Media's Influence On Homicide

473 Words1 Page

Media is both useful for understanding homicide, and has the potential to make people think about it incorrectly. Media can be used to expose people to more ideas about homicide that they themselves might not have thought of while only being exposed to their own demographics.
However, the media can also have a negative impact on people’s view of homicide, as it can also spread false information and cause people to think that violent crime is more represented than it really is. As Soulliere (2003:14) states, “Comparisons reveal that the media tend to depict the crimes that occur the least in American society (violent crimes), while neglecting the crimes that occur the most (property crimes)”.
Let us start with a discussion of media’s positive role with the portrayal of homicide. Since many factors of homicide are subjective, despite having numerous laws to help define what a homicide is (Criminal Code), people have varying opinions on what is defined as homicide. …show more content…

For example, during the “You be the Judge” activity during week two, we discussed our opinions on deaths that may or may not be considered homicide. Some of these opinions I agreed with, and some of them I did not (Fig x)(Kyleen Ferris, Week 2). However, I could understand why this person thought the way they did, and, like media, their post exposed me to differing opinions.
I believe that the negative impact media can have on the public’s perception of homicide to be worse than the positive, though. For one, media has a habit of cherry-picking information as to better support their narrative (Fig x)(Kyleen Ferris, Week 3). I can understand why this is done, as it does not make sense to have conflicting points in an article. However, I believe this can lead to people who do not check sources themselves to have a warped opinion on

Open Document