the successor of the Herut party- campaigned under a spotlight for Begin’s unpretentious and virtuous personality. On the other hand, the opposing party, the Alignment criticized Begin as a fascist totalitarian extremist. Nonetheless, on May 17 1977 Begin’s right wing revisionist Likud won the Israeli Knesset elections by a historical landslide and overthrew the left-wing political basis that had reined Israel since it obtained its statehood (Peleg and Scham 2007, 73). Although elected prime minister, Begin required the majority of the Knesset; to do this he won over the religious and Sephardim voters (Abramson 2013).
Upon attaining his goal, Begin could now finally put his political goals into action. Begin’s first and likely his most impactful accomplishment as prime minster was securing peace with Egypt through the Camp David accords.
Trailing series of private and public efforts by Begin, the Israeli-Egypt Peace Treaty was commenced. In 1978, Begin and Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat negotiated the Camp David Accords in presence of President Jimmy Carter. A year after, Begin and Sadat signed the historic Israeli-Egypt Peace Treaty; Israel agreed to return the entire Sinai Peninsula to Egypt and established peace with its largest and greatest Arabic enemy state. Although the entire situation was volatile, the agreement prevailed and led to shifting in Israel’s tactical and regional statuses.
Not everyone agreed with what Begin did; criticism was extremely rampant in his own Likud party regarding his contradictory behavior towards Begin’s history of being a prompt promoter of Greater Israel agenda (Quandt 1983, 14). Nonetheless, Begin’s image turned overnight from an extremist terrorist to a Nobel Peace Prize winner with his past enemy Anwar
Sadat. Subsequent to the Israel-Egypt peace treaty signing in 1979, Menachem Begin’s second largest political achievement rose from Iraqi Saddam Hussein’s nuclear threats towards Israel. As an ardent revisionist Zionist, Begin did not take the intimidations lightly. Especially when diplomatic attempts to halt Iraq failed, the Israeli government under Begin, preparations of a preemptive attack by the Israelis began (Simons 1994, 320). On June 7 1981, with the consent of the Israeli cabinet, “Operation Opera” was successfully held out. Israeli Air Force successfully destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor Osirak with long ranged missiles. Numerous countries around the world criticized the Israelis for this action and the United States was one of them. To these remarks, Begin responded “On no account shall we permit an enemy to develop weapons of mass destruction (WMD) against the people of Israel." (Begin 1981) and fully acknowledged the bombings. Operation Opera had not only decimated Iraq’s potential weapons of mass destruction, but also it left a powerful statement to the world. After Menachem Begin firmly enunciated the actions and justified them, the Israeli policy adopted the “Begin Doctrine”. The doctrine stated that Israel would enforce a preemptive strike, counter-proliferation policy towards its enemies and its threats (Spector and Cohen 2008, 16-17). Not long after this incident, Begin’s last large political achievement was made. Almost exactly a year after the preemptive strike on Iraq, Begin’s government invaded South Lebanon on self-defense motives, under the name “Operation Peace for Galilee” which led to the 1982 Lebanon War. This declaration was in response to the attempted assassination of Israeli’s ambassador to the United Kingdom in 1982. Begin accused the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the mastermind behind this deed and thus waged war to eradicate the PLO’s political and military presence in southern Lebanon (Bird 2004, 288). Even though the 1982 Lebanon War did not go as Begin planned, the endeavor was clear –it was to apply the Begin Doctrine. Operation Peace for Galilee was Begin’s last giant political action during his tenure; later into 1982, Begin’s wife died and shortly after he retired from his position.
The author believes that the struggle of Jews vs anti-Semites is really just another form of the “rich vs poor struggle” which is existent through many societies in our modern era. The anti-Semites will take out their aggression against the Jews because Jews are an easy target. It is easier for an anti-Semite to accept that he works a hard job for little pay just to make a factory boss rich. However, the question is raised of what good would that do? The anti-Semite needs the job, so he can't quit, and causing an uproar towards his boss would only make him even more unhappy so instead, he channels his hatred in manageable ways, such as toward Jews.
Carter is decidedly recollected, be that as it may, for the noteworthy 1978 Camp David Accords, where he intervened a memorable peace understanding between Israel's Menachem Begin and Egypt's Anwar Sadat. This key summit resuscitated a long-lethargic routine of presidential peacemaking, something each succeeding CEO has copied to shifting degrees. In any case, due to saw shortcomings as a residential and
Israel was created as a haven for persecuted Jew as a result of the Holocaust, however, it was soon run by the military. “The new Israel seemed to be a nation where the military ruled ignoring the will of the countr...
Winter, J. (2002, Jan). The Death of American Antisemitism by Spencer Blakeslee. American Sociological Association. Retrieved Mar 2, 2014, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3089419
Elie Wiesel’s hope, as well as the rest of the hundreds of Jews’, diminishes tremendously. They originally suppress their
Benjamin Harshav’s “Language in Time of Revolution” teaches the reader that social factors, historical factors, willpower, and accidents of history brought back and revived the Hebrew and Yiddish language. This was important because it created the base for a new, secular Jewish society and culture to emerge again with their own language and a new social identity. This new social identity meant that there was a nationalistic movement toward having a common language, literature, and cultural heritage. However, the reason why the Hebrew and Yiddish language lagged in the first place was due to Nazism and Stalinism. These two totalitarian empires wiped out the Yiddish culture since the Jews were not the majority population in places such as Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires. Since only one language of government and education was imposed on various ethnic groups, it is not a surprise that the Yiddish language became irrelevant. Stalinists argued that Jews can’t be a nation because they do not have a territory and a common language; the Zionists, however, tried to help by enforcing the Hebrew language on immigrants from all countries and languages because they believed in “national power and sovereignty rather than mere cultural autonomy.”
This marked the beginning of the Palestine armed conflict, one of its kinds to be witnessed in centuries since the fall of the Ottoman Empire and World War 1. Characterized by a chronology of endless confrontations, this conflict has since affected not only the Middle East relations, but also the gl...
Israel was a very hard place to live when it first was established. We often found sickness, which caused many families to start over again. Because of this, there were many authors who expressed their feelings during this time. This can be seen this in the story Dr. Schmidt. In this story, it is clear that there are a lot of old and new Jews, topics relating to Zionism, and a gap between Ashkenazi Jews and Yemenite Jews. These topics have helped readers relate to these stories, and motivate them to live a better life. This is why the state of Israel has been so successful in its short life. The drive to succeed has shaped the State of Israel for the better.
...the peoples of the world (and America in particular) and a return to nature. A terrific job was done inspiring many Americans to make changes and look for change in the world to start taking place.
Examining any issue pertaining to the Holocaust is accompanied with complexity and the possibility of controversy. This is especially true in dealing with the topic of Jewish resistance to the Holocaust. Historians are often divided on this complex issue, debating issues such as how “resistance” is defined and, in accordance with that definition, how much resistance occurred. According to Michael Marrus, “the very term Jewish resistance suggests a point of view.” Many factors, both internal such as differences in opinion on when or what resistance was appropriate, as well as external, such as the lack of arms with which to revolt, contributed to making resistance, particularly armed resistance, extremely difficult. When considering acts of Jewish resistance, it is important to consider both direct and indirect forms of resistance, as well as avoid diminishing what efforts were made at resistance. Despite many factors making resistance difficult, Jews did perform both direct and indirect resistance, often more than historians have credited to them. As a whole, Jews did not accept their death mutely, as sheep to the slaughter.
...f society. The second point of view held that Jews were inherently bad and can never be salvaged despite any and all efforts made by Christians to assimilate them. These Christians felt that there was absolutely no possibility of Jews having and holding productive positions in society. All the aforementioned occurrences lead to the transformation of traditional Jewish communities, and paved the way for Jewish existence, as it is known today. It is apparent, even through the examination of recent history that there are reoccurring themes in Jewish history. The most profound and obvious theme is the question of whether Jews can be productive members of their country and at the same time remain loyal to their religion. This question was an issue that once again emerged in Nazi Germany, undoubtedly, and unfortunately, it is not the last time that question will be asked.
First of all we will look at Raul Hilberg’s “Two Thousand Years of Jewish Appeasement,” to give us possible reasons why Jews simply willing followed orders to their death. We must see the destruction in a way that has two role-players: the perpetrators and the victims. We will closely look at the role that Jews played in sealing their own fate.
Bourke, Dale Hanson. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Tough Questions, Direct Answers. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity, 2013. N. pag. Print.
Since the inception of an Israeli nation-state in 1948, violence and conflict has played a major role in Israel’s brief history. In the Sixty-One year’s Israel has been a recognized nation-state, they have fought in 6 interstate wars, 2 civil wars, and over 144 dyadic militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) with some display of military force against other states (Maoz 5). Israel has been involved in constant conflict throughout the past half century. Israel’s tension against other states within the Middle East has spurred vast economic, social, and political unity that has fostered a sense of nationalism and unity in Israel not seen in most other states. Over the next several pages I will try and dissect the reasons for why the nation state of Israel has been emerged in constant conflict and how this conflict has helped foster national unity and identity among the people of Israel.
Philosopher Hannah Arendt is well known for her work on totalitarianism and Jewish affairs of World War II. One of her career highlights presents, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, covering events leading to the trial of Adolf Eichmann. The purpose of her work gives the audience the opportunity to analyze Eichmann’s role in the massacre of many individuals, but primarily the report focuses on all who contributed in the death of Jewish citizens. Throughout her report, she notates key factors that unfold the contributions and true character of Adolf Eichmann. Eichmann, born on March 19,1906, grew up as a middle class citizen in Germany with a rough start at life, as he was unable to finish high school and vocational school