Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay of informed consent
The four principles of medical ethics
Medical ethics case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay of informed consent
Medical students’ knowledge and attitude in dealing with medical ethical dilemmas
HO Ariff, AG Rasydan, N Suhaila, AR Shahrir
Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
Introduction
The society’s outlook towards healthcare has changed radically over the past three decades. First, there is an increased emphasis on patient autonomy and self-determination or patient-centered medicine whereby patients are the focus of the clinical interaction. The belief that doctors know what is best for patients is fast diminishing. Secondly, there is also growing recognition that improvements in healthcare require collaboration among many different stakeholders, including patients. Thirdly, health is
…show more content…
Additionally, during the two-week posting in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, in the fourth year, their understanding is strengthened during small group discussions on medical dilemmas commonly encountered in anesthesiology and critical care practice with the medical teachers. In the discussions, students analyze the medical ethical dilemma, apply the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice3 and decide as to the best solution to take. They also learn to analyze the situations using the Islamic ethical principles such as the maqasid and qawaid al-shariah as complement to the conventional ethical principles, which is an essential skill when one addresses similar dilemmas involving Muslim patients. Basically, they are tasked to analyze the ethical issues and apply the conventional ethical principles and Islamic ethical theory on the case studies provided to them4. They have to prepare the discussion script of the given cases and present them during the small group discussion. Ethical issues discussed are those that are normally encountered in anesthesia and critical care practice; namely, informed consent, Do not Resuscitate, DNR, withholding and withdrawal of treatment, euthanasia, brain death, organ donation and end of life care4. It is hoped that after …show more content…
Ethical Issues Yes (%) No (%)
1 Taking consent from patients involves application of ethical principles 97.56 2.44
2 Euthanasia is not permissible in Islam 87.80 12.20
3 Withholding of life support to a dying patient = Physician Assisted Euthanasia 24.39 75.61
4 Morphine administered to a terminally ill cancer patient is not equal to indirect euthanasia 75.61 24.39
5 Withdrawal of life support to a dying patient = Euthanasia 56.10 43.90
6 Withdrawal of life support from a pt with massive stroke, CVA and never regain consciousness is permissible in Islam 73.17 26.83
7 It is permissible to withdraw life support in a ‘brain dead’ patient 92.70 7.30
8 Case 1: Perform CPR on a patient, post Acute Myocardial Infarction, AMI who came to A&E in a cyanosed state and practically dead. (Brought in dead or ‘BID’) 17.07 82.93
9 Case 2: Very ill, post MVA patient on a ventilator, IPPV – had emergency laparotomy for intra-abdominal injury (open and close; abdominal pack); on triple inotropes; severe hypovolemic shock. Deteriorating general condition. Would you do a CPR should she develop a cardiac arrest?
43.9
56.10
10 Observe any doctor resolve ethical situation in the ward 31.71
Today, there are so many legal dilemmas dominating trial for the courts to make a sound legal decision on whose right in a complicated situation. Despite the outcome of the case, the disagreement usually has a profound effect on the healthcare organization, and the industry as a whole. Many cases are arguments centered around if the issue is a legal or moral principle. Regardless what the situation maybe, the final decision is left to the courts to differentiate between the legality issues at hand opposed to justifying a case based on moral rules. According to Pozgar (2012), an ethical dilemma arises in situations where a choice must be made between unpleasant alternative. It can occur whenever a choice involves giving up something good and suffering something bad, no matter what course of action is taken (p. 367). In this paper, I will discuss cases that arose in the healthcare industry that have been tried and brought to justice by the United States court system.
This can be seen in the case study as ethical and legal arise in resuscitation settings, as every situation will have its differences it is essential that the paramedic has knowledge in the areas of health ethics and laws relating to providing health care. The laws can be interpreted differently and direction by state guidelines may be required. Paramedics face ethical decisions that they will be required to interpret themselves and act in a way that they believe is right. Obstacles arise such as families’ wishes for the patients’ outcome, communicating with the key stakeholders is imperative in making informed and good health practice decision. It could be argued that the paramedics in the case study acted in the best interest of the patient as there was no formal directive and they did not have enough information regarding the patients’ wishes in relation to the current situation. More consultation with the key stakeholders may have provided a better approach in reducing the stress and understanding of why the resuscitation was happening. Overall, ethically it could be argued that commencing resuscitation and terminating once appropriate information was available is the right thing to do for the
When a patient’s/family’s religious beliefs go against recommended medical treatment, it brings up an ethical issue. If the patient is a minor, this makes the case even more complex. In such a case, the parents would need to be evaluated to see if they were properly representing their child’s best interest. Depending on the child’s age, the child would need to be consulted to see if he/she meets the criteria of having the capacity to make his/her own medical decisions. Finally, the physician needs to be consulted to determine what his/her beliefs are on the case and under what circumstances would he be willing to perform the surgery.
Carol finishes her story with a plea for a better communication among the different healthcare providers and the system in general. There is no perfect system, and health care, the system that constantly evolves, deals with life and death, and employs people to fill such diverse niches is probably the most complex of them all, the most difficult to assess, comprehend, and change. As big, complex, and sometimes scary as it seems, it can be changed: talking to a colleague, taking a moment and asking a patient’s opinion. “Be the change you wish to see in the world”, said Gandhi. This is my motto.
Mohr, M., & Kettler, D. (1997). Ethical aspects of resuscitation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 253.
The practice of medicine in general has changed due to changes in technology, economics, epidemiology, and demographics. But particularly, the patient-physician relationship has been transformed during the past century, from one characterized by strong physician paternalism to one that reflects strong patient autonomy. (1)
Mr Adams symptoms could indicate some cardiovascular compromise (Resus UK, 2015). However, not all heart attack will result in cardiac arrest. Visual observation must accompany some compromise physiological parameter which will indicate if cardiac arrest is imminent (Steele, 2008. Ruigomez et al., 2009). Mr Adams was later found in a state of collapse by a student nurse; an initial set of observation was performed, Mr Adams was tachycardic, hypoxic, hypertensive and slightly tachypnoea. When dealing with an emergency, there is a need for collaboration between multi-disciplinary team (Standing, 2010). The critical care outreach and medical emergency team were notified and they arrived in time to perform CPR on Mr Adams. The NQN must apply situational judgment and follows a good decision-making process that complies with all relevant legislations, including laws relating to capacity in the event of CPR (Resus UK,
The demand of a constantly developing health service has required each professional to become highly specialised within their own field. Despite the focus for all professionals being on the delivery high quality care (Darzi, 2008); no one profession is able to deliver a complete, tailored package. This illustrates the importance of using inter-professional collaboration in delivering health care. Patient centric care is further highlighted in policies, emphasising the concept that treating the illness alone whilst ignoring sociological and psychological requirements on an individual is no longer acceptable. Kenny (2002) states that at the core of healthcare is an agreement amongst all the health professionals enabling them to evolve as the patient health requirements become more challenging but there are hurdles for these coalitions to be effective: for example the variation in culture of health divisions and hierarchy of roles. Here Hall (2005) illustrates this point by stating that physicians ignore the mundane problems of patients, and if they feel undervalued they do not fully participate with a multidisciplinary team.
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
As the quantity of patients expanded, it ought to have been obvious that one registered Nurse and one Licensed Practical Nurse were insufficient to look after the patients. The emergency department ought to be viewed as a high priority location, and should have staffed with more Registered Nurses; Licensed Practical Nurse essentially do not have the training and abilities to assess patients or delegate the workload. Dangerous actions such as moderate sedation on a patient with no supplemental oxygen or EKG observing. The patient seems to have been overmedicated, with insufficient time between medications to decide his actual level of
The term “failure to rescue” refers to a clinical scenario where hospital doctors, nurses, or caregivers fail to recognize symptoms. Responders do not respond adequately to clinical signs that would prevent harm (Morse, 2008, p.2). Dr. Jeffery H. Silber, Director of the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, first coined the term “failure to rescue” in the 1990’s. He characterized the matrix of institutional and individual errors that contribute to patient deaths as “failure to rescue” (Aleccia, 2008). Since 1990, it has been well documented patients usually exhibit signs and symptoms of impending cardiac or respiratory arrest 6-8 hours before an arrest (Schein, Hazday, Pena, Ruben, & Spring, 1990). Buist, Bernard, Nguyen, Moore, and Anderson’s (2004) research reported similar findings. They found patients had documented clinically abnormal signs and symptom prior to arrest (Buist, et al., 2004). When certain abnormal signs and symptoms are identified early, critical bedside consultat...
The facility should have written statement to refer to in case of emergency to help and protect the health care workers that are onsite. So that it would minimize the confusion. We all know that in the case of cardiac arrest time is very critical. The nurse wasted the patient greatest opportunity of survival by standing there and refusing care. It’s the policy of this facility to not make care for cardiac arrest patient difficult. I understand at 87 years of age the end result is most likely not going to be a promising, but I would help to know that there are some people who are willing to help. I hope the nurse learned her lesson and stand clear of confusion for future patient that reside the
There are many legal aspects that go into declaring what is and what is not brain death. In today’s society, many people, including medical professionals, judges and attorneys struggle to identify what exactly constitutes as brain death. According to, Smith“ the concept of brain death came about during the 1950’s when, as a consequence of developments in critical care, clinicians were faced for the first time with the prospect of an apparently ‘alive’ patient sustained by mechanical ventilation long after brain function had ceased”(Smith, 2011).
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act
The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center uses a protocol for cardiopulmonary death in which they declare the patient dead after two minutes of cardiac arrest.1 This has become controversial because some critics argue patients could be resuscitated at the two minute mark, therefore the patients have not experienced irreversible loss of function and are not truly dead.1 In the event of organ donors, this violates the dead donor rule, which states that the patient must be dead in order to harvest organs.1 However, their council’s rebuttal states that ethically a patient has irreversibly lost function if the patient wishes to be free from life...