When the suspect, Jackson, saw Caughman searching in trash cans he immediately stabbed him in the chest with his 26 inch sword. After the first stab Jackson continued to stab Jackson in the chest and the when turned over, stabbed in the back. After stabbing Caughman, Jackson fled the scene and trashed his weapon in a nearby trash can. Jackson staggered to a nearby restaurant where he washed the blood off of himself and escaped without a trace of the stabbing. Meanwhile Caughman managed to make it to a nearby police precinct and alerted authorities of what happened. After being alerted authorities rushed Caughman to a hospital where he was later announced dead. After 25 hours, Jackson turned himself into the authorities and confessed to killing Caughman and gave the location of the murder weapon and two knives which he …show more content…
In his show Are You A Biased TV Viewer, Stossel and Goldberg are discussing how mediastream is biased (liberal biased), meaning it’s only one sided. Goldberg wrote a book that was not only very popular, but talked about there being bias in the media and that viewers should be made aware of that. In his interview with Stossel, Goldberg said that the reason news media mainstream is so biased is because of groupthink. According to Goldberg, “ groupthink is when there are too many like minded people making the decisions on what the audience and reader gets to read and see on TV.” So when a news reporter talks about something important that has just occurred or is occurring, and say that they are telling the truth they’re correct. However, like Goldberg said in his interview, even though the media is telling the truth they are doing so but through a filtered prism. Not only do they discuss how there is bias in the media, but how the people (viewers) watching the news are biased
In the Stossel video about media being bias Goldberg talk how the media is filter through group think and how that affect how the news is delivered. Goldberg states that groupthink filters a way of thinking that makes everyone think the same way and therefore bias occurs when the new is delivered to the public.(Dealing With Bias) Bernard Goldberg claim can be trusted because he is the author to the number one seller called Bias A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort The News. Goldberg continues on how the media and most of the people in mainstream media change and show only what they want to to the viewers. The workers and news believe they are informing the public with truths but in reality it has bias in it. When the majority agrees or believes a certain way the rest adapts and starts think the same way as everyone else around them. Therefore bias occurs and the news being more and more bias. Also they talk about in the video how the media is bias not because of conspiracy but because of people thinking a certain way and as a result news deliver bias information. Political and other news like politics are greatly bias due to media wanting to portray a way of thinking and agreeing with the same belief as the majority in the big corporations. Media wants to make the viewer agree with the views on politics and make it seem like bias does not occur in mainstream
“The old argument that the networks and other ‘media elites’ have a liberal bias is so blatantly true that it’s hardly worth discussing anymore…No we don’t sit around in dark corners and plan strategies on how we’re going to slant the news. We don’t have to. It comes naturally to most reporters.” (Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News) This example is tremendously important in the author’s discussion because it proves that news stories do manipulate people through bias. Popular news networks are viewed by thousands of people every single day, thus making it have a huge impact on the public since they believe what they see. When news reporters present their news segments, it is natural for them to give their insights due to human nature being instinctively biased. “The news media is [sic] only objective if they report something you agree with… Then they’re objective. Otherwise they’re biased if you don’t agree, you know.” (CNN’s American Morning) In this quote, the readers are presented to current panelists agreeing that news consumers have a very hard time separating their own view of the news from the perspective of the news reporters because they are presenting their own opinions throughout their segments. This problem exists once again because of the bias that is contained in media
Today it seems almost impossible to get a straightforward answer on any major topic from the media. All sources of media have a specific audience that they are intending to hear or view the information that they have prepared, therefore they will cut bits and pieces out so that only the message they are trying to get across will be received. So indeed there is a media bias, and yes it more often than not slants towards the liberal view point, as many reporters and journalists have liberal views themselves.
One of the major problems in the American media today is non-objective reporting which is also known as bias. This has been a trend since the early 1980?s and is very alarming for American citizens who watch the news for truth and honest reporting. Not only has bias been a problem in the broadcast media of ABC, NBC, and CBS, but it has also been a problem in mainstream newspapers such as The New York Times, The Sun, and The Boston Globe. For years, these media outlets have built their reputations on truth and now the trend is to lean left and not tell the whole story. Evidence of this has become very prominent in war coverage and election bias. Bias in the media is a big issue and causes lots of problems throughout the public such as losing trust in a once great source for news, people going elsewhere for information, being ill-informed, and leading to a low voter turnout.
According to James Madison, “nothing could be more irrational than to give the people power and to withhold from them information, without which power is abused,” suggesting that the people have the right to learn popular information and learn both sides of an issue (Paul and Elder 2). However, in modern society, the media often do not present both sides of an issue and are inclined to often mask information for their personal benefits. Therefore, the people often learn and understand only one aspect of an issue and inevitably lean towards the bias present in that news account. Indubitably, the coverage in the mainstream news media influences the majority through its bias and propaganda, especially its partisan audience, which only appreciates one side of the news story. Thus, even though news networks may claim that their news programs and publications are completely factual and credible, their coverage of news events is politically, commercially, and racially biased.
Through the efforts of globalization, television has grown to be more than just a source for the facts. Presently, television cable channel stations seem to be more interested in capturing viewers interest and ratings than reporting the most significant events of the day. More than likely, without thinking about it, viewers fail to recall that cable network stations are in the business of making money first, then attempting to keep the public “infotained”. In other words, keeping you well informed with quality news broadcasting while simultaneously entertaining you at the same time.
I will discuss what I learned from reading Brill’s Content article. Then, I will discuss my findings from visiting Media Research Center (MRC) and Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) websites. I will share my opinion of about the Newsweek. Finally, I will share my thoughts about the role I think the media should play in a democracy.
Most of people believe that television news programs present biased information. On the other hand, there are people who believe that TV news just states the facts, and that it is not biased. These people who believe that TV news states the facts believe whatever they hear and see on TV.
Barrett, Paul M. “Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?” Bloomberg Business Week. Bloomberg, 20 Feb. 2014. Web. 13 Jul 2014.
Media bias is the tendency for the media to represent different people in a particular way based on their own views, the views of their sponsors, and possibly the views of society. Media bias could be blatant, but usually it is subtle. It can be expressed in the content of television shows. It can be expressed in the choices of types of stories that they show on the news. It can be expressed in the language used on shows, and that is written in the newspaper and magazines.
The media is an interesting creature. Evening though it is not actually alive, it still controls a huge part of everyone's lives. Yet has it ever occurred to you that a lot of the information you hear on social media and the news about governmental issues are one sided, biased, and they show the same things over and over again. It is because the government abuses the media and does not give use the whole story. The government should not have so much control over mass media because it has an impact on elections and distracts the public from important information.
Today we live in a world known as the information age. With our advances in technology unlike anything in our history, our thoughts and opinions are shaped by our televisions, computers, smartphones and other media devices. Just by watching the news channels on our home television we can receive knowledge and be up to date on all things happening over the entire globe. Although media is very useful to us, it can sometimes alter the details about issues to be more biased to a particular audience. For example, consider the two major news channels Fox News and CNN. Fox and CNN can be given the same case, such as ObamaCare and can broadcast two completely different views on it.
The media needs to introduce something interesting so that instead of flipping channels over to some entertainment a person will stay on the news channel. So they devise a strategy based on selective exposure to get one’s attention and stop the channel surfing. What the public perceives can sometimes be based on how much of the story they have heard. They then form their own opinions on what they absorbed, whether it was the whole story or not.
Today, Social Media influence people by using celebrities and famous individuals everywhere in commercials and ads utilizing the vast spectrum of today's spread of social networking that is available to us.
In a culture whose economic and social well-being is directly proportionate to the news of the moment, the purveyors of the media outlets and their mediums are uniquely responsible for ’getting it right’. Unfortunately, ‘right’ is subjective to who is giving and who is getting. This subjectivity is reflective of personal bias’, individual intent, beliefs and agendas. While it may not always be intentional as such, bias is always present, not so much in the delivery as much as in the perception or receipt.