Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media negative effects on consumerism
Concentration in media
Pluralist theory of media ownership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media negative effects on consumerism
Concentration of Ownership in the media industry means that a very small group of companies/corporations are controlling the majority share of the media industry. These mergers came about as a result of one media related parent company purchasing another company for control of their resources in order to increase revenues and viewership
The general public depends on media industries to distribute information which help to define the attitudes and opinions of people every day. The information distributed by these media industries keep the public up to date on current events, news and generally what is happening in their region and around the world. When this situation arises, in which a particuar market is controlled by a small group of companies then the public is only hearing the news from a select number of sources which could suggest that the information is either tainted or bias.
…show more content…
E.g. Guardian Media Limited is the media sector of the Trinidadian-based company ANSA McAL. Guardian Media Limited presently owns CNC3 which is one of the premiums TV stations in the country, Trinidad Publishing Company which runs one of the premier news paper in the country and Trinidad Broadcasting Company which includes approximate seven successful radio stations in the country. Companies such as ANSA McAL, sought convergence to make them more powerful, profitable, and able to reach a larger viewing audience. This is a typical example of horizontal Integration.
As information and entertainment became a major part of our culture, Guardian Media Limited sought and created ways to become more efficient in reaching viewers and turning a profit. The advantage of media convergence is, now the company can fully utilze the service of their news crew and use the same reporters, journalist, staff etc. to produce stories for, television, newspaper, radio and Internet
Michael Parenti (2002) declares media in the United States is no longer “free, independent, neutral and objective.” (p. 60). Throughout his statement, Parenti expresses that media is controlled by large corporations, leaving smaller conglomerates unable to compete. The Telecommunications Act, passed in 1996, restricted “a single company to own television stations serving more than one-third of the U.S. public,” but is now overruled by greater corporations. (p. 61). In his opinion, Parenti reveals that media owners do not allow the publishing of stories that are not beneficial and advantageous. Parenti supports his argument very thoroughly by stating how the plutocracy takes control over media in multiple ways: television, magazines, news/radio broadcasting, and other sources.
Perhaps no other company has benefited more from this deregulation than the company which is the focus of this essay – Clear Channel Communications, Inc (CC). The Telecommunications Act and the actions of the FCC paved the way for the rise of this radio industry behemoth. In 1995, the company owned 43 radio stations nationwide. By 2002, it owned 1,239, making it the largest radio company in th...
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
Joseph STRAUBHAAR and Robert LaROSE (2001). Media Now. Communications Media in the Information Age. 3rd Edition. Belmont, Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
The majority of media in the United States, are owned in operated by wealthy individuals and corporations. Media also helps portray “big business” good or bad, depending on their influence, mostly due to contributions. Due to these contributions, select few have been able to manipulate and create a bias towards the contributor. Eventually free media and press evolved into the oligarchy that now “runs” our country.
Loss of authority and credibility normally connected to media that are well established have journalistic standards, ethic and accountability can be seen as a problem
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
Split into four sections, the book breaks down the journalism industry and analyses its different components. Part one explores what flat earth news is by using the ‘Millennium bug’ as a case study. Section two breaks down the structure of news corporations, comparing the journalists to their bosses and how this relationship along with institutional
...In order to remain profitable in such competitive market a company must provide a product or service that spans the global in appeal. The vast media arena is ever changing as innovative young minds continue to find new ways to make success an inevitable fact. In essence the public will have the final say so in which business will sink or swim in the media global marketplace. The tough decisions are made on the streets and not in the boardroom. Over the years the streets have called for a more diversified aspect of the media. The companies mentioned above are leaders in this respective services they provide and will continue to play a major role in global media.
There are many contradictory arguments about cross-media ownership. Some people said it is an effective way to manage media company. Also, some people argue that a media company can offer high quality information and product since they have broad network and huge capital. This information and product cannot be made with small capital. However, there are concerns that media concentration affects our society negatively.
Concentration of media ownership (also known as media consolidation or media convergence or media concentration) is a process whereby progressively fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media. It refers to the idea that the ownership of various media is restricted to a relatively small number of companies. The majority of the major media outlets are owned by a proportionately small number of conglomerates and corporations. Globally, large media conglomerates include Viacom, CBS Corporation, Time Warner, 21st Century Fox and News Corp ,Bertelsmann AG, Sony, Comcast, Vivendi, Televisa, The Walt Disney Company, Hearst Corporation, Organizações Globo and Lagardère Group. The development in communication technologies made it technologically possible and economically feasible for media conglomerates to establish distribution and production networks across continents. A number of U.S. media conglomerates that dominate the U.S. media markets, along with a few Asian and European media conglomerates such as Sony Corp., Bertelsmann, Vivendi, and Pearson, dominate the global media landscape. These media conglomerates have operations worldwide and distribute their content or provide services to a world
Joseph STRAUBHAAR and Robert LaROSE (2002). Media Now. Communications Media in the Information Age. 3rd Edition. Belmont, Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
Finally, observing the traditional organizations and how they used to associate themselves to the physical forms by which they distributed their products – television broadcasting company, radio broadcasting company, newspaper, book or magazine publisher. Recently, these media firms had to restructure their business in order to be successful in this digital world. Hence, they had to widen their delivery medium rather than limiting it, and be exploiters of content wherever content is available to be exploited.
Newspapers have been around since the early 18th century, gaining prominence after 1790 during the colonial era. Magazines followed right behind newspapers and gained popularity as well, television followed last, booming in popularity in the 1960’s. Television is still the most often used source for news and other information, such as the weather. But new forms of mass media are on the rise, such as channels, blogs and podcasts, which have been around since the early 2000’s but are now picking up momentum and gaining prominence as a news source. There are similarities as well as differences between the old media and the new media, and while the new media is more modern and accessible it does not have to push old media out of the picture, the two can be combined for the benefit of the consumers and the company, providing reliable information at a faster speed.
...ing diversity, impeding real competition, forcing smaller players out of the market, and contributing to reinforce conservative views of the world, marginalizing dissent or content that does not generate profit or which is seen as challenging to capitalist values. Although the media industries are not exclusively American anymore, but are largely owned by various Western corporations (Japanese, German, British, American).