Marquis Abortion Analysis

643 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Relationship between science and morality experiments

What is Marquis’s stance on the abortion issue?
Marquis believes that abortion is immoral. He compares abortion to the killing of an adult human. Killing an adult human is wrong because of its effect on the victim. The victim is denied future “experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments (Marquis, D., 1989).” Furthermore, since depriving an adult human of a valuable future is what makes killing wrong, then aborting a fetus deprives it of a valuable future. Therefore, killing a fetus is wrong.
Many have objected that on Marquis’s grounds, it would be wrong to kill a sperm cell or an egg, for they too have a human future. How might Marquis respond?
Many have objected Marquis argument that abortion is immoral because it deprives fetus …show more content…

Most other arguments focus on personhood, but the difficulty with those arguments are the struggle to determine specifically when a fetus becomes a person. Marquis position is far more simplistic and direct. A fetus may not be aborted if it has a valuable future. And to take that future away would be morally wrong. However, one plausible flaw to Marquis position is to argue that to have a valuable future, one must take interest in their future. A fetus lacks this ability, so they do not have a valuable future. Hence, it is morally permissible to kill them. Nevertheless, Marquis could strengthen his argument by comparing a fetus to an adult on life support. An adult human on life support has no interest in their future either, but to consider killing them is morally wrong. So to is to consider killing a fetus.
Marquis uses the words “prima facie” morally wrong several times throughout his writing. An action that is “prima facie” wrong is not always wrong; it is accepted as correct until proven otherwise. Its wrongness can be overridden by other factors. For example, lying is “prima facie” wrong, but its morally permissible to lie to save someone’s life. The same can be said about

Show More
Related

  • Marquis´View on Abortion and Euthanasia

    762 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marquis believes abortion to be extremely immoral. However he mentions that there are exceptions in rare but certain circumstances where abortion is acceptable. We can infer that these instances would include situations that would put the mother or child at serious risk by keeping the fetus. He is frustrated that this idea has received minimal support recently. As a result he wants to influence change in society in hopes of receiving the support and publicity this topic deserves. Marquis’ primary argument stems from the idea of killing in general. He explains it is immoral to kill an adult because it prematurely deprives the human of something they may have valued at the time they were killed, as well as something they may had valued in the future. Although the victim may not realize it at the time of their death, they certainly had a valuable future ahead of them to experience which has been cut short. We are the only ones who can decide what is valuable to them; in this case we value some things more than others, and this concept differs from person to person. For example, in the present I value the life I am given and the opportunity I have to earn my degree at Villanova University while also valuing my future as well knowing that I have a chance to be successful in the future. Although I have not succeeded yet, I still value that opportunity I have and the life I’m capable of achieving through earning a degree. Therefore, he connects this same theory to the life of a fetus. By killing the fetus the result is the same, we are depriving it of its futur...

    Read More

  • Why Don Marquis's Essay 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Don Marquis’s essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” he argues that abortion is immoral because he believes that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult human being. Marquis’ argument takes the following form:

    Read More

  • Don Marquis vs. Abortion

    846 Words  | 2 Pages

    What is abortion? Abortion is killing a fetus inside a mother’s womb. According to Don Marquis, killing a fetus is morally impermissible. Marquis came up with an argument that views abortion as immoral and only in rare cases is it accepted. There are only a few rare cases that abortion is morally acceptable according to Marquis in his article, “Why Abortion is Immoral.” Marquis’s view on abortion is relatable because I am a woman and seeing as I am able to bare a child, I feel it is a women’s right to decide if abortion is permissible or not because it is her body and she has all the rights to her own body. Later described is FLO, one of Marquis’s arguments proving abortion is morally impermissible. I do not agree with the FLO argument. Marquis makes strong points, which can be agreeable, but in summary of Marquis’s arguments, he needs to have a more valid case of FLO.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Why Abortion Is Immoral By Dan Marquis

    1145 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thirdly, Marquis concludes from the last two premises and says that if you kill a fetus then it is prima facie seriously morally wrong of you. By killing off a human being’s potential values, it is cruel, especially to children because they are defenseless. Then, Marquis asserts that if fetuses and adults are in the same moral categories then the fetus can only be aborted if there is a serious moral concern. In the beginning, Marquis proclaims that there are special cases like rape and the mom’s life being threatened that would override the “moral wrongness” of abortion.

    Read More

  • The Crucible Abortion Analysis

    915 Words  | 2 Pages

    Famous author Dr. Seuss states that a “person is a person no matter how small.”

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Don Marquis Views On Abortion

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    To conclude, Marquis’s argument that abortion is wrong is incorrect. Thomson gives many examples of why Marquis is wrong, including that the mother’s right to her body

    Read More

  • Bioethics Before Birth By Tooley And Marquis

    729 Words  | 2 Pages

    A considerable difference is that Marquis’ beliefs are associated with the uncertainty of the future whereas Tooley’s beliefs are invested in the present. Tooley claims that because a fetus isn 't a fully capable person, a fetus is not afforded a merit in a decision such an abortion. Tooley’s argument is based solely on what the fetus is capable of before birth. Marquis’ argument is based on potential following birth. Marquis holds the value of a human future to a high regard. Marquis makes a profound point when he compares the refusal to kill suicidal teens to the anti-abortion position. He emphasizes that the reasoning for not killing suicidal teens is solely because the teen could possibly posses “the desire at some future time to live.” Thus, simply because one is not capable of desiring life does not mean one is not worthy of

    Read More

  • Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis

    1273 Words  | 3 Pages

    Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis is an essay that claims that abortion is morally wrong, and uses one argument in particular to explain why. He argues that many of us would agree that it is wrong to kill a human, and if you believe that, then you should also have that view on abortions. If you think killing is wrong then you think all killing is wrong and the persons biological state, whether it is when a person is a fetus, one year old, or thirty years old, makes no difference. He then explains that killing is wrong not only because it is immoral, but wrong because it deprives the victim of life and the enjoyments one would have otherwise experienced; which Marquis believes is the greatest loss one can suffer (Marquis, 189). Given certain circumstances, Marquis agrees there are cases where killing is acceptable, but nonetheless it is immoral.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Abortion Is Immoral By Don Marquis

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, Marquis makes clear that we are working under the assumption that the fundamental disagreement present in the abortion debate is whether or not the fetus is a being worthy of being saved, and cites several writers that also believe in this fundamental disagreement to support his case. He then examines this paradigm as it pertains to the abortion argument, with pro-choicers on one side saying that fetuses are not rational actors, and pro-lifers on the other side saying that life begins at conception and making emotional appeals. He writes that the prima facie cases of the pro-choice and anti-abortionist movements are, respectively, that “being a person… gives intrinsic moral worth,” It is only… wrong to take the life of a member of the human community;” “It is always… wrong to take a human life,” and “it is always… wrong to end the life of a baby.” Marquis does not, in actuality, reject the validity of either side’s claims (185).

    Read More

  • Judith Jarvis Thomson A Defense Of Abortion Analysis

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    The conservative argument asserts that every person has a right to life. The foetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what happens in and to her body. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to decide what shall happen to her body, and so outweigh it. So the foetus may not be killed and an abortion may not be performed (Thomson, 1971)

    Read More

  • Why abortion is immoral

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    This essay, written by Don Marquis, attempts to undermine general beliefs that anti-abortionist views are simply based on irrational religious or other beliefs. The essay ignores certain special cases of abortion; and mainly purports its focus onto the general arguments against anti-abortionist views by pro-choice holders. Marquis begins by outlining a common argument of anti-abortionists, in which a fetus is seen as being human enough by possessing a genetic code, and is thus necessary and sufficient for dictating that being as a human. This leads to a common conclusion that if a fetus is a human, it must follow to be understood as it being wrong to kill a human. Secondly, he outlines the argument of a pro-choice advocate; which asserts that fetuses are not rational or social beings, therefore it is not a wrongful killing.

    Read More

  • Is Abortion Morally Justified Analysis

    1718 Words  | 4 Pages

    Smith was debating whether or not to have an abortion, Marquis will argue that she should not have an abortion because the fetus that is inside of her, has a soul. He believes that the fetus will soon look like a human and will soon have human-like future just like anybody else. However, Thomson’s argument is the complete opposite of Marquis because she believes that the baby is a developing inside of her will soon become a human as well. But, the different is that Mrs. Smith did not want to have the baby in the first place as she is already struggling to make ends meet. Which means that she did not give the fetus permission for it to develop inside of her body. The fetus should not be using her body without her consent because it is her body. She also argues that since Mrs. Smith was using all the precautions needed to avoid the pregnancy, she should still be given the chance to have an abortion because the contraceptives must have failed, which was something that was out of her

    Read More

  • Abortion

    1462 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e right to use the mother’s body has not been extended to the fetus, abortion does not violate the fetuses right to life. Abortion is permissible in many cases, but this does not mean that we have the right to secure the death of the fetus. I agree with Thomson’s view that the death of a fetus is a necessary side-effect of abortion, but is not the goal. Were it possible to remove a fetus without killing it, then it must not be killed. The potential harm or life depreciation of the mother outweighs the fetuses’ potential right to life, whether it may have a future or not. Killing in self-defense is permissible and the possible death or harm that comes from having a baby is enough right for a mother to have an abortion. I support Thomson’s view on abortion and believe that the mother should have a choice whether to abort her baby or not at an early stage of pregnancy.

    Read More

  • Abortion, Public Policy, & Texas

    1028 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the duration of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with consideration to her reproductive rights. The drawback, however, is that there is no agreement upon when life begins and at which point one crosses the line from unalienable rights to murder.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Abortion

    2054 Words  | 5 Pages

    Abortion in the United States is a legal form of murder. Each and every year over a million babies are murdered and it must be stopped now before it will continue to get out of hand each and every day. We have discussed in this essay that a fetus is a living humans and not something that can just be thrown away. An unborn child is still a child and he or she needs an opportunity to grow and live a long successful life just like the rest of us have gotten the privilege to do. Abortion cannot go on any longer. More and more live are lost every day.

    Read More

More about Marquis Abortion Analysis

Open Document