Megalomaniacs And The Illusion Of Inequality

Megalomaniacs and the Illusion of Inequality

‘’The feminist movement is not just compatible with happiness. They are not for equality; they want to kill everything masculine.’’ - Phyllis Schlafly, Conservative activist.

Feminism. The word itself implies discriminatory and unjust interpretations of ‘equality’. The definition of feminism has been modernised to such an extent that its original meaning is completely lost. In Britain 61% of the people who agreed with gender equality would not describe themselves as feminists. The profound ideology which characterizes women as the eternal victims and prey for the aggressive, violent and savage male species, illustrates the illusion of a never-ending engulfment of power which [modern] feminists

believe they possess. With great power comes great irresponsibility. This ‘authoritative power’ is used for only two purposes - to overpower and acquire more female privileges and embarrass and ridicule all men.

It has been scientifically proven that men - on average - are physically and athletically superior to women. Yet, feminists continue the senseless plead for jobs which entail maximum intensity and immense physical strength and endurance. A great example of the fact that feminists desire advantages instead of equality is a drop in the standards for the U.S military training. Before the implementation of the frivolous standard reduction, 90% of males passed all training classes. Only 14% of women passed the first class, and 0% managed to complete the course. The forced increase of women in the military, and the pathetic cutback of standards only brings one positive outcome and that is not to allow the dyed, short haired, overweight, overconfident and boisterous feminists to scream ‘’Sexist!’’ the admittance of women into the perilous and life threatening situations would result in more deaths not only for the women but also the men. They would be forced to aid the women who are incapable of carrying their own weight as the training did not fully prepare them to such a hostile and belligerent warzone .

Another instance of modern feminism showing its true colour is portrayed through the illusion of the pay gap. The ‘75 cents per dollar’ myth - which states that a woman allegedly would only receive 75% of what a man would get for doing the same line of work - has been debunked countless times. The pay is shown to be directly linked to the hours worked and not the gender of the employee. However, many ostensibly reliable and respected websites, ‘White House Equal Pay’ for instance, do not mention this and thus successfully distort our views and lead us to believe there is a deliberate attempt to sabotage women. The websites state controlled variables such as ‘same qualifications’, ‘same job’, ‘both full time’; but full time could be anything over 35 hours. It is ludicrous that a woman would complain about receiving less pay after 35 hours compared to the 45 hours of work a man has put in? It is simply illogical. Surely, simple maths is at play here - which is longer 45 hours of 35 hours? You do not have to be a Nobel Prize winner to figure this one out.

Feminists do not only take information out of context to make men seem overprivileged and favoured by the whole world but also generate completely fabricated statistics to debilitate them: ‘’30 percent of the women who visit emergency rooms have suffered domestic assault’’. Evidently statistics don’t lie. Right? Feminists do. This is the supplementary testimony to the fact that most modern feminists are pursuing their mission of degrading, dehumanising and demonising all men. False accusations of domestic abuse and even rape can not only destroy the reputation of an innocent life but the life itself. In 2015, a young boy from Southampton, aged 17, ‘’a well-loved student, who was bright and caring’’ committed suicide after the accusation of rape against him. His mother committed suicide a year later. Words can even affect the monstrous, unsympathetic predators, men themselves. Even in the most, supposedly unbiased court of law, the judges would still side with a woman that regretted an average night out. If a female and a male, both equally intoxicated, were to perform mutually consensual sexual intercourse, which the woman would feel slight regret for the next day, the man would be slated for - exploiting, taking advantage of a ‘vulnerability’, raping, molesting and abusing the woman. Of course, the man is forced to soak up the animosity. A woman is a sign of innocence, purity and delicacy, There is no way a woman could rape a man. When a woman openly announces that she has been glanced at by a man that she thought was provocative and inappropriate, she would instantly pull the ‘rape’ card and seek sympathy, protection and most importantly therapy. The cacophonic term of rape has been watered down and the serious connotations, which it once held, have faded as a simple gawk could (by some lunatics) be portrayed as ‘rape’. If a man were to quietly report a serious case of rape which was committed on himself, he would be mocked, laughed at and seen as a joker . And who would fling mud at this ‘rape’ victim - an extremely dangerous group of racists and fascists ; the label is Feminism. There is little doubt that the feminists’ goal is to embarrass men and acquire more power. Nonetheless, rape is a vile act and is morally evil be the victim a woman or a man.

Another often cited contention by the feminists club is the disparity in employment opportunities between sexes.

Feminists who complain about the lack of employment for women in very physically demanding jobs such as mechanics, military and construction. These are but a few of the good examples to show how naive feminists are in thinking they have the physical requirements to do these jobs justice. If jobs were to be divided equally between men and women an armageddon would surely commence. Equality can be obtained indirectly; everyone has their distinctive specialties and skills. The job which satisfies women the most - with a staggering 87% - is a housewife. But that's sexist and stereotypical, right? It cannot happen even if it means women are satisfied! Feminists are a physical representation of embarrassment and chagrin. In their mission of destroying men, they are bringing down the image of women down too. These industrious and villainous sources of animosity are not only abasing themselves by their ludicrous attempt of manipulation but also degrading the status of mankind

itself.

In conclusion, ‘equality’ should not be used as a wall for feminists to hide behind when they are exposed for demoralising men.

Media - the fuel - which is assisting these power-hungry vampires by publishing inaccurate and unspecific information should be flagged as abominable propaganda. Both genders can be equal, but the only convincing solution would be to do so indirectly. Generally, men surpass women in the construction industry; men could never replace women in the line of therapy and social work. Both genders are biologically designed to perform different tasks more efficiently. This is something screeching ‘’Sexist!’’ will not be able to change. Absolute equality is difficult to achieve in all aspects of life. Progression is evidently welcome but the only thing modern feminism will progress mankind to is the

past.

This is not an attack on women but an exposure of the miserable manipulation efforts made by what has been termed as the ‘’feminazis’’.

WC: 1182