Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociopathy vs. psychopathy essay
Sociopathy vs. psychopathy essay
Psychopath vs sociopath
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Even today, these disorders are still incredibly shrouded in mystery. One reason for that is because these two diseases are almost always accompanied with the ability to masterly manipulate and lie. You can't tell the difference between a sociopath and a stranger. As far as medical facts on psychopaths and sociopaths, there are very little. According to Psychologist Martha Stout, an estimate of 4% of the people in the world are psychopaths and "free of conscienceness." In the United States of America alone, that's 12 million people. That means that there are 12 million people in the U.S. that lack empathy, and have keen skills of manipulation, deceit, and selfishness who have an almost God-like complex. Despite many upon many theorized sociopathic …show more content…
populations, only a small percentage is ever diagnosed. They shy away from a diagnosis because it simply does not benefit them. It's a piece of paper or an official word confirming the fact that they are different, something they already know and have found makes life easier for them, according to some. One of the few who sought out a diagnosis is M.
E. Thomas, an anonymous sociopath who shared her thoughts and life experiences in the form of autobiography, Confessions of a Sociopath: A Life Spent Hiding in Plain …show more content…
Sight. In a section of her book, she described her thoughts and reasons for seeking an official diagnosis: At first I wasn't inclined to seek a professional diagnosis. I had read all of the criticisms of the diagnostic process. I trusted my own self-assessment as much as I would anybody who happened to have a degree in psychology. However, eventually I decided that the lack of formal diagnosis might lead some readers to discount my point of view...I figured that if I was going to risk outing myself as a member of one of the most hated subclasses of humans, I might as well ensure that people believed me. (52) Confessions of a Sociopath: A Life Spent Hiding in Plain Sight by M. E. Thomas is a rare occurrence. Many have never heard of a diagnosed sociopath coming forth to give some insight into the mind of someone who is without a conscience and throughout her book, her distance from feeling is very evident. Though much of what she writes is questionable in its validity because sociopaths are known to lie, much of what she writes seems to be alarming and laced with irony. What is shocking is the fact that she is highly emerged into a successful life. She is a practicing attorney, a law professor, an author who is published in some highly recognized law journals, a philanthropist, and a Sunday school teacher at a Mormon church. It's safe to say she is someone you wouldn't readily accuse of being a sociopath, but she is. One characteristic of a psychopath and sociopath is their inability to feel love, romantic or otherwise. Some believe that it is completely impossible for them to feel any version of deep love while others think that they’re simply manipulating people into thinking they cannot feel love. M. E. Thomas touches on this in her book. She claims to feel love, but it is "her" love. It is based on selfish gain, and directly related to how useful the particular person is to her. She separates her love in "terms of possessions or exploits." (M. E. Thomas 246) One type leans towards family and friends while the "exploits" mainly refer to her lovers and sexual partners. In both categories, she only participates in the farce of affection for as long as she is getting whatever she wants. As soon as she is bored, or the chase has lost its luster, she moves on to the next target. This is how a psychopath or sociopath's love is often described as shallow. Though they are devoted to their target, they do not possess an emotional connection with them that would cause pain when a relationship ends. This is why both are known to have a string of brief infatuations throughout their lives. Nothing seems to hold them down to a particular person, not even a sexual relationship. Numerous psychopaths and sociopaths tend to lack a preference in the sex of their particular partner. They will use sexual intimacy to manipulate men and women alike. It is theorized that one difference between psychopaths and sociopaths is that the sociopath is a result of traumatic and impressionable occurrences that warped their mental and emotional state to the point where they block out feeling.
It's an over-reactive coping mechanism. Though this theory cannot be significantly proven, the tone of M. E. Thomas's childhood can give off the impression that this happened. She personally believes that there is no difference between the two names, but she prefers to be known as a sociopath to avoid the negative connotation that accompanies the word psychopath. (3) While describing events that happened during her younger years, she assesses that she had a non-eventful childhood and she was not physically or emotionally abused to any breaking point as one would think, but glimpses of her past hint otherwise. She tells of her mentally unstable sibling Jim (57), and her parents doing cruel things such as purposely leaving her and another sibling in a park by themselves at dark. (64). She stated how her parents' selfish ways and how her father was reckless with money. She told of her father's behavior that strongly resembled that of her own, yet she went as far as to say she hated him and often fantasized of murdering him. "It's hard to overstate how much
I
Are psychopaths like Alice, “mad or bad?” (page 21). The question whether psychopaths are mentally ill or just a bad seed has caused much debate. Dr. Hare explains that the problem is not only labeling them mad or bad, but who deals with them. “Does the treatment or control of the psychopath rightly fall to mental health professionals or to the correctional system?” (page 21). Not only are professionals confused on how to classify psychopaths, but the media also creates confusion. Psychopath means mental illness and the media uses the word to classify someone as, “insane or crazy”, (page 22). Dr. Hare explains that even though psychopaths, “cannot be understood in terms of traditional views of mental illness”, they, “are not disoriented or out of touch with reality, nor do they experience the delusions, hallucinations, or intense subjective distress that characterize most other mental disorders…psychopaths are rational and aware of what they are doing and why.” (page 22). Most professionals use the term psychopath and sociopath as one in the same. Since DSM-III, antisocial personality disorder has been used in place of psychopath and sociopath. Philippe Pinel was the first psychiatrist describe a psychopath and Harvey Cleckley was one of the first successful publish a book describing a psychopath to the general public . Pinel used the term, “insanity without delirium”, (page 25). Cleckley wrote The Mask of Sanity, which influenced researchers in North America. Dr. Robert Hare explained that WWII was the first time clinicians felt a need to diagnosis people with psychopathy. Due to the draft, there was a need to weed out the people could disrupt or harm the military structure. Dr. Robert Hare realized how hard it was to identify a true psychopaths from rule breakers and developed the Psychopathy Checklist. This checklist is used world wide to help clinicians identify true
The question of whether or not man is predetermined at birth to lead a life of crime is a question that has been debated for decades. Are serial killers born with the lust for murder, or are their desires developed through years of abuse and torment? Many believe it is impossible for an innocent child to be born with the capability to commit a horrible act such as murder. But at the same time, how could we have corrupted society so much as to turn an innocent child into a homicidal maniac? Forensic psychologists have picked apart the minds of serial killers to find an answer as to what forces them to commit such perverse acts. Their ultimate goal is to learn how to catch a serial killer before he commits his first crime.
Identifying the mystery of the psychopath can prove to help the them and the general public. Early awareness of the common psychopaths among us will reduce the impact on society. Further research is still needed to better help the psychopath and the general population.
Down the street, in our workplaces, seemingly under our beds- Harvard Medical Professor Martha Stout’s Sociopath Next Door: The Ruthless vs. The Rest of Us sends the reader into a state of frightful paranoia when she mentions that a staggering 1 in 25, 4%, persons is, in fact, a sociopath. A sociopath, as Stout asserts, is a person with the lack of a conscience, thus a person not concerned with the suffering of others, to worry only about itself. She goes on to tell us that, because the rate of sociopaths in our society is so high, we must have already met hundreds without knowing it, due to the elusive and enigmatic nature of this psychological disease.
Psychopath and Sociopath are so closely related that many don’t know they are different illness. Both psychopath and sociopath have similar illness but their factors are completely different. Study’s shows this may be a product of nature vs nurture. Secondly, Psychopath behavior is shown to be controlled while sociopath is shown to have uncontrollable behavior. Thirdly, there violence outburst is different, psychopath usually plan out their crimes while sociopaths are erratic and careless with their crimes. Fourthly, Psychopaths don’t feel any type emotion towards others but they can be in relationships when it comes beneficial to them. Sociopaths often don’t have relationships, they don’t become attached to others. Lastly, Psychopath are actually
whatever it takes to keep them alive. That is not moral, that is legal. But
Kerns, Jeanne M. "Sociopath Vs. Psychopath: There Is a Difference." Yahoo Contributor Network. Www.yahoo.com, 15 Sept. 2008. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
Due to crime-inspired shows that air on television, fascination with serial killers presents itself more and more. People want to learn what makes a person break to the point of taking another’s life. Some suggest that killing releases a sexual desire, while others suggest that revenge may be the motive. A serial killer has the stereotypical look of a white male who tends to act socially awkward, not easily approachable, and possesses a mental illness. While the accuracy of this look tends to be true occasionally, the majority of the time a serial killer looks no different than anyone else and appears rather social. Some experts believe that a serial killer has codes in his DNA which causes him to kill; nonetheless, other experts believe environmental
The responsibility of psychopaths is a highly debated topic in the legal, philosophical, and neuroscientific fields. In the US, a person is responsible if they “have sufficient rational capacity” and “they are not acting under coercion” (Glenn & Raine 2014). The majority of the academic community believes that psychopaths’ responsibility is mitigated because of the profound cognitive and emotional deficits that lead to a reduced rational capacity. However, the public’s instinct is to hold psychopaths responsible for their crimes. What is it that gives us this instinctive reaction?
Conceptualize a world in which you have no conscience, no feelings of guilt or remorse -no matter what actions you take- no sense of empathy or concern of the well being of friends, loved ones, or even family members. This is the world of a sociopath. This is the world of Tom Ripley in Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr. Ripley. Tom develops into an intelligent young man who eventually conjures a crime spree in Europe. His driving force behind this spree, though the spree may be sporadic, is freedom. His ability to be independent from a guilty conscience and the pleasure from concealing a false identity (characteristics of a sociopath) are his motives behind his acquisition for freedom.
Sociopaths are prevalent among society, and some researchers, like Martha Stout, claim that one out of every twenty-five people is a sociopath. However, this statistic is incorrect. This statistic is based on the assumption that sociopaths and psychopaths are the same people—which is untrue. While the sociopathic and psychopathic traits overlap, sociopaths differ in that they are obviously nervous and agitated, unable to create the illusions that psychopaths are so proud of. They live on the fringes of society, uneducated and unable to keep a steady job. Psychopaths, unlike sociopaths, are suave and able to maintain an illusion of conformity and maintain relationships on a superficial level. Both, however, are dominantly male, tend to disregard the rights and social mores of others, and have a tendency display violent and disruptive outbursts without remorse. Unlike psychopaths, who completely lack remorse and the ability to love, sociopaths may attach themselves to certain people, though they still remain contemptuous of the rest of humanity (7).
I always believed that I had a little bit of sociopathy in me, that at some moments I don’t feel anything and I don’t require constant attention. But now that I have read this book, and learned conscience in a much deeper manor I can say that I know many minor sociopaths, not a full blown highly functioning one mind you, but I do know some. It’s made me question how many people I know are sociopaths, and do they even know what they are? I’m no saying there monsters, because simply having a lacking of something does not make you a monster, committing some sort of an action does. The idea that we are lucky, because we have the ability to love, hate, greave, forgive, and all of the biggest emotions, not everybody has them, so that I am lucky to love my family, and that I can look back on all the stupid things I’ve done and been able to reflect on them is amazings, but is taken for granted, because not everyone can. Martha Stout's ideas are based on a good premise, and backed up with logical conclusions, so this book I do not believe is about finding sociopaths, but is the understanding of them, and of conscience in which they
We can all agree that serial killers are unpredictable scary people but when it comes to why they kill, everyone has a different view. In my research paper I will get into the mind of a serial killer and try to figure out what exactly sets them into uncontrollable rage.
Over the years, the theory has evolved into today’s foremost biological crime theory. The theory takes into account genetics and disorders that may be inherited. One example of a disorder that is genetic is antisocial personality disorder. This specific disorder is accompanied by a variety of side effects, some of which may result in psychopathic or sociopathic behavior. Psychopathic and sociopathic behavior specific to this example would be murder. Jeffrey Dahmer, for example, was an individual that participated in seventeen murders over a span of thirteen years. Although Dahmer was not able to plead insanity, he still had a severe mental disorder that may be partly to blame for some of his actions. Biological disorder is often difficult to back up due to the fact that many disorders are also based on nurturing
Psychopathy; the trait that truly distinguishes humans from ¨machines¨, emotionful to emotionless. Within the novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis, one may logically assume that the protagonist, Patrick Bateman is indeed implied to be a psycho as the title suggests. However upon further analyzation, Bateman is revealed to be an unreliable narrator, he does not captivate the reader with all of his emotions verbally, for they are revealed through his actions. Bateman certainly does murder people, however, clinically murder doesn´t rule somebody to be a psychopath. Bateman feels no visible remorse for the victims he kills, because Bateman lives in an artificial hyperbole of a yuppie world where no love is shown, all relationships superficial.