Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The myth of the melting pot
Essay on melting pot
Essay on melting pot
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The myth of the melting pot
“Seventh Grade” and “Melting Pot” both have conflicts. In “Seventh Grade” the conflict happens between Victor and his mind. In “Melting Pot” the conflict happens between groups of different people. The conflict in “Melting Pot” does not have a winner, while the conflict in “Seventh Grade” does have a winner. The conflict in “Seventh Grade” does have a winner. The conflict between Victor and his mind led to a conflict with Mr. Bailor and him. The conflict between Victor and his mind was that he wanted to impress Teresa by speaking French. Although Victor does not know French, so he just tries to say French sounding words. Mr. Bailor understands that Victor was trying to impress Teresa and does not call out his French. Therefor this
In Jack Hitt’s “A Confederacy of Sauces”, the reader learns that there is a sibling feud between two brothers over barbecue sauces. This feud was like the “icing on the cake” after numerous years of the two brothers not getting along. This dispute between Maurice and Melvin exemplify that barbecue has become mixed up with the concerns of race and heritage. Heritage refers to characteristics or practices that are passed down from generation to generation. In this particular story, Maurice and Melvin had a few other brothers in the barbecue business as well. Jack Hitt tastes each brother’s sauce, realizing that the brothers’ versions of their father’s original sauce had very subtle but noticeable distinctions (310). Thus, carrying on their father’s legacy through his sauce.
This article from the Harvard Business Review was an intriguing piece on how an established organization has to change their mindset in order to change their organization. Campbell Soup Company has been a heavyweight in the food industry for over 145 years. The article portrays how Campbell Soup began to fall behind its competitors and needed to change. They did this in two very important ways. Decision making and courage were the two aspects of the company that they changed in order to grow within their industry.
America was founded on change. Past revolutions were fought to make new ways in which to live life in this country. Our families all came to America, at one point, to feed into this definition of being an American. The term melting pot in my mind means structure, meaning what we, as Americans, are made of. It was many ethnic backgrounds that came to make up our country. So as more and more people migrate to America, stand up for the changes they believe in, this country will only continue to get stronger.
Choose a novel or short story in which a conflict between two of the main characters is central to the story.
In Seventh Grade, the main character’s internal conflict is learning French. He wants to take a French class because the girl he likes, Teresa, is taking it as well. He is always thinking about her, and wants to get to know her. Towards the end of the story, he reaches French class, and says something random in a French accent. The teacher is confused about what he said. Victor
The term melting-pot has been used since the 1700s. It has always been a metaphor to describe immigrants coming to America. The melting pot is a fusion of cultures and ethnicities into one larger culture. Americans did not like the idea of immigration to their country, viewing their country as beautiful the way it was. Many thought America would be ruined if too many people immigrated and left their cultural mark on the country. The melting-pot concept on immigration seems to highlight historically how America came to be, but for more current immigration, Americans views are more negative. American attitude towards immigrants in the 1900s was not very favorable. Since they feared them, immigrants were often treated horribly by Americans. Robert H. Clancy says, “Vigorous complaint and more or less bitter persecution have been aimed at newcomers to our shores. Also the congressional reports of about 1840 are full of abuse of English, Scotch, Welsh immigrants as paupers, criminals, and so forth.” (Clancy,
Perhaps, the “Melting Pot” myth gained strength during the Industrial Revolution. With millions of immigrants entering the United States, culture was changing within the United States. Americans set a high standard for there society and everyone wanted to be accepted. There was a social requirement to live in a civil society creating together the “American Dream,” which leads to prosperity. Many immigrants moving to the United States brought with them various traditions of their culture and after moving, they repressed such beliefs and forged ahead with a new way of “American Thinking.” The rituals and traditions of such societies should have brought diversity to this nation’s culture however, these ways would soon become a part of the past. The “Melting Pot” myth heavily influences American society and people believe that everyone no matter what skin color or religious belief is created equal. This belief of the American Way of life is idyllic to say the least. Unfortunately, this myth has been thwarted due to a high level of racial supremacy within the nations past and even present. There are two particular events in national history, which will forever hinder equality: slavery of African Americans and Japanese internment camps during World War II in America. These substantial events shape our society and are only the tip of the iceberg when it
Two humans with a different race are living together in the same house, but fighting over who gets what. The Yakima Wars describe just that. Due to the war between the U.S. military and the Yakima’s, the pioneers setting in the Pacific Northwest were affected by the location of the war, the relationships between the Indians and pioneers, the climate, and the lack of communication between the Indians and whites. All of these affects upon the pioneers contributed to the Yakima Wars. The war could not have been avoided because the whites wanted the land on which the Indians were on. Either way the war would have happened. The main reason the whites fought with the Indians was because the United States Government wanted the land on which the Indians were on, and the whites didn’t follow their treaty between the lands. That was just one reason the Indians and whites fought.
Society is based on two groups the people the haves and the have-nots. In the movie Glory Road, the Caucasians are the haves and the African-Americans are the have-nots. The beliefs of a conflict theorist are that there is competition for scarce resources, some form of inequality to maintain, and social change comes about because of the conflicts (Brinkerhoff 10-11).
‘Romeo and Juliet’ by William Shakespeare incorporates the theme of conflict through many different characters and situations. The definition of conflict is “a fight, battle, or struggle; especially a prolonged struggle; strife” The play mainly focuses on the tragic lives of Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet; the two characters belong to the Montague and Capulet households respectively, which have held ongoing grudges against each other for years. The play ends with both main characters committing suicide, to be together in heaven. As with many of Shakespeare’s works, the theme of conflict is a strong one. For a start, there is the ongoing conflict between the two families; the Montagues and the Capulets. The audience is unsure how this grudge started; this reflects how tedious some ongoing grudges can be. This is a vital conflict to keep the structure of the story, as without this conflict Romeo and Juliet would not have encountered the problems they had with their marriage. However, there are different ways of putting this grudge across - through dialogue, such as Mercutio’s intell...
Child E’s discussion, turned argument, shows how E handles conflict. Like the textbook described, E was quick to change aggression. E was suddenly raising his voice at K, which was very different from his discussion with K previously. The textbook also describes name-calling, which E demonstrated by calling K “meanie” several times. It was interesting that E used his language to describe his feelings towards K. Despite E’s emotions, he was able to verbally communicate with K. I think E showed advancement in changing aggression, because he was able to move his body away from K, before intervention became
The age old question that many ask today is “what is an American?” America is continued to be called the “melting pot” of the world. This statement refers to the combination of different cultures and ethnicities throughout the United States. The diversity of America should not take away from the history and foundation it was found upon. ...
All of this conflict consists of something that is not changeable. One story that this occurs in is the story, by W.D. Wetherell consists of the boy choosing who to go with Shelia or the Bass that he could catch. Next, they both consist of a conflict that the character has to deal with. In the story by Leslie Norris, on ( Pg. 1 ). It says, Jackie asked, “ How's your father?” Barry said, “ No better, he's not going to get better.” Which shows that in this story that the character has to deal with internal conflict as well as external conflict. In, the story by W.D. Wetherell consists of a boy going on a date with a girl. In the middle, of their date the boy had to make a decision to either catch the bass he already has on the line or continue the date with Sheila Mant. This is a huge dilemma for the boy and there is a lot of conflict between this one part. On ( Pg.3 ), Sheila Mant said, “ I think fishing is dumb.” Then she continued by saying, “ I mean, it's boring and all. Definitely dumb”. This is internal conflict because the boy likes fishing and it hurts his feelings knowing the girl he loves so much hates fishing. From this, there is some sensory imagery and contrasting imagery that shows this describing the setting of the boy and Sheila Mant on the boat where he either decides to catch the bass or stay with Sheila Mant and cause no
The first conflict that I noticed was regret. The main character Robert regrets moving to Africa and wishes he could move back to Europe. He regrets moving to Africa because he feels like he doesn’t fit in with everyone else. In the book, the text stated, “‘So? You’re still a Pom. In what way do you think you’re not a Pom, Pommie?’” (Wallace 25). This was a conflict for Robert because people from Africa were being mean to him because of his ethnicity. A pommie or pom is a derogatory term to use when referencing to a British person. Since kids are making fun of Robert, he wishes he could move back home to be with his friends and family.
When the United States was formed, the different ethnic groups had a common goal. They wanted to build a nation of multiethnic groups sharing in common political ideas. This was clearly stated in the Constitution of the United States. “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” builds an immediate identity of citizenship among the people creating cohesion of the different ethnic groups. Hector St. John de Crevecoeur, a French immigrant published Letters from an American Farmer during the American Revolution. In it, he answered his question “What then is the American, this new man?” His answer is “He is an American, who leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, received new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys, and the new rank he holds. The American is a new man, who acts upon new principles….Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men.” (Schlesinger, Jr. 12). The term melting pot was coined to describe the blending of the new multiethnic society in America.