Marxism And Social Darwinism Essay

659 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effect of class struggle

Katie Burke
February 13, 2014
Essay
Marxism and Social Darwinism are two different distinct theories of dealing with the problems of the Industrialist society. Social Darwinism supports the ideas of capitalism and the application of Darwin’s “ Theory of Evolution” to human beings in an industrialized society. Marxism supports a form of socialism and believes that the emergence of capitalism is the cause of class struggles. The two images bring out different theories about the cause and solution of poverty.
A Marxist would see the images as an example of the conflict of class struggles between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariats. Poverty is just the result of the governments’ failure to plan to prepare for a capitalist society. Poverty exists in such a drastic form, because of the exploitation of the working class and the unequal distribution of wealth. A Marxist would say that these images show the need for the creation of a classless society, because it would create a society free of class conflict.
From a Marxist perspective, the women in Image A are playing some sort of version of what looks like badminton and do not look like they are suffering the extreme life of poverty of the proletariat class. They are spending the day in leisure and relaxation. The women are also nicely dressed, wearing what was likely the latest fashion of the time and are playing their game in a open courtyard, whose architecture looks expensive, which is surrounded by nature. It is likely that they are wealthy enough to live outside the city. A Marxist would see this picture as an example of the inequality and random distribution of wealth: an unfair chance of luck, which makes one person better than another. The women are enjoying the carefre...

... middle of paper ...

...capitalist economy thrive.
Therefore the Social Darwinist would see the people in Image B as deserving of their lives of poverty. The suffering of the working class is a result of their own laziness and they are the only ones who can help themselves. If those living a life of poverty suffered and worked a little harder, perhaps they might experience a life of wealth too. This was a very different viewpoint from the Marxist who saw the suffering of the working class as a result of the unfair and random distribution of wealth.
The two images show the contrast between the beliefs and ideas of Marxism and Socialism. Both believe that they have the solution to the problems of the Industrialist society and vehemently believe that the other is wrong. Marxism and Socialism were both responses to Industrialization and played a huge role in shaping the ideas of society.

Show More
Related

  • Robber Barons Pros And Cons

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    This idea of Social Darwinism gave the robber barons of society the justification for their hostile behavior towards their workers. Andrew Carnegie tried to make the gospel of wealth that argued that the duty of someone with power and a lot of money was to put advancement into the society such as libraries. John D. Rockefeller also used this idea and gave away some of his wealth to education as well. However, many socialists, promoting fair distribution of wealth, tried to write books, which were very popular and best sellers at the time to address the social development issue of the economy. The factory workers had no opportunity to gain the independence and advancement to their social class. As argued in the cooperative commonwealth, they addressed the issue was that having liberty as well as monopoly cannot be happening at the same time in order for society to function in a civilized manner. The Social Gospel became known as relief programs that would take place to establish the mission and the relief to the harsh problems that were brought on by the robber barons of society. The arguments of the wage workers we clearly stating that the church can support the political

    Read More

  • Social Darwinism Vs Social Gospel

    262 Words  | 1 Pages

    Both social darwinism and social gospel are ideologies surrounding the economics of urban and industrialization of the 19th century. Both of these were processes on the wealthy, and exactly how they would deal with poor and working class individuals. However, the specific execution on how these were done, as well as the goal were vastly different. Social Darwinism, just like Evolutionary Darwinism, really means survival of the fittest. The strongest survive and the weakest stay weak and eventually die. Relating this theory to economics; Social Darwinism is when a wealthy person keeps his money for him and his kin. Said person usually holds an attitude of, “the rich should get richer and the poor should stay poor.” On the other side of the economic

    Read More

  • Kuyper Against Marx

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Marx’s opinion, the cause of poverty has always been due to the struggle between social classes, with one class keeping its power by suppressing the other classes. He claims the opposing forces of the Industrial Age are the bourgeois and the proletarians. Marx describes the bourgeois as a middle class drunk on power. The bourgeois are the controllers of industrialization, the owners of the factories that abuse their workers and strip all human dignity away from them for pennies. Industry, Marx says, has made the proletariat working class only a tool for increasing the wealth of the bourgeoisie. Because the aim of the bourgeoisie is to increase their trade and wealth, it is necessary to exploit the worker to maximize profit. This, according to Marx, is why the labor of the proletariat continued to steadily increase while the wages of the proletariat continued to steadily decrease.

    Read More

  • Marxist Theory and Class Relations in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marxism is a method of analysis based around the concepts developed by the two German philosophers Karl Marx and Fredrich Engel, centered around the complexities of social-relations and a class-based society. Together, they collaborated their theories to produce such works as The German Ideology (1846) and The Communist Manifesto (1848), and developed the terms ‘’proletariat’ and ’bourgeois’ to describe the working-class and the wealthy, segmenting the difference between their respective social classes. As a result of the apparent differences, Marxism states that proletariats and bourgeoisie are in constant class struggle, working against each other to amount in a gain for themselves.

    Read More

  • Social Darwinism, the Gospel of Wealth, and the Gilded Age

    649 Words  | 2 Pages

    Social Darwinism is a late 19th century term used to describe the application of British naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection to social and political conditions. Late 19th century sociologist Herbert Spencer tried to capture the essence of social Darwinism with his phrase “survival of the fittest”. This essentially meant that the strong would rise to the top while the weak simply died out. Social Darwinists eschew social responsibility and compassion, instead believing that some people are more fit to survive than others. Many social Darwinists advocated that the government should maintain a laissez-faire, or hands off, approach when it came to regulating economic competition and alleviating social inequalities. Social Darwinism was used to justify the consolidation of the majority of wealth by a minority of Americans. The term allowed people to rationalize capitalism, imperialism, racism, and even eugenics. The wealthy believed in social Darwinism because it allowed them to justify their oppressive business tactics and low wages for their labor force. Politicians believed in it because it allowed them to justify imperialism, or expansion of the nation. Affluent Anglo-Saxons believed in social Darwinism, believing themselves to be the superior race, and used it to justify ...

    Read More

  • Thre Views of Social Darwinism

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    The concept of Social Darwinism was a widely accepted theory in the nineteenth-century. Various intellectual, and political figures from each side of the political spectrum grasped the theory and interpreted it in various ways. In this paper, we will discuss three different nineteenth-century thinkers and their conception of Social Darwinism. The conservative, Heinrich von Treitschke, and liberal Herbert Spencer both gave arguments on the usefulness of competition between people on a global scale. The anarchist, Peter Kropotkin, refuted the belief of constant competition among members of the same species and emphasized mutual aid.

    Read More

  • Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and Social Darwinism

    2626 Words  | 6 Pages

    Anyone with even a moderate background in science has heard of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Since the publishing of his book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859, Darwin’s ideas have been debated by everyone from scientists to theologians to ordinary lay-people. Today, though there is still severe opposition, evolution is regarded as fact by most of the scientific community and Darwin’s book remains one of the most influential ever written.

    Read More

  • Stereootyping The Poor Essay: Steretyping The Poor

    1405 Words  | 3 Pages

    Poverty is a potential outcome for everyone. It’s sneaky and many people fall victim to it every year. No one believes that they have the potential to fall into debt, but it can happen through a string of bad luck, time running short, and other possibilities that can’t be controlled. People who are struggling with difficulty believe that there is no way out because no one will help them. However, there are ways for us, as a society, to help those who are short on income receive the help that they need. Many of the impoverished are thought to be slackers, addicts, or self-destructive to their lives. Society can help each other by dismembering the stereotypes given to people who are underneath the “Poverty Line” that they used as wedges between the classes. Labels given to those who’re poor have nothing to do with who they are as humans.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Marxian And Durkheim's Theory Of Poverty

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    This false consciousness causes people to solely think about themselves and how to make themselves look better than the others to get a better paying job. Their relationship to the production is at the same level as proletariats, Marx would say. Poverty is an outcome of how production is produced and by who and therefore is part of the economic base. When social factors contribute to how institutions are run, the institutions created by the economic base are, in a sense, reinforcing and adding to the poverty concentration. One weakness of Marx’s theory to modern society is that there is not a clear explanation of race and ethnicity division that contributes to poverty. We have a lot of immigrants in the United States who comes with the desire to one day achieve the American dream. Although the aspirations and dreams are there, there is a lot of obstacles that immigrants have to overcome, such as language barrier, lack of money, and more. Immigrants come to the United State with the desire to improve their lifestyle, but that does not mean that they have the means to have a stable living the minute they get here. This can be considered along with Durkheim’s concept of people following social expectations because immigrants often have the mindset that America is a land of equal opportunities and that it is one of the wealthiest country and so, they invest into it. However, they add to the number of people in poverty in America because they don’t have much themselves. Therefore, the concentration of poverty in America is composed of poor white Americans, black Americans, other racial Americans, and immigrants. Often we associate white Americans with being the wealthiest in comparison to blacks and other races due to the historical knowledge that we have. We know about slavery and who was the landowner, and

    Read More

  • Approaches to Health

    680 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marxism focuses on a conflicting view that emphasizes social differences and conflicting interests and values of different groups in society.

    Read More

  • The Poor Essay: The Structural Aspects Of Poverty

    2554 Words  | 6 Pages

    Both approaches rest on profound misunderstandings of what makes a problem like poverty ‘social.’ Neither is informed by a sense of how social life actually works as a dynamic relation between social systems and how people participate in those systems. This is also what traps them between blaming problems like poverty on individuals and blaming them on society. Solving social problems doesn’t require us to choose or blame one or the other. It does require us to see how the two combine to shape the terms of social life and how people actually live

    Read More

  • Social Classism In William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying

    1136 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marxism is an economic and social system developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels during the mid-1800s (What is Marxism). A Marxist literary criticism deals with class consciousness and ideology.

    Read More

  • Darwin And Karl Marx And Darwin's Theory Of Evolution

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thus, we can see that Marxism and Darwinism, though aren't really two separate theories that act int their own special domains. The same concept underlies both theories. The new course taken when humans go from the animal state of nature to the human state of nature this causes the groundwork for this theory to manifest itself completely differently. In conclusion, the concepts behind Darwinism and Marxism aren't too different, it is simply the development of the concept in two entirely different 'states of nature' that make them appear different.

    Read More

  • Marxism And Marx's Analysis Of The Material World

    1090 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marx and Engels turn to history to understand the world and argue that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" (Manifesto 65). These class struggles, based on who owns the capital, are the Marxists ' way of reading history. According to Marx and Engels, the current bourgeoisie, with their power and the growing industrial city, is "itself the product of a long course of development" and the final bourgeoisie to exist before the proletariat revolution (Manifesto 67). By stating this they illustrate the understanding that material possessions are what have driven history, ideas, and progress. They see the end result as a place where "class distinctions have disappeared" (Manifesto 84). By this the authors mean that private property, and any other type of personal material wealth will disappear, leading to the best society. The entire premise behind the ideas of the Marxists is that it is the wealth - the capital - that directs society and these class struggles. While these ideas describe the power wealth has on the ideas and history of a society, the impact that Marxist philosophy even further solidifies the relationship of the two seemingly separate

    Read More

  • Essay On Poverty And Poverty

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    Poverty is an outcome of the mode of production and plays a large role in relation to production. Therefore, according to Marx, it is a contributor to the economic base. People who are living at poverty level struggles to meet the living necessities due to capitalist exchange values on productions. What I mean by this that people in poverty cannot afford to buy enough food, clothes, and most importantly a safe home for their kids. This is due to the fact that most people living in poverty are being paid minimum wages that does not meet the exchange values of commodities. People in poverty are the laborers in the capitalist world, they a commodity as well. Using Marx’s theory, people in poverty are the proletariats since they are the actual

    Read More

More about Marxism And Social Darwinism Essay

Open Document