“Today, media, culture and society are really inseparable and one cannot exist without the other.” In today’s times, media has become complex institutions that shape and are in turn shaped by society. The media facilitates communication between sender and receiver and acts as a source of information and knowledge. When we compare ourselves to generations of the past, we as people of the 21st century have access to an enormous amount of information. Every day we see coverage of conflicts and disasters in places around the world and we are exposed to information on thousands of subjects ranging from politics to social problems to cultural problems and so on. We are constantly asking ourselves, what is it that gives the media so much power that we go about living our daily lives, influenced and dependent on the media? This essay will be exploring examples from the South African media relating to how in today’s times, media, culture and society are inseparable and how one cannot exist without the other.
The story that has currently taken not only South Africa but the world by shock is the story of the South African Olympic and Paralympic track star Oscar Pistorius, who shot and killed his girlfriend the former FHM model Reeva Steenkamp in his house in Pretoria on the 14th February 2013 (Motsoeneng, 2013). Within hours after the killing of Reeva, the world knew the story of what had happened. Every single form of media and social network ranging from television to newspapers to twitter were reporting on the Oscar Pistorius story. “The Oscar Pistorius Trial” is the name of the 24 hour carte blanche channel that has been dedicated to the trial of Oscar Pistorius so that the public of South Africa and the world can get live coverage and ...
... middle of paper ...
...itical culture (Rivero, Kotze, & Du Toit, 2002).
We can therefore see that in today’s time and society, technology has become the leading source of information to the public and the media has to act as a father figure in order to inform, influence and speak for the public. Taking a stand is a problematic situation for the media as people are going to be offended no matter which side is taken. The media has a great ability to manipulate and persuade the public whether it is for selfish reasons or simply on behalf of the public. Media has the strength of both the government and the public which is a tool that they use to either benefit or disadvantage its audience. Thus looking at the three examples from the South African media, we can conclude that in today’s time, media, culture and society are interrelated and interdependent and one cannot exist without the other.
The media has been a part of the daily life of the American people for the longest time, because of this fact, the media influences the decisions and views of how people should live. One big part of the media that tends to start to develop a sense of how the day-to-day American should live is Disney. Since kids are the main source of Disney’s billion dollar industry children have become an important dimension of the social theory (Giroux 1999: 65). “Within this context, television emerges as a consumer-oriented medium that reflects advertisers’ desire to reach a young, upscale, and primarily White audience” (Goodale1999; Henderson and Baldasty 2003: 100). As a result other races and ethnic groups other than white Americans are often put aside when it comes to the social media view of how Americans should live.
Media has had many changes in the past years. Growing up I remember my mom saying that we were lucky to have color televisions now. She would say that when she was younger she would have to hear her stories and games over the radio because back then there was no televisions. Another way of getting entertained was reading stories. The newspaper and the radio was the only way of getting news back then. I thought it was funny when my mom told me that since they were one of the few families that had a television in the neighborhood, she would charge the kids 10 cents to watch television in her house. This was actually a pretty smart thing to do.
The issue of the relationship between the mass media and the popular culture has always been a controversial issue in social sciences. The political economists insist on the role of the media industry in the creation of this phenomenon of the twentieth century. Though, advocates such as John Fiske, argue that popular culture is actually the creation of the populous itself, and is independent of the capitalist production process of the communication sector. Basing his argument on the immense interpretive power of the people, Fiske believes that the audience is able to break all the indented meanings within a media message. He also believes- by giving new meanings to that specific message they can oppose the power block that is trying to impose its ideology to the public. Consequently, this anarchistic activity of the audience creates the popular culture as a defence mechanism. Even when we accept Fiske’s ideas, we can not disregard the manipulative power of the media and its effects on cultural and social life.
No matter what it might be, the media is always trying to persuade us what the new best thing is. Since the dawn of advertising, the media has always been trying to get you to buy the next big thing. And ultimately, popular culture declares what is socially acceptable, what products are the best, and what you should think about them. For the most part, media would give advertising space to whoever pays the most, but this isn’t true for political stances. Whatever source of respected pop culture publications has power to create an image of what is “good”, and people interpret it as such. Many different sources pass on their political standpoints to viewers and they can very easily sway what a viewer agrees with and finds as “good”. With this,
Media has always had the power to transform ideas through what it represents. Most of the media we experience today is part of a global message which we absorb into our everyday lives; our customs, cultural coding, religious views and political standings. Due to satellite televesion, nations everywhere are able to tune into the world on a larger scale putting each nation under a single umbrella of opinions and views e...
Hence, the power of media has touched its apex in today’s age. Its societal, political and economic functions reflect its unparallel capacity to affect the human life in all spheres.
If we want a society of peace, then we cannot achieve such a society through violence (B. Rustin, 1987).The media is a vehicle for, The media is a good vehicle for discrimination and prejudice, since it gives people groups the platform to talk their psyches and in that way it enrages individuals, it fills their brains with adverse knowledge settle which is when individuals begin to act rough for our general public in light of the fact that at that point individuals begin to loathe others for reasons unknown. Within the assignment I am firstly going to highlight facts concerning why I think media is a decent vehicle to cause separation give a definition for media and I will be talking about media all in all and I will just concentrate on the negative impacts media has on both discrimination and prejudice since I'm concurring that media is a transportation for discrimination and prejudice, then give definitions for both of them, took after of cases of each and finish up with an arrangements on how I figure it can be settled or diminished.
Everyday we encounter the media in some form. It could be waking up to the sound of the radio, or passing billboards in the streets or simply just watching television. They are a lot of different forms of media, for example, verbal or written media, visual media and aural media. Examples of media would include newspapers, magazines, film, radio, television, billboard advertisements as well as the internet. Media studies came about because of the developments in mass communication and it provokes the generation of exigent questions about what we think we know as well how we came about knowing it. There are always changes in the media and the term “media” refers to the many ways of physically forming meanings as well and carrying them. The term “media studies” on the other hand, means different courses priorities different media; different theories and different learning outcomes (Bazalgette, 2000).
Media Content and Realities of the Social World Media images never simply present the world direct, they are always a construction, a re-presentation, not a transparent window on to the real. The media give us ways of imagining particular identities and groups which can have material effects on how people experience. This is partly because the mass media have the power to re-present, over and over, some identities, some imaginings, and to exclude others, and thereby make them unfamiliar or even threatening. Besides, the Media use bias and stereotypes to represent the world which are not always true or “real”. Should media content attempt to reflect the realities of the social world?
The first argument for media literacy deals with the notion that media plays a dominant role in politics and culture. Media help citizens to understand the complex problems within society. The job of the media is to inform the public; however, it is the job of the public to decipher the messages being sent through the media. T...
The mass media has played a key role in shaping people’s lives. The modern society’s use of mass media including TV, radio, newspaper, as well as print media has largely influenced people’s ideas regarding themselves and the society at large. This is evident from their behavior towards themselves and their community as well as their treatment of the environment. While some experts believe that the media is to blame for most of the negative behavioral traits among the active members of society, the majority agree that the media makes people understand and develop a positive sense of association with their society within which they live, making it easy for them to identify and get their role in it.
The media has developed to become “an important player in any political system”. The evolution of media has allowed for citizens to monitor the state and its actors in a ways that was never possible prior to its existence. In an ideal world, this connection will allow for media outlets to give citizens the tools and the information to help facilitate the exposure of reprehensible actions conducted by their governing bodies, and proceed to develop a state of accountability. The purpose of this essay is to discuss why this is not always the case, and how LDC’s and Liberal Democracies suffer different obstacles in trying to attain this goal. The fundamental roles of the media are often skewed by external factors, such as the power certain states possess, news outlets that chose to sacrifice the truth for entertainment, and the elites who have the power, money and influence to alter the media content to benefit them. Whether you are located in an LDC or a Liberal Democracy, the universal obligation of the media is to the citizens by being independent parties and develop news through the watchdog method, but it is dependent on the states political situation that predicates the obstacles that the media has to go through to achieve this goal. The countries that will be used to help prove this argument will be the USA as our Liberal Democracy and South Africa as our LDC.
In the document, Media transformation, Ownership and Diversity, the ANC criticises the South African media’s self-regulatory model. The fact that the media are first and foremost corporations is incredibly important. Following the recent decline in print media consumption, journalistic standards have dropped following budget cuts by the corporations. (Duncan, 2014, p. 170) Because of the former self-regulatory model, the ANC were concerned that journalists would not call each other out on lapses of ethical conduct.
The Mass Media has had a greater in influence on modern culture than either education or history.
Media technologies are becoming an important aspect of today’s society. Each and every day, people interact with media of many different forms. Media is commonly defined as being a channel of communication. Radio, newspapers, and television are all examples of media. It is impossible to assume that media is made up of completely unbiased information and that the media companies do not impose their own control upon the information being supplied to media users. Since many people use media very frequently, it is obvious to assume that it has affects on people. According to the text book Media Now, "media effects are changes in knowledge, attitude, or behavior that result from exposure to the mass media," (386). This leaves us with many unanswered questions about media and its influences. This paper will look at how the effects of media are determined and explore the main affects on today’s society - violence, prejudice, and sexual behavior.