Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topics on marie antoinette
Topics on marie antoinette
Topics on marie antoinette
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topics on marie antoinette
The famous line, “Let them eat cake”, comes from the of the lady Marie Antoinette in which she grew up in a time period where she was not fit to live in. In the non-fictional book, Marie Antoinette, by Antonia Fraser, a mother named Marie Therese gives birth to a beautiful girl named Marie Antoinette. This girl grew up to be the queen of France, where she face situations that she could not solve. Her journey that led her to be queen of France was only for her to marry Louis XVI, but the consequence of this was that Marie Antoinette was not prepared to face the french politics. Also Antoinette was only part of this to create the Franco-Prussian alliances. Throughout her the young girl’s life Marie Antoinette has faced a life full of luxury, …show more content…
For example many believed that she did not say “Let them eat cake”, and Fraser settle the concept straight by supporting the idea that Antoinette never said the statement. On the other hand she does support the idea that Antoinette had an affair with Fersen but there is no evidence that clearly shows that Antoinette and Fersen had an affair. Fraser defends her argument by saying that they had sexual affairs for the simple reason that it was just human nature. Fraser also mentions that Antoinette was suspected of being a …show more content…
Antoinette was born in a time period that she did not belong in but overall the people of France chose her fate for the actions and consequences that Fraser mentioned within the book. Fraser in the book sympathizes for Marie Antoinette but at the end of Antoinette's story she dies by the guillotine. In fact Fraser mentions that Marie Antoinette could be blamed for the French Revolution and the starvation of the french people. Although I disagree, where in Louis place he could of done some actual work and try to comprehend the people of
5. (CP) Madame Loisel borrows seemingly expensive necklace to satisfy her arrogance and attend a party that was way above her social class, only to lose it. She has been blessed with physical beauty, but not with the lifestyle she desires. She may not be the ideal protagonist, but she went through a tough time after she lost the necklace and had to make money to replace it.
...ult to choose her growing environment, and also she was influenced by Louis XVI, as I mentioned above. Marie Antoinette was just viewed as a traitor, because she support Austria instead. She will definitely support her brother, because he was her family. French people couldn't forgave her. After she married, she need time to get use to her new life, but her husband didn't stop her to spend that much money, because he himself did that too, so their behaviors slowly became a cause of French Revolution.
Before the French Revolution, an inexperienced king, and an irresponsible queen ruled over the citizens of France. Food cost was high due to the poor crop season, and Antoinette gambled away what would be billions today.
In the book, Marie Antoinette: The Last Queen of France , the author, Evelyne Lever, paints a beautiful portrayal of the life of Marie Antoinette; from an Austrian princess to Queen of France to her untimely death at the end of a guillotine. Marie Antoinette was the fifteenth child born to the Empress Maria Theresa and Francis I, the Holy Roman Emperor. She lived a carefree childhood until she was strategically married and sent to France when she was fourteen years old. The marriage between Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI, the future King of France, was meant to bring Austria and France closer together politically. Unfortunately, that did not happen; instead the monarchy collapsed with Marie Antoinette managing to alienate and offend a vast
This essay will include “The Necklace”, “Civil Peace”, and “The Thrill of the Chase”. The necklace is a great example of how our desires can create tragedy rather than happiness. Madame Forestier would have rather been idolized for her wealth instead of buying items that grant her survival. She says,”It’s just that I have no evening dress and so I can’t go to the party.”
...roblems and turned a great number of people against the monarchy. These events lead to the resentment that was another key factor in beginning the French Revolution. The end of King Louis XIV’s rule was especially disastrous. After the death of his advisor Colbert, King Louis XIV made even more horrible and costly decisions. He further enlarged the military and entered into many wars in which he lost a great deal of her newly acquired territories and increased the national debt even more.
Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun was one of the most successful painters of her time. Over the course of her life, spanning from 1755-1842, she painted over 900 works. She enjoyed painting self portraits, completing almost 40 throughout her career, in the style of artists she admired such as Peter Paul Rubens (Montfort). However, the majority of her paintings were beautiful, colorful, idealized likenesses of the aristocrats of her time, the most well known of these being the Queen of France Marie Antoinette, whom she painted from 1779-1789. Not only was Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun the Queen’s portrait painter for ten years, but she also became her close, personal friend. She saw only the luxurious, carefree, colorful, and fabulous lifestyle the aristocracy lived in, rather than the poverty and suffrage much of the rest of the country was going through. Elisabeth kept the ideals of the aristocracy she saw through Marie Antoinette throughout her life, painting a picture of them that she believed to be practically perfect. Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun’s relationship with Marie Antoinette affected her social standing, politics, painting style, and career.
Marie Antoinette Josèphe Jeanne de Habsbourg-Lorraine was born in the mid-eighteenth century as an archduchess and princess, to Maria Teresa, the Austrian Empress, at the very apex of the European hierarchal pyramid. She was an essential part to the oldest royal European house, as it became known that her sole duty in life was to unite the two great powers and long-term enemies of Austria-Hungary and France by marriage. She was brutally overthrown by her own starving people and portrayed to the world as a villain and abuser of power, whereas sympathy for the young queen should be shown.
Julia Child tried to keep herself occupied in France but couldn’t find anything she loved to do. Finally she decided to take a class at Le Cordon Bleu for cooking. She did not like the treatment she was getting in the women’s only class. ...
Marie Antoinette, Queen of France from 1770 to 1797 was despised by the people of France. Their hatred of her and the monarchy in general led to the French Revolution. Many issues led to the unpopularity of Queen Maria Antoinette, her vanity, her disregard for the people, but perhaps the most significant was the Affair of the Diamond Necklace.
In the end, Marie Antoinettes influence on the French Revolution can not be pinpointed. What can be said, is that the rumors spread about her helped evoke a hate for her and what she represented; the aristocrats. The actions of this collective enraged the population of France to rise up and take power. There was a solid reason for the aristocrats to be blamed for the troubles of France, but to pin it all on Marie Antoinette’s head is disagreeable. The French Revolution was caused by several factors, a few that were represented by Marie Antoinette. She did not single handedly cause the Revolution with her actions, but the rumors and false accusations that were spread about her, encouraged the French population to rise up against the monarchy.
As hundreds of years pass by, information gets distorted and misinterpreted. A famous quote supposedly said by Marie-Antoinette, a French princess, was, “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche” or ,“Let them eat cake.” Many historians believed that Marie-Antoinette uttered these words when she was informed that citizens had run out of bread to eat. No one had confirmed at the time that she had said this, so it might have just been a rumor. Marie-Antoinette was also known for being highly intelligent and informed about France’s economic standing; which notes another fault in the rumor. In my opinion, I believe that Marie-Antoinette hadn’t spoken these words, but it was just a hoax, or misinterpreted information originally stated by someone else.
Her twenty-ninth birthday party is a salient example from the text. My party has come and gone bye a few years back. The author describes her focus on minor transgressions like the Madame who shows at the last moment or the disagreeable remarks made at her expense in French, also the opulence and luxury displayed and all the while so very alone but surrounded by many friends. The text describes her as having “an acute longing for the unattainable” (Showalter 219) and I understand that she wants the power and glory of the riches without the trappings and all of the lady-like ways. Hers is an existence of indulgence, magnifying as her choices which do not match up with that of someone who is connected to wealthy society and a lady.
King Louis XVI was next in line for the throne in 1774 and gladly inherited it from Louis XIV to become the ruler over France. He drastically changed the whole country and put its people through ghastly conditions. There was not a soul left unharmed. In Paris, nearly half of its population in 1788 was unemployed. They produced no crops due to them not growing and had extremely high prices on food. With the whole nation already furious with his doings, he decided to marry Marie Antoinette who was foreign. They decided to blame her for their problems of their economy because they figured that King Louis was letting her make major decisions and control them. Together, Antoinette and Louis had a total of four children. Their oldest child lived to be seventy-three.
It took ten years for Mathilde and her husband to pay off the debt of buying a new necklace. Those ten years were not spent with the luxuries she experienced so many years ago at the party, nor were they filled with the simple things she once owned and despised. She came to know “the horrible existence of the needy. She bore her part, however, with sudden heroism.” When passing her rich friend again in the street, she was barely recognizable. Who she was the day she ran into her friend was not who she was the night she wore that necklace.