Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
List of alternative methods for animal testing
What is the government trying to do about animal testing
Argument for using animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: List of alternative methods for animal testing
There are millions types of animals that are locked up in cages waiting to be used for an experiment. Some of those animals are mice, cats, dogs and rats. They go through so much pain, they are lonely and they don’t have a lot of space to roam, they have to sit there and wait to be poked and prodded. They just have to wait until they are performed on again to get out of their cages. After they are done being poked and prodded on, they will eventually be put down. The animals are tortured just to live in fear and eventually be put down. All of the stress and boredom that they go through causes them to have neurotic behavior. When someone walks by the cages their blood pressure rises and they shake in fear. Animal research/experimentation is a form of animal abuse. There was a video I watched where the people were treating the animals terrible. They were ripping animals off of cages, and they were shutting them in doors, shoving pipes down throats, or shoving pipes up their noses, they also shove them in tubes where they can’t breathe or move around. Animal experimentation needs to be stopped. There are multiple ways that it can be stopped, you just need to find the people who care enough to stop it. The animals are suffering. They suffer either from the chemicals, drugs, food and cosmetics test. The animals that are used for animal experimentation aren’t even counted. There is not an exact number of animals that are being used for the experiments. These animals are used to test cosmetics, household cleaners and consumer products. “Hundreds of thousands of animals are poisoned, blinded, and killed every year by cruel corporations.” (Animal Testing 101) The mice and rats that are used are forced to inhale the toxic fumes, the dog... ... middle of paper ... ...ocon.org/ . "Animals Used in Education | Animals Used for Experimentation | The Issues." PETA. N.p., 2014. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/classroom-dissection/ . Cohn, Meredith. "Alternatives to animal testing gaining ground." The Baltimore Sun [Baltimore] 26 Aug. 2010: 1-2. Print. "Cosmetics and Household-Product Animal Testing | Animals Used for Experimentation | The Issues." PETA. N.p., 2014. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/cosmetic-household-products-animal-testing/ . Rowan, Andrew. "Avoiding Animal Testing." The Scientist 1 Dec. 2011: 1. Print. "U.S. Government Animal Testing Programs | Animals Used for Experimentation | The Issues.”PETA. N.p., 2014. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/us-government-animal-testing-programs/ .
"Animal Testing 101." PETA. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, n.d. Web. 22 Mar.
Wolff, Jonathan. "Pro and Con Positions Oversimplify Animal Experimentation Issues."Animal Experimentation. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford, Jr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Rpt. from "Killing Softly." Guardian. 28 Mar. 2006. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 2 Mar. 2014.
The article provides specific examples of illnesses and diseases which have been cured by animal testing that both humans and animals have benefitted. This supports my topic of animal experiments being used for medical advancements. Pointing out that law often requires that products be tested before being sold to the public, George and Wagner additionally help prove my claim that product testing is a purpose of animal experimentation.
Driscoll, Sally and Laura Finley. “Animal Experimentation: An Overview.”Points Of View: Animal Experimentation (2013): 1. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 6 Feb. 2014
Writing this paper did not affect my original line of thinking in regards to the topic. I support animal rights in every way, and am extremely against any sort of testing. Observing the “necessities” of animal testing did not, in any way, alter my negative view of animal experimentation.
“If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal that hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” (DeGeneres, DG). Think about those animals imprisoned in cold cages, having nothing to do but wait, waiting in fear, knowing that when the time comes their cages will be opened, but not to set them free. Unable to react, unable to defend themselves, they rot in pain and mourn with isolation. And yet all we, humans, do is sit back and watch them suffer. Animal testing is the abuse of animals to develop new products. Although some people are against animal testing others agree that animals are needed in researches to find upgraded and new cures for developing diseases, to find advanced aesthetic products, and to find refine household products leading to a more satisfying quality.
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
They are forced into stressful medical experiments and living conditions. Sadly, testing on these animals, whether it be for medical research or cosmetic testing, does not benefit humans. In reality, the animals are going through unnecessary pain, possibly even death, but there are other alternatives to replace animal testing. Overall, animal testing is a way to harm animals, cause them to suffer, and go through extreme amounts of pain with no relief, in an attempt to help humans, in reality, these experiments do not benefit
The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Sun, Shany. A. The Truth Behind Animal Testing. Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 835.
Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.
This brings disvalue to the animals. According to the definition of the Utilitarianism, action is right if and only if it maximizes value, which means happiness, and minimizes disvalue, which means suffer. In the cases of animal experiments, human beings are enjoying the output of new products or therapy after testing on animals. This can maximize the happiness of human beings about having a new product or therapy. However, there are suffer from the animals which are used for the animal tests. According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, millions of animals are suffered from the painful and stress from the animal experiments. Most of them died due to the chemical, drug, food and cosmetics tests. The amount of suffer from the experiments is much more than the happiness from the consumer. If an action cannot maximize happiness and minimize suffer, it is not morally right. So, animal experiment is morally wrong. Refers to Golden Rule, we should treat others as the way we want to be treated. However, there is no people want to be locked into a cage and live under a pressured environment. If the animals are put into a small cage and facing different experiments every single day without any help from human, this is violating the Golden Rule. We are not treating them in the way that we want to be treated. But there are people argue that animals are not human beings. They do not have
It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.
Every year thousands of animals are euthanized due to animal testing such as cosmetic testing, medical testing, and dissection. (A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation) (Types of Animal Testing) Some of the things we use every day such as; make up, soap, furniture polish, and varieties of cleaning supplies, are tested on rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, cats, and other animals. (Animal Testing) Cosmetic testing is used to test a product and its ingredients, medical testing finds cures for different illnesses; and dissection is used to help high school students in science classes have a better understanding of the class or students undergoing the medical field in college. (Animal Experimentation) Animal testing is not required by law; it is only used to protect companies from consumer lawsuits, provided new research for diseases, and provide a visual learning experiment for students. (A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation) It has been proven that there are more reliable and less expensive alternatives to animal testing, such as; computer models and cell and tissue tests. Animal experimentation should be eliminated because it is an inhumane method for testing purposes.
Over 100 million animals are used in experiments; 95% of these animals end up dying. Animals are killed and mutilated for the sake of science. Some experiments can involve “blinding, severing of limbs, damaging brain, and ingesting various drugs.” (Coster,
For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...