Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dream interpretation methods
The interpretation of dreams third english edition
Dream interpretation methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dream interpretation methods
Memory and Textuality In Geoffrey Chaucer’s The House of Fame, the dreamer and the reader are led through a dream vision and are exposed to the technologies of memory as well as the link between textual recovery and the narrative of fame. The fragmentary nature of the dream allows the reader and the dreamer to explore the disconnected nature of philosophical concepts including fame and rumor. Furthermore, the use of the dream vision allows the narrator to present larger arguments about such concepts through the use of extraordinary visuals, conversations, and circumstances. In “Models for Memory” by Mary Carruthers, the concept of recollection as memory explores how visual memory has the ability to create a place where things can be stored. As in the House of Fame, there are visual storehouses used to compile all of the texts, traditions, and words that the dreamer encounters. For example, the glass temple of Venus acts as a storage place for important texts, such as Dido and the Aeneid. Additionally, the foundation of the House of Fame holds the names of those who have claimed their fame, though their fate is uncertain as it rests in ice. Furthermore, within the House of Fame, spoken and unspoken words are collected and placed into groups, only to be termed by Lady Fame as famous or infamous. Finally, the House of Rumour acts as a visual storehouse, thus providing a place of a visual transformation for truth and untruth to combine and depart out into the world. These models for memory work to showcase how fame functions throughout the House of Fame. …show more content…
What do we make of the dream and its fragmentary nature of the narrative?
The fragmentary nature of the dream, including how it ends with a scramble in the House of Rumour, makes the vision more relatable. As the dreamer
described, “At last I saw a man, Which that I nevene nat ne can, But he semed for to be A man of great auctoritee…” (Page 92, Lines 2155-2158) Additionally, the disconnected nature of the narrative allows the reader to be introduced to several extraordinary events and ideas simultaneously. Some of the things the dreamer encounters throughout the dream are otherworldly both through the visuals and the nature of the places and ideas. For example, the dreamer experiences the Temple of Venus, the wonder of the stars, the mysteries of Fame, and the consequences of Rumour. The fragmentary nature of the idea of fame itself? The nature of the dream also works to reflect the nature of fame itself throughout the narrative. From the beginning of the dream, Geffrey is brought to the Temple of Venus which is made of glass, a vulnerable substance. Filled within the temple are treasures and objects of high literary value, among jewels and other extravagant items. These items reside in a structure that, though sparkles anu76d shines, is also a recipe for destruction, for at any moment the structure could be stuck and destroyed. The fortress that protects the famous works is fragile, thus placing a fragility on the items within. Though permanently placed within the extraordinary structure, there is no guarantee of its survival through time. Outside the House of Fame, is another significant structure of importance, the foundation. Indeed, the foundation to the House of Fame is made entirely of ice and, though also appealing to the eye, provides a very shaky and unaccountable base for Fame. Moreover, the names inscribed, or partially inscribed, into the surface of the ice also work to displayThe ice foundation could also arguably be more vulnerable than the temple of glass. Ice needs only heat to send it to its own demise. Moreover, it requires more attention and upkeep than a structure made of glass. What can be said of Fame at this moment? The ice structure is closer in proximity to Fame than the temple was; thus portraying a gradual decline in security as one gets closer to the House. Though the base is weak, the House of Fame itself proves to be a solid structure superior in architectural excellence according to the dreamer. Indeed, he can hardly find the words to describe its beauty. --------- ---------The House of Fame is filled with windows which, combined with the inner structure, places everyone in the vulnerable position of being broken and forgotten. How would anyone find their place among the house, let alone preserve themselves within it? Everything about Geffrey’s dream seems to lend to the idea that fame is not only a possibility by chance alone, but that the concept itself is fragmented. Fame is an unreliable and unpredictable structure, just as the temple of glass, the foundation of the House, and the House itself are. How does the idea of a dream vision work for Chaucer’s exploration of different philosophical ideas in the text? (choose a few) Chaucer’s dream vision takes on several philosophical ideas, as the nature of a dream allows him to expand speculation on the concept of fame and rumor. The House of Fame is one example of how Chaucer’s dream visions tackle unsolvable questions. Indeed, the dreamer’s imagination allows him the freedom to analyze the concept of fame, and the presider over Fame, more closely. He considers Lady Fame’s unpredictability in how she divvies out the fate of each person’s fame and, furthermore, observes the instability of fame itself. Geffrey is exposed to the reality that one cannot choose what he is famous for. Similarly, he discerns that one cannot choose how he will be remembered. Once indulged in the benefits that fame can procure, there is an endless pursuit of wanting more, or better. Further, there is no telling what deed of a person’s life will be written in light, or remembered by others. For example, an author can continue to write books throughout their lifetime, though there is no telling what part of their accomplishments, or failings, will be remembered, if any at all. The dream vision allows the dreamer to consider the nature of rumor. Rumor, like fame, carries an important weight in the memory of a person, for rumors have the ability to derail or propel one’s fame. In the House of Rumour, the dreamer observes millions of tydings flying around, going in and out of small windows. What he witnesses, is the merging of truth and untruth, and ultimately, the transformation of the tyding before it leaves the house and reenters the world. As the dreamer describes: “A lesing and a sad soothe sawe That gonne of adventure drawe Out a windowe for to pace, And, whan they metten in that place, They were a-chekked bothe two, And neither of hem mote out go” (Page 91, Line 2089-2094) This place of news also serves as a place of transformation, for nothing remains pure once it enters the whirling house of twigs. The disconnected nature of the dream vision works also to emulate the broken nature of philosophy. The exploration of philosophical ideas such as fame and rumor are displayed in the text as unpredictable, broken concepts. Lady Fame’s -----?? Accepting that we have an unfinished text, what can we say about the way the content and the form of the dream work together? The dream ends as the dreamer joins among others as they climb over each other to reach a “tyding.” Indeed, as people are talking of love, others are fighting for an opportunity to hear and to learn. The dreamer reaches the crowd and sees a man of great authority whom he does not name, and with this the dream breaks off. The idea of the text as “unfinished” reflects the nature of fame-seekers. This is because the quest for fame, even once achieved, must be continually maintained. One is never quite finished in their search for fame, or their quest for knowledge in this case. The use of the Dream Vision The dream vision serves as a mode for the narrator to express something to a third party, the reader. Similar to the way that everything is transformed in the House of Fame and the House of Rumour, there comes a transformation in what is narrated. Indeed, the dream itself has been interpreted by Geffrey, then retold to the reader, making it difficult for the reader to do the analyzing. There is a trust that must be placed in the narrator to tell the complete story to the best of their ability; however, the reality is that dreams can be interpreted and manipulated by the dreamer in their retelling.
In the book the memory palace of Matteo Ricci, the author Jonathan Spence talks about the Italian preacher Matteo Ricci who spent almost his whole life in China. Spence tries to describe a person who was determined and underwent many difficulties in preaching but never lost his faith in establishing Christian faith among Chinese people by using the memory palace. He divided the book into nine chapters. Despite the preface and the summary of the memory palace, each chapter contains an image or picture which is used for introduction of each chapter. In this way, Spence uses these images and pictures to help the reader build their own memory palace of this book which also well-illustrated the memory method that Matteo Ricci had used – the memory palace. According to Brook (p.831), a memory palace is “a mnemonic method that was popular with sixteenth-century Jesuits for retaining in memory.”
The Parliament of Fowls and the House of Fame are closely related to each other and to the Book of the Duchess, as all three of the poetry share several similar themes. Written between 1368 and 1380 they are some of Chaucer’s earliest works in which aspects of some of the great writers of his time are evident. There are three major themes intertwined within the three works, which Chaucer has added to the Dream Vision genre.
to tell the story of the dreamer whose dreams were corrupted.
In “The Pardoner’s Tale,” Geoffrey Chaucer masterfully frames an informal homily. Through the use of verbal and situational irony, Chaucer is able to accentuate the moral characteristics of the Pardoner. The essence of the story is exemplified by the blatant discrepancy between the character of the storyteller and the message of his story. By analyzing this contrast, the reader can place himself in the mind of the Pardoner in order to account for his psychology.
In his Canterbury Tales, Chaucer fully explicates the cultural standard known as curteisye through satire. In the fourteenth century curteisye embodied sophistication and an education in French international culture. The legends of chilvalric knights, conversing in the language of courtly love, matured during this later medieval period. Chaucer himself matured in the King's Court, and he reveled in his cultural status, but he also retained an anecdotal humor about curteisye. One must only peruse his Tales to discern these sentiments. In the General Prologue, he meticulously describes the Prioress, satirically examining her impeccable table manners. In the Miller's Tale Chaucer juxtaposes courtly love with animalistic lust, and in various other instances he mentions curteisye, or at least alludes to it, with characteristic Chaucerian irony. These numerous references provide the reader with a remarkably rich image of the culture and class structure of late fourteenth century England.
The term ‘memory’ evokes the image of a thing, a container for information, or the content of that container. Thus, from our literate viewpoint, the Iliad preserves the knowledge of the Trojan War. But in jumping to this conclusion, we lose sight of the Iliad as an oral phenomenon, as the singing of a song. It is not so much a thing as an act, a gestalt uniting bard and audience in a shared consciousness. This phenomenon has little in common with that desiccated thing we literates call “memory.” In the world before writing, memory is the social act of remembering. It is commemoration. (15)
Written by Geoffrey Chaucer at the end of the fourteenth century, The Canterbury Tales and more specifically it’s prologue, shed a great deal of light on the rising middle class in (fourteenth century) England. Despite the fact that some readers may not know a lot about the time period today, Chaucer’s writing in the prologue elaborates on topics such as occupations, wealth, education, and political power. Scholar Barbara Nolan writes of the prologue, “it is more complex than most…It raises expectations in just the areas the handbooks propose, promising to take up important matters of natural and social order, moral character, and religion and outlining the organization the work will follow” (Nolan 154). In other words, while noting the distinct complexity of the writing, Nolan points out that Chaucer’s prologue gives the reader a lot to digest when it comes to both background information and overall form of the following writing. Focusing on the background information supplied in the prologue, readers quickly become educated about middle class England in the fourteenth century despite having been born hundreds of years later.
Arrathoon, Leigh A. "The Miller's Tale," Chaucer and the Craft of Fiction. Ed. Leigh A. Arrathoon, Rochester, Michigan: Solaris Press, Inc. 1986. 241-318
In Chaucer’s House of Fame, the reader is privy to a momentous dream of Geoffrey’s, a poet protagonist dedicated to love. In this dream, he meets an eagle that promises to bear him to the House of Fame as a reward from Jupiter himself. Once there, Geoffrey is told that he will “here…mo wonder thynges…and of loves folk moo tydynges, both soothe sawes and lesinges, and moo loves new begonne, and longe yserved loves wonne, and moo loves casuelly (Chaucer, Lines 672-679).” This excerpt is meant to outline what is to be expected from Chaucer and his text. However, when Geoffrey finally arrives at the House of Fame in the opening of Book III, he learns less about Love’s tidings and more about one of the sisters of Love, Fame, and her followers. This redirection of intent forces the reader to question Chaucer, and reconsider the real purpose of Geoffrey’s journey to the House of Fame. Aside from learning of Love’s tidings, the eagle states that Jupiter intended “this caas thee [for] thy lore and for thy prow (Chaucer, Lines 578-559).” Considering this, one realizes that Geoffrey obviously learned a great deal from his visit, but has to question exactly how Geoffrey, and in turn the reader, profited from it and what meaning, if any, is meant to be drawn from The House of Fame. Paul G. Ruggiers, author of “The Unity of Chaucer’s House of Fame”, claims that the aim of the text is to illustrate the influence of Fame on all things, including those subject to her sister, Love. Considering this, one can further claim that Jupiter’s true reward for Geoffrey, and also Chaucer’s intent for the reader, is detailed knowledge of Fame and her subjects, which serves as a valuable example of Fame’s very nature.
In Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, a collection of tales is presented during a pilgrimage to Canterbury Cathedral. The pilgrims on the journey are from divergent economic and social backgrounds but they have all amalgamated to visit the shrine of Saint Thomas. Chaucer uses each pilgrim to tell a tale which portrays an arduous medieval society. The values, morals and social structures of the society can be examined through the fictitious tales, unravelling a corrupt, unjust and manipulative world, a world that is based around an ecclesiastical society.
will not fade from the memories of the population. The stories of Beowolf are a
Chaucer’s book “The Canterbury Tales” presents a frame story written at the end of the 14th century that is set through a group of pilgrims participation in a story-telling contest that they make up to entertain each other while they travel to the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral. Because of this, some of the tales become particularly attractive for they are written within a frame of parody which, as a style that mocks genre, is usually achieved by the deliberate exaggeration of some aspects of it for comic effect. In fact, as a branch of satire mimicry, its purpose may be corrective as well as derisive. (Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms) Chaucer, therefore, uses parody to highlight – satirize - some aspects of the medieval society that should be re-evaluated. He uses the tales and the behaviours of its characters to paint an ironic and critical portrait of the English society at that time, therefore the tales turn satirical, elevated, ironic, earthy, bawdy, and comical. When analysing the Knight’s and the Miller’s Tale, one can realise how Chaucer mocks the courtly love convention, and other social codes of behaviours typical of the medieval time.
Chaucer’s life was well-documented for someone of the time, and sound decisions made early in his life allowed him to gain positions of importance at a relatively young age. Born in 1343 to a wine merchant father, there is indication that Chaucer’s family was upper class and very profitable (Polland). With his famil...
Before the age of television shows, movies, and the Internet people entertained one another with vibrant and exaggerated tales. Geoffrey Chaucer’s, The Canterbury Tales, is a good example of this form of entertainment. The novel details the journey of a band of pilgrims, who engaged in a storytelling competition, as they travel toward the shrine of Thomas à Becket. These Middle Age storytellers varied as much as the stories, and consisted of a knight, physician, monk, and many more. In “the Prologue” the Physician is revealed as a con artist who cares more about himself than his patients.
Chaucer's society represents every social class. In doing so, it shows what it takes to actually make a society function. The different people carry different stories to share. These stories carry lessons learned in hopes of sharing them with others so that they may not end up in the same predicaments. After all, that is the main point of sharing stories, isn't it?